Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice
M. Mark, T. Lufkin, J.L. Vonesch, E. Ruberte, J.C. Olivo, P. Dolle, P. Gorry, A. Lumsden, P. Chambon
Development 1993 119: 319-338;
M. Mark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Lufkin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.L. Vonesch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Ruberte
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.C. Olivo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Dolle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Gorry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Lumsden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Chambon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

This study provides a detailed description of the anatomical defects in the Hoxa-1−/− mutant mice previously generated in our laboratory (T. Lufkin, A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, M. Mark and P. Chambon, 1991; Cell 66, 1105–1119). Three-dimensional reconstructions of the Hoxa-1−/− rhombencephalon reveals that it bears only five rhombomeric structures (ie. morphological segments) instead of the normal seven. The first three of these rhombomeres appear normal as judged from the distribution pattern of CRABPI transcripts in the neurectoderm and from the histological analysis of the cranial nerve components derived from these structures. In contrast, the neural-crest-cell-free region normally located opposite rhombomere 5 is lacking in Hoxa-1−/− embryos, and motor neurons of the facial and abducens nerves, which normally differentiate within rhombomeres 4, 5 and 6, are missing in Hoxa-1−/− fetuses. These morphological data, combined with the determination of the molecular positional identities of the rhombomeres 4 and 5 (P. Dolle, T. Lufkin, R. Krumlauf, M. Mark, D. Duboule and P. Chambon, 1993; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press), suggest that rhombomere 4 is markedly reduced, whereas rhombomere 5 is almost absent. Thus, the remnants of rhombomeres 4 and 5 appear to be fused caudally with rhombomere 6 to form a single fourth rhombomeric structure. Moreover, the migration of neural crest cells contributing to the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves occurs in a more rostral position, resulting in abnormalities of these cranial nerves, which were visualized by whole-mount anti-neurofilament immunostaining. The mutual relationship along the rostrocaudal axis between the otic pit and the neuroepithelial site of int-2 protein secretion (a putative otogenic cue) is not significantly changed in Hoxa-1−/− embryos. However, the abnormal relationship between the rhombencephalon and the epithelial inner ear may account for the aplasia and faulty differentiation of the membranous labyrinth, the disruption of the cartilaginous otic capsule and the disorganisation of some middle ear structures. This phenotype is compared with that of the Hoxa-1−/− mutants generated by O. Chisaka, T. S. Musci and M. R. Capecchi, 1992 (Nature 335, 516–520) and with that of the mice homozygous for the kreisler mutation.

REFERENCES

    1. Akam M.
    (1989). Hox and HOM: Homologous gene clusters in insects and vertebrates. Cell 57, 347–349
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Chisaka O.,
    2. Capecchi M. R.
    (1991). Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homebox gene hox-1.5. Nature 350, 473–479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chisaka O.,
    2. Musci T. S.,
    3. Capecchi M. R.
    (1992). Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1. 6. Nature 355, 516–520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Couly G. F.,
    2. Coltey P. M.,
    3. Le Douarin N. M.
    (1992). The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras. Development 114, 1–15
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. D'Amico-Martel A.,
    2. Noden D. M.
    (1983). Contributions of placodal and neural crest cells to avian cranial peripheral ganglia. Am. J. Anat 166, 445–468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Davies A. M.
    (1988). The trigeminal system: an advantageous experimental model for studying neuronal development. Development 103, 175–183
    1. Deol M. S.
    (1964). The abnormalities of the inner ear in kreisler mice. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph 12, 475–490
    1. Deol M. S.
    (1964). The origin of the abnormalities of the inner ear in dreher mice. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph 12, 727–733
    1. Deol M. S.
    (1966). Influence of the neural tube on the differentiation of the inner ear in the mammalian embryo. Nature 209, 219–220
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dolle P.,
    2. Ruberte E.,
    3. Kastner P.,
    4. Petkovich M.,
    5. Stoner C. M.,
    6. Gudas L. J.,
    7. Chambon P.
    (1989). Differential expression of genes encoding the retinoic acid receptors, and CRABPI in the developing limbs of the mouse. Nature 342, 702–705
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dressler G. R.,
    2. Gruss P.
    (1989). Anterior boundaries of Hox gene expression in mesoderm-derived structures correlate with the linear gene order along the chromosome. Differentiation 41, 193–201
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Duboule D.,
    2. Dolle P.
    (1989). The structural and functional organization of the murine Hox gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J 8, 1497–1505
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Duboule D.,
    2. Boncinelli E.,
    3. DeRobertis E.,
    4. Featherstone M.,
    5. Lonai P.,
    6. Oliver G.,
    7. Ruddle F. H.
    (1990). An update of mouse and human Hox genes nomenclature. Genomics 7, 458–459
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Edelman G. M.
    (1992). Morphoregulation. Developmental Dynamics 193, 2–10
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Field K. G.,
    2. Olsen G. J.,
    3. Lane D. J.,
    4. Giovanonni S. J.,
    5. Ghiselin M. T.,
    6. Raff E. C.,
    7. Pace N. R.,
    8. Raff R. A.
    (1988). Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239, 748–753
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Fraser S.,
    2. Keynes R.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1990). Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431–435
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Frenz D. A.,
    2. Van de Water T. R.
    (1991). Epithelial control of periotic mesenchyme. Dev. Biol 144, 38–46
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Frohman M. A.,
    2. Boyle M.,
    3. Martin G. R.
    (1990). Isolation of the mouse Hox-2.9 gene; analysis of embryonic expression suggests that positional information along the anterior-posterior axis is specified by mesoderm. Development 110, 589–607
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Frohman M. A.,
    2. Martin G. R.
    (1992). Isolation and analysis of embryonic expression of Hox-4.9, a member of the murine labial -like gene family. Mech. Dev 38, 55–67
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Frohman M. A.,
    2. Martin G. R.,
    3. Cordes S. P.,
    4. Halamek L.,
    5. Barsh G. S.
    (1993). Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr). Development, 117, 925–936
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Gaul U.,
    2. Jäckle H.
    (1987). How to fill a gap in the Drosophila embryo. Trends Genet 3, 127–131
    1. Graham A.,
    2. Papalopulu N.,
    3. Krumlauf R.
    (1989). The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57, 367–378
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Guthrie S.,
    2. Lumsden A.
    (1991). Formation and regeneration of rhombomere boundaries in the developing chick brain. Development 112, 221–229
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Guthrie S.,
    2. Muchamore I.,
    3. Kuroiwa A.,
    4. Marshall H.,
    5. Krumlauf R.,
    6. Lumsden A.
    (1992). Neuroectodermal autonomy of Hox-2.9 expression revealed by rhombomere transpositions. Nature 356, 157–159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hogan B.,
    2. Wright C.
    (1992). The making of the ear. Nature 355, 494–495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Holland P.
    (1992). Homeobox genes in vertebrate evolution. BioEssays 14, 267–273
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Gulisano M.,
    3. Cook M.,
    4. Sham M.-H.,
    5. Faiella A.,
    6. Wilkinson D.,
    7. Boncinelli E.,
    8. Krumlauf R.
    (1991). A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Nature 353, 861–864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jegalian B. G.,
    2. De Robertis E. M.
    (1992). Homeotic transformations in the mouse induced by overexpression of a human Hox3.3 transgene. Cell 71, 901–910
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kaan H. W.
    (1938). Further studies on the auditory vesicle and cartilaginous capsule of amblystoma punctatum. J. Exp. Zool 78, 159–183
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kaur S.,
    2. Singh G.,
    3. Stock J. L.,
    4. Schreiner C. M.,
    5. Kier A. B.,
    6. Yager K. L.,
    7. Mucenski M. L.,
    8. Scott W. J.,
    9. Potter S. S.
    (1992). Dominant mutation of the murine Hox-2.2 gene results in developmental abnormalities. J. Exp. Zool 264, 323–336
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kessel M.,
    2. Balling R.,
    3. Gruss P.
    (1990). Variations of cervical vertebrae after expression of a Hox-1.1 transgene in mice. Cell 61, 301–308
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Keynes R. J.,
    2. Stern C. D.
    (1988). Mechanisms of vertebrate segmentation. Development 103, 413–429
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. LeMouellic H.,
    2. Lallemand Y.,
    3. Brûlet P.
    (1992). Homeosis in the mouse induced by a null mutation in the Hox-3.1 gene. Cell 69, 251–264
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lufkin T.,
    2. Dierich A.,
    3. LeMeur M.,
    4. Mark M.,
    5. Chambon P.
    (1991). Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 66, 1105–1119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lufkin T.,
    2. Mark M.,
    3. Hart C. P.,
    4. Dolle P.,
    5. LeMeur M.,
    6. Chambon P.
    (1992). Homeotic transformation of the occipital bones of the skull by ectopic expression of a homeobox gene. Nature 359, 835–841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lumsden A.
    (1990). The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends Neurosci 13, 329–339
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Cohen J.
    (1991). Axon guidance in the vertebrate central338nervous system. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 1, 230–235
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Keynes R.
    (1989). Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick brain. Nature 337, 424–428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Sprawson N.,
    3. Graham A.
    (1991). Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 113, 1281–1291
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Maden M.,
    2. Horton C.,
    3. Graham A.,
    4. Leonard L.,
    5. Pizzey J.,
    6. Siegenthaler G.,
    7. Lumsden A.,
    8. Eriksson U.
    (1992). Domains of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein I (CRABPI) expression in the hindbrain and neural crest of the mouse embryo. Mech. Dev 37, 13–23
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Mansour S. L.,
    2. Goddard J. M.,
    3. Capecchi M. R.
    (1993). Mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 have developmental defects in the tail and inner ear. Development 117, 13–28
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. McGinnis W.,
    2. Krumlauf R.
    (1992). Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68, 283–302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. McLain K.,
    2. Schreiner C.,
    3. Yager K. L.,
    4. Stock J. L.,
    5. Potter S. S.
    (1992). Ectopic expression of Hox-2.3 induces craniofacial and skeletal malformations in transgenic mice. Mech. Dev 39, 3–16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Murphy P.,
    2. Davidson D. R.,
    3. Hill R. E.
    (1989). Segment specific expression of a homeobox-containing gene in the mouse hindbrain. Nature 341, 156–159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Murphy P.,
    2. Hill R. E.
    (1991). Expression of the mouse labial -like homeobox-containing genes, Hox-2.9 and Hox-1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain. Development 111, 61–74
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1983). The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective, and muscle tissues. Dev. Biol 96, 144–165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1988). Interactions and fates of avian craniofacial mesenchyme. Development 103, 121–140
    1. Noden D. M.,
    2. Van de Water T. R.
    (1992). Genetic analyses of mammalian ear development. Trends Neurosci 15, 235–237
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Olivo J. C.,
    2. Kahn E.,
    3. Halpern S.,
    4. Fragu P.
    (1990). Digital correlation of ion and optical microscopic images: application to the study of thyroglobulin chemical modification. Scanning Microsc 4, 825–828
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Pankratz M. J.,
    2. Jäckle H.
    (1990). Making stripes in the Drosophila embryo. Trends Genet 6, 287–292
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Pollock R. A.,
    2. Jay G.,
    3. Bieberich C. J.
    (1992). Altering the boundaries of Hox3.1 expression: evidence for antipodal gene regulation. Cell 71, 911–923
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Represa J.,
    2. Leon Y.,
    3. Miner C.,
    4. Giraldez F.
    (1991). The int-2 proto-oncogene is responsible for induction of the inner ear. Nature 353, 561–563
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ruberte E.,
    2. Dolle P.,
    3. Krust A.,
    4. Zelent A.,
    5. Morriss-Kay G.,
    6. Chambon P.
    (1990). Specific spatial and temporal distribution of retinoic acid receptor gamma transcripts during mouse embryogenesis. Development 108, 213–222
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Ruberte E.,
    2. Friederich V.,
    3. Morriss-Kay G.,
    4. Chambon P.
    (1992). Differential distribution patterns of CRABP I and CRAPB II transcripts during mouse embryogenesis. Development 115, 973–987
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Scott M. P.
    (1992). Vertebrate homeobox gene nomenclature. Cell 71, 551–553
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Serbedzija G.N.,
    2. Bronner-Fraser M.,
    3. Fraser S.E.
    (1992). Vital dye analysis of cranial neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo. Development 116, 297–307
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sham M. H.,
    2. Vesque C.,
    3. Nonchev S.,
    4. Marshall H.,
    5. Frain M.,
    6. Das Gupta R.,
    7. Whiting J.,
    8. Wilkinson D.,
    9. Charnay P.,
    10. Krumlauf R.
    (1993). The zinc finger gene Krox20 regulates HoxB2 (Hox2.8) during hindbrain segmentation. Cell 72, 183–196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Van de Water T. R.
    (1988). Tissue interactions and cell differentiation: neurone-sensory cell interaction during otic development. Development 103, 185–193
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bhatt S.,
    3. Chavrier P.,
    4. Bravo R.,
    5. Charnay P.
    (1989). Segment specific expression of a zinc finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse. Nature 337, 461–464
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Peters G.,
    3. Dickson C.,
    4. McMahon A. P.
    (1988). Expression of the FGF-related proto-oncogene int-2 during gastrulation and neurulation in the mouse. EMBO J 7, 691–695
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bhatt S.,
    3. McMahon A. P.
    (1989). Expression pattern of the FGF-related proto-oncogene int-2 suggests multiple roles in fetal development. Development 105, 131–136
    OpenUrlAbstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice
M. Mark, T. Lufkin, J.L. Vonesch, E. Ruberte, J.C. Olivo, P. Dolle, P. Gorry, A. Lumsden, P. Chambon
Development 1993 119: 319-338;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice
M. Mark, T. Lufkin, J.L. Vonesch, E. Ruberte, J.C. Olivo, P. Dolle, P. Gorry, A. Lumsden, P. Chambon
Development 1993 119: 319-338;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Non-imprinted Igf2r expression decreases growth and rescues the Tme mutation in mice
  • REF-1, a protein with two bHLH domains, alters the pattern of cell fusion in C. elegans by regulating Hox protein activity
  • Centrosome migration into the Drosophila oocyte is independent of BicD and egl, and of the organisation of the microtubule cytoskeleton
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

A new society for regenerative biologists

Kenneth Poss and Elly Tanaka announce the launch of the International Society for Regenerative Biology (ISRB), which will promote research and education in the field of regenerative biology.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


An interview with Cagney Coomer

Over a virtual chat, we spoke to Cagney Coomer about her experiences in the lab, the classroom and the community centre, and why she thinks outreach and role models are vital to science.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992