Advertisement
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Blastomere derivation and domains of gene expression in the Spemann Organizer of Xenopus laevis
M.A. Vodicka, J.C. Gerhart
Development 1995 121: 3505-3518;

Summary

Spemann's Organizer, located in the dorsal marginal zone of the amphibian gastrula, induces and differentiates dorsal axial structures characteristic of this and other vertebrates. To trace the cellular origins of the Xenopus Organizer, we labelled dorsal blastomeres of three of the four tiers (A, B and C) of the 32-cell embryo with green, red and blue fluorescent lineage tracers. A strong vegetalward displacement of labelled clones occurs between the late blastula and early gastrula stages but clones mix only slightly at their borders. The typical early gastrula Organizer is composed of approximately 10% A1 progeny in its animalmost region, 70% B1 progeny in the central region, and 20% C1 progeny in vegetal and deep regions. Variability in the composition of the early gastrula Organizer results from variability in the position of early cleavage planes and in pregastrulation movements. As the Organizer involutes during gastrulation, forming dorsal axial mesoderm, clonal boundaries are greatly dispersed by cell intermixing. Within a clone, deep cells are displaced and intermixed more than superficial cells. Variability in the distribution of progeny in the dorsal axial mesoderm of the late gastrula results mostly from variable intermixing of cells during gastrulation. Experiments to perturb later developmental events by molecular or embryonic manipulations at an early stage must take this variability into account along with the majority distributions of the fate map. Within the early gastrula Organizer, the genes Xbra, goosecoid, noggin and xNR3 are expressed differently in the animal-vegetal and superficial-deep dimensions. In situ hybridization and lineage labelling define distinct regions of the dorsal marginal zone. By the end of gastrulation, dorsal axial mesoderm cells derived from the Organizer have altered their expression of the genes Xbra, goosecoid, noggin and xNR3. At a given stage, a cell's position in the embryo rather than its lineage may be more important in determining which genes it will express.

Reference

    1. Amaya E.,
    2. Musci T. J.,
    3. Kirschner M. W.
    (1991) Expression of a dominant negative mutant of the FGF receptor disrupts mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 66, 257–70
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bauer D. V.,
    2. Huang S.,
    3. Moody S. A.
    (1994) The cleavage stage origins of Spemann's Organizer: analysis of the movements of blastomere clones before and during gastrulation in Xenopus. Development 120, 1179–1189
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Black S. D.,
    2. Vincent J. P. O.
    (1988) The first cleavage plane and the embryonic axis are determined by separate mechanisms in Xenopus laevis. II. Experimental dissociation by lateral compression of the egg. Dev. Biol 128, 65–71
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cho K. W.,
    2. Blumberg B.,
    3. Steinbeisser H.,
    4. De Robertis E. M.
    (1991) Molecular nature of Spemann's Organizer: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 67, 1111–20
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Cooke J.,
    2. Webber J. A.
    (1985) Dynamics of control of body pattern in the development of Xenopus laevis. I. Timing and pattern in the development of dorsoanterior and posterior blastomere pairs, isolated at the 4-cell stage. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol 88, 113–33
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Dale L.,
    2. Slack J. M.
    (1987) Fate map for the 32-cell stage of Xenopus laevis. Development 99, 527–51
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dirksen M. L.,
    2. Jamrich M.
    (1992) A novel, activin-inducible, blastopore lip-specific gene of Xenopus laevis contains a fork head DNA-binding domain. Genes Dev 6, 599–608
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gont L. K.,
    2. Steinbeisser H.,
    3. Blumberg B.,
    4. de Robertis E. M.
    (1993) Tail formation as a continuation of gastrulation: the multiple cell populations of the Xenopus tailbud derive from the late blastopore lip. Development 119, 991–1004
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Green J. B. A.,
    2. New H.,
    3. Smith J. C.
    (1992) Responses of embryonic Xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm. Cell 71, 731–739
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hama T.,
    2. Hidenobu T.,
    3. Kaneda R.,
    4. Takata K.,
    5. Ohara A.
    (1985) Inductive capacities for the dorsal mesoderm of the dorsal marginal zone and pharyngeal endoderm in the very early gastrula of the newt, and presumptive pharyngeal endoderm as an initiator of the organization center. Develop. Growth and Differ 27, 419–433
    1. Harland R. M.
    (1994) Neural induction in Xenopus. Curr. Op. Gen. Dev 4, 543–549
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Harland R. M.
    (1991) In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. Meth. Cell Biol 36, 685–95
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hemmati-Brivanlou A.,
    2. Melton D. A.
    (1992) A truncated activin receptor inhibits mesoderm induction and formation of axial structures in Xenopus embryos. Nature 359, 609–14
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Herrmann B. G.
    (1991) Expression pattern of the Brachyury gene in whole-mount T wis/ T wismutant embryos. Development 113, 913–917
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Jacobs R. E.,
    2. Fraser S. E.
    (1994) Magnetic resonance microscopy of embryonic cell lineages and movements. Science 263, 681–684
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Keller R. E.
    (1975) Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula of Xenopus laevis I. Prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the superficial layer. Dev. Biol 42, 222–241
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Keller R. E.
    (1976) Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula of Xenopus laevis II. Prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the deep layer. Dev. Biol 51, 118–137
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Keller R. E.
    (1978) Time-lapse cinemicrographic analysis of superficial cell behavior during and prior to gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. J. Morph 157, 223–247
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Keller R. E.
    (1980) The cellular basis of epiboly: an SEM study of deep-cell rearrangement during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph 60, 201–34
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Keller R.
    (1991) Early embryonic development of Xenopus laevis. Meth. Cell Biol 36, 61–113
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Keller R.,
    2. Danilchik M.
    (1988) Regional expression, pattern and timing of convergence and extension during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. Development 103, 193–209
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Keller R. E.,
    2. Danilchik M.,
    3. Gimlich R.,
    4. Shih J.
    (1985) The function and mechanism of convergent extension during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph 89, 185–209
    1. Keller R.,
    2. Cooper M. S.,
    3. Danilchik M.,
    4. Tibbetts P.,
    5. Wilson P. A.
    (1989) Cell intercalation during notochord development in Xenopus laevis. J. Exp. Zool 251, 134–54
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kirschner M. W.,
    2. Hara K.
    (1980) A new method of local vital staining of amphibian embryos using ficoll and “crystals” of Nile Red. Mikroskopie 36, 12–15
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kispert A.,
    2. Herrmann B. G.
    (1993) The Brachyury gene encodes a novel DNA binding protein. Embo J 12, 3211–3220
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Knecht A. K.,
    2. Good P. J.,
    3. Dawid I. B.,
    4. Harland R. M.
    (1995) Dorsal-ventral patterning and differentiation of noggin-induced neural tissue in the absence of mesoderm. Development 121, 1927–1936
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Knochel S.,
    2. Lef J.,
    3. Clement J.,
    4. Klocke B.,
    5. Hille S.,
    6. Koster M.,
    7. Knochel W.
    (1992) Activin A induced expression of a fork head related gene in posterior chordamesoderm (notochord) of Xenopus laevis embryos. Mech. Dev 38, 157–65
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kroll K. L.,
    2. Gerhart J. C.
    (1994) Transgenic X. laevis embryos from eggs transplanted with nuclei of transfected cultured cells. Science 266, 650–653
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lamb T. M.,
    2. Knecht A. K.,
    3. Smith W. C.,
    4. Stachel S. E.,
    5. Economides A. N.,
    6. Stahl N.,
    7. Yancoplous G. D.,
    8. Harland R. M.
    (1993) Neural induction by the secreted polypeptide noggin. Science 262, 713–718
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lemaire P.,
    2. Gurdon J. B.
    (1994) A role for cytoplasmic determinants in mesoderm patterning: cell-autonomous activation of the goosecoid and Xwnt-8 genes along the dorsoventral axis of early Xenopus embryos. Development 120, 1191–1199
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. MacNicol A. M.,
    2. Muslin A. J.,
    3. Williams L. T.
    (1993) Raf-1 kinase is essential for early Xenopus development and mediates the induction of mesoderm by FGF. Cell 73, 571–83
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Masho R.
    (1990) Close correlation between the first cleavage plane and the body axis in early Xenopus embryos. Develop. Growth & Differ 32, 57–64
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Moody S. A.
    (1987) Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stage Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol 119, 560–78
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Moody S. A.
    (1987) Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell-stage Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol 122, 300–19
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Nakamura O.,
    2. Kishiyama J.
    (1971) Prospective fates of blastomeres at the 32 cell stage of Xenopus laevis embryos. Proc. J. Acad 47, 407–412
    OpenUrl
    1. Niehrs C.,
    2. Keller R.,
    3. Cho K. W.,
    4. De Robertis E. M.
    (1993) The homeobox gene goosecoid controls cell migration in Xenopus embryos. Cell 72, 491–503
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rashbass P.,
    2. Cooke L. A.,
    3. Herrmann B. G.,
    4. Beddington R. S.
    (1991) A cell autonomous function of Brachyury in T/T embryonic stem cell chimaeras. Nature 353, 348–351
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Saha M. S.,
    2. Grainger R. M.
    (1992) A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development in Xenopus. Neuron 8, 1003–14
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Sasai Y.,
    2. Lu B.,
    3. Steinbeisser H.,
    4. Geissert d.,
    5. Gont L. K.,
    6. DeRobertis E. M.
    (1994) Xenopus chordin: a novel dorsalizing factor activated by Organizer-specific homeobox genes. Cell 79, 779–790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Schulte-Merker S.,
    2. Ho R. H.,
    3. Herrmann B. G.,
    4. Nusslein-Volhard C.
    (1992) The protein product of the zebrafish homologue of the mouse T gene is expressed in nuclei of the germ ring and the notochord of the early embryo. Development 116, 1021–1032
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Shawlot W.,
    2. Behringer R. R.
    (1995) Requirement for Lim1 in head-Organizer function. Nature 374, 425–430
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shih J.,
    2. Keller R.
    (1992) The epithelium of the dorsal marginal zone of Xenopus has Organizer properties. Development 116, 887–899
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Smith J. C.,
    2. Price B. M. J.,
    3. Green J. B. A.,
    4. Weigel D.,
    5. Herrmann B.
    (1991) Expression of the Xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction. Cell 67, 79–87
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Smith W. C.,
    2. Harland R. M.
    (1992) Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann Organizer in Xenopus embryos. Cell 70, 829–40
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Smith W. C.,
    2. Knecht A. K.,
    3. Wu M.,
    4. Harland R. M.
    (1993) Secreted noggin protein mimics the Spemann Organizer in dorsalizing Xenopus mesoderm. Nature 361, 547–549
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Smith W. C.,
    2. McKendry R. M.,
    3. Harland R. M.
    (1995) A nodal-related gene defines a physical and functional domain within the Spemann Organizer. Cell 82, 1938–.
    OpenUrl
    1. Stewart R. M.,
    2. Gerhart J. C.
    (1990) The anterior extent of dorsal development of the Xenopus embryonic axis depends on the quantity of Organizer in the late blastula. Development 109, 363–72
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Taira M.,
    2. Jamrich M.,
    3. Good P. J.,
    4. Dawid I. B.
    (1992) The LIM domain-containing homeo box gene Xlim-1 is expressed specifically in the Organizer region of Xenopus gastrula embryos. Genes Dev 6, 356–66
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Vincent J. P.,
    2. Gerhart J. C.
    (1987) Subcortical rotation in Xenopus eggs: an early step in embryonic axis specification. Dev. Biol 123, 526–39
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Vincent J. P.,
    2. Oster G. F.,
    3. Gerhart J. C.
    (1986) Kinematics of gray crescent formation in Xenopus eggs: the displacement of subcortical cytoplasm relative to the egg surface. Dev. Biol 113, 484–500
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Vize P. D.,
    2. Melton D. A.,
    3. Hemmati-Brivanlou A.,
    4. Harland R. M.
    (1991) Assays for gene function in developing Xenopus embryos. In. Methods in Cell Biology 36, 361–381
    OpenUrl
    1. von Dassow G.,
    2. Schmidt J. E.,
    3. Kimelman D.
    (1993) Induction of the Xenopus Organizer: expression and regulation of Xnot, a novel FGF and activin-regulated homeo box gene. Genes Dev 7, 355–66
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Blastomere derivation and domains of gene expression in the Spemann Organizer of Xenopus laevis
M.A. Vodicka, J.C. Gerhart
Development 1995 121: 3505-3518;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Kathryn Virginia Anderson (1952-2020)

Developmental geneticist Kathryn Anderson passed away at home on 30 November 2020. Tamara Caspary, a former postdoc and friend, remembers Kathryn and her remarkable contribution to developmental biology.

Zooming into 2021

In a new Editorial, Editor-in-Chief James Briscoe and Executive Editor Katherine Brown reflect on the triumphs and tribulations of the last 12 months, and look towards a hopefully calmer and more predictable year.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

Over 60 institutions in 12 countries are now participating in our Read & Publish initiative. Here, James Briscoe explains what this means for his institution, The Francis Crick Institute. Find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.

Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Sign up to join our next session:

10 February
Time: 13:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: preLights