Advertisement
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Segment polarity gene interactions modulate epidermal patterning in Drosophila embryos
A. Bejsovec, E. Wieschaus
Development 1993 119: 501-517;

Summary

Each segment of a Drosophila larva shows a precisely organized pattern of cuticular structures, indicating diverse cellular identities in the underlying epidermis. Mutations in the segment polarity genes alter the cuticle pattern secreted by the epidermal cells; these mutant patterns provide clues about the role that each gene product plays in the development of wild-type epidermal pattern. We have analyzed embryos that are multiply mutant for five key patterning genes: wingless, patched, engrailed, naked and hedgehog. Our results indicate that wild-type activity of these five segment polarity genes can account for most of the ventral pattern elements and that their gene products interact extensively to specify the diverse cellular identities within the epidermis. Two pattern elements can be correlated with individual gene action: wingless is required for formation of naked cuticle and engrailed is required for formation of the first row of denticles in each abdominal denticle belt. The remaining cell types can be produced by different combinations of the five gene activities. wingless activity generates the diversity of cell types within the segment, but each specific cell identity depends on the activity of patched, engrailed, naked and hedgehog. These molecules modulate the distribution and interpretation of wingless signalling activity in the ventral epidermal cells and, in addition, each can contribute to pattern through a pathway independent of the wingless signalling pathway.

REFERENCES

    1. Akam M.
    (1987). The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development 101, 1–22
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Baker N. E.
    (1987). Molecular cloning of sequences from wingless, a segment polarity gene in Drosophila: the spatial distribution of a transcript in embryos. EMBO J 6, 1765–1773
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Baker N. E.
    (1988). Embryonic and imaginal requirements for wg, a segment polarity gene in Drosophila. Dev. Biol 125, 96–108
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bate M.,
    2. Martinez Arias A.
    (1991). The embryonic origin of imaginal discs in Drosophila. Development 112, 755–761
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Bejsovec A.,
    2. Martinez Arias A.
    (1991). Roles of wingless in patterning the larval epidermis of Drosophila. Development 113, 471–485
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Desplan C. J.,
    2. Theis J.,
    3. O'Farrell P.
    (1985). The Drosophila developmental gene engrailed encodes a sequence specific DNA binding activity. Nature 318, 630–635
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. DiNardo S.,
    2. Kuner J. M.,
    3. Theis J.,
    4. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1985). Development of the embryonic pattern in D. melanogaster as revealed by the accumulation of the nuclear engrailed protein. Cell 43, 59–69
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. DiNardo S.,
    2. Sher E.,
    3. Heemskerk-Jongens J.,
    4. Kassis J. A.,
    5. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1988). Two-tiered regulation of spatially patterned engrailed gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Nature 322, 604–609
    OpenUrl
    1. Dougan S.,
    2. DiNardo S.
    (1992). Drosophila wingless generates cell type diversity among engrailed expressing cells. Nature 360, 347–350
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fjose A.,
    2. McGinnis W. J.,
    3. Gehring W. J.
    (1985). Isolation of a homeobox containing gene from the engrailed region of Drosophila and the spatial distribution of its transcripts. Nature 313, 284–289
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gonzalez F.,
    2. Swales L.,
    3. Bejsovec A.,
    4. Skaer H.,
    5. Martinez Arias A.
    (1991). Secretion and movement of the wingless protein in the Drosophila embryo. Mech. Dev 35, 43–54
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hama C.,
    2. Zehra A.,
    3. Kornberg T.
    (1990). Region-specific recombination and expression are directed by portions of the Drosophila engrailed promoter. Genes Dev 4, 1079–1093
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Heemskerk J.,
    2. DiNardo S.,
    3. Kostriken R.,
    4. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1991). Multiple modes of engrailed regulation in the progression toward cell fate determination. Nature 352, 404–410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hidalgo A.,
    2. Ingham P. W.
    (1990). Cell patterning in the Drosophila segment: spatial regulation of the segment polarity gene patched. Development 110, 291–301
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Hidalgo A.
    (1991). Interactions between segment polarity genes and the generation of the segmental pattern in Drosophila. Mech. Dev 35, 77–87
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hooper J. E.,
    2. Scott M. P.
    (1989). The Drosophilapatched gene encodes a putative membrane protein required for segmental patterning. Cell 59, 751–765
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ingham P. W.
    (1988). The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila. Nature 335, 25–34
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ingham P. W.,
    2. Hidalgo A.
    (1993). Regulation of wingless transcription in the Drosophila embryo. Development 117, 283–291
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ingham P. W.,
    2. Taylor A. M.,
    3. Nakano Y.
    (1991). Role of the Drosophila patched gene in positional signalling. Nature 353, 184–187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Klingensmith J.,
    2. Noll E.,
    3. Perrimon N.
    (1989). The segment polarity phenotype of Drosophila involves differential tendencies toward transformation and cell death. Dev. Biol 134, 130–145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kornberg T.
    (1981). engrailed: a gene controlling compartment and segment formation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 1095–1099
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kornberg T.,
    2. Siden I.,
    3. O'Farrell P.,
    4. Simon M.
    (1985). The engrailed locus of Drosophila: In situ localization of transcripts reveals compartment specific expression. Cell 40, 45–63
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lee J. J.,
    2. Von Kessler D. P.,
    3. Parks S.,
    4. Beachy P. A.
    (1992). Secretion and localized transcription suggest a role in positional signalling for products of the segmentation gene hedgehog. Cell 71, 33–50
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lohs-Schardin M.,
    2. Cremer C.,
    3. Nusslein-Volhard C.
    (1979). A fate map for the larval epidermis of Drosophila melanogaster: localized cuticle defects following irradiation of the blastoderm with a UV laser microbeam. Dev. Biol 73, 239–255
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Martinez Arias A.,
    2. Baker N. E.,
    3. Ingham P. W.
    (1988). Role of segment polarity genes in the definition and maintenance of cell states in the Drosophila embryo. Development 103, 157–170
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Mohler J.
    (1988). Requirements for hedgehog, a segmental polarity gene, in patterning larval and adult cuticle of Drosophila. Genetics 120, 1061–1072
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Mohler J.,
    2. Vani K.
    (1992). Molecular organization and embryonic expression of the hedgehog gene involved in cell-cell communication in segmental patterning of Drosophila. Development 115, 957–971
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Nakano Y.,
    2. Guerrero I.,
    3. Hidalgo A.,
    4. Taylor A.,
    5. Whittle J. R. S.,
    6. Ingham P. W.
    (1989). The Drosophila segment polarity gene patched encodes a protein with multiple potential membrane spanning domains. Nature 341, 508–513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Nordermeer J.,
    2. Johnston P.,
    3. Rijsewijk F.,
    4. Nusse R.,
    5. Lawrence P.
    (1992). The consequences of ubiquitous expression of the wingless gene in the Drosophila embryo. Development 116, 711–719
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Patel N. H.,
    2. Schafer B.,
    3. Goodman C. S.,
    4. Holmgren R.
    (1989). The role of segment polarity genes during Drosophila neurogenesis. Genes Dev 3, 890–904
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Peifer M.,
    2. Bejsovec A.
    (1992). Knowing your neighbors: Cell interactions determine intrasegmental patterning in Drosophila. Trends Genet 8, 243–249
    1. Perrimon N.,
    2. Mahowald A.
    (1987). Multiple functions of segment polarity genes in Drosophila. Dev. Biol 119, 587–600
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Sampedro J.,
    2. Johnston P.,
    3. Lawrence P. A.
    (1993). A role for wingless in the segmental gradient of Drosophila?. Development 117, 677–687
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Siegfried E.,
    2. Chou T.-B.,
    3. Perrimon N.
    (1992). wingless signaling acts through zeste white 3, the Drosophila homolog of glycogen synthase kinase-3, to regulate engrailed and establish cell fate. Cell 71, 1167–1179
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Tabata T.,
    2. Eaton S.,
    3. Kornberg T.
    (1992). The Drosophila hedgehog gene is expressed specifically in posterior compartment cells and is a target of engrailed regulation. Genes Dev 6, 2635–2645
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tautz D.,
    2. Pfeifle C.
    (1989). A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in the Drosophila embryo reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98, 81–85
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. van den Heuvel M.,
    2. Nusse R.,
    3. Johnston P.,
    4. Lawrence P. A.
    (1989). Distribution of the wingless gene product in Drosophila embryos: a protein involved in cell-cell communication. Cell 59, 739–749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Segment polarity gene interactions modulate epidermal patterning in Drosophila embryos
A. Bejsovec, E. Wieschaus
Development 1993 119: 501-517;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.

Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.

New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.

Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.

Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.