Advertisement
JOURNAL ARTICLES
The ALK-2 and ALK-4 activin receptors transduce distinct mesoderm-inducing signals during early Xenopus development but do not co-operate to establish thresholds
N.A. Armes, J.C. Smith
Development 1997 124: 3797-3804;

Summary

The TGFbeta family member activin induces different mesodermal cell types in a dose-dependent fashion in the Xenopus animal cap assay. High concentrations of activin induce dorsal and anterior cell types such as notochord and muscle, while low concentrations induce ventral and posterior tissues such as mesenchyme and mesothelium. In this paper we investigate whether this threshold phenomenon involves the differential effects of the two type I activin receptors ALK-2 and ALK-4. Injection of RNA encoding constitutively active forms of the receptors (here designated ALK-2* and ALK-4*) reveals that ALK-4* strongly induces the more posterior mesodermal marker Xbra and the dorsoanterior marker goosecoid in animal cap explants. Maximal levels of Xbra expression are attained using lower concentrations of RNA than are required for the strongest activation of goosecoid, and at the highest doses of ALK-4*, levels of Xbra transcription decrease, as is seen with high concentrations of activin. By contrast, the ALK-2* receptor activates Xbra but fails to induce goosecoid to significant levels. Analysis at later stages reveals that ALK-4* signalling induces the formation of a variety of mesodermal derivatives, including dorsal cell types, in a dose-dependent fashion, and that high levels also induce endoderm. By contrast, the ALK-2* receptor induces only ventral mesodermal markers. Consistent with these observations, ALK-4* is capable of inducing a secondary axis when injected into the ventral side of 32-cell stage embryos whilst ALK-2* cannot. Co-injection of RNAs encoding constitutively active forms of both receptors reveals that ventralising signals from ALK-2* antagonise the dorsal mesoderm-inducing signal derived from ALK-4*, suggesting that the two receptors use distinct and interfering signalling pathways. Together, these results show that although ALK-2* and ALK-4* transduce distinct signals, the threshold responses characteristic of activin cannot be due to interactions between these two pathways; rather, thresholds can be established by ALK-4* alone. Furthermore, the effects of ALK-2* signalling are at odds with it behaving as an activin receptor in the early Xenopus embryo.

REFERENCES

    1. Attisano A.,
    2. Cárcamo J.,
    3. Ventura F.,
    4. Weis F. M. B.,
    5. Massague J.,
    6. Wrana J. L.
    (1993) Identification of human activin and TGFtype I receptors that form heteromeric kinase complexes with type II receptors. Cell 75, 671–680
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Attisano L.,
    2. Wrana J. L.,
    3. Montalvo E.,
    4. Massague J.
    (1996) Activation of signalling by the activin receptor complex. Mol. Cell Biol 16, 1066–1073
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Brummel T. J.,
    2. Twombly V.,
    3. Marques G.,
    4. Wrana J. L.,
    5. Newfeld S. J.,
    6. Attisano L.,
    7. Massague J.,
    8. O'Connor M. B.,
    9. Gelbart W. M.
    (1994) Characterization and relationship of Dpp receptors encoded by the saxophone and thick veins genes in Drosophila. Cell 78, 251–261
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Cárcamo J.,
    2. Weis F. M. B.,
    3. Ventura F.,
    4. Wieser R.,
    5. Wrana J. L.,
    6. Attisano L.,
    7. Massague J.
    (1994) Type I receptors specify growth inhibitory and transcriptional responses to transforming growth factorand activin. Mol. Cell Biol 14, 3810–3821
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chang C.,
    2. Wilson P. A.,
    3. Mathews L.,
    4. Hemmati-Brivanlou A.
    (1997) A Xenopus type I activin receptor mediates mesodermal but not neural specification during embryogenesis. Development 124, 827–837
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Cho K. W. Y.,
    2. Blumberg B.,
    3. Steinbeisser H.,
    4. De Robertis E. M.
    (1991) Molecular nature of Spemann's organizer: the role of the Xenopushomeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 67, 1111–1120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Dale L.,
    2. Howes G.,
    3. Price B. M.,
    4. Smith J. C.
    (1992) Bone morphogenetic protein 4: a ventralizing factor in early Xenopu s development. Development 115, 573–85
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Dale L.,
    2. Slack J. M.
    (1987) Fate map for the 32-cell stage of Xenopus laevis. Development 99, 527–51
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Driever W.,
    2. Nusslein-Volhard C.
    (1989) The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 337, 138–143
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Driever W.,
    2. Thoma G.,
    3. Nusslein-Volhard C.
    (1989) Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen. Nature 340, 363–7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Dyson S.,
    2. Gurdon J. B.
    (1996) Activin signalling has a necessary function in Xenopus early development. Curr. Biol 7, 81–84
    1. Graff J. M.,
    2. Bansal A.,
    3. Melton D. A.
    (1996) Xenopus Mad proteins transduce distinct subsets of signals for the TGFsuperfamily. Cell 85, 479–487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Green J. B. A.,
    2. Howes G.,
    3. Symes K.,
    4. Cooke J.,
    5. Smith J. C.
    (1990) The biological effects of XTC-MIF: quantitative comparison with Xenopus bFGF. Development 108, 229–38
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Green J. B. A.,
    2. New H. V.,
    3. Smith J. C.
    (1992) Responses of embryonic Xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm. Cell 71, 731–739
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Green J. B. A.,
    2. Smith J. C.
    (1990) Graded changes in dose of a Xenopus activin A homologue elicit stepwise transitions in embryonic cell fate. Nature 347, 391–394
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Green J. B. A.,
    2. Smith J. C.,
    3. Gerhart J. C.
    (1994) Slow emergence of a multithreshold response to activin requires cell-contact-dependent sharpening but not prepattern. Development 120, 2271–2278
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Gurdon J. B.,
    2. Harger P.,
    3. Mitchell A.,
    4. Lemaire P.
    (1994) Activin signalling and response to a morphogen gradient. Nature 371, 487–492
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gurdon J. B.,
    2. Mitchell A.,
    3. Mahony D.
    (1995) Direct and continuous assessment by cells of their position in a morphogen gradient. Nature 376, 520–521
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hoodless P. A.,
    2. Haerry T.,
    3. Abdollah S.,
    4. Stapleton M.,
    5. O'Connor M. B.,
    6. Attisano L.,
    7. Wrana J. L.
    (1996) MADR1, a MAD-related protein that functions in BMP2 signaling pathways. Cell 85, 489–500
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Jones C. M.,
    2. Armes N.,
    3. Smith J. C.
    (1996) Signalling by TGF-family members: short-range effects of Xnr-2 and BMP-4 contrast with the long-range effects of activin. Curr. Biol 6, 1468–1475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Jones C. M.,
    2. Dale L.,
    3. Hogan B. L. M.,
    4. Wright C. V. E.,
    5. Smith J. C.
    (1996) Bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) exerts its ventralizing effects on embryonic mesoderm during gastrula stages in Xenopus development. Development 122, 1545–1554
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Jones C. M.,
    2. Kuehn M. R.,
    3. Hogan B. L. M.,
    4. Smith J. C.,
    5. Wright C. V. E.
    (1995) Nodal-related signals induce axial mesoderm and dorsalize mesoderm during gastrulation. Development 121, 3651–3662
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Jones C. M.,
    2. Lyons K. M.,
    3. Lapan P. M.,
    4. Wright C. V. E.,
    5. Hogan B. L. M.
    (1992) DVR-4 (Bone morphogenetic protein-4) as a posterior-ventralizing factor in Xenopus mesoderm induction. Development 115, 639–647
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Kintner C. R.,
    2. Brockes J. P.
    (1984) Monoclonal antibodies recognise blastemal cells derived from differentiating muscle in newt limb regeneration. Nature 308, 67–69
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kondo M.,
    2. Semba K.,
    3. Shiokawa K.,
    4. Yamamoto T.
    (1996) Molecular cloning of Xenopus activin type I receptor and the analysis of its expression during embryogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 218, 549–555
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Liu F.,
    2. Hata A.,
    3. Baker J. C.,
    4. Doody J.,
    5. Carcamo J.,
    6. Harland R. M.,
    7. Massague J.
    (1996) A human Mad protein acting as a BMP-regulated transcriptional activator. Nature 381, 620–623
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu F.,
    2. Ventura F.,
    3. Doody J.,
    4. Massague J.
    (1995) Human type II receptor for bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs): extension of the two-kinase receptor model to the BMPs. Mol. Cell Biol 15, 3479–3486
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ma X.,
    2. Yuan D.,
    3. Diepold K.,
    4. Scarborough T.,
    5. Ma J.
    (1996) The Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid binds DNA cooperatively. Development 122, 1195–1206
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Mahony D.,
    2. Gurdon J. B.
    (1995) A type I serine/threonine kinase receptor that can dorsalize mesoderm in Xenopus. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6474–6478
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Mathews L. S.
    (1994) Activin receptors and cellular signaling by the receptor serine kinase family. Endocrine Reviews 15, 310–325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Mohun T. J.,
    2. Brennan S.,
    3. Dathan N.,
    4. Fairman S.,
    5. Gurdon J. B.
    (1984) Cell type-specific activation of actin genes in the early amphibian embryo. Nature 311, 716–721
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nellen D.,
    2. Affolter M.,
    3. Basler K.
    (1994) Receptor serine/threonine kinases implicated in the control of Drosophila body pattern by decapentaplegic. Cell 78, 225–237
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. O'Reilly M.-A. J.,
    2. Smith J. C.,
    3. Cunliffe V.
    (1995) Patterning of the mesoderm in Xenopus: dose-dependent and synergistic effects of Brachyury and Pintallavis. Development 121, 1351–1359
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Penton A.,
    2. Chen Y.,
    3. Staehling-Hampton K.,
    4. Wrana J. L.,
    5. Attisano L.,
    6. Szidonya J.,
    7. Cassill J. A.,
    8. Massague J.,
    9. Hoffmann F. M.
    (1994) Identification of two bone morphogenetic protein type I receptors in Drosophila and evidence that Brk25D is a decapentaplegic receptor. Cell 78, 239–250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ruiz i Altaba A.,
    2. Jessell T. M.
    (1992) Pintallavis, a gene expressed in the organizer and midline cells of frog embryos: involvement in the development of the neural axis. Development 116, 81–93
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Ruiz i Altaba A.,
    2. Melton D. A.
    (1989) Bimodal and graded expression of the Xenopus homeobox gene Xhox3 during embryonic development. Development 106, 173–183
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Sargent M. G.,
    2. Bennett M. F.
    (1990) Identification in Xenopus of a structural homologue of the Drosophila gene Snail. Development 109, 967–973
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sasai Y.,
    2. Lu B.,
    3. Piccolo S.,
    4. De Robertis E. M.
    (1996) Endoderm induction by the organizer-secreted factors chordin and noggin in Xenopus animal caps. EMBO J 15, 4547–4555
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Singer M. A.,
    2. Penton A.,
    3. Twombly V.,
    4. Hoffmann F. M.,
    5. Gelbart W. M.
    (1997) Signaling through both type I DPP receptyors is required for anterior-posterior patterning of the entire Drosophila wing. Development 124, 79–89
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Slack J. M. W.
    (1984) Regional biosynthetic markers in the early amphibian embryo. J. Embryol. exp. Morph 80, 289–319
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Slack J. M. W.
    (1994) Inducing factors in Xenopus early embryos. Curr. Biol 4, 116–126
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Smith J. C.,
    2. Price B. M. J.,
    3. Green J. B. A.,
    4. Weigel D.,
    5. Herrmann B. G.
    (1991) Expression of a Xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction. Cell 67, 79–87
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Smith J. C.,
    2. Slack J. M. W.
    (1983) Dorsalization and neural induction: properties of the organizer in Xenopus laevis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph 78, 299–317
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Smith J. C.,
    2. Yaqoob M.,
    3. Symes K.
    (1988) Purification, partial characterization and biological effects of the XTC mesoderm-inducing factor. Development 103, 591–600
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Struhl G.,
    2. Struhl K.,
    3. Macdonald P. M.
    (1989) The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator. Cell 57, 1259–1273
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Symes K.,
    2. Smith J. C.
    (1987) Gastrulation movements provide an early marker of mesoderm induction in Xenopus. Development 101, 339–349
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Symes K.,
    2. Yordan C.,
    3. Mercola M.
    (1994) Morphological differences in Xenopus embryonic mesodermal cells are specified as an early response to distinct threshold concentrations of activin. Development 120, 2339–2346
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. ten Dijke P.,
    2. Yamashita H.,
    3. Sampath T. K.,
    4. Reddi A. H.,
    5. Estevez M.,
    6. Riddle D. L.,
    7. Ichijo H.,
    8. Heldin C. H.,
    9. Miyazono K.
    (1994) Identification of type I receptors for osteogenic protein-1 and bone morphogenetic protein-4. J Biol. Chem 269, 16985–16988
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tsuchida K.,
    2. Sawchenko P. E.,
    3. Nishikawa S. I.,
    4. Vale W. W.
    (1996) Molecular-cloning of a novel type-I receptor serine/threonine kinase for the TGF-beta superfamily from rat-brain. Mol. Cell. Neurosci 7, 467–478
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Weis-Garcia F.,
    2. Massague J.
    (1996) Complementation between kinase-defective and activation-defective TGF-receptors reveals a novel form of receptor cooperativity essential for signalling. EMBO J 15, 276–289
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wieser R.,
    2. Wrana J. L.,
    3. Massague J.
    (1995) GS domain mutations that constitutively activate TR-1, the downstream signaling component in the TGF receptor complex. EMBO J 14, 2199–2208
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wilson P. A.,
    2. Melton D. A.
    (1994) Mesodermal patterning by an inducer gradient depends on secondary cell-cell communication. Curr. Biol 4, 676–686
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wrana J. L.,
    2. Attisano L.,
    3. Wieser R.,
    4. Ventura F.,
    5. Massague J.
    (1994) Mechanism of activation of the TGF-beta receptor. Nature 370, 341–347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Yamashita H.,
    2. ten Dijke P.,
    3. Huylebroeck D.,
    4. Sampath T. K.,
    5. Andries M.,
    6. Smith J. C.,
    7. Heldin C.-H.,
    8. Miyazono K.
    (1995) Osteogenic protein-1 binds to activin type II receptor and induces certain activin-like effects. J. Cell Biol 130, 217–226
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
JOURNAL ARTICLES
The ALK-2 and ALK-4 activin receptors transduce distinct mesoderm-inducing signals during early Xenopus development but do not co-operate to establish thresholds
N.A. Armes, J.C. Smith
Development 1997 124: 3797-3804;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Kathryn Virginia Anderson (1952-2020)

Developmental geneticist Kathryn Anderson passed away at home on 30 November 2020. Tamara Caspary, a former postdoc and friend, remembers Kathryn and her remarkable contribution to developmental biology.

Zooming into 2021

In a new Editorial, Editor-in-Chief James Briscoe and Executive Editor Katherine Brown reflect on the triumphs and tribulations of the last 12 months, and look towards a hopefully calmer and more predictable year.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

Over 60 institutions in 12 countries are now participating in our Read & Publish initiative. Here, James Briscoe explains what this means for his institution, The Francis Crick Institute. Find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.

Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Sign up to join our next session:

10 February
Time: 13:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: preLights