Advertisement
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are required for msx 1 and msx 2 gene expression in the developing murine molar tooth
A.K. Jowett, S. Vainio, M.W. Ferguson, P.T. Sharpe, I. Thesleff
Development 1993 117: 461-470;

Summary

Duplication of the msh-like homeobox gene of Drosophila may be related to the evolution of the vertebrate head. The murine homologues of this gene, msx 1 and msx 2 are expressed in the developing craniofacial complex including the branchial arches, especially in regions of epithelial-mesenchymal organogenesis including the developing tooth. By performing in vitro recombination experiments using homochronic dental and non-dental epithelial and mesenchymal tissues from E10 to E18 mouse embryos, we have found that the maintenance of homeobox gene expression in the tooth is dependent upon tissue interactions. In homotypic recombinants, dental-type tissue interactions occur, leading to expression of both genes in a manner similar to that seen during in vivo development. msx 1 is expressed exclusively in mesenchyme, both in the dental papilla and follicle. msx 2 is expressed in the dental epithelium and only in the mesenchyme of the dental papilla. In heterotypic recombinants, the dental epithelium is able to induce msx 1 expression in non-dental mesenchyme, this potential being lost at the bell stage. In these recombinants msx 2 was induced by presumptive dental epithelium prior to the bud stage but not thereafter. The expression of msx 1 and msx 2 in dental mesenchyme requires the presence of epithelium until the early bell stage. However, whereas non-dental, oral epithelium is capable of maintaining expression of msx 1 in dental mesenchyme throughout tooth development, induction of msx 2 was temporally restricted suggesting regulation by a specific epithelial-mesenchymal interaction related to the inductive events of tooth formation. msx 1 and msx 2, as putative transcription factors, may play a role in regulating the expression of other genes during tooth formation. We conclude that expression of msx 1 in jaw mesenchyme requires a non-specific epithelial signal, whereas msx 2 expression in either epithelium or mesenchyme requires reciprocal interactions between specialized dental cell populations.

REFERENCES

    1. Coelho C. N. D.,
    2. Krabbenhoft K.,
    3. Upholt W. B.,
    4. Fallon J. F.,
    5. Kosher R. A.
    (1991) Altered expression of the chicken homeobox-containing genes GHox-7 and GHox-8 in the limb buds of limbless mutant chick embryos. Development 113, 1487–1493
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Dolle P.,
    2. Price M.,
    3. Duboule D.
    (1992) Expression of the murine Dlx-1 homeobox gene during facial, ocular and limb development. Differentiation 49, 93–99
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gaunt S. J.
    (1991) Expression patterns of mouse hox genes: clues to an understanding of developmental and evolutionary strategies. Bioessays 13, 505–513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hall B. K.,
    2. Ekanayake S.
    (1991) Effects of growth factors on the differentiation of neural crest cells and neural crest cell-derivatives. Int. J. Dev. Biol 35, 367–387
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hill R. E.,
    2. Jones P. F.,
    3. Rees A. R.,
    4. Sime C. M.,
    5. Copeland N. G.,
    6. Jenkins N. A.,
    7. Graham E.,
    8. Davidson D. R.
    (1989) A new family of mouse homeobox containing genes: molecular structure, chromosomal location and developmental expression of Hox-7. 1. Genes Dev 3, 26–37
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Holland P. W. H.
    (1991) Cloning and evolutionary analysis of msh-like genes from mouse, zebrafish and ascidian. Gene 98, 253–257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) Hox genes coming to a head. Curr. Biol 1, 304–306
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Whiting J.,
    3. Muchamore I.,
    4. Marshall H.,
    5. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) Homeobox genes and models for patterning the hindbrain and branchial arches. Development 1991, 187–196
    1. Kessel M.,
    2. Gruss P.
    (1991) Homeotic transformations of murine vertebrae and concomitant alteration of hox codes induced by retinoic acid. Cell 67, 89–104
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kollar E. J.,
    2. Baird G. R.
    (1969) The influence of the dental papilla on the devlopment of tooth shape in embryonic mouse tooth germs. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph 21, 131–148
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A. G. S.
    (1988) Spatial organization of the epithelium and the role of neural crest cells in the initiation of the mammalian tooth germ. Development 103, 155–169
    1. MacKenzie A.,
    2. Leeming G. L.,
    3. Jowett A. K.,
    4. Ferguson M. W. J.,
    5. Sharpe P. T.
    (1991) The homeobox gene Hox 7. 1 has specific regional and temporal expression patterns during early murine craniofacial embryogenesis, especially tooth development in vivo and in vitro. Development 111, 269–285
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. MacKenzie A.,
    2. Ferguson M. W. J.,
    3. Sharpe P. T.
    (1991) Hox-7 expression during murine craniofacial development. Development 113, 601–611
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. MacKenzie A.,
    2. Ferguson M. W. J.,
    3. Sharpe P. T.
    (1992) Expression patterns of the homeobox gene Hox-8 in the mouse embryo suggest a role in specifying tooth initiation and shape. Development 115, 403–420
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Monaghan A. P.,
    2. Hill R. E.,
    3. Bhattacharya S. S.,
    4. Graham E.,
    5. Davidson D. R.
    (1991) Msh-like homeobox genes define domains in the developing vertebrate eye. Development 112, 1053–1061
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Robert B.,
    2. Sassoon D.,
    3. Jacq B.,
    4. Gehring W.,
    5. Buckingham M.
    (1989) Hox-7, a mouse homeobox gene with a novel pattern of expression during embryogenesis. EMBO J 8, 91–100
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Robert B.,
    2. Lyons G.,
    3. Simandl B. K.,
    4. Kuroiwa A.,
    5. Buckingham M.
    (1991) The apical ectodermal ridge regulates Hox-7 and Hox-8 gene expression in developing chick limb buds. Genes Dev 5, 2363–2374
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ruch J. V.,
    2. Lesot H.,
    3. Karcher-Djuricic V.,
    4. Meyer J. M.,
    5. Olive M.
    (1982) Facts and hypotheses concerning the control of odontoblast differentiation. Differentiation 21, 7–12
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Smith M. M.,
    2. Hall B. K.
    (1990) Development and evolutionary origins of vertebrate skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues. Biol. Rev 65, 273–373
    OpenUrl
    1. Suzuki H. R.,
    2. Padanilam B. J.,
    3. Vitale E.,
    4. Ramirez F.,
    5. Solursh M.
    (1991) Repeating developmental expression of G-Hox 7, a novel homeobox-containing gene in the chicken. Dev. Biol 148, 375–388
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Takahashi Y.,
    2. Bontoux M.,
    3. Le Douarin N. M.
    (1991) Epithelio-mesenchymal interactions are critical for Quox-7 expression and membrane bone differentiation in the neural crest derived mandibular mesenchyme. EMBO J 10, 2387–2393
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Thesleff I.,
    2. Stenamn S.,
    3. Vaheri A.,
    4. Timpl R.
    (1979) Changes in the matrix proteins, fibronectin and collagen during differentiation of mouse tooth germ. Dev. Biol 70, 116–126
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Thesleff I.,
    2. Mackie E.,
    3. Vainio S.,
    4. Chiquet-Ehrismann R.
    (1987) Changes in the distribution of tenascin during tooth development. Development 101, 289–296
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Thesleff I.,
    2. Jalkanen M.,
    3. Vainio S.,
    4. Bernfield M.
    (1988) Cell surface proteoglycan expression correlates with epithelial-mesenchymal interaction during tooth morphogenesis. Dev. Biol 129, 565–572
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Thesleff I.,
    2. Vaahtokari A.,
    3. Vainio S.
    (1990) Molecular changes during determination and differentiation of the dental mesenchymal cell lineage. Journal de Biologie Buccale 18, 179–188
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Thorogood P.,
    2. Hanken J.
    (1992) Body building exercises. Curr. Biol 2, 83–85
    1. Trowell O. A.
    (1954) A modified technique for organ culture in vitro. Exp. Cell Res 46, 246–248
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Vaahtokari A.,
    2. Vainio S.,
    3. Thesleff I.
    (1991) Associations between transforming growth factor1 RNA expression and epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during tooth morphogenesis. Development 113, 985–994
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Vainio S.,
    2. Thesleff I.
    (1992) Coordinated induction of cellproliferation and syndecan expression in dental mesenchyme by epithelium: evidence for diffusible signals. Developmental Dynamics 194, 105–117
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Vainio S.,
    2. Jalkanen M.,
    3. Thesleff I.
    (1989) Syndecan and tenascin expression is induced by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in embryonic tooth mesenchyme. J. Cell Biol 108, 1945–1954
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Vainio S.,
    2. Jalkanen M.,
    3. Vaahtokari A.,
    4. Sahlberg C.,
    5. Mali M.,
    6. Bernfield M.,
    7. Thesleff I.
    (1991) Expression of syndecan gene is induced early, is transient, and correlates with changes in mesenchymal cell proliferation during tooth organogenesis. Dev. Biol 147, 322–333
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are required for msx 1 and msx 2 gene expression in the developing murine molar tooth
A.K. Jowett, S. Vainio, M.W. Ferguson, P.T. Sharpe, I. Thesleff
Development 1993 117: 461-470;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Kathryn Virginia Anderson (1952-2020)

Developmental geneticist Kathryn Anderson passed away at home on 30 November 2020. Tamara Caspary, a former postdoc and friend, remembers Kathryn and her remarkable contribution to developmental biology.

Zooming into 2021

In a new Editorial, Editor-in-Chief James Briscoe and Executive Editor Katherine Brown reflect on the triumphs and tribulations of the last 12 months, and look towards a hopefully calmer and more predictable year.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

Over 60 institutions in 12 countries are now participating in our Read & Publish initiative. Here, James Briscoe explains what this means for his institution, The Francis Crick Institute. Find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.

Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Sign up to join our next session:

10 February
Time: 13:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: preLights