Advertisement
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change
M.Z. Ludwig, N.H. Patel, M. Kreitman
Development 1998 125: 949-958;

Summary

Experimental investigations of eukaryotic enhancers suggest that multiple binding sites and trans-acting regulatory factors are often required for wild-type enhancer function. Genetic analysis of the stripe 2 enhancer of even-skipped (eve), an important developmental gene in Drosophila, provides support for this view. Given the importance of even-skipped expression in early Drosophila development, it might be predicted that many structural features of the stripe 2 enhancer will be evolutionarily conserved, including the DNA sequences of protein binding sites and the spacing between them. To test this hypothesis, we compared sequences of the stripe 2 enhancer between four species of Drosophila: D. melanogaster, D. yakuba, D. erecta and D. pseudoobscura. Our analysis revealed a large number of nucleotide substitutions in regulatory protein binding sites for bicoid, hunchback, Kruppel and giant, as well as a systematic change in the size of the enhancer. Some of the binding sites in D. melanogaster are either absent or modified in other species. One functionally important bicoid-binding site in D. melanogaster appears to be recently evolved. We, therefore, investigated possible functional consequences of sequence differences among these stripe 2 enhancers by P-element-mediated transformation. This analysis revealed that the eve stripe 2 enhancer from each of the four species drove reporter gene expression at the identical time and location in D. melanogaster embryos. Double staining of native eve protein and transgene mRNA in early embryos showed that the reporter gene mimicked native eve expression and, in every case, produced sharply defined stripes at the blastoderm stage that were coincident with eve stripe 2 protein. We argue that stripe 2 eve expression in Drosophila evolution can be viewed as being under constant stabilizing selection with respect to the location of the anterior and posterior borders of the stripe. We further hypothesize that the stripe 2 enhancer is functionally robust, so that its evolution may be governed by the fixation of both slightly deleterious and adaptive mutations in regulatory protein binding sites as well as in the spacing between binding sites. This view allows for a slow but continual turnover of functionally important changes in the stripe 2 enhancer.

REFERENCES

    1. Ahringer J.
    (1996) Posterior patterning by the Caenorhabditis elegans even-skipped homolog vab-7. Genes Dev 10, 1120–1130
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Akashi H.
    (1995) Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at ‘silent’ sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139, 1067–1076
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Arnone M. I.,
    2. Davidson E. H.
    (1997) The hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems. Development 124, 1851–1864
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Arnosti D.,
    2. Barolo S.,
    3. Levine M.,
    4. Small S.
    (1996) The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. Development 122, 205–214
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Bastian H.,
    2. Gruss P.
    (1990) A murine even-skipped homologue, Evx1, is expressed during early embryogenesis and neurogenesis in a biphasic manner. EMBO J 9, 1839–1852
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Fujioka M.,
    2. Jaynes J. B.,
    3. Goto T.
    (1995) Early even-skipped stripes act as morphogentic gradients at the single cell level to establish engrailed expression. Development 121, 4371–4382
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Goto T.,
    2. Macdonald P.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    (1989) Early and late periodic patterns of even-skipped expression are controlled by distinct regulatory elements that respond to different spatial cues. Cell 57, 413–422
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gray S.,
    2. Szymanski P.,
    3. Levine M.
    (1994) Short-range repressionpermits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev 8, 1829–1838
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hanes S. D.,
    2. Riddihough G.,
    3. Ish-Horowicz D.,
    4. Brent R.
    (1994) Specific DNA recognition and intersite spacing are critical for action of the bicoid morphogen. Mol. Cell Biol 14, 3364–3375
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Harding K.,
    2. Hoey T.,
    3. Warrior R.,
    4. Levine M.
    (1989) Autoregulatory and gap response elements of the even-skipped promoter of Drosophila. EMBO J 8, 1205–1212
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Jeffs P. S.,
    2. Holmes E. C.,
    3. Ashburner M.
    (1994) The molecular evolution of the alcohol dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase-related genes in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Mol. Biol. Evol 11, 287–304
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Jiang J.,
    2. Kosman D.,
    3. Ip Y. T.,
    4. Levine M.
    (1991) The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant twist in early Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev 5, 1881–1891
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jiang J.,
    2. Hoey T.,
    3. Levine M.
    (1991) Autoregulation of a segmentation gene in Drosophila: Combinatorial interaction of the even-skipped homeo box protein with a distal enhancer element. Genes Dev 5, 265–277
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kenyon C.
    (1994) If birds can fly, why can't we? Homeotic genes and evolution. Cell 78, 175–180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Kimura M.
    (1981) Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to non-random usage of synonymous codons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 5773–5777
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Langland J. A.,
    2. Carroll S. B.
    (1993) Conservation of regulatory elements controlling hairy pair-rule stripe formation. Development 117, 585–596
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Lawrence P. A.,
    2. Johnston P.,
    3. Macdonald P.,
    4. Struhl G.
    (1987) Borders of parasegments in Drosophila embryos are delimited by the fushi tarazu and even-skipped genes. Nature 328, 440–442
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ludwig M. Z.,
    2. Kreitman M.
    (1995) Evolutionary dynamics of the enhancer region of even-skipped in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol 12, 1002–1011
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Ludwig M. Z.,
    2. Tamarina N. A.,
    3. Richmond R. C.
    (1993) Localization of sequences controlling the spatial, temporal, and sex-specific expression of the esterase 6 locus in Drosophila melanogaster adults. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 6233–6237
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ma X.,
    2. Yuan D.,
    3. Diepold K.,
    4. Scarborough T.,
    5. Ma J.
    (1996) The Drosophila morphogenic protein Bicoid binds DNA cooperatively. Development 122, 1195–1206
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Nusslein-Volhard C.,
    2. Kluding H.,
    3. Jurgens G.
    (1985) Genes affecting the segmental subdivision of the Drosophila embryo. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol 50, 145–154
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Patel N. H.,
    2. Ball E. E.,
    3. Goodman C. S.
    (1992) Changing role of even-skipped during the evolution of insect pattern formation. Nature 357, 339–342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Patel N. H.,
    2. Condron B. G.,
    3. Zinn K.
    (1994) Pair-rule expression patterns of even-skipped are found in both short-and long-germ beetles. Nature 367, 429–434
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Robertson H. M.,
    2. Preston C. R.,
    3. Phillis R. W.,
    4. Johnson-Schlitz D. M.,
    5. Benz W. K.,
    6. Engels W. R.
    (1988) A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 118, 461–470
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ruiz i Altaba A.,
    2. Melton D. A.
    (1989) Involvement of the Xenopus homeobox gene Xho3 in pattern formation along the anterior-posterior axis. Cell 57, 317–326
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Small S.,
    2. Blair A.,
    3. Levine M.
    (1992) Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 11, 4047–4057
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Small S.,
    2. Arnosti D. N.,
    3. Levine M.
    (1993) Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter. Development 119, 767–772
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Small S.,
    2. Blair A.,
    3. Levine M.
    (1996) Regulation of two pair-rule stripes by a single enhancer in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol 175, 314–324
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Sommer R.,
    2. Tautz D.
    (1991) Segmentation gene expression in the housefly Musca domestica. Development 113, 419–430
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Stanojevic D.,
    2. Small S.,
    3. Levine M.
    (1991) Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo. Science 254, 1385–1387
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Thummel C. S.,
    2. Boulet A. M.,
    3. Lipshitz H. D.
    (1988) Vectors for Drosophila P element-mediated transformation and tissue culture transfection. Gene 74, 445–456
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Williams J. A.,
    2. Paddock S. W.,
    3. Vorwerk K.,
    4. Carroll S. B.
    (1994) Organization of wing formation and induction of a wing-patterning gene at the dorsal/ventral compartment boundary. Nature 368, 299–305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Warrior R.,
    2. Levine M.
    (1990) Dose-dependent regulation of pair-rule stripes by gap proteins and the initiation segment polarity. Development 110, 759–767
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

 Download PDF

Email
JOURNAL ARTICLES
Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change
M.Z. Ludwig, N.H. Patel, M. Kreitman
Development 1998 125: 949-958;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Alerts

Article navigation

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Advertisement

Kathryn Virginia Anderson (1952-2020)

Developmental geneticist Kathryn Anderson passed away at home on 30 November 2020. Tamara Caspary, a former postdoc and friend, remembers Kathryn and her remarkable contribution to developmental biology.

Zooming into 2021

In a new Editorial, Editor-in-Chief James Briscoe and Executive Editor Katherine Brown reflect on the triumphs and tribulations of the last 12 months, and look towards a hopefully calmer and more predictable year.

Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

Over 60 institutions in 12 countries are now participating in our Read & Publish initiative. Here, James Briscoe explains what this means for his institution, The Francis Crick Institute. Find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.

Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.

Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Sign up to join our next session:

10 February
Time: 13:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: preLights