In mammals, left-right (L-R) asymmetry is established by posteriorly oriented cilia driving a leftwards laminar flow in the embryonic node, thereby activating asymmetric gene expression. The two-cilia hypothesis argues that immotile cilia detect and respond to this flow through a Pkd2-mediated mechanism; a putative sensory partner protein has, however, remained unidentified. We have identified the Pkd1-related locus Pkd1l1 as a crucial component of L-R patterning in mouse. Systematic comparison of Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 point mutants reveals strong phenocopying, evidenced by both morphological and molecular markers of sidedness; both mutants fail to activate asymmetric gene expression at the node or in the lateral plate and exhibit right isomerism of the lungs. Node and cilia morphology were normal in mutants and cilia demonstrated typical motility, consistent with Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 activity downstream of nodal flow. Cell biological analysis reveals that Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 localise to the cilium and biochemical experiments demonstrate that they can physically interact. Together with co-expression in the node, these data argue that Pkd1l1 is the elusive Pkd2 binding partner required for L-R patterning and support the two-cilia hypothesis.
The internal organs and vasculature of all vertebrates are left-right (L-R) asymmetrical in their position and patterning; this asymmetry is conserved, revealing a clearly ancient origin. Morphological asymmetry of the initially symmetrical embryo is first evident during somitogenesis, when the heart tube kinks asymmetrically to the right. During subsequent development of the embryo, the heart, lungs, gut and associated vasculature all become asymmetrically positioned and patterned. Defects in this process are associated with congenital human disorders, most significantly heart disease (Ramsdell, 2005).
The earliest known event in establishing mammalian L-R asymmetry is a leftwards flow of liquid in the embryonic node, at ~8.0 days post-coitum (dpc) in mouse, resulting from the clockwise rotation of polarised, posteriorly tilted nodal cilia (Hirokawa et al., 2006; Shiratori and Hamada, 2006). This ‘nodal flow’ in turn results in activation of the left-sided Nodal signalling cascade. The TGFβ family member Nodal is expressed in the left, but not right, lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) (Collignon et al., 1996; Lowe et al., 1996), where it induces its own expression, as well as that of its antagonist Lefty2 and the downstream transcription factor Pitx2 (Shiratori and Hamada, 2006). Whereas Nodal and Lefty2 are expressed for only a few hours (between 3 and 6 somites), specifically left-sided Pitx2 expression is maintained into organogenesis and is argued to be the ultimate specifier of leftness (Logan et al., 1998; Ryan et al., 1998).
Although it is broadly accepted that nodal flow drives asymmetric gene expression in the mouse (Hirokawa et al., 2006; Nonaka et al., 2002; Shiratori and Hamada, 2006), the mechanism by which flow is detected, and the nature of the response at the tissue and cellular level, remain unclear. An initial hypothesis argued that a morphogen becomes concentrated on the left side of the node in response to flow (Nonaka et al., 2002; Okada et al., 1999; Okada et al., 2005). Others suggested that Nodal itself is asymmetrically transported towards the left lateral plate in response to flow (Brennan et al., 2002; Oki et al., 2007; Saijoh et al., 2003). In a development of these theories, Tanaka and colleagues argued that lipid-bound vesicles containing morphogens are carried leftwards, breaking on the left side of the node and thereby releasing their cargoes asymmetrically (Tanaka et al., 2005). By contrast, the two-cilia hypothesis (McGrath et al., 2003; Tabin and Vogan, 2003) proposed that, in addition to motile cilia creating flow, immotile mechanosensory cilia within the node are displaced and respond to flow on the left, but not right, side of the node. It has been proposed that this results in a left-sided Ca2+ signal through the action of Pkd2 (McGrath et al., 2003).
The PKD1 and PKD2 genes were identified as being mutated in human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (OMIM: 173900) (Harris and Torres, 2009). Work from various groups has led to the understanding that these two proteins act together, forming a flow-sensitive Ca2+ channel in kidney tubules (Hanaoka et al., 2000; Nauli et al., 2003). PKD1, which contains a large and structurally robust extracellular domain, is believed to act as a flow sensor, whereas PKD2 forms the channel (Gonzalez-Perrett et al., 2001; Koulen et al., 2002). Loss-of-function mouse mutants of Pkd1 and Pkd2 are homozygous lethal, resulting in embryonic death associated with cardiac failure, polycystic kidneys and gross oedema (Boulter et al., 2001; Lu et al., 2001; Muto et al., 2002; Pennekamp et al., 2002; Wu et al., 2000). Heterozygous mutants of both Pkd1 and Pkd2 survive to adulthood, but show adult-onset polycystic kidney disease, a phenotype that develops earlier in double than single heterozygotes (Wu et al., 2002). Homozygous Pkd2 mutants also show distinct L-R patterning defects, failing to activate detectable levels of Nodal expression in the lateral plate (Pennekamp et al., 2002); these data underpin the two-cilia hypothesis that nodal flow activates Pkd2 signalling specifically on the left side of the node (McGrath et al., 2003). Surprisingly, no overt L-R patterning defects are evident in the mouse Pkd1 mutant, and Pkd1 protein was not detected in the rabbit node (Karcher et al., 2005), suggesting that Pkd2 acts in L-R determination in the absence of Pkd1 protein; there are, however, conflicting data concerning the presence of Pkd1 in the mouse node (Karcher et al., 2005; Nakaya et al., 2005). Although it is formally possible that Pkd2 acts alone in L-R determination, other binding partners, such as inversin, have been suggested (Karcher et al., 2005).
Here, we report the identification of a point mutation in the mouse Pkd1l1 locus named rks that results in right pulmonary isomerism, cardiac outflow defects, overt oedema and lethality by 15.5 dpc. The normally left-sided genes Nodal, Lefty2 and Pitx2 are not expressed in Pkd1l1rks mutants, indicating a failure to activate the Nodal signalling cascade. Node morphology, cilia morphology and cilia motility are all unaffected in Pkd1l1rks mutants. Systematic analysis of a Pkd2 mutant on an identical genetic background shows that Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 mutants phenocopy, suggesting that Pkd1l1 is the elusive Pkd2 binding partner in L-R determination. We demonstrate that Pkd1l1 can directly interact with Pkd2 and that, when co-expressed, both proteins localise to the cilium. We propose that direct interaction between Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 is required for L-R determination, thereby supporting the two-cilia hypothesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pkd1l1rks was derived from an ENU-driven genetic screen; mutagenised C57Bl6/J mice were outcrossed to C3H/HeH. The line was maintained by backcrossing to C3H/HeH. Pkd2lrm4 is an E442G point mutation, previously incorrectly described as being E452G (Ermakov et al., 2009), and was maintained by backcrossing to C3H/HeH. Genotyping of mutant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was performed by pyrosequencing.
Full-length Pkd1l1 cDNA was synthesised according to NCBI ref. seq. XM_126005.7. The Pkd1l1_CC fragment comprised bases 7320-7821 (amino acids 2440-2607). The whole-mount in situ hybridisation probe comprised bases 5245-6073. Both full-length Pkd1l1 cDNA and Pkd1l1_CC were C-terminally tagged with GFP by cloning into pEGFP-N1 (Clontech). Pkd1l1_CCL2554D-GFP was produced using the QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The Myc-PKD2 vector was as previously described (Hanaoka et al., 2000).
Whole-mount in situ hybridisation (WISH)
WISH was performed using standard protocols. Digoxygenin-labelled riboprobes for Pkd1l1, Pkd2 (Pennekamp et al., 2002), Nodal (Collignon et al., 1996), Lefty1/2 (Meno et al., 1997), Pitx2 (Ryan et al., 1998), Twist (Twist1) (Fuchtbauer, 1995), Cerl2 (Marques et al., 2004) and Shh (Echelard et al., 1993) were transcribed. Alkaline phosphatase-coupled anti-digoxygenin antibody (Roche) was used to localise hybridised probes and NBT/BCIP (Roche) was the chromogenic substrate, producing blue precipitates for visualisation.
Analysis of embryonic nodes
For morphological analysis, embryos were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, dehydrated through an acetone series, critical-point dried (EMITECH 850), mounted, sputter coated with gold (8 nm) and viewed in a Hitachi S-530 or JEOL 6500F scanning electron microscope. For cilia beat analysis, embryos dissected in ice-cold 199 medium (GIBCO) were flat-mounted on a microscope slide under a coverslip. High-speed video capture (100 frames per second) was performed under differential interference contrast optics (Leica 2500 microscope) using a 63× NA 0.9 objective. At least four wild-type and mutant embryos were analysed frame-by-frame; six different cilia per node were counted for five rotations to calculate rotation frequency. Yolk sacs were collected for genotyping.
Cell culture, transfection and immunofluorescence
HEK 293T cells were maintained in DMEM (Invitrogen) and IMCD3 cells in DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen) media, both supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), pen-strep (Invitrogen) and l-glutamine (Invitrogen). Constructs were transfected using JetPei (Polypus Transfection) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For immunofluorescence, GFP and Myc protein tags were detected using rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000; Invitrogen, A-21311) and mouse anti-Myc (1:200; Hybridoma Bank, 9E10) antibodies, respectively. Alexa Fluor 488 nm, 594 nm and 647 nm secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, A11032, A21206 and A21463) were used for visualisation. Slides were imaged using a TCS SP5 confocal microscope (Leica). Cilia were visualised using an antibody against acetylated tubulin (1:1000; Sigma, T7451).
Protein preparation, Western blotting and immunoprecipitation
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche). Total protein concentration was determined using Bradford Reagent (Sigma). Immunoprecipitations (IPs) were performed with 0.4 mg pre-cleared protein lysate per IP, using anti-Myc (Sigma, C 3956) and anti-GFP (Roche, 11 814 460 001) antibodies bound to Protein G Sepharose beads (Sigma, P3296). IPs were performed for 1 hour at 4°C with rotation. Precipitates were resolved on 4-12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen), transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (iBLOT; Invitrogen), then blocked in 5% milk in PBT (0.1% Tween 20 in PBS). Membranes were probed with anti-GFP (1:4000; Roche, 11 814 460 001) or anti-Myc (1:5000; Hybridoma Bank, 9E10) antibodies.
rks: a novel Pkd1l1 allele in mouse
During an ongoing ENU-driven forward genetic screen for developmental defects in mouse (Bogani et al., 2009; Patterson et al., 2009; Yates et al., 2009), a recessive mutant demonstrating consistent situs abnormalities was identified. Right pulmonary isomerism and gross oedema were evident in all phenotypic individuals from the initial screen, together with apparently randomised situs of other organ systems (data not shown). We named this mutant rikishi (rks) owing to the similarity in shape of the initial mutants to a Sumo wrestler. A genome-wide analysis of 11 such phenotypic G3 embryos demonstrated linkage of rks to proximal chromosome 11 (data not shown). Successive backcrossing to C3H/HeH mice was accompanied by intercrosses to produce further phenotypic embryos for mapping. Subsequent haplotypic analyses defined a ~200 kb minimal region between 8.69 and 8.89 Mb as containing the mutation; multiple recombination events at both flanking markers were recorded (Fig. 1A).
The rks minimal region contains only the Pkd1l1 locus and two non-coding pseudogenes (Fig. 1A). As Pkd1l1 is the only functional gene in the region, and because the gross phenotype of rks appeared strikingly similar to that of the well-characterised Pkd2 null (Pennekamp et al., 2002), we hypothesised that Pkd1l1 might be the elusive Pkd2 binding partner. We therefore sequenced all the exons of Pkd1l1, the associated splice donor and acceptor sites and the non-coding pseudogenes. A single sequence change from the reference was detected in exon 8 of Pkd1l1, at nucleotide 1232 (Fig. 1A). This A-to-G transition results in a negatively charged aspartic acid at position 411 being replaced by an uncharged non-polar glycine residue; the changes in charge and size are both non-conservative in nature.
The Pkd1l1 protein comprises 11 transmembrane domains, a C-terminal intracellular coiled coil (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material) and an N-terminal extracellular region encompassing a REJ domain and two PKD domains (Fig. 1C) (Yuasa et al., 2002); the Pkd1l1rks mutation lies in the second PKD domain. Multi-species amino acid alignment revealed a high level of conservation within the domain, with absolute conservation of the mutated residue seen in species as distantly related as the sea urchin (S. pupuratus); a conservative change to the negatively charged glutamic acid is present in zebrafish (Fig. 1B). Previous analysis of equivalent domains in Pkd1 identified the WDFGDGS motif, within which the Pkd1l1rks mutation (underlined) lies, as the most highly conserved region of the domain (Fig. 1B) (Bycroft et al., 1999). Both NMR-derived and X-ray crystallography-derived structures of PKD domains comprise β-sandwiches of seven β-sheets (Bycroft et al., 1999; Jing et al., 2002); the WDFGDGS motif forms a linker connecting β-sheets C and C′ (Fig. 1D). Based on these structures, we modelled the likely effects of the Pkd1l1rks mutation using homology-based molecular modelling with nFOLD3 (Jones et al., 2005). This yielded an in silico prediction of destabilisation of the C′ β-sheet and a reduction of the length of the E β-sheet (Fig. 1D), implying that the Pkd1l1rks phenotype results from structural disruption of the second PKD domain of Pkd1l1.
Pkd1l1rks mutants exhibit gross left-right abnormalities that phenocopy Pkd2lrm4 mutants
Although initial analysis during screening gave an indication of the Pkd1l1rks phenotype, these embryos were of mixed genetic background and were likely to carry additional, unknown ENU-derived mutations. Moreover, non-phenotypic embryos were not genotyped for the Pkd1l1rks mutation, hence genetic penetrance was undetermined. The previously reported Pkd2lrm4 point mutant, a predicted null allele, was also originally analysed on a mixed genetic background (Ermakov et al., 2009). Therefore, both the Pkd1l1rks and Pkd2lrm4 mutations were backcrossed to C3H for over ten generations, segregating away other ENU-derived mutations and providing a single, defined genetic background. The resulting congenic stocks were analysed in this study. Initially, we assessed age of death for Pkd1l1rks, collecting and genotyping cohorts of embryos at 13.5, 14.5 and 15.5 dpc (Fig. 2J). At both 13.5 and 14.5 dpc, normal Mendelian ratios were observed, but by 15.5 dpc a significant drop in the frequency of homozygous embryos was evident (Fig. 2J); only two mutant 15.5 dpc embryos were identified and these were both developmentally delayed and close to death. Pkd2lrm4 embryos also failed to survive significantly beyond 14.5 dpc, as previously reported (Ermakov et al., 2009) (data not shown).
To determine the precise profile of morphological defects, we analysed genotyped 13.5-14.5 dpc embryos; genetically wild-type (WT) and Pkd1l1+/rks embryos proved indistinguishable, exhibiting normal situs and no oedema (Fig. 2A,B). By contrast, all mutant Pkd1l1rks/rks embryos analysed (33/33) showed right pulmonary isomerism, with four lung lobes evident on each side (Fig. 2D,E; Table 1); stomach situs and gross cardiac situs, however, showed incidence of both situs solitus and situs inversus (Fig. 2D,E; Table 1). Overt oedema was also present in 25 out of 28 embryos analysed (Table 1). Very similar results were evident for the congenic Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 mutants (Fig. 2G-I; Table 1): 1 of 38 showed situs solitus lungs, compared with 37 with right isomerism; heart and stomach situs were randomised; 31 of 33 embryos demonstrated obvious oedema (Fig. 2G-I; Table 1). At 9.5 dpc, Pkd1l1rks/rks embryos exhibited normal, inverted (Fig. 2F) and indifferent (midline) embryonic turning (Table 1); a mixture of WT and inverted (Fig. 2I) turning was evident in Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 embryos (Table 1).
Owing to the strong association between defective situs, cardiac defects and oedema (Ramsdell, 2005), we examined cardiac patterning. External patterning of the outflow tract was scored, revealing a significant incidence of apparent double outlet right ventricle (DORV) and transposition of the great arteries (TGA) (Table 2), with ~75% of both Pkd1l1rks/rks and Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 embryos showing overt outflow tract defects. Indeed, the incidence of DORV and of TGA were equivalent in the two mutants. Histological analysis of Pkd1l1rks/rks embryos revealed, in addition to evidence of oedema, incidence of ventricular septal defects (VSDs) (see Fig. S2 in the supplementary material), similar to that previously reported for Pkd2 mutants (Boulter et al., 2001; Ermakov et al., 2009; Pennekamp et al., 2002; Wu et al., 2000). Together, these data demonstrate that the Pkd1l1rks and Pkd2lrm4 phenotypes are highly similar when assessed on an identical genetic background.
Pkd1l1rks embryos do not exhibit defects in kidney development
The established relationship of PKD genes with polycystic kidney disease led us to investigate kidney morphology in Pkd1l1rks animals. Mutant Pkd1l1rks/rks embryos arrest and die at ~14.5 dpc (Fig. 2J). The kidneys of 14.5 dpc embryos appear normal (data not shown), but it is difficult to analyse cyst formation at this stage; Pkd1 and Pkd2 mutant kidney cysts are not readily visualised before 15.5 dpc. However, both Pkd1+/− and Pkd2+/− adults develop kidney cysts with age (Boulter et al., 2001; Lu et al., 2001; Wu et al., 1998). We therefore investigated the effects of aging Pkd1l1+/rks animals, analysing gross pathology, kidney pathology, gross situs and cardiac pathology. We detected no pathology that varied from WT controls in animals aged up to 18 months (see Fig. S3 in the supplementary material; data not shown). Animals doubly heterozygous for Pkd1 and Pkd2 show an earlier onset and increased incidence of kidney cysts, reflecting a genetic interaction (Wu et al., 2002). It therefore seemed possible that doubly heterozygous Pkd1l1+/rks;Pkd2+/lrm4 animals might show phenotypes affecting L-R patterning. Intercrosses between Pkd2+/lrm4 and Pkd1l1+/rks animals produced progeny at the expected Mendelian frequencies (Fig. 2K); pathological analysis revealed no abnormal kidney, cardiac or situs pathology (data not shown), reflecting no obvious genetic interaction.
Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 are required to activate asymmetric gene expression
Since morphological L-R asymmetry is prefigured by molecular asymmetries, we next investigated establishment of L-R asymmetric gene expression in the LPM. LPM Nodal, expressed between the 3- and 6-somite stages, autoactivates itself and activates its antagonists Lefty1 and Lefty2 and the downstream transcription factor Pitx2 (Shiratori and Hamada, 2006). In WT embryos we detected Nodal expression surrounding the node and, from 3-6 somites, in the left, but not right, LPM (Fig. 3A). By contrast, Pkd1l1rks/rks embryos showed peri-nodal, but no LPM, expression (Fig. 3B; Table 3). Lefty2 expression, which normally spatiotemporally echoes that of Nodal in the left LPM (Fig. 3D), and Lefty1 expression in the midline (Fig. 3D), were similarly absent in all mutant embryos analysed (Fig. 3E; Table 3). Asymmetric Pitx2 expression in the left LPM was detected in WT controls (Fig. 3G) as previously reported (Piedra et al., 1998; Ryan et al., 1998; Yoshioka et al., 1998). However, LPM Pitx2 expression was absent from 43/44 Pkd1l1rks/rks mutants examined (Fig. 3H; Table 3); the remaining embryo demonstrated bilateral LPM expression (Table 3).
The results we describe for Nodal and Lefty2 expression in Pkd1l1rks/rks are very similar to data reported for the Pkd2 null, but there is a significant difference for Pitx2 as the majority of embryos previously reported showed bilateral Pitx2 expression (Pennekamp et al., 2002). We therefore analysed expression of situs markers in congenic C3H-Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 mutant embryos. No expression of Nodal or Lefty2 was detected in the lateral plate (Fig. 3C,F; Table 3), consistent with both the Pkd1l1rks data and the previously published Pkd2 null analysis. However, Pitx2 expression was also absent from all 17 mutant embryos analysed (Fig. 3I; Table 3), in accordance with data reported here for the Pkd1l1rks mutant. Thus, our analysis reveals a failure to activate the Nodal signalling cascade in the LPM of both mutants.
Both their morphology and subsequent normal development over many days, notwithstanding situs-related defects, argue that the LPM, node and midline are structurally normal in Pkd1l1rks and Pkd2lrm4 mutants. We confirmed this by analysing the expression of Twist and Shh, markers of the LPM and node/notochord, respectively (Echelard et al., 1993; Fuchtbauer, 1995). No difference in expression between WT and mutant embryos was evident (data not shown).
Peri-nodal Nodal expression is also asymmetric, with stronger expression on the left than right (Collignon et al., 1996; Lowe et al., 1996); this slightly precedes LPM asymmetry. In WT embryos, we detected asymmetric peri-nodal expression of Nodal (Fig. 3A′) beginning at the 2-somite stage (data not shown). By contrast, Pkd1l1rks/rks mutant embryos showed no asymmetry of Nodal expression at the node (Fig. 3B′). Similarly, Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 mutant embryos showed no Nodal asymmetry (Fig. 3C′). The cerberus-related gene Cerl2 (also known as Dand5) is also asymmetrically expressed at the node, but with higher expression on the right than the left side (Marques et al., 2004; Pearce et al., 1999). In WT embryos, we detected the reported asymmetry of Cerl2 (Fig. 3J); however, when examining Pkd1l1rks/rks (Fig. 3K) and Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 (Fig. 3L) mutant embryos, we detected no asymmetry in the vast majority of embryos: 18/20 Pkd1l1rks/rks and 9/12 Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 embryos showed L-R symmetrical Cerl2 expression; 2/20 Pkd1l1rks/rks and 2/12 Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 embryos demonstrated stronger right-sided expression, whereas 1/12 Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 embryos showed stronger left-sided expression. Together, these data place Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 genetically upstream of asymmetric gene expression.
The nodes of Pkd1l1rks and Pkd2lrm4 mutants appear normal
As both gross phenotypic and expression-based data point to a defect originating within the node, we analysed node morphology and function. Three- to four-somite WT and mutant embryos were collected and visualised by scanning electron microscopy. Node size, morphology and cilia length in Pkd1l1rks/rks and Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 mutants were comparable to those of WT embryos (Fig. 4A-G), arguing that the phenotype does not result from abnormal node morphology. Motile cilia at the node generate the nodal flow that establishes embryonic situs (Hirokawa et al., 2006; Shiratori and Hamada, 2006). We therefore visualised cilia motion in WT, Pkd1l1rks/rks and Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 embryos using differential interference contrast microscopy. All embryos analysed showed motile cilia (see Movies 1-3 in the supplementary material). Subsequent frame-by-frame analysis revealed comparable numbers of motile cilia with similar cilial beat frequencies in WT controls, Pkd1l1rks/rks and Pkd2lrm4/lrm4 mutant embryos (Fig. 4H). Our data therefore point to Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 acting functionally downstream of cilia motility.
Pkd1l1 is abundantly expressed in the node
If Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 act together in the node to facilitate flow detection in L-R patterning, they must both be expressed in early node-stage embryos (7.75-8.5 dpc). We therefore examined their expression by mRNA whole-mount in situ hybridisation (WISH). Consistent with published data (Pennekamp et al., 2002), we detected broad expression of Pkd2 throughout the embryo at 7.5-8.5 dpc (data not shown). By contrast, we detected strongly regionalised expression of Pkd1l1, with expression in the node, extending into the node crown cells, and in the midline in late streak embryos (Fig. 5A-C), being maintained into early somite stages (Fig. 5D-F). Sectioning of the embryos revealed consistent Pkd1l1 expression in the outer endodermal layer from 7.5 dpc onwards (Fig. 5C′), with markedly higher expression in the notochordal plate and node (Fig. 5A-C′); this expression was maintained at 8.5 dpc (Fig. 5D-F′). No L-R asymmetry of Pkd1l1 expression was evident at any stage analysed. No expression was detected with control sense probes (data not shown). Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 are therefore co-expressed at the time and place at which it is believed that nodal flow breaks L-R symmetry.
Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 proteins physically interact
As Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 are co-expressed in ventral node cells, we hypothesised that their protein products interact to form functional complexes and tested this using immunoprecipitation (IP) assays in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells. In the absence of functional antibodies against the mouse Pkd1l1 protein, we cloned Pkd1l1 cDNA and attached a C-terminal GFP tag to create the Pkd1l1-GFP construct (Fig. 6A). This was used in conjunction with the previously published N-terminally tagged Myc-PKD2 (Hanaoka et al., 2000). Lysates from cells transiently transfected with Pkd1l1-GFP and/or Myc-PKD2 were subjected to IP with anti-GFP or anti-Myc antibodies. We detected Myc-PKD2 as either 140 kDa bands (Fig. 6C,D) or as a smear, as found previously (Fig. 6B) (Hanaoka et al., 2000); a specific 140 kDa band was evident at lower exposures (data not shown). Based on the predicted molecular weight of Pkd1l1, we expected to find Pkd1l1-GFP bands at ~315 kDa. However, there were no bands in the 268-460 kDa region on GFP western blots (see Fig. S4A in the supplementary material). Instead, we consistently observed a Pkd1l1-GFP-specific 80 kDa band (see Fig. S4A,B in the supplementary material), which could be enriched by GFP IP. We predicted this to be a Pkd1l1 C-terminal cleavage fragment. Based on the molecular weight as assessed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting, we concluded that the cleavage product is 53 kDa, revealing a cleavage site within the third intracellular loop of the transmembrane region of Pkd1l1 (Fig. 6A, blue arrow). Cleavage at an equivalent position in Pkd1 has recently been described (Woodward et al., 2010), suggesting that this cleavage site is conserved between polycystin-1 family members. During our IP experiments, we found that the Pkd1l1-GFP 80 kDa band, which we named Pkd1l1_53, co-purified with Myc-PKD2 upon GFP or Myc IP (Fig. 6B). In summary, after co-expression of Pkd1l1-GFP and Myc-PKD2, we found that a 53 kDa C-terminal Pkd1l1 cleavage product was able to interact with full-length Myc-PKD2.
PKD1 and PKD2 interact via C-terminal coiled coil (CC) domains (Qian et al., 1997). Pkd1l1 also contains a C-terminal CC domain (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material), which would still be present in the 53 kDa C-terminal cleavage product; therefore, we examined whether this domain is crucial for the Pkd1l1-PKD2 interaction. To test this, we made a Pkd1l1-GFP construct (Pkd1l1_CC-GFP) consisting of a very short C-terminal Pkd1l1 region containing the final transmembrane domain and the CC domain (Fig. 6A). We co-expressed Pkd1l1_CC-GFP and Myc-PKD2 in HEK 293T cells and performed GFP and Myc IPs on protein extracts. Western blotting revealed a 45 kDa Pkd1l1_CC-GFP band that was successfully enriched by GFP IP (Fig. 6C). IP experiments on doubly transfected samples revealed that Pkd1l1_CC-GFP co-purified with Myc-PKD2 upon GFP or Myc IP, indicative of an interaction. These results suggest that the C-terminal Pkd1l1 CC domain is sufficient for interaction with PKD2. To support this, we mutated a leucine residue within the CC domain to aspartic acid (L2554D), disrupting CC formation (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material). Under identical IP conditions, the mutant Pkd1l1_CCL2554D-GFP construct did not bind to Myc-PKD2 (Fig. 6D). We also attempted co-IP experiments with Trim71-Flag, a protein that contains a similarly sized CC domain to Pkd1l1 (see Fig. S5A in the supplementary material). We found no evidence of an interaction between Pkd1l1_CC-GFP and Trim71-Flag (see Fig. S5B in the supplementary material), implying that the CC domain of Pkd1l1 shows some specificity for PKD2. Together, these experiments reveal that Pkd1l1 and PKD2 can interact, and that the C-terminal CC domain of Pkd1l1 is sufficient to mediate this interaction.
Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 proteins co-localise to the cilium
As Pkd2 protein is known to localise to nodal cilia (McGrath et al., 2003), we hypothesised that Pkd1l1 would also localise to cilia. To analyse cellular Pkd1l1 localisation, Pkd1l1-GFP and/or Myc-PKD2 were expressed in the ciliated mammalian kidney cell line IMCD3. In all experiments, anti-acetylated tubulin staining was used to mark the ciliary axoneme. Mock-transfected control cells revealed a low-level, non-specific, punctate background staining with anti-GFP antibodies and no anti-Myc staining (Fig. 7A). When expressed alone, Pkd1l1-GFP (Fig. 7B) or Myc-PKD2 (Fig. 7C) was localised to the cell body and there was no localisation to the cilia. However, when the two proteins were co-expressed, a reduction in the level of protein detectable in the cell body was accompanied by localisation of the proteins in the cilia (Fig. 7D). When 250 cilia were imaged, four showed Pkd1l1-GFP overlapping the cilial staining of acetylated tubulin in the absence of Myc-PKD2, compared with 163 in the presence of Myc-PKD2 (Fig. 7E). The 35% of cells in which no co-localisation was detected most likely reflects the efficiency of transfection. We further visualised the localisation of both Pkd1l1-GFP and of Pkd1l1_CC-GFP in the presence and absence of Myc-PKD2, visualising only GFP and acetylated tubulin. In the absence of Myc-PKD2, no cilial localisation was evident (data not shown), but in its presence both the full-length Pkd1l1 (Fig. 7F) and the C-terminal Pkd1l1_CC domain (Fig. 7G) were evident in small punctate foci within the cilia. These data support our hypothesis that Pkd1l1-Pkd2 complexes within cilia sense nodal flow and argue that Pkd1l1 requires Pkd2 for cilial localisation.
We have identified rks, a novel point mutant in Pkd1l1 that reveals a requirement for this gene in L-R determination. Systematic analysis demonstrates that when variables such as genetic background are removed, Pkd1l1rks and Pkd2lrm4 point mutants show virtually identical morphological and molecular phenotypes. Both lead almost exclusively to right isomerism and failed activation of the left LPM Nodal signalling cascade; asymmetry of gene expression at the node was also affected. However, no defects in node morphology, nodal cilia morphology or function were detected in either mutant, arguing that these genes act between nodal flow and the establishment of asymmetric gene expression. Biochemical analysis shows that the two proteins interact and that the Pkd1l1 C-terminal CC domain alone interacts with Pkd2 protein. Subcellular localisation reveals that both proteins localise to cilia. Together, these data argue that Pkd1l1 is the elusive Pkd2 binding partner in mediating L-R patterning; this disarms a major criticism of the two-cilia hypothesis.
The Pkd1l1rks mutation is a single amino acid change at an evolutionarily highly conserved residue lying within the WDFGDGS motif, which was previously identified as the most highly conserved region of PKD domains (Bycroft et al., 1999). The function of the WDFGDGS motif remains unknown; it comprises a linker connecting two β-sheets within a β-sandwich structure. The previous identification of pathological mutations resulting in ADPKD within this motif in PKD domains of human PKD1 underlines its importance (Rossetti et al., 2007). Intriguingly, atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies have revealed that PKD domains are mechanically very strong and it has been argued that this reflects a role in stress detection (Forman et al., 2005). Subsequent analysis of pathogenic mutations within PKD domains, including mutations within the WDFGDGS motif, showed that these can result in decreased mechanical strength; mutation of the residue neighbouring rks results in significant changes in AFM-driven unfolding, consistent with a change in mechanical function (Ma et al., 2009). These findings, along with the molecular modelling that we have performed, suggest that the rks mutation destabilises β-sheets within a PKD domain, resulting in reduced mechanical strength. Overall, our observations fit most simply with a model in which the PKD domains of Pkd1l1 are important in sensing or responding to nodal flow.
The question of whether Pkd1l1rks is a null mutation is not readily deducible from the domain structure. Recently, however, the characterisation of an engineered Pkd1l1 null allele has been reported (Vogel et al., 2010); less than one-third of the expected number of homozygotes were identified, implying embryonic lethality. Of those born, one-third demonstrated situs inversus and the remainder situs solitus; no other discernible defects were evident following broad-spectrum phenotyping. Although both mutations clearly affect the establishment of situs, the identification of homozygous viable adults represents a clear phenotypic difference from Pkd1l1rks. The two mutations were analysed on different genetic backgrounds (Pkd1l1− on a mixed B6;129 and Pkd1l1rks on C3H), which we cannot exclude as a source of variation. However, one other interpretation is that Pkd1l1rks is a stronger, perhaps dominant-negative, allele. A possible mechanistic explanation of this effect would invoke interaction between Pkd2 and multiple Pkd1 family members. In this scenario, if Pkd1l1 were the major Pkd2 binding partner in the node because of its protein level or binding affinity, then loss of Pkd1l1 protein in the null mutant would allow other family members to partially compensate. The presence of non-functional mutant Pkd1l1rks protein would, by contrast, maintain the normal interaction with Pkd2, thus preventing other family members from interacting to partially rescue the phenotype. Furthermore, the suggestion that three Pkd2 molecules bind to each Pkd1 molecule (Yu et al., 2009) makes such a model more compelling. Interestingly, Nakaya and colleagues reported Pkd1 protein in mouse nodal cilia (Nakaya et al., 2005), and the physical interaction of Pkd1 and Pkd2 proteins in kidney cilia is well established (Hanaoka et al., 2000; Nauli et al., 2003), showing that such an interaction in the node is possible.
This discussion raises a question about the nature of the Pkd2lrm4 point mutant that we have analysed. Our data conflict, in part, with the published Pkd2 null allele (Pennekamp et al., 2002), both in terms of gross morphology and, perhaps most significantly, at the molecular level: Pitx2 expression was bilateral in two-thirds of the null embryos analysed, and was absent in less than 20%. This might reflect differences in genetic background (Pkd2− was analysed on a 129;B6 background, Pkd2lrm4 on C3H) between the two colonies; indeed, the original Pkd2lrm4 outbred mice showed a morphological phenotype that more closely resembled that of the null allele (Ermakov et al., 2009). However, we cannot rule out the possibility that multiple Pkd2 family members act at the node, of which Pkd2 is the major player, and that an inactive mutant protein will therefore result in a stronger phenotype than the total loss of that protein. Work to investigate these possibilities is ongoing.
The role of nodal flow in establishing L-R patterning in mammals has become well accepted in the field (for reviews, see Hirokawa et al., 2006; Shiratori and Hamada, 2006), deriving from work on immotile cilia disease (for a review, see Afzelius, 2004) and on mice with ultrastructurally normal, yet immotile, nodal cilia, such as Dnahc11 and Dnahc5 mutants (Olbrich et al., 2002; Supp et al., 1997). Similar cilia- and flow-based mechanisms have now been demonstrated in many vertebrate lineages, suggesting that this is a conserved mechanism; only the chicken is reported not to utilise nodal flow (for a review, see Blum et al., 2008). The requirement for Pkd2 genes in L-R patterning has been demonstrated in both mouse (Pennekamp et al., 2002) and zebrafish (Bisgrove et al., 2005; Schottenfeld et al., 2007), but in both cases the associated interacting partner has remained unidentified. Our work, and that of Kamura and colleagues studying these loci in the medaka fish (Kamura et al., 2011), both point to Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 acting together downstream of nodal flow to mediate L-R patterning, arguing that this is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism.
Multiple models have been proposed to explain the establishment of L-R asymmetry in response to nodal flow. The data we present fit most simply with the two-cilia hypothesis. Within this model, we merely need to invoke co-operation between Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 within sensory cilia at the node, acting to detect flow. Indeed, the identification of human pathogenic ADPKD mutations within WDFGDGS motifs in PKD1 (Rossetti et al., 2007) in combination with the proposed role of PKD domains in force sensation (Forman et al., 2005; Ma et al., 2009; Qian et al., 2005) support this model. By contrast, the morphogen and NVP hypotheses of Hirokawa and colleagues (Nonaka et al., 1998; Okada et al., 2005; Tanaka et al., 2005) do not provide so obvious a niche for Pkd1l1. The presence of a Ca2+ signal spreading from the left side of the node in all of these models raises the possibility that Pkd proteins might be involved downstream of flow detection. A third model is proposed by Kamura and colleagues (Kamura et al., 2011). Following extensive analysis, they do not detect immotile cilia in the medaka fish Kupffer's Vesicle (KV; equivalent to the mouse node), and therefore argue that motile KV cilia must act to detect either a morphogen gradient or flow-based stresses. Work from various groups has revealed that motile cilia can and do perform sensory functions, including mechanosensation (for a review, see Bloodgood, 2010). Therefore, it is possible that a modified version of the two-cilia hypothesis exists in medaka fish in which motile cilia are also mechanosensitive; whether motile mouse cilia can be mechanosensitive remains to be determined. We cannot, however, rule out the possibility that a morphogen is involved.
Loss of cilia motility in the node results in randomised situs and stochastic activation of the Nodal signalling cascade in the LPM (Shiratori and Hamada, 2006); left-sided, right-sided, bilateral and failed activation of the cascade are all reported. Modelling has revealed how these results could be produced by stochastic activation of Nodal and subsequent reaction-diffusion of Nodal protein and its antagonists Lefty1 and 2 (Nakamura et al., 2006). However, the failed activation of the Nodal cascade in virtually all Pkd2 and Pkd1l1 mutant embryos argues that these proteins are required for that stochastic activation. Although the nature of that mechanism is beyond the scope of this study, the restricted expression of Pkd1l1 argues that this stochastic activation either originates within, or requires signals from, the node. In contrast to the lack of activation of asymmetric lateral plate markers that we report for both Pkd1l1rks and Pkd2lrm4, zebrafish Pkd2 acts to restrict Nodal (Spaw) to the left lateral plate (Bisgrove et al., 2005; Schottenfeld et al., 2007). Kamura and colleagues demonstrate this difference in function to be more generally maintained in teleosts (Kamura et al., 2011). Whether this difference in action relates to differences in the mechanism by which motility is detected will require further study.
In conclusion, we have identified a Pkd1 family member with a spatiotemporal profile of expression that precisely matches that of a gene predicted to function in the detection of nodal flow. Crucially, its disruption in the Pkd1l1rks mutant results in a failure to activate the left-sided Nodal signalling cascade and asymmetric gene expression at the node. No defects were detected in the Pkd1l1rks node itself, consistent with Pkd1l1 acting downstream of flow. Moreover, the Pkd1l1rks mutant phenocopies defects in Pkd2lrm4 mutants with respect to situs, the two proteins interact biochemically and they co-localise to the cilium. In light of the known relationship between Pkd1 and Pkd2, our findings argue strongly that Pkd1l1 and Pkd2 jointly comprise a cilia-specific, stress-responsive channel in the node, a conclusion that provides convincing support for the two-cilia hypothesis.
We thank Hiroyuki Takeda, Keiichiro Kamura and colleagues for helpful discussion and for sharing their data prior to publication; Jeremy Sanderson (MRC Harwell) for advice and assistance with imaging; Paraskevi Goggolidou (MRC Harwell) for assistance with scanning electron microscopy; Rosario Romero (MRC Harwell) for expert advice; Chris Esapa (MRC Harwell) for reagents and advice; the Histology Department (MRC Harwell) for histology; Colin Davies, Joanne Dorning, Emma Rush and Jackie Harrison (MRC Harwell) for expert husbandry skills; Gregory Germino for providing the Myc-PKD2 construct; Liz Robertson and Martin Blum for providing in situ probes; Colin Johnson for providing IMCD3 cells; and Jenny Murdoch (Royal Holloway) and Victoria Patterson (MRC Harwell) for the Trim71 construct. This work was funded by awards from the MRC to D.P.N. (U142670370 and G0501680) and A.G. (U142684167). Deposited in PMC for release after 6 months.
Competing interests statement
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary material for this article is available at http://dev.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/dev.058149/-/DC1
- Accepted January 10, 2011.
- © 2011.