Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Inserting the Ftz homeodomain into engrailed creates a dominant transcriptional repressor that specifically turns off Ftz target genes in vivo
A. John, S.T. Smith, J.B. Jaynes
Development 1995 121: 1801-1813;
A. John
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.T. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.B. Jaynes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

The Engrailed homeodomain protein is an ‘active’ or dominant transcriptional repressor in cultured cells. In contrast, the Fushi Tarazu homeodomain protein is an activator, both in cultured cells and in Drosophila embryos, where it activates several known target genes, including its own gene. This auto-activation has been shown to depend on targeting to a fushi tarazu enhancer by the Fushi Tarazu homeodomain. We combined Fushi Tarazu targeting and Engrailed active repression in a chimeric regulator, EFE. When EFE is ubiquitously expressed, it overrides endogenous Fushi Tarazu and causes a fushi tarazu mutant phenotype. Normal Fushi Tarazu target genes are affected as they are in fushi tarazu mutants. One such target gene is repressed by EFE even where Fushi Tarazu is not expressed, suggesting that the repression is active. This is confirmed by showing that the in vivo activity of EFE depends on a domain that is required for active repression in culture. A derivative that lacks this domain, while it cannot repress the endogenous fushi tarazu gene, can still reduce the activity of the fushi tarazu autoregulatory enhancer, suggesting that it competes with endogenous Fushi Tarazu for binding sites in vivo. However, this passive repression is much less effective than active repression.

Reference

    1. Amaya E.,
    2. Musci T. J.,
    3. Kirschner M. W.
    (1991) Expression of a dominant negative mutant of the FGF receptor disrupts mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 66, 257–70
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Badiani P.,
    2. Corbella P.,
    3. Kioussis D.,
    4. Marvel J.,
    5. Weston K.
    (1994) Dominant interfering alleles define a role for c-Myb in T-cell development. Genes Dev 8, 770–82
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Baker N.
    (1988) Localization of transcripts from the wingless gene in whole Drosophila embryos. Development 103, 289–98
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Biggin M. D.,
    2. Tjian R.
    (1989) A purified Drosophila homeodomain protein represses transcription in vitro. Cell 58, 433–40
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Binari R.,
    2. Perrimon N.
    (1994) Stripe-specific regulation of pair-rule genes by hopscotch, a putative Jak family tyrosine kinase in Drosophila. Genes Dev 8, 300–12
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Carroll S. B.,
    2. DiNardo S.,
    3. O'Farrell P. H.,
    4. White R. A.,
    5. Scott M. P.
    (1988) Temporal and spatial relationships between segmentation and homeotic gene expression in Drosophila embryos, distributions of the fushi tarazu, engrailed, Sex combs reduced, Antennapedia, and Ultrabithorax proteins. Genes Dev 2, 350–60
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Coleman K. G.,
    2. Poole S. J.,
    3. Weir M. P.,
    4. Soeller W. C.,
    5. Kornberg T.
    (1987) The invected gene of Drosophila: sequence analysis and expression studies reveal a close kinship to the engrailed gene. Genes Dev 1, 19–28
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dearolf C. R.,
    2. Topol J.,
    3. Parker C. S.
    (1989) The caudal gene product is a direct activator of fushi tarazu transcription during Drosophila embryogenesis. Nature 341, 340–3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Desplan C.,
    2. Theis J.,
    3. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1988) The sequence specificity of homeodomain-DNA interaction. Cell 54, 1081–90
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. DiNardo S.,
    2. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1987) Establishment and refinement of segmental pattern in the Drosophila embryo, spatial control of engrailed expression by pair-rule genes. Genes Dev 1, 1212–25
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. DiNardo S.,
    2. Sher E.,
    3. Heemskerk J. J.,
    4. Kassis J. A.,
    5. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1988) Two-tiered regulation of spatially patterned engrailed gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Nature 332, 604–9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dorsett D.,
    2. Viglianti G. A.,
    3. Rutledge B. J.,
    4. Meselson M.
    (1989) Alteration of hsp82 gene expression by the gypsy transposon and suppressor genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev 3, 454–68
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Eaton S.,
    2. Kornberg T. B.
    (1990) Repression of ci-D in posterior compartments of Drosophila by engrailed. Genes Dev 4, 1068–77
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Edgar B.,
    2. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1990) The three postblastoderm cell cycles of Drosophila embryogenesis are regulated in G2 by string. Cell 62, 469–80
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ekker S. C.,
    2. Young K. E.,
    3. von Kessler D. P.,
    4. Beachy P. A.
    (1991) Optimal DNA sequence recognition by the Ultrabithorax homeodomain of Drosophila. EMBO J 10, 1179–86
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Erickson R. P.
    (1993) The use of antisense approaches to study development. Devel. Genetics 14, 251–7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Fitzpatrick V. D.,
    2. Percival-Smith A.,
    3. Ingles C. J.,
    4. Krause H. M.
    (1992) Homeodomain-independent activity of the fushi tarazu polypeptide in Drosophila embryos. Nature 356, 610–2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Forrest D.,
    2. Munoz A.,
    3. Raynoschek C.,
    4. Vennstrom B.,
    5. Beug H.
    (1990) Requirement for the C-terminal domain of the v-erbA oncogene protein for biological function and transcriptional repression. Oncogene 5, 309–16
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Frasch M.,
    2. Levine M.
    (1987) Complementary patterns of even-skipped and fushi tarazu expression involve their differential regulation by a common set of segmentation genes in Drosophila. Genes Dev 1, 981–95
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gibson G.,
    2. Schier A.,
    3. LeMotte P.,
    4. Gehring W. J.
    (1990) The specificities of Sex combs reduced and Antennapedia are defined by a distinct portion of each protein that includes the homeodomain. Cell 62, 1087–1103
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Han K.,
    2. Manley J. L.
    (1993) Functional domains of the Drosophila Engrailed protein. EMBO J 12, 2723–33
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Han K.,
    2. Manley J. L.
    (1993) Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila Even-skipped protein, definition of a minimal repression domain. Genes Dev 7, 491–503
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Han W.,
    2. Yu Y.,
    3. Altan N.,
    4. Pick L.
    (1993) Multiple proteins interact with the fushi tarazu proximal enhancer. Mol.Cell. Biol 13, 5549–59
    OpenUrl
    1. Harding K.,
    2. Rushlow C.,
    3. Doyle H. J.,
    4. Hoey T.,
    5. Levine M.
    (1986) Cross-regulatory interactions among pair-rule genes in Drosophila. Science 233, 953–9
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Harding K.,
    2. Hoey T.,
    3. Warrior R.,
    4. Levine M.
    (1989) Autoregulatory and gap gene response elements of the even-skipped promoter of Drosophila. EMBO J 8, 1205–12
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Heemskerk J.,
    2. DiNardo S.,
    3. Kostriken R.,
    4. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1991) Multiple modes of engrailed regulation in the progression towards cell fate determination. Nature 352, 404–10
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Herschbach B. M.,
    2. Arnaud M. B.,
    3. Johnson A. D.
    (1994) Transcriptional repression directed by the yeast2 protein in vitro. Nature 370, 309–11
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Herskowitz I.
    (1987) Functional inactivation of genes by dominant negative mutations. Nature 329, 219–22
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hiromi Y.,
    2. Gehring W. J.
    (1987) Regulation and function of the Drosophila segmentation gene fushi tarazu. Cell 50, 963–74
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hoey T.,
    2. Levine M.
    (1988) Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila. Nature 332, 858–61
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hooper J. E.,
    2. Scott M. P.
    (1989) The Drosophila patched gene encodes a putative membrane protein required for segmental patterning. Cell 59, 751–65
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ingham P. W.,
    2. Baker N. E.,
    3. Martinez A. A.
    (1988) Regulation of segment polarity genes in the Drosophila blastoderm by fushi tarazu and even-skipped. Nature 331, 73–5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ingham P. W.
    (1988) The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila [published erratum appears in Nature 1988; 335, 744]. Nature 335, 25–34
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ip Y. T.,
    2. Kraut R.,
    3. Levine M.,
    4. Rushlow C. A.
    (1991) The dorsal morphogen is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that interacts with a long-range repression element in Drosophila. Cell 64, 439–46
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ish-Horowicz D.,
    2. Pinchin S. M.,
    3. Ingham P. W.,
    4. Gyurkovics H. G.
    (1989) Autocatalytic ftz activation and metameric instability induced by ectopic ftz expression. Cell 57, 223–32
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Jaynes J. B.,
    2. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1988) Activation and repression of transcription by homoeodomain-containing proteins that bind a common site. Nature 336, 744–9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jaynes J. B.,
    2. O'Farrell P. H.
    (1991) Active repression of transcription by the Engrailed homeodomain protein. EMBO J 10, 1427–33
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Johnson A. D.,
    2. Herskowitz I.
    (1985) A repressor (MAT alpha 2 Product) and its operator control expression of a set of cell type specific genes in yeast. Cell 42, 237–47
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Johnson B. F.,
    2. Krasnow M. A.
    (1992) Differential regulation of transcription preinitiation complex assembly by activator and repressor homeo domain proteins. Genes & Dev 6, 2177–89
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kassis J. A.
    (1990) Spatial and temporal control elements of the Drosophila engrailed gene. Genes Dev 4, 433–43
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Keleher C. A.,
    2. Redd M. J.,
    3. Schultz J.,
    4. Carlson M.,
    5. Johnson A. D.
    (1992) Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell 68, 709–19
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kissinger C. R.,
    2. Liu B. S.,
    3. Martin-Blanco E.,
    4. Kornberg T. B.,
    5. Pabo C. O.
    (1990). Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 Å resolution, a framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell 63, 579–90
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kornberg T.,
    2. Siden I.,
    3. O'Farrell P. H.,
    4. Simon M.
    (1985) The engrailed locus of Drosophila, in situ localization of transcripts reveals compartment-specific expression. Cell 40, 45–53
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kornberg T.
    (1981) Compartments in the abdomen of Drosophila and the role of the engrailed locus. Dev. Biol 86, 363–72
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kuziora M. A.,
    2. McGinnis W.
    (1989) A homeodomain substitution changes the regulatory specificity of the Deformed protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell 59, 563–71
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lai J.-S.,
    2. Cleary M. A.,
    3. Herr W.
    (1992) A single amino acid exchange transfers VP16-induced positive control from the Oct-1 to the Oct-2 homeo domain. Genes Dev 6, 2058–65
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lavorgna G.,
    2. Ueda H.,
    3. Clos J.,
    4. Wu C.
    (1991) FTZ-F1, a steroid hormone receptor-like protein implicated in the activation of fushi tarazu. Science 252, 848–51
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lawrence P. A.,
    2. Morata G.
    (1976) Compartments in the wing of Drosophila, a study of the engrailed gene. Dev. Biol 50, 321–37
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lawrence P. A.,
    2. Johnston P.,
    3. Macdonald P.,
    4. Struhl G.
    (1987) Borders of parasegments in Drosophila embryos are delimited by the fushi tarazu and even-skipped genes. Nature 328, 440–2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Licht J. D.,
    2. Grossel M. J.,
    3. Figge J.,
    4. Hansen U. M.
    (1990) Drosophila Kruppel protein is a transcriptional repressor. Nature 346, 76–9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lin L.,
    2. McGinnis W.
    (1992) Mapping functional specificity in the Dfd and Ubx homeo domains. Genes Dev 6, 1071–81
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Logan C.,
    2. Hanks M. C.,
    3. Noble-Topham S.,
    4. Nallainathan D.,
    5. Provart N. J.,
    6. Joyner A. L.
    (1992) Cloning and sequence comparison of the mouse, human, and chicken engrailed genes reveal potential functional domains and regulatory regions. Devel. Genetics 13, 345–58
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Madden S. L.,
    2. Cook D. M.,
    3. Morris J. F.,
    4. Gashler A.,
    5. Sukhatme V. P.,
    6. Rauscher F. I.
    (1991) Transcriptional repression mediated by the WT1 Wilms tumor gene product. Science 253, 1550–3
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Mann R. S.,
    2. Hogness D. S.
    (1990) Functional dissection of Ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster. Cell 60, 597–610
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Manoukian A. S.,
    2. Krause H. M.
    (1992) Concentration-dependent activities of the even-skipped protein in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev 6, 1740–51
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Martinez Arias A.,
    2. Baker N. E.,
    3. Ingham P. W.
    (1988) Role of segment polarity genes in the definition and maintenance of cell states in the Drosophila embryo. Development 103, 157–170
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Morata G.,
    2. Kornberg T.,
    3. Lawrence P. A.
    (1983) The phenotype of engrailed mutations in the antenna of Drosophila. Dev. Biol 99, 27–33
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nusslein-Volhard C.,
    2. Wieschaus E.
    (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287, 795–801
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ohno C. K.,
    2. Petkovich M.
    (1992) FTZ-F1, a novel member of the Drosophila nuclear receptor family. Mech. Development 40, 13–24
    OpenUrl
    1. Pick L.,
    2. Schier A.,
    3. Affolter M.,
    4. Schmidt G. T.,
    5. Gehring W. J.
    (1990) Analysis of the ftz upstream element, germ layer-specific enhancers are independently autoregulated. Genes Dev 4, 1224–39
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Poole S. J.,
    2. Kauvar L. M.,
    3. Drees B.,
    4. Kornberg T.
    (1985) The engrailed locus of Drosophila, structural analysis of an embryonic transcript. Cell 40, 37–43
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Roth S. Y.,
    2. Shimizu M.,
    3. Johnson L.,
    4. Grunstein M.,
    5. Simpson R. T.
    (1992) Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast alpha-2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutations in histone H4. Genes Dev 6, 411–25
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Saha S.,
    2. Brickman J. M.,
    3. Lehming N.,
    4. Ptashne M.
    (1993) New eukaryotic transcriptional repressors. Nature 363, 648–52
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sap J.,
    2. Munoz A.,
    3. Schmitt J.,
    4. Stunnenberg H.,
    5. Vennstrom B.
    (1989) Repression of transcription mediated at a thyroid hormone response element by the v-erb-A oncogene product. Nature 340, 242–4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sauer F.,
    2. Jäckle H.
    (1991) Concentration-dependent transcriptional activation or repression by Kruppel from a single binding site. Nature 353, 563–6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schier A. F.,
    2. Gehring W. J.
    (1992) Direct homeodomain-DNA interaction in the autoregulation of the fushi tarazu gene. Nature 356, 804–7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Spradling A. C.,
    2. Rubin G. M.
    (1982) Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218, 341–347
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Struhl G.
    (1985) Near-reciprocal phenotypes caused by inactivation or indiscriminate expression of the Drosophila segmentation gene ftz. Nature 318, 677–680
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tabata T.,
    2. Eaton S.,
    3. Kornberg T. B.
    (1992) The Drosophila hedgehog gene is expressed specifically in posterior compartment cells and is a target of engrailed regulation. Genes Dev 6, 2635–45
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ueda H.,
    2. Sonoda S.,
    3. Brown J. L.,
    4. Scott M. P.,
    5. Wu C.
    (1990) A sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that activates fushi tarazu segmentation gene expression. Genes Dev 4, 624–35
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Uhlenbeck O. C.
    (1987) A small catalytic oligoribonucleotide. Nature 328, 596–600
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wagner R. W.
    (1994) Gene inhibition using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Nature 372, 333–5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wakimoto B. T.,
    2. Turner F. R.,
    3. Kaufman T. C.
    (1984) Defects in embryogenesis in mutants associated with the Antennapedia gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol 102, 147–72
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Weir M. P.,
    2. Edgar B. A.,
    3. Kornberg T.,
    4. Schubiger G.
    (1988) Spatial regulation of engrailed expression in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev 2, 1194–1203
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Winslow G. M.,
    2. Hayashi S.,
    3. Krasnow M.,
    4. Hogness D. S.,
    5. Scott M. P.
    (1989) Transcriptional activation by the Antennapedia and fushi tarazu proteins in cultured Drosophila cells. Cell 57, 1017–30
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Yoshinaga S. K.,
    2. Peterson C. L.,
    3. Herskowitz I.,
    4. Yamamoto K. R.
    (1993) Roles of SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 proteins for transcriptional enhancement by steroid receptors. Science 258, 1598–1604
    1. Zhao J. J.,
    2. Pick L.
    (1993) Generating loss-of-function phenotypes of the fushi tarazu gene with a targeted ribozyme in Drosophila. Nature 365, 448–50
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Zuo P.,
    2. Stanojevic D.,
    3. Colgan J.,
    4. Han K.,
    5. Levine M.,
    6. Manley J. L.
    (1991) Activation and repression of transcription by the gap proteins hunchback and Kruppel in cultured Drosophila cells. Genes Dev 5, 254–64
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inserting the Ftz homeodomain into engrailed creates a dominant transcriptional repressor that specifically turns off Ftz target genes in vivo
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Inserting the Ftz homeodomain into engrailed creates a dominant transcriptional repressor that specifically turns off Ftz target genes in vivo
A. John, S.T. Smith, J.B. Jaynes
Development 1995 121: 1801-1813;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Inserting the Ftz homeodomain into engrailed creates a dominant transcriptional repressor that specifically turns off Ftz target genes in vivo
A. John, S.T. Smith, J.B. Jaynes
Development 1995 121: 1801-1813;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Groucho augments the repression of multiple Even skipped target genes in establishing parasegment boundaries
  • Axial skeletal patterning in mice lacking all paralogous group 8 Hox genes
  • Morphogenetic cell movements in the middle region of the dermomyotome dorsomedial lip associated with patterning and growth of the primary epaxial myotome
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.


Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Brandon Carpenter talks about how inherited histone methylation defines the germline versus soma decision in C. elegans. 

Sign up to join our next session:

10 March
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992