Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Workshops and Meetings
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Workshops and Meetings
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
Research Report
Temporal progression of hypothalamic patterning by a dual action of BMP
Kyoji Ohyama, Raman Das, Marysia Placzek
Development 2008 135: 3325-3331; doi: 10.1242/dev.027078
Kyoji Ohyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raman Das
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marysia Placzek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

In the developing chick hypothalamus, Shh and BMPs are expressed in a spatially overlapping, but temporally consecutive, manner. Here, we demonstrate how the temporal integration of Shh and BMP signalling leads to the late acquisition of Pax7 expression in hypothalamic progenitor cells. Our studies reveal a requirement for a dual action of BMPs: first, the inhibition of GliA function through Gli3 upregulation; and second, activation of a Smad5-dependent BMP pathway. Previous studies have shown a requirement for spatial antagonism of Shh and BMPs in early CNS patterning; here, we propose that neural pattern elaboration can be achieved through a versatile temporal antagonism between Shh and BMPs.

  • Shh
  • BMP
  • Neural pattern
  • Hypothalamus
  • Gli
  • Chick

INTRODUCTION

In the developing vertebrate central nervous system (CNS), cellular fate and diversity are established through inductive interactions, mediated largely through only a few families of signalling ligands (Edlund and Jessell, 1999; Altman and Brivanlou, 2001; Ulloa and Briscoe, 2007). A key question is how this limited repertoire of signals can elicit the cellular diversity that is characteristic of the CNS? One way in which this can be achieved is through the ability of a cell to integrate inputs from multiple signalling pathways. In the ventral neural tube, for example, the transcriptional response of cells to a key ventralising signal, Shh, is modulated by both the Wnt and the BMP signalling pathways (McMahon et al., 1998; Liem et al., 2000; Patten and Placzek, 2002; Lei et al., 2006).

Much evidence has shown that the Hedgehog (Hh) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling ligands play key roles in regulating cell identities in the neural tube (Ericson et al., 1995; Lee and Jessell, 1999; Ho and Scott, 2002; Chizhikov and Millen, 2005; Liu and Niswander, 2005; Ulloa and Briscoe, 2007). Through most of the neuraxis, BMPs and Shh, which emanate from dorsal and ventral regions, respectively, establish opposing spatial gradients that govern dorsoventral patterning by regulating cell-intrinsic factors (Edlund and Jessell, 1999; Briscoe et al., 2000; Briscoe and Ericson, 2001; Liem et al., 2000; Patten and Placzek, 2002; Wijgerde et al., 2002; Jacob and Briscoe, 2003; Meyer and Roelink, 2003). However, although there is clear evidence that cells can integrate BMP and Shh signalling, the mechanisms that underlie this integrated response are less well defined. In particular, few studies have examined the interaction of Shh and BMP signalling at the level of the Gli genes. In the case of Shh, numerous lines of evidence have identified the Gli transcription factors as key mediators of the cellular response to Shh. Shh promotes ventral cell identities by antagonising the repressive activity of the Gli3 protein: in the absence of Shh, specific ventral cell types fail to form, but they can be rescued in Shh-null animals by the simultaneous inactivation of Gli3 (Litingtung and Chiang, 2000; Persson et al., 2002; Wijgerde et al., 2002; Bai et al., 2004; Lei et al., 2004; Stamataki et al., 2005; Blaess et al., 2006). However, although recent evidence shows that BMP signalling can maintain Gli3 expression in dorsal regions of the neural tube (Meyer and Roelink, 2003), no study has yet shown that BMP signalling can initiate the expression of Gli3.

In contrast to other regions of the neural tube, in the hypothalamus, Shh and BMPs are expressed in a spatially overlapping, but temporally consecutive manner (Dale et al., 1997; Dale et al., 1999; Ohyama et al., 2005; Manning et al., 2006). Here, we examine the mechanism by which this discrete signalling profile governs downstream Gli effectors and hypothalamic transcriptional signatures. Our studies show that Bmp7 operates in a dual manner to specify hypothalamic progenitors, first through a temporal antagonism of Shh-Gli activator function, which is mediated by Gli3 upregulation, and second, via Smad5 activation. We demonstrate that Shh signalling operates through the Gli activator (GliA) to prevent Pax7 expression. Bmp7 signalling upregulates Gli3 and we demonstrate that the Gli3 repressor (Gli3R) can derepress Pax7 expression, but inefficiently. Robust derepression requires both Gli3R and Smad5 activity. Together, our data reveal that BMPs can initiate Gli3 expression in the neural tube. In addition, they suggest that, in the CNS, neural pattern elaboration can be achieved through the temporal integration of antagonising Shh and BMP ligands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunolabelling

Chick embryos (n=5-10; each stage) and explants (n=5-20) were examined as described previously (Ohyama et al., 2005). Antibodies used were: 5E1 anti-Shh mAb (1:50); anti-Pax7 mAb (1:50); anti-Lim1 (4F8); anti-Msx1/2 (4G1: 1:50) (all from DSHB); Kyo2-60 anti-Nkx2.1 polyclonal antibody (1:2000); anti-Gsh polyclonal antibody (1:2000); NCL-Ki67-PKi67 anti-human (Novocastra, 1:3000); anti-Isl1 polyclonal antibody (1:800); AB3216 anti-RFP polyclonal antibody (Chemicon, 1:1000); anti-GFP polyclonal (BD 632576, 1:1000); anti-pSmad1/5/8 (Cell Signaling 95115, 1:100-1:500). Secondary antibodies were conjugated to Cy3, FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 1:200), Alexa fluor 594 or Alexa fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, 1:500), and images taken using Spot RT software v3.2 (Diagnostic Instruments) or an Olympus FV-1000 confocal.

In situ hybridisation

Embryos and explants were processed as described previously (Ohyama et al., 2005; Manning et al., 2006; Borycki et al., 2000).

Explant dissection and culture

pHyp and prechordal mesoderm were dissected with Dispase (1 mg/ml) for 15 minutes at room temperature and explants were cultured in collagen gels (Dale et al., 1999). Bmp7 and chordin proteins were prepared as described (Ohyama et al., 2005). To block Shh or BMP signalling, cyclopamine (600 nM) and/or dorsomorphin (4μ M) were added into culture medium 24-36 hours after onset of culture and continued for up to 6 days.

    Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Temporal expression of Shh, BMP signal pathway components and Pax7 in the chick hypothalamus. (A-H) At stage 9-10, Shh, Ptc1 and Gli1 are detected in prechordal mesoderm (white arrow, A) and/or hypothalamic floor plate (blue arrow, A). Bmp7 is detected in prechordal mesoderm (arrow, E), but Bmp7, Msx1/2 and pSmad1/5/8 are not detected in the hypothalamic floor plate. Pax7 is detected in roof plate cells (H), but not floor-plate cells, marked by expression of Nkx2.1 (red). (I-P) At stage 15-17, Shh is expressed in Nkx2.1+ ventrolateral cells (arrow, I; Nkx2.1 expression shown in red in J); Ptc1 and Gli1 show some overlap with Shh, but extend more dorsally. Expression of Bmp7, Msx1/2 and pSmad1/5/8 is detected in hypothalamic floor plate cells. (Q-W) At stage 22-25, ventrolateral cells that span the neuroepithelium express Shh. Expression is largely detected in cell bodies and end-feet. Shh mRNA appears to be largely confined to VZ cells. Ptc1 and Gli1 are detected dorsal to Shh-expressing cells. Bmp7, Msx1/2 and pSmad1/5/8 are detected in ventrolateral cells, which now express Pax7. (X) Robust expression of Pax7 is detected in ventrolateral cells at stage 30. (A′) Pax7+ cells form in Nkx2.1+ cells located furthest from the VZ. Many Pax7+ cells co-express Nkx2.1, but a minority of Pax7-single positive cells can be detected. (B′-G′) Pax7 marks basal progenitors of the ventrolateral hypothalamus. Gsh+ cells are located at the VZ/SVZ boundary. The majority of Gsh+ cells lie just medial to Pax7+ cells, but some cells co-express Gsh and Pax7 (arrows, E′). Pax7+ cells co-express Ki67 (F′, arrows), and are distinct from postmitotic Isl1+ cells (G′).

Electroporation

Electroporation was performed as described (Ohyama et al., 2005). Plasmids used were: Gli1 (Sasaki et al., 1999); pCAGGS-GFP (Das et al.2006); pCAGGS-RFP (Das et al., 2006); Smad5 (Ishida et al., 2000); Gli3 repressor (Gli3R) (Persson et al., 2002) and pRFPRNAi-Luciferase (Luc RNAi) (Das et al., 2006). Gli3 RNAi plasmid was designed to target the following sequence: CCACATACATGGTGAGAAGAAA.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the developing hypothalamus, Shh and BMPs show temporally regulated wave-like expression patterns in ventral midline cells of the prechordal mesoderm, hypothalamic floor plate and in the ventro-lateral hypothalamus. In each cell group, Shh expression precedes that of Bmp7: they transiently overlap, before Shh is downregulated (Fig. 1A,B,E,I,J,M,Q,R,U) (Dale et al., 1997; Dale et al., 1999; Ohyama et al., 2005; Manning et al., 2006). Shh is retained at high levels only in the ventrolateral hypothalamus, in cells that span the lumen, with nuclei at the ventricular zone (VZ) (Fig. 1Q,R). Two outstanding issues are whether ventrally derived Bmp7 temporally opposes Shh signalling to specify progenitors in the developing ventrolateral hypothalamus, and, if so, how this is achieved.

To begin to examine whether BMP signalling may temporally antagonise Shh signalling, we documented expression of recognised responses to the two signals, generating a profile of their spatiotemporal activities. The Shh-responsive genes Ptc1 and Gli1 (Epstein et al., 1996; Goodrich et al., 1996; Hynes et al., 1997; Marigo and Tabin, 1996) show a similar initial spatiotemporal profile to Shh itself: expression detected in ventral-dorsal waves, extending from the hypothalamic floor plate at stage 10 to ventrolateral cells at stage 15-17 (Fig. 1C,D,K,L); at these stages, expression of Ptc1 and Gli1 extends slightly more dorsally to that of Shh, a feature more pronounced at stages 22-25 (Fig. 1Q,S,T). The onset of expression of the BMP-responsive genes Msx1/2 and pSmad1/5/8 (Liem et al., 1995; Rios et al., 2004) in each cell group appears to correlate with the downregulation of Shh and Shh-responsive genes. Msx1/2 and pSmad1/5/8 are robustly detected in hypothalamic floor-plate cells at stage 15-17, then in ventrolateral cells by stage 22-25 (Fig. 1F,G,N,O,V,W). Together, this analysis is consistent with the idea that BMP might antagonise Shh signalling in a temporal manner.

We reasoned, then, that additional progenitor markers that are usually dorsally restricted in the posterior CNS might show ventral expression patterns within the hypothalamus, and focused on expression of the general `dorsal' progenitor marker Pax7. Prior to stage 16, Pax7 is expressed at the forebrain roof plate, but is not observed in the ventral or ventrolateral hypothalamus (Fig. 1H,P). By contrast, by stage 25, Pax7 expression is detected in roof-plate cells (shown in Fig. 4E), but, additionally, a new domain of expression is detected in a set of progenitor cells in the ventrolateral Nkx2.1+ hypothalamus (Fig. 1A′,D′). At stage 25, the ventrolateral Pax7+ cells occupy Shh-negative regions of the subventricular zone (SVZ), and are located within outermost regions of a broader Nkx2.1+ domain, and just lateral to Gsh+ cells (Fig. 1A′-D′); many cells co-express Nkx2.1 and Pax7, and some cells show co-expression of Gsh and Pax7 (Fig. 1A′,E′). By stage 30, Pax7+ cells occupy a distinct domain (Fig. 1X). Double-labelling of Pax7 and a proliferation marker, Ki67, demonstrates that at stage 30, many Pax7+ cells are proliferating progenitors (Fig. 1F′). Consistent with this observation, they are segregated from postmitotic Isl1+ cells (Fig. 1G′). Together, these data show that Pax7 is upregulated in proliferating basal progenitors of the ventrolateral hypothalamus.

    Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Bmp7 upregulates Gli3 and specifies Pax7+ basal progenitors. (A) Schematic showing pHyp dissection (green box) from stage 5-7 embryos and culture in collagen. (B-J) Sections through explants, analysed by double-colour immunofluorescent labelling for expression of Nkx2.1/Pax7 (B-F) or Gsh/Pax7 (G-J). Pax7+ cells, either adjacent to, or co-expressed with, Nkx2.1 and Gsh (arrows), are detected in the presence of prechordal mesoderm (PM; B,G), Bmp7 (D,I) and cyclopamine (F). (H,I) Quantitative analysis of pHyp explants cultured with (I) or without (H) Bmp7. Quantitative analysis reveals that expression of Pax7 does not occur at the expense of Gsh+ cells (mean number of Gsh+ cells: in control=150±5.8, in explants with Bmp7=156±8.2; mean number of Pax7+ cells: in control=0.4±0.2, in explants with Bmp7=171±9.1). (F) Pax7+ cells, many of which co-express Nkx2.1 are found in pHyp explants cultured in the presence of cyclopamine. (K) Quantitative analysis on pHyp explants cultured alone, with Bmp7 or with cyclopamine. Bars show mean number of Pax7+ cells/section. Cyclopamine can significantly increase the number of Pax7+ cells (control=4.9±1.3 cells; cyclopamine=47.7±10.2 cells; P<0.0024; unpaired t-test), but approximately threefold more Pax7+ cells are detected with Bmp7. (L-S) Gli3 expression in vivo (L-O) and in pHyp explants (P-S). (L) At stage 8, Gli3 is not detected in the ventral/ventrolateral hypothalamus (arrow). (M-O) At stage 25, Gli3 expression is detected in ventral and ventrolateral regions of the hypothalamus, expression confined to VZ/SVZ cells (arrows in M,N). (P,Q) Gli3 expression is not detected in a stage 6 pHyp explant cultured alone (P), but is upregulated in the presence of Bmp7 (Q). (R,S) Stage 15 ventral hypothalamic explants, dissected from region shown (box in inset, R). Gli3 expression is detected when ventral hypothalamic regions are explanted at stage 15 and cultured to a stage 25 equivalent (R). Expression is abolished when explants are cultured with chordin (S).

To test whether ventrally derived Bmp7 upregulates Pax7 expression in the ventrolateral hypothalamus, we first co-cultured prospective hypothalamic (pHyp) explants (Fig. 2A) with prechordal mesoderm (PM), a source of Bmp7 (Fig. 1E), for 5-6 days. Many Pax7+ cells were detected, the majority of which co-expressed Nkx2.1, and were co-expressed with, or adjacent to, Gsh+ cells (n=6; Fig. 2B,G). By contrast, pHyp explants cultured alone expressed Nkx2.1 and Gsh but not Pax7 (n=15; Fig. 2C,H,K). Bmp7 mimicked the activity of prechordal mesoderm: in explants exposed to Bmp7, Pax7 expression was upregulated in and adjacent to Nkx2.1+ and Gsh+ cells (n=5; Fig. 2D,I,K). Conversely, when pHyp explants were co-cultured with PM in the presence of chordin, a Bmp7 inhibitor, no expression of Pax7 was detected in Nkx2.1 or Gsh+ cells (n=6; Fig. 2E,J). These data suggest that Bmp7 can upregulate Pax7 expression in Nkx2.1+/Gsh+ ventrolateral progenitors.

    Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Antagonistic actions of GliA and GliR regulate Pax7 expression. (A-I;K-N) Transverse section through hypothalamus of chicks electroporated at stage 10-12 and developed until stage 25-30. White dots indicate lumen; electroporated sides are to the left of the lumen in images A-N. (A-D) Electroporation of Gli1 (GliA) abolishes Pax7 expression (A,B). A control GFP construct has no apparent effect on Pax7 (C,D). (E-H) Electroporation of a Gli3 RNAi contruct leads to the downregulation of Gli3 (E,F; adjacent sections). (G,H) Electroporated cells show a marked downregulation of Pax7; neighbouring non-electroporated cells develop with normal Pax7+ identity. (I) Co-electroporation of Gli3 RNAi and a Gli3R shows rescue of Pax7+ cells; i.e. similar numbers of Pax7+ cells are detected on non-electroporated and electroporated sides. (J) Percentage of Pax7+ cells on electroporated versus non-electroporated sides of the hypothalamus. (Gli1 overexpression=20±8 (s.e.m.); GFP=97±3; Gli3 RNAi=27±6; Gli3 RNAi + Gli3=93±4). Residual Pax7 expression detected after Gli1 overexpression or Gli3 knockdown appears to be in non-electroporated cells (e.g. G). (K, L) Gli3 RNAi has no effect on Lim1+ expression. (M, N) A control luciferase RNAi construct does not affect Pax7 expression.

To begin to address the mechanism of Pax7 upregulation by Bmp7, we examined whether exposure of pHyp explants to cyclopamine, a Shh-signalling inhibitor (Incardona et al., 1998), can mimic Bmp7 activity. Although not as efficient as Bmp7, cyclopamine significantly upregulated Pax7 (n=10; Fig. 2F,K). Together, these experiments suggest that BMP exerts its effect, at least in part, by antagonising Shh signalling.

The antagonistic effects of Shh and Bmp7 on Pax7 expression are reminiscent of dorsoventral spinal cord patterning, where BMPs contribute to the establishment of neural progenitor domains in dorsal and intermediate regions by opposing ventrally derived Shh and repressing ventral progenitor identity (Liem et al., 1995). The mechanisms by which BMP and Shh signals antagonise each other's function are diverse, but one point of intersection is at the Gli transcription factors. The Gli3 repressor (Gli3R) opposes Shh-GliA signalling, governing dorsal identity through the repression of Nkx2.2+ and derepression of Pax7 (Persson et al., 2002). It is believed that in the prospective spinal cord, BMPs elicit their effects on dorsoventral patterning by maintaining Gli3 expression (Meyer and Roelink, 2003), but the factors that govern initial expression of Gli3 remain unclear.

We therefore examined whether there is a correlation in BMP signalling and Gli3 expression in the hypothalamus. At stage 8-13, Gli3 is not detected in the ventral hypothalamus, although strong expression is detected in the dorsal and intermediate forebrain (Fig. 2L). However, just prior to Pax7 upregulation, Gli3 expression is observed, in a dynamic fashion in the ventral and ventro-lateral hypothalamus (Fig. 2M-O). To test whether Bmp7 can direct Gli3 expression, pHyp explants were cultured alone (n=8) or with Bmp7 (n=7) for 3-4 days. In the presence of Bmp7, Gli3 expression was detected (Fig. 2P,Q). Conversely, when stage 15 pHyp explants were cultured alone, until a stage 25 equivalent, Gli3 was detected. When identical stage 15 pHyp explants were cultured with chordin, Gli3 showed a marked downregulation (n=4 each; compare Fig. 2R with 2S), indicating that BMP is required to upregulate Gli3 in the hypothalamus.

    Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Dual BMP action specifies Pax7+ ventral progenitors in the hypothalamus. (A-J) Transverse sections through stage 25 hypothalamus, after electroporation at stage 10. (A, B) Co-electroporation of Gli3R and an RFP expression plasmid. Ectopic Pax7+ cells are observed (white arrows), but are restricted to the dorsal region of the hypothalamus, close to endogenous sites of Pax7 expression at the roof plate. (C, D) Co-electroporation of Smad5 and RFP. No ectopic Pax7+ cells are detected. (E-H) Co-electroporation of GFP, Gli3R and Smad5. Ectopic Pax7+ cells are detected throughout the dorsoventral axis. G and H show high-power views of boxed regions (E',F'). White arrows show cells co-expressing Pax7 and GFP. (I, J) Co-electroporation of Smad5 and GFP. No ectopic expression of Gli3 is detected. (K) Model for the specification of Pax7+ ventral progenitors in the developing hypothalamus. Asterisk (*) indicates that Gli3R de-represses Pax7. (L-O) Stage 6 pHyp explants cultured with Bmp7 or a combination of cyclopamine (Cyc) and dorsomorphin (DM). No expression of Pax7 or pSmad1/5/8 is detected with cyclopamine and dorsomorphin. Inset shows that expression of Gli3 is detected under both conditions.

The late onset of expression of Gli3 raises the possibility that a temporally controlled antagonism of Shh and BMP signalling causes the differentiation of SVZ cells to a Pax7+ progenitor fate. To test this, we first examined whether Shh-GliA function prevents the onset of Pax7 expression, by electroporating a Gli1 constitutive activator (GliA) construct (Sasaki et al., 1999) into the ventrolateral hypothalamus. Gli1 overexpression prevented Pax7 upregulation (n=5), whereas a control GFP-alone vector showed no significant effect (n=5 each; Fig. 3A-D,J). We next tested whether, conversely, there is a requirement for Gli3 repressor function for Pax7 expression, by performing Gli3 knockdown experiments. A Gli3 siRNA knockdown construct (Das et al., 2006), efficacious in reducing Gli3 expression (Fig. 3E,F), was electroporated into the hypothalamus at stage 10-12 and embryos were analysed at stage 25-30. When Gli3 was knocked down, the number of Pax7+ progenitors was markedly reduced (n=6; Fig. 3G,H,J); this effect could be reversed through the simultaneous electroporation of Gli3 RNAi and a Gli3 expression vector (n=6; Fig. 3I,J). The knock-down of Gli3 did not abolish hypothalamic cells, as expression of an additional hypothalamic marker, Lim1 (Ohyama et al., 2005), was unaltered by Gli3 knockdown (n=4; Fig. 3K,L). A luciferase knockdown construct did not affect Pax7+ cells (n=4; Fig. 3M,N). Together, these data suggest that Gli3 is required for Pax7 expression in the ventral hypothalamus.

Our experiments support the idea that the upregulation of Pax7 requires the temporal antagonism of Shh signalling by BMP-mediated upregulation of Gli3, but do not indicate whether this is sufficient. To examine this, we asked whether Gli3R can upregulate Pax7 in the hypothalamus, targeting electroporations into regions of the anterior/medial hypothalamus in which neither Gli3 nor Pax7 are normally observed. These experiments revealed that Gli3R can upregulate Pax7, but in an inefficient and spatially restricted manner. Ectopic Pax7 expression was detected only when the Gli3R construct was electroporated into regions close to endogenous Pax7+ domains, and then only in a subset of embryos (6/9: Fig. 4A,B).

The finding that Bmp7, but not Gli3R, can robustly upregulate Pax7 suggests a complex action of Bmp7. We therefore asked whether the upregulation of Pax7 could be more robustly achieved through the simultaneous activation of the BMP signalling pathway and repression of the Shh signalling pathway. A Smad5 activator (Smad5A), a downstream signalling component of BMPs (Ishida et al., 2000), was electroporated either alone or with Gli3R. Smad5A alone was unable to induce ectopic Pax7+ cells (n=5; Fig. 4C,D), although it was able to efficiently induce Msx expression (data not shown). However, co-electroporation of Gli3R and Smad5A resulted in a very robust induction of Pax7+ cells, ectopic Pax7 expression detected in electroporated cells throughout the dorsoventral axis (n=8/9; Fig. 4E-H). These data suggest that pSmad5 and Gli3R may operate in non-linear pathways, both of which are required for Pax7 expression. In support of this, examination of Smad5-electroporated embryos showed, indeed, that Gli3 is not upregulated by Smad5 (n=9; Fig. 4I,J). Together, these data suggest the idea that a dual action of BMP signalling specifies Pax7+ basal progenitors: a Smad5-independent Bmp7-Gli3R pathway opposes the Shh-Gli1A pathway to de-repress Pax7 in the ventrolateral hypothalamus; in addition, BMP signalling via pSmad5 is required to activate Pax7 (Fig. 4K).

To test this hypothesis, we prevented signalling of both Bmp7 and Shh in pHyp explants. We reasoned that if BMP signalling acts exclusively through Shh antagonism, the effect of cyclopamine should be dominant over that of dorsomorphin, an ALK2/3/6 inhibitor that blocks pSmad (Yu et al., 2008), and Pax7+ cells should be retained. pHyp explants were exposed to a combination of cyclopamine and dorsomorphin (n=9), and analysed for expression of Gli3, pSmad5 and Pax7. Only Gli3 was upregulated in the presence of cyclopamine and dorsomorphin (Fig. 4M,O), whereas all three were detected in pHyp explants exposed to Bmp7 (Fig. 4L,N; n=9). Scattered expression of pSmad5, and no expression of Gli3 were detected in pHyp explants cultured alone (not shown). Together, these results support our proposed model for a dual action of Bmp7 is mediating Pax7 upregulation in the hypothalamus.

In conclusion, our analysis makes a number of key points. First, it provides a novel insight into how cellular diversity can be achieved within the embryo in response to a limited repertoire of signalling molecules. Our study shows that, in addition to the well-accepted view that BMP signal opposes Shh activity in a spatial manner (Liem et al., 1995; McMahon et al., 1998; Liem et al., 2000; Briscoe and Ericson, 2001; Meyer and Roelink, 2003), ventrally derived Bmp7 signalling can oppose Shh signalling in a temporal manner to specify ventral progenitors within the hypothalamus. The deployment of the two signals in this versatile temporal manner in turn leads to novel modules of transcription factor expression, in order to achieve elaborate cellular diversity (Edlund and Jessell, 1999; Ingham and Placzek, 2006; Blaess et al., 2006). Our work adds to the growing body of data suggesting that cell fate in the neural tube is governed through the temporal integration of, and adaptation to, signalling ligands (Stamataki et al., 2005; Blaess et al., 2006; Dessaud et al., 2007; Patthey et al., 2008; Tucker et al., 2008).

Our data suggest, further, that Pax7 is normally suppressed in early progenitors that are exposed to Shh signalling, but that a BMP-mediated upregulation of Gli3 leads to a repression of Shh signalling and subsequent de-repression of Pax7 expression. Our study is the first to demonstrate an upregulation of Gli3 by Bmp7. Previous experiments have shown that BMPs can maintain Gli3 expression within dorsal regions of the presumptive spinal cord (Meyer and Roelink, 2003); our study extends these observations. A key question is how does BMP upregulate Gli3 expression within the ventral hypothalamus? Several reports indicate epistatic relationships between BMP and Wnt signalling (e.g. Fuentealba et al., 2007), and recent data have suggested that Wnt signalling can induce, or maintain, Gli3 expression (Alvarez-Medina et al., 2008). However, we find no evidence that a canonical BMP/Wnt signalling pathway is sufficient to induce Gli3 in the hypothalamus: first, overexpression of pSmad5 does not lead to Gli3 upregulation; second, inhibition of pSmad signalling by dorsomorphin does not eliminate Gli3 expression; third, although Wnt8b is expressed within a region of the hypothalamus (Hollyday et al., 1995), its expression does not match precisely that of pSmad1/5/8. Our in vitro analyses, however, suggest some complexity to the upregulation of Gli3 by Bmp7, as induction is limited to a small region within pHyp explants, favouring the interpretation that only specific cell types are competent to respond to BMP by upregulating Gli3. Potentially, different competence factors enable different responses to pSmad5 signalling, making it difficult to exclude entirely some role for pSmad activity in Gli3 upregulation. A second possibility, though, is that Gli3 upregulation is mediated by a distinct signalling pathway. Earlier reports raise the possibility that non-canonical BMP signalling pathways may operate in the CNS (Panchision et al., 2001). Alternatively, Gli3 upregulation may be governed by a Tbx2-mediated pathway. In previous work, we have demonstrated that a BMP-Tbx2 pathway leads to a downregulation of Shh and then of Shh signalling pathway elements, including Ptc1 and Gli1/2 (Manning et al., 2006). Future experiments will determine whether Tbx2 leads to Gli3 upregulation.

Our experiments reveal, however, that the repression of Shh signalling and upregulation of Gli3 expression are insufficient to drive Pax7, which instead requires additional BMP signalling. This suggests that a dual action of BMP signalling specifies Pax7+ basal progenitors in the ventrolateral hypothalamus: a Smad5-independent Bmp7-Gli3R pathway opposes the Shh-Gli1A pathway, and, in addition, a Smad5-dependent BMP signalling pathway is required to activate Pax7 (Fig. 4K).

Generally, our studies show insights into how complexity of cell patterning can be achieved within the CNS through the temporal restriction of key signalling factors. The sequential temporal exposure of hypothalamic progenitors to the `ventralising' influence of Shh and subsequently to the `dorsalising' influence of Bmp7 establishes specific transcription factor codes, in this case directing the differentiation of ventrolateral Pax7+ progenitors. Here, we focus on the importance of this temporal sequence in the specification of Pax7+ hypothalamic progenitors. However, they are clearly only a fraction of the basal progenitor pool: the existence of Ki67+/Pax7-progenitors implies that there are other late-arising ventral hypothalamic progenitors. Future studies will reveal whether they are also specified by the temporal antagonism of Shh and BMP signalling.

Acknowledgments

We thank Miss P. Ellis and Mr C. Law for assistance and advice; S. A. Wilson for the siRNA plasmid; K. Miyazono for Smad5 expression plasmid; C. Emerson for Gli3 probe; M. Goulding for Gsh antibody; H. Edlund for Isl1 antibody; H. Sasaki for Gli1 expression plasmid; J. Briscoe for Gli3R expression plasmid; Mrs C. Hill and J. Sanderson in the Wellcome Trust-funded Microscopy Facility; and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. This study was supported by the Medical Research Council of Great Britain (M.P.).

Footnotes

    • Accepted August 12, 2008.
  • © 2008.

References

  1. Altmann, C. R. and Brivanlou, A. H. (2001). Neural patterning in the vertebrate embryo. Int. Rev. Cytol. 203,447 -482.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Alvarez-Medina, R., Cayuso, J., Okubo, T. and Marti, E. (2008). Wnt canonical pathway restricts graded Shh/Gli patterning activity through the regulation of Gli3 expression. Development 135,237 -247.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Bai, C. B., Stephen, D. and Joyner, A. L. (2004). All mouse ventral spinal cord patterning by hedgehog is Gli dependent and involves an activator function of Gli3. Dev Cell 6,103 -115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Borycki, A., Brown, A. M. and Emerson, C. P., Jr (2000). Shh and Wnt signalling pathway converge to control Gli gene activation in avian somites. Development 127,2075 -2087.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    Blaess, S., Corrales, J. D. and Joyner, A. L. (2006). Sonic hedgehog regulates Gli activator and repressor functions with spatial and temporal precision in the mid/hindbrain region. Development 133,1799 -1809.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Briscoe, J. and Ericson, J. (2001). Specification of neuronal fates in the ventral neural tube. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11,43 -49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Briscoe, J., Pierani, A., Jessell, T. M. and Ericson, J. (2000). A homeodomain protein code specifies progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube. Cell 101,435 -445.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Chizhikov, V. V. and Millen, K. J. (2005). Roof plate-dependent patterning of the vertebrate dorsal central nervous system. Dev. Biol. 277,287 -295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Dale, J. K., Vesque, C., Lints, T. J., Sampath, T. K., Furley, A., Dodd, J. and Placzek, M. (1997). Cooperation of BMP7 and SHH in the induction of forebrain ventral midline cells by prechordal mesoderm. Cell 90,257 -269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Dale, J. K., Sattar, N., Heemskerk, J., Clarke, J. D. W., Placzek, M. and Dodd, J. (1999). Differential patterning of ventral midline cells by axial mesoderm is regulated by BMP7 and chordin. Development 126,397 -408.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  11. ↵
    Das, R. M., Van Hateren, N. J., Howell, G. R., Farrell, E. R., Bangs, F. K., Porteous, V. C., Manning, E. M., McGrew, M. J., Ohyama, K., Sacco, M. A. et al. (2006). A robust system for RNA interference in the chicken using a modified microRNA operon. Dev. Biol. 294,554 -563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Dessaud, E., Yang, L. L., Hill, K., Cox, B., Ulloa, F., Ribeiro, A., Mynett, A., Novitch, B. G. and Briscoe, J. (2007). Interpretation of the sonic hedgehog morphogen gradient by a temporal adaptation mechanism. Nature 450,717 -720.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Edlund, T. and Jessell, T. M. (1999). Progression from extrinsic to intrinsic signalling in cell fate specification: a view from the nervous system. Cell 96,211 -224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Epstein, D. J., Marti, E., Scott, M. P. and McMahon, A. P. (1996). Antagonizing cAMP-dependent protein kinase A in the dorsal CNS activates a conserved Sonic hedgehog signaling pathway. Development 122,2885 -2894.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. ↵
    Ericson, J., Muhr, J., Jessell, T. M. and Edlund, T. (1995). Sonic hedgehog: a common signal for ventral patterning along the rostro-caudal axis of the neural tube. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 39,809 -816.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Fuentealba, L. C., Eivers, E., Ikeda, A., Hurtado, C., Kuroda, H., Pera, E. M. and De Robertis, E. M. (2007). Integrating patterning signals: Wnt/GSK3 regulates the duration of the BMP/Smad1 signal. Cell 131,980 -993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Goodrich, L. V., Johnson, R. L., Milenkovic, L., McMahon, J. A. and Scott, M. P. (1996). Conservation of the hedgehog/patched signaling pathway from flies to mice: induction of a mouse patched gene by Hedgehog. Genes Dev. 10,301 -312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Ho, K. S. and Scott, M. P. (2002). Sonic hedgehog in the nervous system: functions, modifications and mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12, 57-63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Hollyday, M., McMahon, J. A. and McMahon, A. P. (1995). Wnt expression patterns in chick embryo nervous system. Mech. Dev. 52,9 -25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Hynes, M., Stone, D. M., Dowd, M., Pitts-Meek, S., Goddard, A., Gurney, A. and Rosenthal, A. (1997). Control of cell pattern in the neural tube by the zinc finger transcription factor and oncogene Gli-1. Neuron 19,15 -26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Incardona, J. P., Gaffield, W., Kapur, R. P. and Roelink, H. (1998). The teratogenic veratrumalkaloid cyclopamine inhibits sonic hedgehog signal transduction. Development 125,3553 -3562.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  22. ↵
    Ingham, P. W. and Placzek, M. (2006). OrchestratingoOntogenesis: variations on a theme by Sonic hedgehog. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7,841 -851.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Ishida, W., Hamamoto, T., Kusanagi, K., Yagi, K., Kawabata, M., Takehara, K., Sampath, T. K., Kato, M. and Miyazono, K. (2000). Characterization of bone morphogenetic protein-responsive element in the mouse Smad6 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 275,6075 -6079.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Jacob, J. and Briscoe, J. (2003). Gli proteins and the control of spinal-cord patterning. EMBO Rep. 4, 761-765.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Lee, K. J. and Jessell, T. M. (1999). The specification of dorsal cell fates in the vertebrate central nervous system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22,261 -294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Lei, Q., Zelman, A. K., Kuang, E., Li, S. and Matise, M. P. (2004). Transduction of graded Hedgehog signaling by a combination of Gli2 and Gli3 activator functions in the developing spinal cord. Development 131,3593 -3604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Lei, Q., Jeong, Y., Misra, K., LI, S., Zelman, A. K., Epstein, D. J. and Matise, M. P. (2006). Wnt signalling inhibitors regulate the transcriptional response to morphogenetic Shh-Gli signalling in the neural tube. Dev. Cell 11,325 -337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Liem, K. F., Jr, Tremml, G., Roelink, H. and Jessell, T. M. (1995). Dorsal differentiation of neural plate cells induced by BMP-mediated signals from epidermal ectoderm. Cell 82,969 -979.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Liem, K. F., Jessell, T. M. and Briscoe, J. (2000). Regulation of the neural patterning activity of sonic hedgehog by secreted BMP inhibitors expressed by notochord and somites. Development 127,4855 -4866.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    Litingtung, Y. and Chiang, C. (2000). Specification of ventral neural types is mediated by an antagonistic action between Shh and Gli3. Nat. Neurosci. 10,979 -209.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Liu, A. and Niswander, L. A. (2005). Bone morphogenetic protein signalling and vertebrate nervous system development. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6,945 -954.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Marigo, V. and Tabin, C. J. (1996). Regulation of patched by sonic hdgehog in the developing neural tube. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93,9346 -9351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    McMahon, J. A., Takada, S., Zimmerman, L. B., Fan, C. M., Harland, R. M. and McMahon, A. P. (1998). Noggin-mediated antagonism of BMP signaling is require for growth and patternin of the neural tube and somite. Genes Dev. 12,1438 -1452.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Manning, L., Ohyama, K., Saeger, B., Hatano, O., Wilson, S. A., Logan, M. and Placzek, M. (2006). Regional morphogenesis in the hypothalamus. Dev. Cell 11,873 -885.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Meyer, N. P. and Roelink, H. (2003). The amino-terminal region of Gli3 antagonizes the Shh response and acts in dorsoventral fate specification in the developing spinal cord. Dev. Biol. 257,343 -355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Ohyama, K., Ellis, P., Kimura, S. and Placzek, M. (2005). Directed differentiation of neural cells to hypothalamic dopaminergic neurons. Development 132,5185 -5197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Panchision, D. M., Pickel, J. M., Studer, L., Lee, S.-H., Turner, P. A., Hazel, T. G. and McKay, R. D. G. (2001). Sequnetial actions of BMP receptors control neural precursor cell production and fate. Genes Dev. 15,2094 -2110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Patten, I. and Placzek, M. (2002). Opponent activities of Shh and BMP signalling during floor plate induction in vivo. Curr. Biol, 12,47 -52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Patthey, C., Gunhaga, L. and Edlund, T. (2008). Early development of the central and peripheral nervous systems is coordinated by Wnt and BMP signals. PLoS ONE 3:e1625 .
  40. ↵
    Persson, M., Stamataki, D., te, Welscher, P., Andersson, E., Böse, J., Rüther, U., Ericson, J. and Briscoe, J. (2002). Dorsal-ventral patterning of the spinal cord requires Gli3 transcriptional repressor activity. Genes Dev. 16,2865 -2878.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Rios, I., Alvarez-Rodriguez, R., Marti, E. and Pons, S. (2004). BMP2 antagonises sonic hedgehog-mediated proliferation of cerebellar granule neurones through Smad5 signalling. Development 131,3159 -3168.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Sasaki, H., Nishizaki, Y., Hui, C.-C., Nakafuku, M. and Kondoh, H. (1999). Regulation of Gli2 and Gli3 activities by an amino-terminal repression domain: implication of Gli2 and Gli3 as primary mediators of Shh signalling. Development 126,3915 -3924.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  43. ↵
    Stamataki, D., Ulloa, F., Tsoni, S. V., Mynett, A. and Briscoe, J. (2005). A gradient of Gli activity mediates graded Sonic Hedgehog signaling in the neural tube. Genes Dev. 19,626 -634.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Tucker, J. A., Mintzer, K. A. and Mullins, M. C. (2008). The BMP signaling gradient patterns dorsoventral tissues in a temporally progressive manner along the anteroposterior axis. Dev. Cell 14,108 -119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Ulloa, F. and Briscoe, J. (2007). Morphogens and the control of cell proliferation and patterning in the spinal cord. Cell Cycle 6,2640 -2649.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    Wijgerde, M., McMahon, J. A., Rule, M. and McMahon, A. P. (2002). A direct requirement for Hedgehog signaling for normal specification of all ventral progenitor domains in the presumptive mammalian spinal cord. Genes Dev. 16,2849 -2864.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Yu, P. B., Hong, C. C., Sachidanandan, C., Babitt, J. L., Deng, D. Y., Hoyng, S. A., Lin, H. Y., Bloch, K. D. and Peterson, R. T. (2008). Dorsomorphin inhibits BMP signals required for embryogenesis and iron metabolism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 33-41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Temporal progression of hypothalamic patterning by a dual action of BMP
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
Share
Research Report
Temporal progression of hypothalamic patterning by a dual action of BMP
Kyoji Ohyama, Raman Das, Marysia Placzek
Development 2008 135: 3325-3331; doi: 10.1242/dev.027078
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Report
Temporal progression of hypothalamic patterning by a dual action of BMP
Kyoji Ohyama, Raman Das, Marysia Placzek
Development 2008 135: 3325-3331; doi: 10.1242/dev.027078

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • TOP1α regulates FLOWERING LOCUS C expression by coupling histone modification and transcription machinery
  • The OsJAZ1 degron modulates jasmonate signaling sensitivity during rice development
  • Rho-of-plant-activated root hair formation requires Arabidopsis YIP4a/b gene function
Show more RESEARCH REPORT

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

The people behind the papers – Elena Popa and Abigail Tucker

Elena Popa and Abigail Tucker

“After what felt like hundreds of failed attempts, finally being able to see Sox2 staining under the microscope felt like a huge relief!”

First author Elena Popa and Abigail Tucker, Professor of Development and Evolution at King's College London, talk about their research into tooth development in the mouse and other organisms.


Spotlight - CRISPR babies: a view from the centre of the storm

Matt Porteus (right) and Robin Lovell-Badge (left) clarify some statements made by He Jiankui. Courtesy of Vivian Tam (School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Hong Kong)

Matt Porteus (right) and Robin Lovell-Badge (left) clarify some statements made by He Jiankui. Courtesy of Vivian Tam (School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Hong Kong)

Robin Lovell-Badge gives his perspective on the recent report from Jiankui He of the world's first genome edited babies and discusses if and how clinical applications of germline genome editing in humans may be justifiable.


Developmental biology for agriculture

Example crop plants

In the latest Spotlight for our Advocacy series, Scott Boden and Lars Østergaard argue that technological advances in sequencing, genome editing and advanced data processing should allow developmental biologists to improve crop performance as crop yields come under pressure to meet the growing human population's needs.

Demonstrating some of these principles in a new Research Article, Laura Dixon and team analyse the flowering and growth responses of a range of wheat cultivars to warmer growth temperatures.


A new Instagram account for Development 

Our Instagram cover image, Nematostella

Our new Instagram account promotes the beauty of developmental biology through the work of our authors. Do join us there!


Workshop - New frontiers in the brain: unexpected roles of the choroid plexus-cerebrospinal fluid system in health and disease

Wiston House, where the workshop will take place

We are pleased to announce a Company of Biologist's Workshop, organised by Fiona Doetsch and Maria Lehtinen, bringing together scientists working on all aspects of choroid plexus and cerebrospinal fluid biology. The Workshop will be held in July 2019 at Wiston House, UK. Ten funded early-career places are available – apply here before 31 March 2019.

Call for papers: Chromatin and Epigenetics

Call for papers: Chromatin and Epigenetics

Development is pleased to welcome submissions for an upcoming Special Issue on ‘Chromatin and Epigenetics’, edited by Benoit Bruneau, Haruhiko Koseki, Susan Strome and Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla. This special issue aims to showcase the best research covering the chromatin-based and epigenetic mechanisms which regulate development across the plant and animal kingdoms. Submission deadline: 31 March 2019. 


PreLights – A direct and widespread role for the nuclear receptor EcR in mediating the response to ecdysone in Drosophila

PreLighter Natalie Dye

Extensive and dynamic genome binding by a steroid hormone receptor highlights the interconnection between systemic and local cues for organ development, shows a preprint written by Christopher Uyehara and Daniel McKay and highlighted by Natalie Dye.

Catch up with other recent preLights selected for the developmental biology community.


Articles of interest in our sister journals

Wnt signaling in orofacial clefts: crosstalk, pathogenesis and models
Kurt Reynolds, Priyanka Kumari, Lessly Sepulveda Rincon, Ran Gu, Yu Ji, Santosh Kumar, Chengji J. Zhou
Disease Models & Mechanisms 2019 12: dmm037051 

Loss of the deglutamylase CCP5 perturbs multiple steps of spermatogenesis and leads to male infertility
Tiziana Giordano, Sudarshan Gadadhar, Satish Bodakuntla, et al.
J Cell Sci 2019 132: jcs226951

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Workshops and Meetings
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992