The fully linked HTML version of this article has now been published.
Development ePress online publication date 4 Jul 2007
doi: 10.1242/dev.02868
Research article
Bi-compartmental communication contributes to the opposite proliferative behavior of Notch1-deficient hair follicle and epidermal keratinocytes
Jonghyeob Lee,
Jacob M. Basak,
Shadmehr Demehri,
and
Raphael Kopan*
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: kopan{at}wustl.edu)
Notch1-deficient epidermal keratinocytes become progressively hyperplastic and eventually produce tumors. By contrast, Notch1-deficient hair matrix keratinocytes have lower mitotic rates, resulting in smaller follicles with fewer cells. In addition, the ratio of melanocytes to keratinocytes is greatly reduced in hair follicles. Investigation into the underlying mechanism for these phenotypes revealed significant changes in the Kit, Tgf
and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling pathways, which have not been previously shown to be downstream of Notch signaling. The level of Kitl (Scf) mRNA produced by Notch1-deficient follicular keratinocytes was reduced when compared with wild type, resulting in a decline in melanocyte population. Tgf
ligands were elevated in Notch1-deficient keratinocytes, which correlated with elevated expression of several targets, including the diffusible IGF antagonist Igfbp3 in the dermal papilla. Diffusible stromal targets remained elevated in the absence of epithelial Tgf
receptors, consistent with paracrine Tgf
signaling. Overexpression of Igf1 in the keratinocyte reversed the phenotype, as expected if Notch1 loss altered the IGF/insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) balance. Conversely, epidermal keratinocytes contained less stromal Igfbp4 and might thus be primed to experience an increase in IGF signaling as animals age. These results suggest that Notch1 participates in a bi-compartmental signaling network that controls homeostasis, follicular proliferation rates and melanocyte population within the skin.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. Schindler, A. Hindes, E. L. Gribben, C. J. Burns, Y. Yin, M.-H. Lin, R. J. Owen, G. D. Longmore, G. E. Kissling, J. S. C. Arthur, et al.
p38{delta} Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Is Essential for Skin Tumor Development in Mice
Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2009;
69(11):
4648 - 4655.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Demehri and R. Kopan
Notch signaling in bulge stem cells is not required for selection of hair follicle fate
Development,
March 15, 2009;
136(6):
891 - 896.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Fuchs and J.A. Nowak
Building Epithelial Tissues from Skin Stem Cells
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol,
November 6, 2008;
(2008)
sqb.2008.73.032v1.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Wang, H. A. Pasolli, T. Williams, and E. Fuchs
AP-2 factors act in concert with Notch to orchestrate terminal differentiation in skin epidermis
J. Cell Biol.,
October 6, 2008;
183(1):
37 - 48.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zanotti, A. Smerdel-Ramoya, L. Stadmeyer, D. Durant, F. Radtke, and E. Canalis
Notch Inhibits Osteoblast Differentiation and Causes Osteopenia
Endocrinology,
August 1, 2008;
149(8):
3890 - 3899.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bai, R. Kopan, W. Zou, M. J. Hilton, C.-t. Ong, F. Long, F. P. Ross, and S. L. Teitelbaum
NOTCH1 Regulates Osteoclastogenesis Directly in Osteoclast Precursors and Indirectly via Osteoblast Lineage Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2008;
283(10):
6509 - 6518.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007