Advertisement
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Hoxa-2 expression in normal and transposed rhombomeres: independent regulation in the neural tube and neural crest
V. Prince, A. Lumsden
Development 1994 120: 911-923;

Summary

In this study we have cloned the chick Hoxa-2 gene and analysed its expression during early development. We find that Hoxa-2 has a rostral limit of expression in the rhombencephalic neural tube corresponding precisely to the boundary between rhombomeres (r)1 and 2; a limit further rostral than any other Hox gene reported to date. Neural crest migrates from r2 to populate the first branchial arch, yet although Hoxa-2 is expressed down the full dorsoventral extent of r2 during the phase of neural crest emigration, there is no Hoxa-2 expression in either the emergent neural crest or in the first branchial arch. Conversely, at the level of r4, both the neural tube and the neural crest cells, which migrate out of this rhombomere to populate the second branchial arch, express Hoxa-2. Other Hox genes expressed in the rhombencephalic neural tube demonstrate a transfer of expression from neural tube to neural crest at all axial levels of expression. Hoxa-2 is thus unusual in demonstrating separate anterior expression limits in neural tube and neural crest; this allowed us to test whether Hox gene expression patterns in neural crest are determined by migratory pathways or are prespecified by the site of origin in the neuroepithelium. Grafting experiments in which pairs of rhombomeres were transplanted to ectopic sites at the time of rhombomere boundary formation reveal a prepatterning of the neural crest with respect to Hoxa-2 expression. The decision to down-regulate Hoxa-2 expression in r2-derived neural crest, but to maintain Hoxa-2 expression in r4-derived neural crest is intrinsic to the premigratory crest cell population. Thus, following grafting of r4 to the r2 site and vice-versa, Hoxa-2 expression is maintained in r4-derived neural crest, but lost in r2-derived neural crest.

REFERENCES

    1. Acampora D.,
    2. D'Esposito M.,
    3. Faiella A.,
    4. Pannese M.,
    5. Migliaccio E.,
    6. Morelli F.,
    7. Stornaiuolo A.,
    8. Nigro V.,
    9. Simeone A.,
    10. Boncinelli E.
    (1989) The human HOX gene family. Nucl. Acids Res 17, 10385–10402
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chisaka O.,
    2. Capecchi M. R.
    (1991). Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from the targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature 350, 473–479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chisaka O.,
    2. Musci T. S.,
    3. Capecchi M. R.
    (1992). Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.6. Nature 355, 516–520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Couly G. F.,
    2. Coltey P. M.,
    3. Le Douarin M. N.
    (1992) The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras. Development 114, 1–15
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Couly G. F.,
    2. Coltey P. M.,
    3. Le Douarin M. N.
    (1993) The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 117, 409–429
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Fraser S. E.,
    2. Keynes R. J.,
    3. Lumsden A. S. G.
    (1990) Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431–435
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gaunt S. J.
    (1991) Expression patterns of mouse Hox genes: clues to an understanding of developmental and evolutionary strategies. BioEssays 13, 505–513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gaunt S. J.,
    2. Krumlauf R.,
    3. Duboule D.
    (1989). Mouse homeo-genes within a subfamily, Hox-1.4,-2.6,-5.1, display similar anteroposterior domains of expression in the embryo, but show stage-and tissue-dependent differences in their regulation. Development 107, 131–141
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Geada A. M. C.,
    2. Gaunt S. J.,
    3. Azzawi M.,
    4. Shimeld S. M.,
    5. Pearce J.,
    6. Sharpe P. T.
    (1992). Sequence and embryonic expression of the murine Hox-3.5 gene. Development 116, 497–506
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Graham A.,
    2. Heyman I.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1993) Even-numbered rhombomeres control the apoptotic elimination of neural crest cells from odd-numbered rhombomeres in the chick hindbrain. Development 119, 233–245
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Graham A.,
    2. Papalopulu N.,
    3. Krumlauf R.
    (1989) The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organisation and expression. Cell 57, 367–378
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hamburger V.,
    2. Hamilton H.
    (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morph 88, 49–92
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Guilisano M.,
    3. Cook M.,
    4. Sham M.,
    5. Faiella A.,
    6. Wilkinson D.,
    7. Boncinelli E.,
    8. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Nature 353, 861–864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Wilkinson D.,
    3. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) Patterning the vertebrate head: murine Hox 2 genes mark distinct subpopulations of premigratory and cranial neural crest. Development 112, 43–50
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Kozak M.
    (1987) An analysis of 5-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucl. Acids Res 15, 8125–8148
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Krumlauf R.
    (1993) Hox genes and pattern formation in the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Trends Genet 9, 106–112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kuratani S. C.,
    2. Eichele G.
    (1993) Rhombomere transplantation repatterns the segmental organization of cranial nerves and reveals cell-autonomous expression of a homeodomain protein. Development 117, 105–117
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Le Lievre C.
    (1978) Paticipation of neural crest-derived cells in the genesis of the skull in birds. J. Embryol. exp. Morph 47, 17–37
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Le Lievre C.,
    2. Le Douarin N. M.
    (1975) Mesenchymal derivatives of the neural crest: analysis of chimaeric quail and chick embryos. J. Embryol. exp. Morph 34, 125–154
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lufkin T.,
    2. Dierich A.,
    3. LeMur M.,
    4. Mark M.,
    5. Chambon P.
    (1991). Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 66, 1105–1119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Keynes R.
    (1989) Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 337, 424–428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Sprawson N.,
    3. Graham A.
    (1991) Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 113, 1281–1291
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Marchuk D.,
    2. Drumm M.,
    3. Saulino A.,
    4. Collins F. S.
    (1991) Construction of T-vectors, a rapid and general system for direct cloning of unmodified PCR products. Nucl. Acid Res 19, 115–.
    1. Murphy P.,
    2. Davidson D. R.,
    3. Hill R. E.
    (1989) Segment-specific expression of a homeobox-containing gene in the mouse hindbrain. Nature 341, 156–159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Murphy P.,
    2. Hill R. E.
    (1991). Expression of the mouse labial -like homeobox-containing genes, Hox 2.9 and Hox 1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain. Development 111, 61–74
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Nieto M. A.,
    2. Gilardi-Hebenstreit P.,
    3. Charnay P.,
    4. Wilkinson D.
    (1992) A receptor protein tyrosine kinase implicated in the segmental patterning of the hindbrain and mesoderm. Development 116, 1137–1150
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1978) The control of avian cephalic neural crest cytodifferentiation. I. Skeletal and connective tissues. Dev. Biol 67, 313–329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1983) The role of neural crest in patterning avian cranial skeletal, connective and muscle tissues. Dev. Biol 96, 144–165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1986) Patterning of avian craniofacial muscles. Dev. Biol 116, 347–356
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rubock M. J.,
    2. Larin Z.,
    3. Cook M.,
    4. Papalopulu N.,
    5. Krumlauf R.,
    6. Lehrach H.
    (1990) A yeast artificial chromosome containing the mouse homeobox cluster Hox-2. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4751–4755
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sechrist J.,
    2. Serbedzija G.,
    3. Scherson T.,
    4. Fraser S.,
    5. Bronner-Fraser M.
    (1993) Segmental migration of the hindbrain neural crest does not arise from its segmental generation. Development 118, 691–703
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Sundin O.,
    2. Eichele G.
    (1990) A homeodomain protein reveals themetameric nature of the developing chick hindbrain. Genes Dev 4, 1267–1276
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tan D. P.,
    2. Ferrante J.,
    3. Nazarali A.,
    4. Shao X.,
    5. Kozak C. A.,
    6. Guo V.,
    7. Nirenberg M.
    (1992). Murine Hox-1.11 homeobox gene structure and expression. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6280–6284
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tan S. S.,
    2. Morriss-Kay G.
    (1985) The development and distribution of the cranial neural crest in the rat embryo. Cell Tissue Res 240, 403–416
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Tosney K. W.
    (1982) The segregation and early migration of cranial neural crest cells in the avian embryo. Dev. Biol 89, 13–24
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Vaage S.
    (1969) The segmentation of the primitive neural tube in chickembryos (Gallus domesticus). Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol 41, 3–.
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bhatt S.,
    3. Chavrier P.,
    4. Bravo R.,
    5. Charnay P.
    (1989) Segment-specific expression of a zinc-finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse. Nature 337, 461–464
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bhatt S.,
    3. Cook M.,
    4. Boncinelli E.,
    5. Krumlauf R.
    (1989) Segmental expression of Hox-2 homeobox containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain. Nature 341, 405–409
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Hoxa-2 expression in normal and transposed rhombomeres: independent regulation in the neural tube and neural crest
V. Prince, A. Lumsden
Development 1994 120: 911-923;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.

Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.

New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.

Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.

Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Brandon Carpenter talks about how inherited histone methylation defines the germline versus soma decision in C. elegans. 

Sign up to join our next session:

10 March
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit