Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes
James M. McClintock, Robin Carlson, Devon M. Mann, Victoria E. Prince
Development 2001 128: 2471-2484;
James M. McClintock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin Carlson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Devon M. Mann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria E. Prince
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •     Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Chordate phylogeny, which illustrates evolutionary relationships and differing Hox cluster complements (from Carroll, 1988). Blue brackets indicate time spans within which particular duplication events are believed to have occurred. The times when the ray and lobe-finned fishes last shared a common ancestor, and when the ostariophysans and acanthopterygians last shared a common ancestor, are indicated in green (in millions of years ago; Mya).

  •     Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Hox paralogue group 1 genes: sequence and functional domains. (A) Clustal X (Thompson et al., 1997) alignment of amino acid sequences of zebrafish, mouse and amphioxus Hox paralogue group 1 genes. Conceptual translations of the four zebrafish Hox PG1 genes are compared with mouse Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxd1 and AmphiHox-1. Identical residues in red, conserved changes in blue. Hexapeptide and homeodomain are overlined in blue and green, respectively; note the unusually long linker region between the hexapeptide and homeodomain regions of hoxc1a. The diagnostic PG1 residues (Sharkey et al., 1997) are indicated with asterisks (below sequence). The 2/7 diagnostic residues not conserved in hoxc1a are indicated with black rather than red asterisks. (B) Schematic of intron/exon structure for the four zebrafish PG1 genes, drawn to scale; hexapeptide and homeodomain are indicated in blue and green, respectively, alternatively spliced exon is indicated in yellow. Based on comparison to genomic sequences (GenBank Accession Numbers AF071243, AF071251, U40995, AF071263). Note that hoxc1a has no intron, as confirmed by PCR on genomic DNA. Numbers indicate intron/exon boundaries with respect to the start of translation; the length of the primary intron is also indicated. The following coding sequences have been placed on the EMBL database: hoxc1a, Accession Number AJ306432; hoxb1b, Accession Number, AJ306433; and hoxa1a, Accession Numbers AJ306430 and AJ306431. (C) Neighbour-joining tree to show the phylogenetic relationships between Hox PG1 genes (based on Clustal X alignment in A; displayed using NJ-Plot) (Perriere and Gouy, 1996), bootstrap values based on 1000 replicates are shown; scale bar refers to branch lengths. The tree suggests that mouse Hoxd1 and zebrafish hoxc1a group together; however, the long branch lengths imply that these genes are more distantly related.

  •     Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of zebrafish PG1 genes. Two-colour double in situ hybridization shows Hox genes in purple, plus krox-20 in red as a marker of r3 and r5. All embryos are mounted with dorsal side towards reader and anterior upwards. Rhombomere (r) numbers as indicated. (A-D) The hoxb1b and hoxb1a genes both have early expression domains in r4. (A) hoxb1b expression at 80% epiboly (8 hours, h) lies in bilateral epiblast domains above the margin. (B) At tailbud stage (10 h) hoxb1b expression is localized to r4 abutting early krox-20 expression in r3. (C) By the one-somite stage (10.5 h) hoxb1b expression has already started to retreat posteriorly and is absent from r4. (D) hoxb1a expression at the equivalent stage (one somite) is already upregulated in r4. (E-I) hoxa1a is expressed in an anterior subpopulation of neurones. (E) At 24 h hoxa1a expression is localized to discrete bilateral clusters of cells in the anterior hindbrain and ventral midbrain (arrowheads). (F) 36 h; expression is now localized to cell clusters in the midbrain, medial to the eyes, and r1 (arrowheads). (G) 3.5 μm transverse section (t.s.) through plane indicated in F. (H) HNK-1 antibody staining reveals cell bodies of the nMLF (arrowheads), the MLF axon tract and the trigeminal ganglia (TG) at 22 h. hoxa1a expression colocalizes to the nMLF. (I) hoxa1a-expressing cells continue to colocalize with HNK-1-positive neurones in the nMLF (arrowheads) at 28 h, arrows indicate hoxa1a-expressing cells in the anterior hindbrain. (J-M) hoxc1a expression: (J) at 12 h in notochord (n); (K) at 16.5 h in CNS (anterior limit at spinal cord/hindbrain junction); (L) at 24 h in bilateral cell clusters in the ventral midbrain (arrowhead) and Mauthner neurones (arrow); (M) at 36 h in cells medial to eyes (arrowhead), similar to hoxa1a.

  •     Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Efficiency of Hox protein translation. (A) In vitro translation products of synthetic PG1 Hox gene mRNAs analyzed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Protein products of the expected size are efficiently produced in vitro. Predicted sizes: long form of hoxa1a, 36 kDa; hoxb1a, 35 kDa; hoxb1b, 34 kDa; long form of hoxc1a, 34 kDa. Molecular weight marker sizes in kDa are indicated. (B) Western blot analysis of Myc-tagged Hox proteins synthesized in vivo after micro-injection of 50 ng/μl concentrations of each PG1 mRNA. Lysates of whole embryos were prepared at the 20-22 hour stage and 10 μg of total extracted protein electrophoresed and blotted. As expected, Myc-tagged proteins (six Myc-epitopes) are approximately 10 kDa larger that untagged versions. Molecular weight marker sizes in kDa are indicated.

  •     Table 1.
  •     Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Disposition of neuroanatomical and molecular markers reveals that mis-expression of hoxb1b transforms r2 to an r4 phenotype. (A-D) Retrograde labelling from the spinal cord of 5-day-old larvae reveals the disposition of the RS neurones (anterior to the top). (A) The subset of neurones labelled from the right hand side of the spinal cord only is schematized and labelled: M, Mauthner; nV, nucleus of the vestibular formation; MiM1, middle medial 1 cells; MiV1, middle ventral 1 cells; RoL2, rostral lateral 2 cells; llf, lateral longitudinal fascicle. Other abbreviations as previously designated (Hanneman et al., 1988). The locations of the rhombomeres relative to the RS neurones are indicated on the left-hand side. (B) Retrograde labelling of a normal 5-day-old larva. Mi, MiM1 plus MiV1 cells; rhombomeres numbered on right-hand side. Inset, 3A10 antibody staining reveals the r4 Mauthner neurones, M. (C,D) Mis-expression of hoxb1b leads to formation of the r4 characteristic M, Mi and nV cells at the r2 level; ectopic neurones are indicated by ′. These examples show unilateral duplications, less frequently bilateral duplications were observed, as shown in the inset in (D) by 3A10 antibody staining to reveal ectopic Mauthner neurones at the r2 level, M′. (E-J) Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of injected embryos, mounted with dorsal side uppermost and anterior to the left; in each case an unmanipulated control embryo is shown on the left-hand side and a hoxb1b-injected embryo at the same stage on the right-hand side. (E,F) 28 h; (G-J) 19 h; (E) islet1 expression labels cell bodies of the branchiomotor neurones. The trigeminal (Vth nerve) cell bodies have a lateral location, show intense labelling, and are subdivided into a major anterior (r2) population and a minor posterior (r3) population (white arrowheads). The facial (VIIth nerve) cell bodies lie more medially, show lower level expression, and form an anterior-posterior array through r4-r6 at this stage (bracket). (F) hoxb1b-injected embryo, islet1 expression shows medial facial-like neurones (VII′) at the level of r2 and r1, and possibly extending into the midbrain. O, otic vesicle. (G) In wild-type embryos, hoxb1a (blue) is expressed in r4 and krox-20 (red) in r3 and r5. (H) In hoxb1b-injected embryos there is ectopic hoxb1a (blue) expression at the r2 level, note expansion of the r3 krox-20 territory (red). (I) mar is expressed at elevated levels in rhombomere boundaries (arrowheads). (J) In hoxb1b-injected embryos, mar boundary staining reveals expansion of the r3 territory at the expense of the r2 territory.

  •     Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Mis-expression of hoxb1a, hoxa1a or AmphiHox-1 causes extensive posteriorizing transformations, but mis-expression of hoxc1a causes reduced transformations. The concentration of mRNA injected (in ng/μl) is indicated in the top right-hand corner of each panel. (A,B) hoxb1a-injected embryos, retrograde labelling from the spinal cord, rhombomeres as numbered, ectopic neurones are indicated by ′. (A) Bilateral transformation of r2 to an r4-like character, note duplications of M, Mi and nV (vestibular nuclei) neurones. (B) Example with a more extensive posteriorizing transformation, multiple Mauthner neurones have formed at the r2-r4 levels; there are also unilateral ectopic Mi cells extending through r1-r4. (C-E) hoxb1a-injected embryos assayed for expression of endogenous hoxb1a (blue) and krox20 (red, C,D only), 19 h, anterior towards left. (C) Example with hoxb1a expression at the r2 level; note also expansion of the krox20 positive r3 territory. (D) Example with more extensive ectopic expression of endogenous hoxb1a, expression is present in r1-r3 in addition to the r4 domain. (E) Example with ectopic hoxb1a expression in r2, midbrain (mb), forebrain (fb) and eyes (e). (F) hoxa1a mis-expression; example of bilateral ectopic Mauthner neurones (M′) in r2 revealed with 3A10 antibody at 28 h. (G,H) hoxa1a-injected embryos assayed for expression of hoxb1a. (G) Note ectopic expression of hoxb1a at the r2 level and enlargement of the r3 territory. (H) Note extensive anterior truncation accompanied by expansive ectopic hoxb1a expression (asterisk). (I) AmphiHox-1 mis-expression, example of a unilateral ectopic Mauthner neurone (M′) in r2 revealed with 3A10 antibody. (J) hoxc1a-injected embryo assayed for expression of hoxb1a, note small, lateral domains of ectopic expression of hoxb1a at the anterior r2 level (arrowhead). Scale bars: 50 μm.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes
James M. McClintock, Robin Carlson, Devon M. Mann, Victoria E. Prince
Development 2001 128: 2471-2484;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes
James M. McClintock, Robin Carlson, Devon M. Mann, Victoria E. Prince
Development 2001 128: 2471-2484;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Note added in proof
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Capillarity and active cell movement at mesendoderm translocation in the Xenopus gastrula
  • MFN2 interacts with Nuage-associated proteins and is essential for male germ cell development by controlling mRNA fate during spermatogenesis
  • The intrinsically disordered protein SPE-18 promotes localized assembly of MSP in Caenorhabditis elegans spermatocytes
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

A new society for regenerative biologists

Kenneth Poss and Elly Tanaka announce the launch of the International Society for Regenerative Biology (ISRB), which will promote research and education in the field of regenerative biology.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


An interview with Cagney Coomer

Over a virtual chat, we spoke to Cagney Coomer about her experiences in the lab, the classroom and the community centre, and why she thinks outreach and role models are vital to science.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992