Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
JOURNAL ARTICLES
FGF8 induces formation of an ectopic isthmic organizer and isthmocerebellar development via a repressive effect on Otx2 expression
S. Martinez, P.H. Crossley, I. Cobos, J.L. Rubenstein, G.R. Martin
Development 1999 126: 1189-1200;
S. Martinez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.H. Crossley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. Cobos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.L. Rubenstein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.R. Martin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

Beads containing recombinant FGF8 (FGF8-beads) were implanted in the prospective caudal diencephalon or midbrain of chick embryos at stages 9–12. This induced the neuroepithelium rostral and caudal to the FGF8-bead to form two ectopic, mirror-image midbrains. Furthermore, cells in direct contact with the bead formed an outgrowth that protruded laterally from the neural tube. Tissue within such lateral outgrowths developed proximally into isthmic nuclei and distally into a cerebellum-like structure. These morphogenetic effects were apparently due to FGF8-mediated changes in gene expression in the vicinity of the bead, including a repressive effect on Otx2 and an inductive effect on En1, Fgf8 and Wnt1 expression. The ectopic Fgf8 and Wnt1 expression domains formed nearly complete concentric rings around the FGF8-bead, with the Wnt1 ring outermost. These observations suggest that FGF8 induces the formation of a ring-like ectopic signaling center (organizer) in the lateral wall of the brain, similar to the one that normally encircles the neural tube at the isthmic constriction, which is located at the boundary between the prospective midbrain and hindbrain. This ectopic isthmic organizer apparently sends long-range patterning signals both rostrally and caudally, resulting in the development of the two ectopic midbrains. Interestingly, our data suggest that these inductive signals spread readily in a caudal direction, but are inhibited from spreading rostrally across diencephalic neuromere boundaries. These results provide insights into the mechanism by which FGF8 induces an ectopic organizer and suggest that a negative feedback loop between Fgf8 and Otx2 plays a key role in patterning the midbrain and anterior hindbrain.

Reference

    1. Acampora D.,
    2. Avantaggiato V.,
    3. Tuorto F.,
    4. Simeone A.
    (1997) Genetic control of brain morphogenesis through Otx gene dosage requirement. Development 124, 3639–3650
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Ang S.-L.,
    2. Conlon R. A.,
    3. Jin O.,
    4. Rossant J.
    (1994) Positive and negative signals from mesoderm regulate the expression of mouse Otx2 in ectoderm explants. Development 120, 2979–2989
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Ang S.-L.,
    2. Rossant J.
    (1993) Anterior mesendoderm induces mouse Engrailed genes in explant cultures. Development 118, 139–149
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Bally-Cuif L.,
    2. Cholley B.,
    3. Wassef M.
    (1995) Involvement of Wnt-1 in the formation of the mes/metencephalic boundary. Mech. Dev 53, 23–34
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bally-Cuif L.,
    2. Gulisano M.,
    3. Broccoli V.,
    4. Boncinelli E.
    (1995) c-otx2 is expressed in two different phases of gastrulation and is sensitive to retinoic acid treatment in chick embryo. Mech. Dev 49, 49–63
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bally-Cuif L.,
    2. Wassef M.
    (1994) Ectopic induction and reorganization of Wnt-1 expression in quail/chick chimeras. Development 120, 3379–3394
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Beddington R. S. P.,
    2. Robertson E. J.
    (1998) Anterior patterning in mouse. Trends Genet 14, 277–284
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Birgbauer E.,
    2. Fraser S. E.
    (1994) Violation of cell lineage restriction compartments in the chick hindbrain. Development 120, 1347–1356
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Bloch-Gallego E.,
    2. Millet S.,
    3. Alvarado-Mallart R.-M.
    (1996) Further observations on the susceptibility of diencephalic prosomeres to En-2 induction and on the resulting histogenetic capabilities. Mech. Dev 58, 51–63
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bouillet P.,
    2. Chazaud C.,
    3. Oulad-Abdelghani M.,
    4. Dolle P.,
    5. Chambon P.
    (1995) Sequence and expression pattern of the Stra7 (Gbx-2) homeobox-containing gene induced by retinoic acid in P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Dev. Dynamics 204, 372–382
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Crossley P. H.,
    2. Martin G. R.
    (1995) The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo. Development 121, 439–451
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Crossley P. H.,
    2. Martinez S.,
    3. Martin G. R.
    (1996) Midbrain development induced by FGF8 in the chick embryo. Nature 380, 66–68
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Crossley P. H.,
    2. Minowada G.,
    3. MacArthur C. A.,
    4. Martin G. R.
    (1996) Roles for FGF8 in the induction, initiation and maintenance of chick limb development. Cell 84, 127–136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Danielian P. S.,
    2. McMahon A. P.
    (1996) Engrailed-1 as a target of the Wnt-1 signalling pathway in vertebrate midbrain development. Nature 383, 332–334
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Davis C. A.,
    2. Holmyard D. P.,
    3. Millen K. J.,
    4. Joyner A. L.
    (1991) Examining pattern formation in mouse, chicken and frog embryos with an En -specific antiserum. Development 111, 287–298
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Favor J.,
    2. Sandulache R.,
    3. Neuhauser-Klaus A.,
    4. Pretsch W.,
    5. Chatterjee B.,
    6. Senft E.,
    7. Wurst W.,
    8. Blanquet V.,
    9. Grimes P.,
    10. Sporle R.,
    11. Schughart K.
    (1996) The mouse Pax2 (1Neu) mutation is identical to a human PAX2 mutation in a family with renal-coloboma syndrome and results in developmental defects of the brain, ear, eye, and kidney. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13870–13875
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Figdor M. C.,
    2. Stern C. D.
    (1993) Segmental organization of embryonic diencephalon. Nature 363, 630–634
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Fraser S. E.,
    2. Keynes R.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1990) Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431–435
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gardner C. A.,
    2. Darnell D. K.,
    3. Poole S. J.,
    4. Ordahl C. P.,
    5. Barald K. F.
    (1988) Expression of an engrailed -like gene during development of the early embryonic chick nervous system. J. Neurosci. Res 21, 426–437
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Guthrie S.,
    2. Butcher M.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1991) Patterns of cell division and interkinetic nuclear migration in the chick embryo hindbrain. J. Neurobiol 22, 742–754
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hamburger V.,
    2. Hamilton H.
    (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryos. Reprinted in. Dev. Dynamics 195, 231–272
    OpenUrl
    1. Heikinheimo M.,
    2. Lawshe A.,
    3. Shackleford G. M.,
    4. Wilson D. B.,
    5. MacArthur C. A.
    (1994) Fgf-8 expression in the post-gastrulation mouse suggests roles in the development of the face, limbs, and central nervous system. Mech. Dev 48, 129–138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Henrique D.,
    2. Adam J.,
    3. Myat A.,
    4. Chitnis A.,
    5. Lewis J.,
    6. Ish-Horowicz D.
    (1995) Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature 375, 787–790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Heyman I.,
    2. Faissner A.,
    3. Lumsden A.
    (1995) Cell and matrix specialisations of rhombomere boundaries. Dev. Dynamics 204, 301–315
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Joyner A. L.
    (1996) Engrailed, Wnt and Pax genes regulate midbrain-hindbrain development. Trends Genet 12, 15–20
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. LaVail J. H.,
    2. Cowan W. M.
    (1971) The development of the chick optic tectum. I. Normal morphology and cytoarchitectonic development. Brain Res 28, 391–419
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lee S. M. K.,
    2. Danielian P. S.,
    3. Fritzsch B.,
    4. McMahon A. P.
    (1997) Evidence that FGF8 signalling from the midbrain-hindbrain junction regulates growth and polarity in the developing midbrain. Development 124, 959–969
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Logan C.,
    2. Hanks M. C.,
    3. Noble-Topham S.,
    4. Nallainathan D.,
    5. Provart N. J.,
    6. Joyner A. L.
    (1992) Cloning and sequence comparison of the mouse, human, and chicken engrailed genes reveal potential functional domains and regulatory regions. Dev. Genet 13, 345–358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lumsden A.,
    2. Krumlauf R.
    (1996) Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274, 1109–1115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lun K.,
    2. Brand M.
    (1998). A series of no isthmus (noi) alleles of the zebrafish pax2.1 gene reveals multiple signaling events in development of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Development 125, 3049–3062
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. MacArthur C. A.,
    2. Lawshe A.,
    3. Xu J.,
    4. Santos-Ocampo S.,
    5. Heikinheimo M.,
    6. Chellaiah A. T.,
    7. Ornitz D. M.
    (1995) FGF-8 isoforms activate receptor splice forms that are expressed in mesenchymal regions of mouse development. Development 121, 3603–3613
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Mahmood R.,
    2. Bresnick J.,
    3. Hornbruch A.,
    4. Mahony C.,
    5. Morton N.,
    6. Colquhoun K.,
    7. Martin P.,
    8. Lumsden A.,
    9. Dickson C.,
    10. Mason I.
    (1995) A role for FGF-8 in the initiation and maintenance of vertebrate limb bud outgrowth. Curr. Biol 5, 797–806
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Marin F.,
    2. Puelles L.
    (1994) Patterning of the embryonic avian midbrain after experimental inversions: a polarizing activity from the isthmus. Dev. Biol 163, 19–37
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Martinez S.,
    2. Geijo E.,
    3. Sanchez-Vives M. V.,
    4. Puelles L.,
    5. Gallego R.
    (1992) Reduced junctional permeability at interrhombomeric boundaries. Development 116, 1069–1076
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Martinez S.,
    2. Marin F.,
    3. Nieto M. A.,
    4. Puelles L.
    (1995) Induction of ectopic engrailed expression and fate change in avian rhombomeres: intersegmental boundaries as barriers. Mech. Dev 51, 289–303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. McMahon A. P.,
    2. Bradley A.
    (1990) The Wnt-1 (int-1) proto-oncogene is required for development of a large region of the mouse brain. Cell 62, 1073–1085
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. McMahon A. P.,
    2. Joyner A. L.,
    3. Bradley A.,
    4. McMahon J. A.
    (1992). The midbrain-hindbrain phenotype of Wnt-1-/Wnt-1-mice results from stepwise deletion of engrailed-expressing cells by 9.5 days postcoitum. Cell 69, 581–595
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Meyers E. N.,
    2. Lewandoski M.,
    3. Martin G. R.
    (1998) An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre-and Flp-mediated recombination. Nat. Genet 18, 136–141
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Millet S.,
    2. Alvarado-Mallart R.-M.
    (1995) Expression of the homeobox-containing gene En-2 during the development of the chick central nervous system. Eur. J. Neurosci 7, 777–791
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Millet S.,
    2. Bloch-Gallego E.,
    3. Simeone A.,
    4. Alvarado-Mallart R.-M.
    (1996) The caudal limit of Otx2 gene expression as a marker of the midbrain/hindbrain boundary: a study using in situ hybridisation and chick/quail homotopic grafts. Development 122, 3785–3797
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Nusse R.,
    2. Varmus H. E.
    (1992) Wnt genes. Cell 69, 1073–1087
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ohuchi H.,
    2. Yoshioka H.,
    3. Tanaka A.,
    4. Kawakami Y.,
    5. Nohno T.,
    6. Noji S.
    (1994) Involvement of androgen-induced growth factor (FGF-8) gene in mouse embryogenesis and morphogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 204, 882–888
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Puelles L.,
    2. Rubenstein J. L. R.
    (1993) Expression patterns of homeobox and other putative regulatory genes in the embryonic mouse forebrain suggest a neuromeric organization. Trends Neurosci 16, 472–479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Reifers F.,
    2. Bohli H.,
    3. Walsh E. C.,
    4. Crossley P. H.,
    5. Stainier D. Y.,
    6. Brand M.
    (1998) Fgf8 is mutated in zebrafish acerebellar (ace) mutants and is required for maintenance of midbrain-hindbrain boundary development and somitogenesis. Development 125, 2381–2395
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Retaux S.,
    2. Harris W. A.
    (1996) Engrailed and retinotectal topography. Trends Neurosci 19, 542–546
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rubenstein J. L. R.,
    2. Beachy P. A.
    (1998) Patterning of the embryonic forebrain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 8, 18–26
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Rubenstein J. L. R.,
    2. Martinez S.,
    3. Shimamura K.,
    4. Puelles L.
    (1994) The embryonic vertebrate forebrain: the prosomeric model. Science 266, 578–580
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Rubenstein J. L. R.,
    2. Puelles L.
    (1994) Homeobox gene expression during development of the vertebrate brain. Dev. Biol 29, 1–64
    1. Suda Y.,
    2. Matsuo I.,
    3. Aizawa S.
    (1997) Cooperation between Otx1 and Otx2 genes in developmental patterning of rostral brain. Mech. Dev 69, 125–141
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Thomas K. R.,
    2. Capecchi M. R.
    (1990) Targeted disruption of the murine int-1 proto-oncogene resulting in severe abnormalities in midbrain and cerebellar development. Nature 346, 847–850
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wassarman K.,
    2. Lewandoski M.,
    3. Campbell K.,
    4. Joyner A. L.,
    5. Rubenstein J. L. R.,
    6. Martinez S.,
    7. Martin G. R.
    (1997) Specification of the anterior hindbrain and establishment of a normal mid/hindbrain organizer is dependent on Gbx2 gene function. Development 124, 2923–2934
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Wilkinson D. G.,
    2. Bailes J. A.,
    3. McMahon A. P.
    (1987) Expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 is restricted to specific neural cells in the developing mouse embryo. Cell 50, 79–88
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Wurst W.,
    2. Auerbach A. B.,
    3. Joyner A. L.
    (1994) Multiple developmental defects in Engrailed-1 mutant mice: an early mid-hindbrain deletion and patterning defects in forelimbs and sternum. Development 120, 2065–2075
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Ye W.,
    2. Shimamura K.,
    3. Rubenstein J. L.,
    4. Hynes M. A.,
    5. Rosenthal A.
    (1998) FGF and Shh signals control dopaminergic and serotonergic cell fate in the anterior neural plate. Cell 93, 755–766
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FGF8 induces formation of an ectopic isthmic organizer and isthmocerebellar development via a repressive effect on Otx2 expression
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
JOURNAL ARTICLES
FGF8 induces formation of an ectopic isthmic organizer and isthmocerebellar development via a repressive effect on Otx2 expression
S. Martinez, P.H. Crossley, I. Cobos, J.L. Rubenstein, G.R. Martin
Development 1999 126: 1189-1200;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
JOURNAL ARTICLES
FGF8 induces formation of an ectopic isthmic organizer and isthmocerebellar development via a repressive effect on Otx2 expression
S. Martinez, P.H. Crossley, I. Cobos, J.L. Rubenstein, G.R. Martin
Development 1999 126: 1189-1200;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Genetic dissection of nodal function in patterning the mouse embryo
  • The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana regulates formation of a symmetric lamina, establishment of venation and repression of meristem-related homeobox genes in leaves
  • Drosophila puckered regulates Fos/Jun levels during follicle cell morphogenesis
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.


Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Brandon Carpenter talks about how inherited histone methylation defines the germline versus soma decision in C. elegans. 

Sign up to join our next session:

10 March
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992