Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr)
M.A. Frohman, G.R. Martin, S.P. Cordes, L.P. Halamek, G.S. Barsh
Development 1993 117: 925-936;
M.A. Frohman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.R. Martin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.P. Cordes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.P. Halamek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.S. Barsh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

Rhombomeres appear transiently in the vertebrate hindbrain shortly after neurulation and are thought to represent embryologic compartments in which the expression of different combinations of genes leads to segment-specific differentiation of the developing hindbrain, the cranial ganglia, and the branchial arches. To determine the extent to which gene expression is related to the formation of visible rhombomere boundaries, we have examined, by in situ hybridization, the expression of five rhombomere-specific genes in mouse embryos homozygous for the kreisler (kr) mutation, in which rhombomeres 4–7 are replaced by a smooth morphologically unsegmented neural tube. Using molecular probes specific for Hoxb-1 (Hox-2.9), Hoxb-3 (Hox-2.7), Hoxb-4 (Hox-2.6), Krox-20, or Fgf-3 (Int-2), we found that the kr mutation affects the expression of all the genes we examined, but, surprisingly, the altered patterns of expression are not restricted to that portion of the mutant hindbrain which is morphologically abnormal. Rostral expression boundaries of Hoxb-3 and Hoxb-4 are displaced from their normal positions at r4/5 and r6/7 to the approximate positions of r3/4 and r4/5, respectively. The expression domains of Krox-20 and Fgf-3 are also displaced in a rostral direction and the intensity of Fgf-3 hybridization is greatly reduced. The expression domain of Hoxb-1 is affected differently from the other genes in kr/kr embryos; its rostral boundary at r3/4 is intact but the caudal boundary is displaced from its normal location at r4/5 to the approximate position of r5/6. Because boundaries of gene expression for Hoxb-1 and Hoxb-4 are found in a region of the kr/kr hindbrain that lacks visible rhombomeres, establishment of regional identity, as reflected by differential gene expression, does not require overt segmentation. To investigate whether the altered patterns of gene expression we observed in the kr/kr embryonic hindbrain are associated with morphologic changes in the adult, we examined neural crest-derived tissues of the second and third branchial arches, which normally arise from rhombomeres 4 and 6, respectively. We found that the hyoid bone in kr/kr animals exhibited an accessory process on the greater horn (a third arch structure) most easily explained by ectopic development of a second arch structure (the hyoid lesser horn) in an area normally derived from the third arch.

REFERENCES

    1. Chavrier P.,
    2. Zerial M.,
    3. Lemaire P.,
    4. Almendral J.,
    5. Bravo R.,
    6. Charnay P.
    (1988) A gene encoding a protein with zinc fingers is activated during G0/G1 transition in cultured cells. EMBO J 7, 29–35
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Chisaka O.,
    2. Musci T. S.,
    3. Capecchi M. R.
    (1992). Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.6. Nature 355, 516–520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Deol M. S.
    (1964) The abnormalities of the inner ear in kreisler mice. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph 12, 475–490
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Fraser S.,
    2. Keynes R.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1990) Segmentation in the chickembryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431–435
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Frohman M. A.,
    2. Boyle M.,
    3. Martin G. R.
    (1990). Isolation of the mouse Hox-2.9 gene: analysis of embryonic expression suggests that positional information along the anterior-posterior axis is specified by mesoderm. Development 110, 589–607
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Frohman M. A.,
    2. Dush M. K.,
    3. Martin G. R.
    (1988) Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8998–9002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gaunt S. J.,
    2. Krumlauf R.,
    3. Duboule D.
    (1989). Mouse homeo-genes within a subfamily, Hox-1.4, −2.6 and -5.1, display similar anteroposterior domains of expression in the embryo, but show stage-and tissue-dependent differences in their regulation. Development 107, 131–141
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Graham A.,
    2. Papalopulu N.,
    3. Lorimer J.,
    4. McVey J. H.,
    5. Tuddenham E. G.,
    6. Krumlauf R.
    (1988). Characterization of a murine homeo box gene, Hox-2.6, related to the DrosophilaDeformed gene. Genes Dev 2, 1424–1438
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Guthrie S.,
    2. Muchamore I.,
    3. Kuroiwa A.,
    4. Marshall H.,
    5. Krumlauf R.,
    6. Lumsden A.
    (1992). Neuroectodermal autonomy of Hox-2.9 expression revealed by rhombomere transpositions. Nature 356, 157–159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hertwig P.
    (1942) Sechs neue Mutationen bei der Hausmaus in ihrer Bedeutung fur allgemeine Vererbungsfragen. Z. Lehre 26, 1–21
    OpenUrl
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Gulisano M.,
    3. Cook M.,
    4. Sham M. H.,
    5. Faiella A.,
    6. Wilkinson D.,
    7. Boncinelli E.,
    8. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Nature 353, 861–864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Whiting J.,
    3. Muchamore I.,
    4. Marshall H.,
    5. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) Homeobox genes and models for patterning the hindbrain and branchial arches. Development 1, 187–196
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Wilkinson D.,
    3. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) Patterning the vertebrate head: murine Hox 2 genes mark distinct subpopulations of premigratory and migrating cranial neural crest. Development 112, 43–50
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Justice M. J.,
    2. Bode V. C.
    (1986) Induction of new mutations in a mouse t -haplotype using ethylnitrosourea mutagenesis. Genet. Res 47, 187–192
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kaan H. W.
    (1938) Further studies on the auditory vesicle and cartilaginous capsule of Amblystoma punctatum. J. Exp. Zool 78, 159–183
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Keynes R.,
    2. Lumsden A.
    (1990) Segmentation and the origin of regional diversity in the vertebrate central nervous system. Neuron 2, 1–9
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. LeDouarin N.
    (1980) Migration and differentiation of neural crest cells. Current Top. Dev. Biol 16, 32–86
    OpenUrl
    1. Lovett M.,
    2. Cheng Z. Y.,
    3. Lamela E. M.,
    4. Yokoi T.,
    5. Epstein C. J.
    (1987) Molecular markers for the agouti coat color locus of the mouse. Genetics 115, 747–754
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lufkin T.,
    2. Dierich A.,
    3. LeMeur M.,
    4. Mark M.,
    5. Chambon P.
    (1991). Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 66, 1105–1119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Keynes R.
    (1989) Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 337, 424–428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Sprawson N.,
    3. Graham A.
    (1991) Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 113, 1281–1291
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Mansour S. L.,
    2. Martin G. R.
    (1988) Four classes of mRNA are expressed from the mouse int-2 gene, a member of the FGF gene family. EMBO J 7, 2035–2041
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Mansour S. L.,
    2. Goddard J. M.,
    3. Capecchi M. R.
    (1993) Mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the proto-oncogene Int-2 have developmental defects in the tail and inner ear. Development 117, 13–28
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. McLeod M. J.
    (1980) Differential staining of cartilage and bone in whole mouse fetuses by alcian blue and alizarin red S. Teratology 22, 299–301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Morriss-Kay G. M.,
    2. Murphy P.,
    3. Hill R. E.,
    4. Davidson D. R.
    (1991). Effects of retinoic acid excess on expression of Hox-2.9 and Krox-20 and on morphological segmentation in the hindbrain of mouse embryos. EMBO J 10, 2985–2995
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Morriss-Kay G. M.,
    2. Tan S.-S.
    (1987) Mapping cranial neural crest cell migration pathways in mammalian embryos. Trends Genet 3, 257–262
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Murphy P.,
    2. Davidson D. R.,
    3. Hill R. E.
    (1989) Segment-specific expression of a homoeobox-containing gene in the mouse hindbrain. Nature 341, 156–159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Murphy P.,
    2. Hill R. E.
    (1991). Expression of the mouse labial -like homeobox-containing genes, Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6 during segmentation of the hindbrain. Development 111, 61–74
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1973) An analysis of the migratory behavior of avian cephalic neural crest cells. Dev. Biol 42, 106–130
    OpenUrl
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1978) The control of avian cephalic neural crest cytodifferentiation. I. Skeletal and connective tissues. Dev. Biol 67, 296–312
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1983) The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective and muscle tissues. Dev. Biol 96, 144–165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1988) Interactions and fates of avian craniofacial mesenchyme. Development 103, 121–140
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Papalopulu N.,
    2. Clarke J. D.,
    3. Bradley L.,
    4. Wilkinson D.,
    5. Krumlauf R.,
    6. Holder N.
    (1991) Retinoic acid causes abnormal development and segmental patterning of the anterior hindbrain in Xenopus embryos. Development 113, 1145–1158
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Represa J.,
    2. Leon Y.,
    3. Miner C.,
    4. Giraldez F.
    (1991) The int-2 proto-oncogene is responsible for induction of the inner ear. Nature 353, 561–563
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rinchik E. M.,
    2. Carpenter D. A.,
    3. Selby P. B.
    (1990) A strategy for fine-structure functional analysis of a 6-to 11-centimorgan region of mouse chromosome 7 by high-efficiency mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 896–900
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sham M. H.,
    2. Hunt P.,
    3. Nonchev S.,
    4. Papalopulu N.,
    5. Graham A.,
    6. Boncinelli E.,
    7. Krumlauf R.
    (1992). Analysis of the murine Hox-2.7 gene: conserved alternative transcripts with differential distributions inthe nervous system and the potential for shared regulatory regions. EMBO J 11, 1825–1836
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Siracusa L. D.,
    2. Buchberg A. M.,
    3. Copeland N. G.,
    4. Jenkins N. A.
    (1989) Recombinant inbred strain and interspecific backcross analysis of molecular markers flanking the murine agouti coat color locus. Genetics 122, 669–679
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Siracusa L. D.,
    2. Russell L. B.,
    3. Jenkins N. A.,
    4. Copeland N. G.
    (1987) Allelic variation within the Emv-15 locus defines genomic sequences closely linked to the agouti locus on mouse chromosome 2. Genetics 117, 85–92
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sundin O. H.,
    2. Busse H. G.,
    3. Rogers M. B.,
    4. Gudas L. J.,
    5. Eichele G.
    (1990). Region-specific expression in early chick and mouse embryos of Ghox-lab and Hox-1.6, vertebrate homeobox-containing genes related to Drosophila labial. Development 108, 47–58
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Sundin O. H.,
    2. Eichele G.
    (1990) A homeo domain protein reveals the metameric nature of the developing chick hindbrain. Genes Dev 4, 1267–1276
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tuckett F.,
    2. Lim L.,
    3. Morriss-Kay G. M.
    (1985) The ontogenesis of cranial neuromeres in the rat embryo. I. A scanning electron microscope and kinetic study. J. Embryol. exp. Morph 87, 215–228
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Tuckett F.,
    2. Morriss-Kay G. M.
    (1985) The ontogenesis of cranial neuromeres in the rat embryo. II. A transmission electron microscope study. J. Embryol. exp. Morph 88, 231–247
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bhatt S.,
    3. Chavrier P.,
    4. Bravo R.,
    5. Charnay P.
    (1989) Segment-specific expression of a zinc-finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse. Nature 337, 461–464
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bhatt S.,
    3. Cook M.,
    4. Boncinelli E.,
    5. Krumlauf R.
    (1989) Segmental expression of Hox-2 homoeobox-containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain. Nature 341, 405–409
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Krumlauf R.
    (1990) Molecular approaches to the segmentation of the hindbrain. Trends Neurosci 13, 335–339
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Peters G.,
    3. Dickson C.,
    4. McMahon A. P.
    (1988) Expression of the FGF-related proto-oncogene int-2 during gastrulation and neurulation in the mouse. EMBO J 7, 691–695
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Yntema C. L.
    (1933) Experiments on the determination of the ear ectoderm of Amblystoma punctatum. J. Exp. Zool 65, 317–357
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Yntema C. L.
    (1950) An analysis of induction of the ear from foreign ectoderm in the salamander embryo. J. Exp. Zool 113, 211–244
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Zwilling E.
    (1941) The determination of the otic vesicle in Rana pipiens. J. Exp. Zool 86, 333–342
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr)
M.A. Frohman, G.R. Martin, S.P. Cordes, L.P. Halamek, G.S. Barsh
Development 1993 117: 925-936;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr)
M.A. Frohman, G.R. Martin, S.P. Cordes, L.P. Halamek, G.S. Barsh
Development 1993 117: 925-936;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Groucho augments the repression of multiple Even skipped target genes in establishing parasegment boundaries
  • Axial skeletal patterning in mice lacking all paralogous group 8 Hox genes
  • Morphogenetic cell movements in the middle region of the dermomyotome dorsomedial lip associated with patterning and growth of the primary epaxial myotome
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

A new society for regenerative biologists

Kenneth Poss and Elly Tanaka announce the launch of the International Society for Regenerative Biology (ISRB), which will promote research and education in the field of regenerative biology.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


An interview with Cagney Coomer

Over a virtual chat, we spoke to Cagney Coomer about her experiences in the lab, the classroom and the community centre, and why she thinks outreach and role models are vital to science.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992