Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
JOURNAL ARTICLES
The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres
I.J. McKay, I. Muchamore, R. Krumlauf, M. Maden, A. Lumsden, J. Lewis
Development 1994 120: 2199-2211;
I.J. McKay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. Muchamore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Krumlauf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Maden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Lumsden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Lewis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

kreisler is a recessive mutation resulting in gross malformation of the inner ear of homozygous mice. The defects in the inner ear are related to abnormalities in the hindbrain of the embryo, adjacent to the ear rudiments. At E9.5, the neural tube posterior to the boundary between the third and fourth rhombomeres, r3 and r4, appears unsegmented, and the region that would normally correspond to r4 is unusually thick-walled and contains many dying cells. The absence of morphological segmentation in the posterior hindbrain corresponds to an altered pattern of gene expression in that region, with major abnormalities posterior to the r4/5 boundary and minor abnormalities anterior to it. From the expression patterns at E9.5 of Krox-20, Hoxb-1 (Hox 2.9), Hoxb-2 (Hox 2.8), Hoxa-3 (Hox 1.5), Hoxd-4 (Hox 4.2) and cellular retinoic-acid binding protein I (CRABP I), it appears that the fundamental defect is a loss of r5 and r6. Correspondingly, the glossopharyngeal ganglion and nerve, associated with r6 are missing and the abducens nerve, which originates from r5 and r6, is also absent. Examination of Krox-20 expression at stages as early as E8.5 indicates that Krox-20 fails ever to be expressed in its r5 domain in the homozygous kreisler mutant. The abnormal amount of cell death is seen only later. An interpretation is that the cells that would normally become specified at an early stage as r5 and r6 adopt an r4 character instead, producing an excess of r4 cells that is disposed of subsequently by cell death.

REFERENCES

    1. Adelmann H. B.
    (1925) The development of the neural folds and cranial ganglia of the rat. J. Comp. Neurol 39, 19–172
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Chisaka O.,
    2. Musci T. S.,
    3. Capecchi M. R.
    (1992). Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targetted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.6. Nature 355, 516–520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Dencker L.,
    2. Annerwall E.,
    3. Busch C.,
    4. Eriksson U.
    (1990) Localization of specific retinoid-binding sites and expression of cellular retinoic-acid-binding-protein (CRABP) in the early mouse embryo. Development 110, 343–352
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Deol M. S.
    (1964) The abnormalities of the inner ear in kreisler mice. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph 12, 475–490
    1. Dodd J.,
    2. Morton S. B.,
    3. Karagogeos D.,
    4. Yamamoto M.,
    5. Jessell T. M.
    (1988) Spatial regulation of axonal glycoprotein expression on subsets of embryonic spinal neurones. Neuron 1, 105–116
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Dolle P.,
    2. Lufkin T.,
    3. Krumlauf R.,
    4. Mark M.,
    5. Duboule D.,
    6. Chambon P.
    (1993). Local alterations of Krox-20 and Hox gene expression in the hindbrain suggest lack of rhombomeres 4 and 5 in homozygote null Hoxa-1 (Hox-1.6) mutant embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7666–7670
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Duboule D.,
    2. Dolle P.
    (1989) The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J 8, 1497–1505
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Eriksson U.,
    2. Hansson E.,
    3. Nordlinder H.,
    4. Busch C.,
    5. Sundelin J.,
    6. Peterson P. A.
    (1987) Quantification and tissue localization of the cellular retinoic acid-binding protein. J. Cell Physiol 133, 482–490
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fraser S.,
    2. Keynes R.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1990) Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 334, 431–435
    OpenUrl
    1. Frohman M. A.,
    2. Boyle M.,
    3. Martin G. R.
    (1990). Isolation of the mouse Hox-2.9 gene; analysis of embryonic expression suggests that positional information along the anterior-posterior axis is specified by the mesoderm. Development 110, 589–607
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Frohman M. A.,
    2. Martin G. R.,
    3. Cordes S. P.,
    4. Halamek L. P.,
    5. Barsh G. S.
    (1993) Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr). Development 117, 925–936
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Gaunt S. J.
    (1987). Homoeobox gene Hox-1.5 expression in mouse embryos: earliest detection by in situ hybridisation is during gastrulation. Development 101, 51–60
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gaunt S. J.,
    2. Krumlauf R.,
    3. Duboule D.
    (1989) Mouse homeo-genes within a family display similar anteroposterior domains of expression in the embryo, but show stage-and tissue-dependent differences in their regulation. Development 107, 131–141
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Graham A.,
    2. Papalopulu N.,
    3. Krumlauf R.
    (1989) The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57, 367–378
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Graham A.,
    2. Heyman I.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1993) Even-numbered rhombomeres control the apoptotic elimination of neural crest cells from odd-numbered rhombomeres in the chick hindbrain. Development 119, 233–245
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Guthrie S.,
    2. Lumsden A.
    (1991) Formation and regeneration of rhombomere boundaries in the developing chick hindbrain. Development 112, 221–230
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Guthrie S.,
    2. Prince V.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1993) Selective dispersal of rhombomere cells in orthotopic and heterotopic grafting experiments. Development 118, 527–538
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Gulisano M.,
    3. Cook M.,
    4. Sham M. H.,
    5. Faiella A.,
    6. Wilkinson D.,
    7. Boncinelli E.,
    8. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Nature 353, 861–864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hunt P.,
    2. Whiting J.,
    3. Nonchev S.,
    4. Sham M. H.,
    5. Marshall H.,
    6. Graham A.,
    7. Cook M.,
    8. Allelmann R.,
    9. Rigby P. J. W.,
    10. Gulisano M.,
    11. Faiella A.,
    12. Boncinelli E.,
    13. Krumlauf R.
    (1991) The branchial Hox code and itsimplications for gene regulation, patterning of the nervous system and head evolution. Development 112, 43–50
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Ingham P. W.,
    2. Martinez-arias A.
    (1986) The correct activation of Antennapedia and bithorax complex genes requires the fushi tarazu gene. Nature 324, 592–597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Li C. W.
    (1979) Congenital malformation of the inner ear I. An in vitro study of cell determination of the homozygotic and heterozygotic kreisler mouse otocysts. Dev. Neurosci 2, 7–18
    1. Lufkin T.,
    2. Dierich A.,
    3. Lemeur M.,
    4. Mark M.,
    5. Chambon P.
    (1991). Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 66, 1105–1120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Keynes R.
    (1989) Segmental pattern of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 337, 424–428
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.
    (1990) The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends in Neurosci 13, 329–335
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Sprawson N.,
    3. Graham A.
    (1991) Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 113, 1281–1292
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. McGinnis W.,
    2. Krumlauf R.
    (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68, 283–302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Maden M.,
    2. Horton C.,
    3. Graham A.,
    4. Leonard L.,
    5. Pizzey J.,
    6. Siegenthaler G.,
    7. Lumsden A.,
    8. Eriksson U.
    (1992) Domains of retinoic acid-binding protein I (CRABP I) expression in the hindbrain and neural crest of the mouse embryo. Mech. Dev 37, 13–23
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Mark M.,
    2. Lufkin T.,
    3. Vonesch J.-L.,
    4. Ruberte E.,
    5. Olivo J.-C.,
    6. Dolle P.,
    7. Gorry P.,
    8. Lumsden A.,
    9. Chambon P.
    (1993) Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice. Development 119, 319–338
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Murphy P.,
    2. Davidson D. R.,
    3. Hill R. E.
    (1989) Segment-specific expression of a homeobox-containing gene in the mouse hindbrain. Nature 341, 156–159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Noden D. M.
    (1983) The role of the neural crest in the patterning avian cranial skeletal, connective and muscle tissues. Dev. Biol 96, 144–165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Raff M. C.
    (1992) Social controls on cell survival and cell death. Nature 356, 397–400
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ruben R. J.
    (1973) Development and cell kinetics of the kreisler (kr/kr) mouse. Laryngoscope 83, 1440–1468
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Schneider-Maunoury S.,
    2. Topilko P.,
    3. Seitanidou T.,
    4. Levi G.,
    5. Cohen-Tannoudji M.,
    6. Pournin S.,
    7. Babinet C.,
    8. Charnay P.
    (1993) Disruption of Krox-20 results in alteration of rhombomeres 3 and 5 in the developing hindbrain. Cell 75, 1199–1214
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Sham M. H.,
    2. Vesque C.,
    3. Nonchev S.,
    4. Marshall H.,
    5. Frain M.,
    6. Das Gupta R.,
    7. Whiting J.,
    8. Wilkinson D.,
    9. Charnay P.,
    10. Krumlauf R.
    (1993). The zinc finger gene Krox20 regulates HoxB2(Hox2.8) during hindbrain segmentation. Cell 72, 183–196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Tan S. S.,
    2. Morriss-Kay G.
    (1985) The development and distribution of the cranial neural crest in the rat embryo. Cell Tissue Res 240, 403–416
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Van de Water T. R.,
    2. Ruben R. J.
    (1974) Symposium: New data for noise standards. III. Organ culture of the mammalian inner ear: A tool to study inner ear deafness. Laryngoscope 86, 738–749
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bhatt S.,
    3. Chavrier P.,
    4. Bravo R.,
    5. Charnay P.
    (1989) Segment-specific expression of a zinc-finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse. Nature 337, 461–464
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bhatt S.,
    3. Cook M.,
    4. Boncinelli E.,
    5. Krumlauf R.
    (1989) Segmental expression of Hox 2 homeobox-containing genes in the developing mouse hindbrain. Nature 341, 405–409
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
JOURNAL ARTICLES
The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres
I.J. McKay, I. Muchamore, R. Krumlauf, M. Maden, A. Lumsden, J. Lewis
Development 1994 120: 2199-2211;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
JOURNAL ARTICLES
The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres
I.J. McKay, I. Muchamore, R. Krumlauf, M. Maden, A. Lumsden, J. Lewis
Development 1994 120: 2199-2211;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Morphogenetic cell movements in the middle region of the dermomyotome dorsomedial lip associated with patterning and growth of the primary epaxial myotome
  • Germline and developmental roles of the nuclear transport factor importin (α)3 in C. elegans
  • Monofocal origin of telencephalic oligodendrocytes in the anterior entopeduncular area of the chick embryo
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Kathryn Virginia Anderson (1952-2020)

Developmental geneticist Kathryn Anderson passed away at home on 30 November 2020. Tamara Caspary, a former postdoc and friend, remembers Kathryn and her remarkable contribution to developmental biology.


Zooming into 2021

In a new Editorial, Editor-in-Chief James Briscoe and Executive Editor Katherine Brown reflect on the triumphs and tribulations of the last 12 months, and look towards a hopefully calmer and more predictable year.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

Over 60 institutions in 12 countries are now participating in our Read & Publish initiative. Here, James Briscoe explains what this means for his institution, The Francis Crick Institute. Find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Sign up to join our next session:

10 February
Time: 13:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: preLights

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992