Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
Research Article
The role of the zebrafish nodal-related genes squint and cyclops in patterning of mesendoderm
Scott T. Dougan, Rachel M. Warga, Donald A. Kane, Alexander F. Schier, William S. Talbot
Development 2003 130: 1837-1851; doi: 10.1242/dev.00400
Scott T. Dougan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel M. Warga
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald A. Kane
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander F. Schier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William S. Talbot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

Nodal signals, a subclass of the TGFβ superfamily of secreted factors, induce formation of mesoderm and endoderm in vertebrate embryos. We have examined the possible dorsoventral and animal-vegetal patterning roles for Nodal signals by using mutations in two zebrafish nodal-related genes, squint and cyclops, to manipulate genetically the levels and timing of Nodal activity. squint mutants lack dorsal mesendodermal gene expression at the late blastula stage, and fate mapping and gene expression studies in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants show that some dorsal marginal cells inappropriately form hindbrain and spinal cord instead of dorsal mesendodermal derivatives. The effects on ventrolateral mesendoderm are less severe, although the endoderm is reduced and muscle precursors are located nearer to the margin than in wild type. Our results support a role for Nodal signals in patterning the mesendoderm along the animal-vegetal axis and indicate that dorsal and ventrolateral mesoderm require different levels of squint and cyclops function. Dorsal marginal cells were not transformed toward more lateral fates in either sqt-/-; cyc+/- or sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos, arguing against a role for the graded action of Nodal signals in dorsoventral patterning of the mesendoderm. Differential regulation of the cyclops gene in these cells contributes to the different requirements for nodal-related gene function in these cells. Dorsal expression of cyclops requires Nodal-dependent autoregulation, whereas other factors induce cyclops expression in ventrolateral cells. In addition, the differential timing of dorsal mesendoderm induction in squint and cyclops mutants suggests that dorsal marginal cells can respond to Nodal signals at stages ranging from the mid-blastula through the mid-gastrula.

  • Nodal signals
  • Zebrafish
  • Spemann organizer
  • Gastrulation
  • Dorsoventral axis
  • Mesoderm

INTRODUCTION

During vertebrate gastrulation, cell movements form three distinct germ layers and elaborate the body axes. In pregastrula stage teleost and amphibian embryos, precursors of the three germ layers are distributed at characteristic positions along the animal-vegetal axis. In zebrafish, for example, the cells near the blastoderm margin at the late blastula stage form mesoderm and endoderm (mesendoderm), and are the first to involute at the onset of gastrulation (Kimmel et al., 1990; Warga and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1999). Cells slightly farther from the margin involute at later stages and exclusively become mesodermal cell types. In more animal regions, cells adopt ectodermal fates and do not involute. Each germ layer is patterned along the dorsoventral axis, generating the diverse array of cell types characteristic of the vertebrate body plan. The initial animal-vegetal and dorsoventral asymmetries are established by maternal transcription factors, which regulate zygotic genes controlling cell fate specification and morphogenesis (Harland and Gerhart, 1997; Heasman, 1997; Moon and Kimelman, 1998; Schier and Talbot, 1998; De Robertis et al., 2000; Kimelman and Griffin, 2000; Schier, 2001). Although zygotic factors that can induce and pattern mesoderm have been identified, significant questions remain unanswered about how the mesoderm is patterned.

nodal-related genes encode zygotically acting TGFβ family proteins that are necessary for induction of mesoderm and endoderm (Conlon et al., 1994; Jones et al., 1995; Joseph and Melton, 1997; Schier and Shen, 2000; Takahashi et al., 2000; Schier and Talbot, 2001; Whitman, 2001). Mouse nodal mutant embryos lack a primitive streak and fail to form mesodermal derivatives (Conlon et al., 1994; Varlet et al., 1997). In zebrafish, there are two known nodal-related genes, squint (sqt; ndr1 — Zebrafish Information Network) and cyclops (cyc; ndr2 — Zebrafish Information Network) (Erter et al., 1998; Feldman et al., 1998; Rebagliati et al., 1998a; Rebagliati et al., 1998b; Sampath et al., 1998). Whereas defects in sqt and cyc single mutants are largely confined to dorsal axial structures (Hatta et al., 1991; Thisse et al., 1994; Heisenberg and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1997; Feldman et al., 1998; Warga and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1999), almost all mesendodermal derivatives are absent in sqt; cyc double mutants, including notochord, trunk somites, pronephros, heart, blood and gut (Feldman et al., 1998). Thus, these nodal-related genes have both overlapping and essential functions in mesendoderm development. Cell tracing experiments in sqt; cyc double mutants and in maternal-zygotic one-eyed pinhead (oep) (MZoep) mutants, which are completely unresponsive to Nodal signals (Gritsman et al., 1999), indicate that Nodal signals allocate marginal cells to mesendodermal fates (Feldman et al., 2000; Carmany-Rampey and Schier, 2001).

Although it is now firmly established that Nodal signals induce mesendoderm, a possible role for Nodal signals in specifying different mesendodermal fates along the dorsoventral axis is still controversial. In Xenopus, three classes of models have been proposed for the role of activin-like ligands, a group that includes Activin and Nodal signals, in mesoderm patterning (Harland and Gerhart, 1997; Heasman, 1997; McDowell and Gurdon, 1999; De Robertis et al., 2000; Kimelman and Griffin, 2000). One group of models proposes that a gradient of activin-like signals patterns the mesoderm along the dorsoventral axis. This view is supported by explant experiments in which low doses of activin-like signals induced ventrolateral mesodermal fates and high levels induced dorsal fates (Smith et al., 1988; Ruiz i Altaba and Melton, 1989; Green et al., 1992; Agius et al., 2000). Further support for graded action of nodal-related genes comes from analysis of the distribution of phosphorylated Smad2, a proposed transcriptional effector of Nodal signals that is initially elevated in the dorsal marginal region in Xenopus blastulae (Faure et al., 2000). In addition, Nodal inhibitors block mesoderm formation in different dorsoventral positions in a dosage-dependent manner when overexpressed in Xenopus embryos, consistent with asymmetric action of endogenous Nodal signals (Agius et al., 2000).

The second class of models proposes that activin-like signals act uniformly along the dorsoventral axis to induce mesoderm in the marginal region, while independent signals generate dorsoventral pattern (Christian et al., 1992; Kimelman et al., 1992; Clements et al., 1999). This view is supported by experiments with a synthetic activin/TGF-β responsive reporter, which found that the transcriptional output from these signals is uniform along the dorsoventral axis at the beginning of gastrulation (Watabe et al., 1995). Furthermore, promoter analysis indicates that input from both Wnt and activin-like signaling pathways is required for proper expression of dorsal-specific genes, such as goosecoid and siamois (Watabe et al., 1995; Crease et al., 1998).

Recent work (Lee et al., 2001) supports a third model emphasizing the dynamic action of activin-like signals. The spatiotemporal distribution of phosphorylated Smad2 suggests that these signals are active predominantly in dorsal regions in the late blastula, and that the activity shifts to ventral regions as gastrulation progresses. In addition, activin-like ligands acting in dorsal regions elicit responses at earlier stages than ventrally acting ligands (Lee et al., 2001; Schohl and Fagotto, 2002). These results suggest that dorsoventral patterning involves distinct temporal responses to activin-like signals in dorsal and ventral cells.

Drawing parallels from the work on activin-like signals in Xenopus, analysis of Nodal pathway mutants has suggested at least two possible models of Nodal function in zebrafish mesendoderm patterning. The first model proposes graded action of Nodal signals along the dorsoventral axis, with high levels inducing dorsal mesendoderm and low levels inducing ventrolateral mesendoderm (Fig. 1A). In support of this view, dorsal axial structures are reduced in mutants with impaired Nodal signaling, such as sqt, cyc and schmalspur (sur) single mutants (Hatta et al., 1991; Heisenberg and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1997; Feldman et al., 1998; Pogoda et al., 2000; Sirotkin et al., 2000a). The expression patterns of sqt and cyc are consistent with an elevated dorsal requirement for nodal-related gene function. Soon after the onset of zygotic transcription, sqt is expressed specifically in the dorsal marginal region, where dorsal mesendoderm originates, and cyc is strongly expressed in the axial mesendoderm during gastrulation (Erter et al., 1998; Feldman et al., 1998; Rebagliati et al., 1998a). Moreover, dorsal mesoderm is most sensitive to overexpression of lefty1 (also known as activin), an inhibitor of activin-like signals (Bisgrove et al., 1999; Thisse and Thisse, 1999; Meno et al., 1999; Thisse et al., 2000). Finally, overexpression of high levels of sqt or cyc induces presumptive ectodermal cells to initiate dorsal mesendodermal gene expression, while lower levels induce pan-mesodermal but not dorsal mesodermal markers (Erter et al., 1998; Sampath et al., 1998; Chen and Schier, 2001). Models in which Nodal activity gradients pattern the dorsoventral axis predict a transformation of cell fates along the dorsoventral axis as Nodal dose is lowered (one scenario is depicted in Fig. 1A, right), but this prediction has not yet been tested by fate-mapping experiments.

    Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Two models for the action of Nodal signals in patterning the mesendoderm along the dorsoventral axis in zebrafish embryos. In each case, the gradient of shading at the margin represents the putative distribution of Nodal signals, with the darkest shade indicating the highest concentration. The fate maps shown in the second column are loosely based on those of Kimmel et al. (Kimmel et al., 1990). Mesendoderm is shaded red, green or blue, depending on the position along the dorsoventral axis, and regions generating both mesoderm and endoderm shaded darker than regions producing mesoderm alone. (A) High levels of Nodal signals specify dorsal mesendodermal fates, intermediate levels specify lateral mesendodermal fates and low levels determine ventral mesendoderm. In this model, Nodal signals act in a dorsal-to-ventral gradient to pattern the mesendoderm. The gradient shown here is only one of many such gradients that could be drawn consistent with the evidence. However, all versions of the gradient model predict that reductions in the level of Nodal function would result in the transformation of dorsal marginal cells to more ventrolateral fates (illustrated in the right-hand panels in A). (B) Nodal activity is uniformly distributed along the dorsoventral axis, but a gradient of Nodal signals along the animal-vegetal axis patterns the germ layers. Independent dorsalizing factors pattern the mesendoderm along the dorsoventral axis (represented by the red arrow). This model predicts that endodermal cells (darker colors near the margin) are transformed to more animal fates as levels of Nodal signals are reduced (right-hand panels in B). Dorsalizing factors remain to establish dorsoventral pattern. Ne, neuroectoderm; D, dorsal mesendoderm; L, lateral mesendoderm; V, ventral mesendoderm, Y, yolk.

The second model proposes that Nodal signals act uniformly along the dorsoventral axis to induce mesendoderm, while independent signals instruct fates along the dorsoventral axis (Fig. 1B). In support of this possibility, dorsoventral asymmetry is established even in the absence of Nodal signals. For example, the dorsal genes chordin and bozozok (dharma — Zebrafish Information Network) are expressed in sqt; cyc double mutants and in MZoep mutants (Gritsman et al., 1999; Shimizu et al., 2000; Sirotkin et al., 2000b). The sqt and cyc genes are expressed uniformly along the dorsoventral margin at the late blastula stage (Erter et al., 1998; Feldman et al., 1998; Rebagliati et al., 1998a; Sampath et al., 1998), consistent with an equivalent requirement in dorsal and ventrolateral regions. Additional evidence derives from the analysis of zygotic oep (Zoep) mutants (Schier et al., 1997), in which the response to Nodal signals is impaired but not eliminated (Gritsman et al., 1999). Zoep mutants lack endodermal derivatives from both the dorsal and ventral margin. Fate mapping of the dorsal marginal region in Zoep mutants indicates that the marginal-most cells (prechordal plate precursors) are transformed to a slightly more animal fate (notochord precursors), suggesting that different levels of Nodal signaling distinguish these cell fates (Gritsman et al., 2000). Similarly, low levels of exogenous antivin block endoderm but not mesoderm formation (Thisse and Thisse, 1999; Thisse et al., 2000). If Nodal signals are required uniformly around the margin, reductions in Nodal levels should shift all marginal derivatives toward more animal fates (Fig. 1B, right panels) — a prediction that has not been tested by fate mapping cells in ventrolateral regions.

To test these models and to explore possible stage-specific requirements for nodal-related genes, we have assessed mesendodermal patterning and fate specification in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos, in which the action of endogenous Nodal signals is reduced but not eliminated. Our results indicate that Nodal signals act in the marginal region to pattern the animal-vegetal axis and that ventrolateral mesendodermal fates can be induced by a lower level of nodal-related gene function than dorsal mesendoderm. Furthermore, we find that differential regulation of the cyclops gene in dorsal and ventrolateral cells contributes to the different requirements for nodal-related gene function in these cells. In addition, our analysis shows that dorsal mesendodermal precursors are competent to respond to Nodal signals over a surprisingly long period, ranging from late blastula through at least early gastrula stages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mutant alleles and photography

sqtcz35 and cycm294are presumed null alleles that have been described previously (Feldman et al., 1998; Sampath et al., 1998). Embryos were collected from natural crosses and staged as described (Kimmel et al., 1995). Embryos shown in Fig. 4D and Fig. 2A-O were derived from crosses of sqtcz35/+; cycm294/+ × sqtcz35/+; cycm294/+ parents. After photography, DNA for genotype analysis was extracted from living embryos as described by Gates et al. (Gates et al., 1999), or from fixed and stained embryos as described by Sirotkin et al. (Sirotkin et al., 2000b). For analysis of gsc, embryos with defective gsc expression at each stage were counted and a representative sample was photographed; after photography, DNA was extracted for genotyping as previously described. All other mutant embryos, except the sqt mutants shown in Fig. 9G-J and Fig. 3E,J were derived from repeated crosses of a small group of sqtcz35/+; cycm294/+ × sqtcz35/+ parents, in which the majority of sqtcz35/sqtcz35; cycm294/+ progeny consistently had a truncated notochord and fused somites, as shown in Fig. 2P-U. For quantitation of foxa2/axial expression at 8 hours post-fertilization (h), stained embryos were photographed as wholemounts in canada balsam: methyl salicylate (11:1), rehydrated in PBT (1× PBS and 0.1% Tween-20), and equilibrated in 80% glycerol. The embryos were then dissected along the ventral midline, photographed under low magnification, and DNA was extracted to determine the genotype by PCR.

    Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Time course of dorsal mesendoderm development in sqt-/-; cyc+/+, sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- mutants. gsc expression in wild-type (A), sqt-/-; cyc+/+ (B), sqt-/-; cyc+/- (C) and sqt-/-; cyc-/- (D) embryos. For each stage, wild-type, sqt-/-; cyc+/+, sqt-/-; cyc+/- are siblings; the sqt-/-; cyc-/-, mutants were derived from a separate cross that was processed in parallel. The images for panels C6 and D6 come from a separate cross of sqt+/-; cyc+/- adults. gsc expression initiates in sqt-/-; cyc+/+, sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- embryos (A1,B1,C1,D1), but is rapidly lost (B2,C2,D2). In sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos, gsc is expressed only in a few cells at 5 h, but steadily increases throughout gastrulation such that it is often indistinguishable from wild-type at bud stage (B2-B6). Dorsal views are shown, except for animal views at 5 and 10 h. The genotypes of all embryos shown were determined by PCR after photography, except for panels C6 and D6, which were determined by morphology. In the sqt+/-; cyc+/+ intercross depicted in A6, B6, only 3/51 embryos displayed reduced gsc expression; the rest of the embryos, including the remaining sqt mutants, have a wild-type pattern as shown. Notably, we found no reduction of gsc expression in cycm294 homozygotes at 8 h (data not shown). This contrasts with earlier work on cycb16 (Thisse et al., 1994), which is now known to be a deficiency that removes other genes in the cyclops region of linkage group 12 (Talbot et al., 1998).

    Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Analysis of genetic interaction between sqt and cyc. Images of 28 hour embryos from a sqt+/-; cyc+/- intercross (A-O) or cross of sqt+/-; cyc+/- to sqt+/-; cyc+/+ parents (P-U). Phenotypes were scored at 6 h, 1 d and 5 d; an embryo representative of each phenotypic class is shown. (A-C) sqt-/-; cyc-/- embryos lack head and trunk mesoderm and endoderm derivatives, and display severe cyclopia (C). Tail mesoderm still forms in these embryos, as indicated by the presence of tail somites (A). (D-F) Trunk somites, heart and blood form in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (D). These embryos have strong midline defects, including a reduced notochord and missing floor plate (E) as well as cyclopia (F), which is indicative of defects in prechordal plate mesoderm. These defects are typically more severe than those observed in sibling sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (G-I), which are often indistinguishable from wild type (M-O), and can survive to adulthood. Some sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos display mild cyclopia (I), but have normal notochords and floor plates. (J-L) The defects in sqt+/+; cyc-/- embryos include a curved body axis (J), missing floor plate (K) and cyclopia (L); these embryos have apparently normal trunk somites and notochord (K). In other clutches, the majority of sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos have truncated notochords and fused somites (R), unlike typical sqt-/-; cyc+/+ siblings (Q). Kupffer's vesicle is apparent in the tailbuds of 12-14 h wild-type embryos (S, arrow), but is reduced or absent in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt+/+; cyc-/- embryos (T,U, arrows). Anterior is towards the left in A-R, except for head views in C,F,I,L,O. Posterior is towards the left in S-U. No, notochord; Som, somites. The genotypes of all embryos shown were determined by PCR after photography.

    Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

β-catenin regulates sqt and cyc, and requires sqt to induce gsc. Wild-type embryos were injected with β-catenin (A,C,E) or lacZ (B,D,F) mRNA, and processed for in situ hybridization. Overexpression of β-catenin induces cyc expression at 6 h (A), but not at 4 h (E, sphere) or 5 h (C, 40% epiboly). (G-J) Analysis of gsc expression at 5 hours in embryos from a sqt+/- intercross injected with β-catenin or lacZ mRNA. β-catenin mRNA (G), but not lacZ mRNA (H), can induce ectopic gsc expression in wild-type embryos. β-catenin mRNA does not induce normal levels of gsc expression in sqt-/- mutants (I), but ectopic patches of weak gsc are often observed in these embryos, indicating that β -catenin has some activity in sqt mutants (arrows, I). β -catenin induces sqt expression at 3.3 h (K), but not at 5 h (M, 40% epiboly). Animal views; dorsal towards right when apparent.

    Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Analysis of crossregulation between squint and cyclops. Time course of sqt expression in wild-type (A-E), sqt mutant (J) and cyc mutant embryos (F-I). cyc expression in wild-type (K-O), sqt-/-; cyc+/+ (P-S) and sqt-/-; cyc+/- (T-V) embryos. Developmental stages are indicated at the bottom, except for E and J, which are 5 h embryos as noted in the panels. Although the absence of sqt transcripts in sqt mutants is consistent with an autoregulatory role for sqt, it is also possible that the 1.9 kb insertion in the sqtcz35 allele affects the stability of the message. Animal pole views are shown for all embryos prior to 6 h, and dorsal views are shown for embryos at 6 and 8 h, except for the lateral images in D,I. The genotypes of all embryos shown were determined by PCR after photography, except for E and J, for which the genotypes were inferred from the phenotypic ratio evident in progeny from a sqt/+ intercross (10 mutants/33 progeny).

Primers and conditions for genotyping sqtcz35 and cycm294 have been described (Feldman et al., 1998; Sampath et al., 1998). In crosses with no cyc homozygotes, we used a primer pair that amplified a fragment specific to the cycm294 allele to distinguish cyc+/+ and cycm294/+ embryos: forward, 5′-GGTGGACATGCATGTGGATTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCGGGCAGGCCCCCTCCCG-3′.

mRNA synthesis and embryo injection

The zβ-catenin expression vector has been described previously (Kelly et al., 1995). Transcripts for injection were synthesized using the Message Machine kit (Ambion). Wild-type embryos were injected with 100 pg β-catenin mRNA, while embryos from an intercross of sqtcz35/+ parents were injected with 500 pg β-catenin mRNA. In this experiment (Fig. 9G-J), mutant genotypes were inferred from phenotypes rather than assessed by PCR. In the control injection 24% (12/49) of the embryos had reduced gsc expression typical of sqt mutants (Fig. 9J), whereas the remaining 76% (37/49) displayed normal gsc (Fig. 9H). β-catenin overexpression induced ectopic or expanded gsc (Fig. 9G) in over half of the wild-type embryos (46/77). β-catenin did not induce high levels of gsc expression in sqt mutants, because 26% (16/62) of injected embryos displayed reduced gsc typical of uninjected sqt mutants (Fig. 9I).

Immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization

For analysis of the distribution of β-catenin protein, wild-type embryos were fixed at 15 minute intervals during the first 4 hours of embryogenesis, processed for immunocytochemistry with β-catenin antibodies and sectioned. Polyclonal anti-β-catenin antibodies (Schneider et al., 1996) were used at a 1:1000 dilution. Immunostaining was carried out as described (Schier et al., 1997). For sectioning, embryos were embedded in Eponate-12 resin and sectioned at 3 μ m. Twenty embryos were analyzed at each time-point, and two or three of these were sectioned to confirm the presence or absence of nuclear β -catenin. Although the majority of embryos after the 1000-cell stage exhibited β-catenin protein in dorsal nuclei (in both the YSL and blastomeres), only three embryos at the 128-cell stage, three embryos at the 256-cell stage and three embryos at the 512 stage exhibited β-catenin protein in dorsal nuclei. At all stages, staining of membrane localized β -catenin protein served as a positive control for the antibody reaction.

Synthesis of probes and in situ hybridization were conducted as described (Sirotkin et al., 2000b). After in situ hybridization, the number of mutant embryos from each cross was counted and representative examples of each phenotype were photographed and genotyped by PCR, except when the genotype could be inferred from morphology as in the analysis of gsc at 10 h in sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- embryos and sox17 expression in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants. The number of mutants was usually close to the expected values, and the same mutant phenotypes were observed in repeated crosses of the same parents.

Lineage-tracing and fete map analysis

Embryos of sqtcz35/+; cycm294/+ × sqtcz35/+ parents were injected (Kimmel et al., 1990) with the lineage tracer dye tetramethylrhodamine-isocyanate dextran (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR; 10×103 Mr, diluted to 5% (wt/vol) in 0.2 M KCl) in single blastomeres of the surface enveloping layer (EVL) at the 1000-cell stage. Injected embryos were mounted in 0.125% agarose in embryo medium and oriented so that the fluorescent cells faced toward the microscope objective; the position of the clone along the animal-vegetal axis was then determined. The clonal position relative to the dorsoventral axis was determined at 6 h, when the dorsal side is first morphologically apparent in wild-type embryos, or at 8 h, when the dorsal side is morphologically apparent in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos. Some embryos were filmed during gastrulation with time-lapse photography as previously described (Warga and Kimmel, 1990). After filming, embryos were removed from agarose and the fates of the resulting clones were determined at 24 h and 48 h, after which all embryos were genotyped by PCR.

RESULTS

Genetic interaction between nodal-related genes reveals dosage-sensitive function of cyclops

To understand the role of Nodal signaling in patterning the mesendoderm, we analyzed the phenotypes of embryos with reduced nodal gene function, including sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants. At 6 h, sqt-/-; cyc+/+ single mutants lack a morphologically visible embryonic shield, the site of presumptive dorsal mesendoderm (Table 1) (Feldman et al., 1998). Kupffer's vesicle, a derivative of the dorsal forerunner cells (Cooper and D'Amico, 1996; Melby et al., 1996), was reduced or absent at 12 h (Fig. 2T). Forerunner cells were also reduced or absent in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ mutants (see Fig. 5J-L, arrows), as revealed by expression of sox17 (Alexander and Stainier, 1999). Thus, most or all sqt-/-; cyc+/+ single mutants have defects in dorsal marginal structures at the onset of gastrulation. At 24 h, a variable fraction of sqt mutants display mild cyclopia and reduction of ventral diencephalon (Table 1; Fig. 2I) and some sqt-/-; cyc+/+ single mutants are morphologically indistinguishable from wild type (Table 1; data not shown). The amelioration of the sqt mutant phenotype at later stages depends on the function of cyc, because sqt; cyc double mutants lack all mesendodermal derivatives in the head and trunk at 24 h (Fig. 2A-C) (Feldman et al., 1998).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Phenotypes of sqt-/-, cyc-/-, sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- mutants

    Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Endoderm development in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants. Expression of axial/foxa2 (A-F) or sox17 (G-L) in wild-type (A,D,G,J), sqt-/-; cyc+/+ (B,E,H,K) and sqt-/-; cyc+/- (C,F,I,L) embryos at 6 h (A-C,G-I; animal pole views) and 8 h (D-F,J-L; dorsal views). The reduction of endodermal expression of axial/foxa2 and sox17 in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos is particularly apparent on the dorsal margin (E,F,K,L). Arrows in J-L indicate the position of dorsal forerunner cells. (M) The total number of endodermal precursors expressing axial/foxa2 at 8 h in wild-type embryos (n=3), sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (n=4) and sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (n=5). (N) Reduction of axial/foxa2 expressing endodermal cells at different positions along the dorsoventral axis (dorsal midline set at zero degrees, ventral midline at 180 degrees). Height of each bar indicates the number of marginal cell tiers along the animal-vegetal axis expressing axial/foxa2. No cells at the dorsal midline expressed axial/foxa2 in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos. The genotype is indicated by color, as shown in M. The genotypes of all embryos shown were determined by PCR after photography.

To search for possible dosage-sensitive functions for squint and cyclops, we compared the phenotypes of sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos, which differ by a single copy of cyc. Like sqt-/-; cyc+/+ single mutants, sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos did not form an embryonic shield or Kupffer's vesicle (Table 1; Fig. 2U). At later stages, however, sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos had a significantly stronger phenotype than sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (Fig. 2, compare D-F to G-I). For example, the notochord was severely reduced or truncated in most sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (Fig. 2E), although it formed normally in the majority of sqt-/-; cyc+/+ single mutants (Fig. 2H). In sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos with truncated notochords, the somites were often fused across the midline (Fig. 2R), as were adaxial and paraxial domains of myod expression (Weinberg et al., 1996) (Fig. 6A-F). In addition, sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos have more pronounced cyclopia than sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (Fig. 2F,I), suggesting a greater reduction in prechordal plate mesoderm. The severity of these defects varies with the genetic background, but within a group of siblings the typical sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryo has a stronger phenotype than the typical sqt-/-; cyc+/+ sibling. These results indicate that the formation of dorsal axial structures in sqt mutants is strongly dependent on cyc gene dosage, such that the phenotype of sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos is compounded by the loss of a single copy of cyc (i.e. in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos). Conversely, we did not note any differences between the phenotypes of sqt+/+; cyc-/- and sqt+/-; cyc-/- embryos (Fig. 2J-L; Table 1; data not shown).

    Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Analysis of markers for ventrolateral mesoderm and neurectoderm in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos. The genes, genotypes and stages analyzed are shown. Fusion of paraxial and adaxial myod expression domains is apparent in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (C,F). In wild-type, sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos, spt (G-L), tbx6 (M-O) and vox (P-R) are each strongly expressed around the ventrolateral margin. tbx6 and vox are normally excluded from the dorsal margin, and this region of exclusion is expanded in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (O,R). spt expression in the prechordal plate (J, arrow), is reduced in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ (arrow) and absent in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos, while marginal expression is excluded from a larger dorsal sector in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (I,L) than in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ or wild-type embryos. ntl is also reduced dorsally in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ (T) and absent dorsally in sqt-/-; cyc+/- (U) embryos. (V-X) Expression of neural marker cyp26. Lateral views, dorsal towards the right. Arrow indicates marginal domain of cyp26 expression, arrowheads indicate vegetal extent of neural domain. The neural expression is shifted slightly towards the margin in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (W), and more dramatically in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (X). In X, the dorsal marginal domain of cyp26 expression is located at a more animal position than the ventrolateral marginal domain, apparently because of abnormal morphogenetic movements of dorsal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos. Dorsal views with anterior towards the left (A-F), animal views with dorsal to the right (G-I,P-R,S-U), dorsal views with animal pole upwards (J-O) and lateral views with animal pole upwards (V-X). The genotypes of all embryos shown were determined by PCR after photography.

Dorsal expression of cyc is activated by sqt and by autoregulation

Maintenance of sqt and cyc expression depends on the ability of cells to respond to Nodal signaling (Meno et al., 1999; Pogoda et al., 2000; Sirotkin et al., 2000a). Therefore we investigated the role of crossregulation in the dosage-sensitive interaction between sqt and cyc by examining cyc expression in sqt mutants and sqt expression in cyc mutants. Expression of sqt appeared normal in a time course of cyc mutant embryos (compare Fig. 3F-I with 3A-D), but was reduced in sqt mutants (Fig. 3E,J). cyc expression was altered in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ mutants (compare Fig. 3L-O with 3P-S). Although cyc expression initiated in sqt mutants (Fig. 3P), it was reduced or absent at the dorsal margin at 5 h (Fig. 3Q) and was evident at the dorsal midline at reduced levels during gastrulation (Fig. 3R,S). Expression of cyc was reduced significantly in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants (Fig. 3T-V) in comparison with sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (Fig. 3Q-S). At the onset of gastrulation in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants, cyc transcripts were present in only two weak dorsolateral patches (Fig. 3U); the dorsal gap between these patches closed as gastrulation progressed, such that a narrow strip of cyc expression was visible at the dorsal midline at 8 h (Fig. 3V). These results show that dorsal cyc expression is activated by sqt at 5 h, the first stage where a reduction of cyc expression is evident in sqt mutants. The reduction of cyc expression in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos when compared with sqt-/-; cyc+/+ mutants suggests that cyc expression also activates its own transcription. It is not likely that a reduction of mutant mRNA stability is the cause of reduced cyc expression in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants, because the level and pattern of cyc mRNA expression was not altered in sqt+/+; cyc+/- embryos when compared with wild type (data not shown).

Mesendoderm induction requires different levels of nodal-related gene function in dorsal and ventrolateral regions

To examine the effect of reduced Nodal signaling on dorsoventral patterning of the mesendoderm, we analyzed the time course of expression of an array of marker genes in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants. For these experiments, we analyzed clutches of embryos in which most sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants had strong cyclopia, truncated notochords, and medially fused somites. Embryos from appropriate crosses were harvested at blastula and gastrula stages, analyzed by whole-mount in situ hybridization, assigned to phenotypic classes based on expression patterns, and then genotyped by PCR assays to determine which genotypes constituted each phenotypic class. As expected from morphological analysis, markers for dorsal mesendoderm such as gsc and axial/foxa2 were reduced more severely in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos than in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ single mutants. Expression of gsc, which marks the prechordal plate during gastrulation (Stachel et al., 1993), initiated in the dorsal marginal region in sqt-/-; cyc+/+, sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- embryos (Fig. 4B1,C1,D1), but it rapidly faded in embryos of all three mutant genotypes (Fig. 4B2,C2,D2). By 5 h (40% epiboly), gsc transcripts were prominent at the dorsal margin of wild-type embryos (Fig. 4A2), but were detectable in only a few cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ mutants (Fig. 4B2). We were unable to detect gsc expression in sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- embryos at this stage (Fig. 4C2,D2). gsc expression recovered during gastrulation in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ mutants (Fig. 4B3-B6), but not in sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- mutant siblings (Fig. 4C3-C5,D3-D5). After gastrulation, weak ectodermal gsc expression initiated in both sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- mutants (Fig. 4C6,D6). Like gsc, expression of axial/foxa2 in axial mesoderm (Strähle et al., 1993) is reduced to a much greater extent in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos than sqt-/-; cyc+/+ siblings (Fig. 5A-F). And like gsc, axial/foxa2 expression at the midline later recovers in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (data not shown). Thus, early dorsal mesendodermal gene expression is reduced in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ single mutants, and the further loss of a single copy of the cyclops gene compounds this defect. The recovery of dorsal mesoderm gene expression in some sqt mutants suggests that dorsal marginal cells can adopt dorsal mesendoderm fates in response to cyc signaling during gastrulation, more than 2 hours after dorsal mesendoderm induction occurs in wild type.

To examine how the endoderm is affected in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants embryos, we analyzed expression of axial/foxa2 and sox17 (Fig. 5A-L) (Schier et al., 1997; Alexander and Stainier, 1999). In order to quantify endodermal progenitors, we made fillets of mid-gastrula stage wild-type and mutant embryos stained for axial/foxa2 expression and counted the total number of labeled endodermal cells (Fig. 5M). At mid-gastrulation, wild-type embryos (n=4) had an average of 270 (±54) axial/foxa2-expressing endodermal cells, sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (n=5) had an average of 164 (±35), and sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (n=5) had only 65 (±12). A similar distribution of endodermal cells was observed in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants at 10 h and 12 h, as detected by sox17 expression (data not shown). The reduction in endodermal precursors was not uniform along the dorsoventral axis (Fig. 5N). In wild-type embryos, previous work showed that endoderm is asymmetrically distributed at mid-gastrulation (Warga and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1999), and we found an average of 13 rows of axial/foxa2-expressing endodermal cells dorsally, compared with only four rows ventrally (Fig. 5N). This asymmetry was less pronounced in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos, which had an average of only seven tiers of axial-expressing cells dorsally and 2.5 tiers ventrally. Dorsal endoderm was completely eliminated in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos, although one to three tiers of axial/foxa2-expressing cells remained ventrally and laterally. Thus, like mesoderm, endoderm in dorsal locations in sqt mutants is more sensitive to reductions in cyc gene dosage than endoderm in lateral and ventral positions.

We next investigated whether the loss of dorsal mesendodermal markers is accompanied by a corresponding alteration in ventrolateral gene expression (Fig. 6). The ventrolateral mesoderm markers spadetial (spt; tbx16 — Zebrafish Information Network), tbx6 and vox (Hug et al., 1997; Griffin et al., 1998; Kawahara et al., 2000; Melby et al., 2000) are each expressed around the margin but are largely excluded from dorsal marginal regions (Fig. 6G,J,M,P). Ventrolateral expression of these genes was not significantly altered in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ or sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutant embryos (Fig. 6H,K,N,Q), except that each of these genes was excluded from a larger dorsal sector in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (Fig. 6I,L,O,R). The different effects on dorsal and ventrolateral mesendodermal gene expression in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants suggests that the formation of mesoderm and endoderm requires higher levels of cyc function at the dorsal margin than at the ventrolateral margin.

Dorsal marginal cells adopt neural fates in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants

As dorsal marginal cells fail to express markers for both dorsal and ventrolateral mesendoderm in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants, we wished to determine the fates of dorsal marginal cells in these embryos. Expression of the pan-mesodermal marker ntl/brachyury (Schulte-Merker et al., 1992), was reduced on the dorsal side of sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (Fig. 6T) and absent from a dorsal sector in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (Fig. 6U), raising the possibility that dorsal marginal cells adopt a neurectodermal fate in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants. Accordingly, the neural plate marker cyp26 (White et al., 1996; Thisse and Thisse, 1999; Kudoh et al., 2001) was positioned closer to the margin in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants than in wild type (Fig. 6W,X, arrowheads).

The gene expression studies prompted us to determine directly the fates of marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants. We labeled single blastomeres at the 1000-cell stage by injection of a lineage tracer dye and ascertained the fates of their progeny between 1 and 3 d, when most cells have differentiated. Dorsal cells closest to the margin in wild-type embryos exclusively form mesodermal and endodermal derivatives, including hatching gland, foregut and notochord (Kimmel et al., 1990; Melby et al., 1996; Warga and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1999). By contrast, some dorsal marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants adopt neural fates, including spinal cord, hindbrain and midbrain (Fig. 7B,C upper panels), which derive from more animal regions in wild-type embryos (Fig. 7A). In two cases, mutant dorsal marginal clones exclusively generated neural fates (sqt-/-; cyc+/+ n=1; sqt-/-; cyc+/- n=1), which is never observed in wild type. In addition, dorsal marginal cells formed foregut endoderm and hatching gland rarely if at all in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants, although these cells can form notochord. As previously reported (Feldman et al., 2000; Carmany-Rampey and Schier, 2001), all dorsal marginal cells adopt neural fates in the absence of Nodal signaling (Fig. 7D).

    Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Fate map of wild-type, sqt-/-; cyc+/+, sqt-/-; cyc+/- and sqt-/-; cyc-/- embryos. Positions of clones along the animal-vegetal and dorsoventral axes are depicted on a graphic representation of an embryo, in which each line represents a different row of cells. The `0' line represents cells in contact with the YSL. In the dorsal region, clones generating neural fates arose at least eight cell rows animal to the margin in wild-type (A, top panel). By contrast, sqt-/-; cyc+/+ (B) and sqt-/-; cyc+/- (C) embryos, clones at the dorsal margin produced spinal cord, hindbrain and midbrain. (D) As previously reported, dorsal marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc-/- adopt neural fates. Two ventrolateral clones adopted tail muscle fates. The genotypes of all embryos shown were determined by PCR after photography.

In none of these experiments did we find evidence that disruption of nodal-related genes shifted the fates of dorsal marginal cells along the dorsoventral axis. There was instead clear evidence that marginal cells adopt fates characteristic of more animal positions. This animal-vegetal fate shift was most apparent at the dorsal margin, where cells adopt neural fates in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants (Fig. 7B,C, upper panels). There is also evidence to suggest an animal-vegetal fate shift at the ventrolateral margin, where muscle precursors are located closer to the margin than in wild type (Fig. 7B,C, middle panels).

Abnormal morphogenesis of dorsal marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants

In addition to changes in cell fate, we observed that dorsal marginal cells undergo an aberrant morphogenetic behavior in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos, consistent with their altered cell fates (Fig. 7 and Fig. 8B). At the onset of gastrulation, dorsal marginal cells enter the mesendodermal germ layer and rapidly move toward the animal pole, forming the prechordal plate (n=16 clones, Fig. 8A) (Warga and Nüsslein-Volhard, 1999). Instead of undergoing normal involution movements and moving toward the animal pole, dorsal marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos dispersed along the margin. Many dorsal cells in mutants rolled inwards, temporarily altered their course and then continued migrating toward the vegetal pole (Fig. 8B n=3 clones in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos). Despite their anomalous behavior, some of these dorsal cells were able to contribute to trunk notochord, much as they did in wild type (Fig. 7, Fig. 8A″,B″, arrows). In contrast to dorsal marginal cells, the morphogenetic program of cells on the ventrolateral margin appeared normal in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (Fig. 8D, n=33 wild-type and 3 sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos).

    Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Aberrant morphogenesis of dorsal clones in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos. Morphogenesis and resulting fates of dorsal marginal clones (A,B) and ventrolateral marginal clones (C,D) in wild-type (A,C), and in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (B,D) were examined during the time periods indicated. Tracings of the behavior of individual cells within each clone are shown (A′-D′). Dorsal marginal cells migrate towards the vegetal pole with the movements of epiboly, and begin to involute at the onset of gastrulation at 50% epiboly (A). Some cells do not involute and contribute to the tail (asterisk in A′). In sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (B), dorsal marginal cells fail to involute (B′). Whereas the dorsal marginal cells became hatching gland, pharyngeal endoderm and endothelium near the eye in wild type (A″, blue circle), these cells became floorplate in sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (B″, blue circles). Arrows in A″ and B″ mark labeled notochord cells. In many sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos, a region devoid of cells is created at the dorsal midline, possibly generated by the abnormal movements of dorsal marginal cells. By contrast, morphogenetic movements of ventrolateral marginal cells in wild-type (C,C′) and sqt-/-; cyc+/- embryos (D,D′) are indistinguishable, each undergoing the normal movements of epiboly, involution and convergence (Warga and Kimmel, 1990). Labeled cells formed heart endothelium (C″,D″; yellow circles), pronephric duct (C″,D″; white circles), fin bud (C″,D″; green circles), and muscle (C″,D″; black circles) in both wild-type and mutant clones. Other labeled cells (red) are in the EVL. The genotypes of all embryos shown were determined by PCR after photography.

β-catenin activates dorsal expression of sqt and cyc

The pronounced reduction of dorsal but not ventrolateral mesendoderm in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants correlates with the elevated expression of both sqt and cyc at the dorsal margin (Erter et al., 1998; Feldman et al., 1998; Rebagliati et al., 1998a; Sampath et al., 1998). To understand how the asymmetry of sqt and cyc expression is generated, we asked if cyc is controlled by the maternal dorsal determinant β-catenin, which has been implicated as a regulator of sqt and Xenopus xnr-1 (Hyde and Old, 2000; Shimizu et al., 2000). β-catenin mRNA overexpression induced expanded or ectopic cyc expression at 6 h in about half (32/60) of injected wild-type embryos (Fig. 9A), similar to the fraction of injected embryos (12/18) with ectopic or expanded gsc expression at 5 h (Fig. 9G). Although β-catenin did not affect cyc expression prior to 6 h (Fig. 9C-F), it induced ectopic or expanded sqt expression at 3.3 h (79/112) (Fig. 9K), as previously reported (Shimizu et al., 2000). β-catenin had no effect on sqt expression at 5 h (Fig. 9M). Thus, activation of sqt and cyc by β-catenin follow distinct time courses, suggesting that sqt may be a direct target, while cyc could be an indirect target of β-catenin, mediated by genes such as sqt or boz that are induced at earlier stages (Fekany et al., 1999).

Because squint expression is rapidly upregulated by β-catenin, we asked if it is required for β-catenin function. We injected β-catenin mRNA into embryos from sqt+/- parents and analyzed gsc expression at 5 h (40% epiboly). At this stage, gsc is reduced to only a few cells in control injected and uninjected sqt mutants (Fig. 9J). Although β-catenin mRNA can induce mutant secondary axes in the absence of sqt, as indicated by extra patches of cells expressing low levels of gsc (Fig. 9I, arrow), it cannot induce the high levels of gsc typical in wild-type embryos (Fig. 9G) (Kelly et al., 1995; Pelegri and Maischein, 1998). Thus, β-catenin requires squint function to induce high levels of dorsal mesodermal gene expression. Nevertheless, β-catenin, acting directly or through other factors, is sufficient to induce low levels of ectopic gsc expression in sqt mutants.

Consistent with the possibility that β-catenin activates early sqt expression, we found that β-catenin protein is localized to the nuclei of presumed dorsal blastomeres prior to 3 h (Fig. 10A-C), when sqt transcripts are first detected (Erter et al., 1998; Feldman et al., 1998). These results extend a prior analysis of β-catenin distribution, which reported that β-catenin accumulates in dorsal nuclei at 3.3 h (Schneider et al., 1996). Moreover, we detected nuclear β-catenin in embryos as early as the 128-cell stage (2.25 h) (Fig. 10A), prior to formation of the yolk syncytial layer (YSL), an extra-embryonic structure proposed to have a role in establishing dorsoventral asymmetry in the overlying blastoderm (reviewed by Schier and Talbot, 1998). Nuclear β-catenin was detected in only a small fraction (15%, n=3/20, at the 128-cell stage) of the embryos prior to the 1000-cell stage, perhaps because of intermittent accumulation of nuclear β-catenin during rapid cleavage divisions. Although there are no other markers of dorsoventral polarity in zebrafish embryos younger than 3 h, the dorsal accumulation of nuclear β-catenin after 3 h has been confirmed by colocalization with dorsal specific genes (Koos and Ho, 1998). Therefore, we presume that β-catenin accumulates in dorsal nuclei prior to 3 h, as it does after 3 h. Our results show that dorsoventral asymmetry is established in the blastoderm before the YSL forms.

    Fig. 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 10.

β-catenin protein is localized in the nucleus at the correct time and place to endogenously regulate squint expression. β-catenin protein was detected by immunohistochemistry in whole-mount assays, after which embryos were sectioned. Arrows in B-D indicate boundary between blastomeres and the yolk syncytial layer (YSL). (A) β-catenin in the nucleus of a marginal blastomere at 2.25 h (128-cell stage), the earliest stage detected. (B,C) Nuclear β-catenin is observed in dorsal blastomeres in embryos at 3 h (1000-cell stage), both in the enveloping layer (B,C), and in the deep layer (B). (D) β-catenin accumulates in nuclei of the dorsal YSL at 3.3 h (high stage), but it is also seen in dorsal blastomeres. β -catenin was associated with membranes of blastomeres at all stages examined, consistent with its role in cell adhesion. Dorsal is towards the right.

DISCUSSION

The role of Nodal signals in mesendodermal patterning

We have examined the role of the zebrafish nodal-related genes squint and cyclops in mesendoderm induction and patterning. Using marker gene analysis and cell tracing, we characterized the fates of dorsal and ventrolateral mesendodermal progenitors in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants, in which endogenous Nodal signals are reduced but not eliminated. Our data support a role for nodal-related genes in patterning marginal blastomeres along the animal-vegetal axis. At the dorsal margin, Nodal signals act to prevent dorsal marginal cells from adopting neurectodermal fates. In wild-type embryos, dorsal marginal cells exclusively form mesendodermal derivatives such as hatching gland, notochord and foregut. By contrast, dorsal marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants often gave rise to neural fates, including spinal cord, hindbrain and midbrain (Fig. 7B,C), and neural marker gene expression was shifted toward the margin (Fig. 6V-X). At the ventrolateral margin, expression of endodermal markers was reduced in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants (Fig. 5), and muscle precursors were located closer to the margin than in wild-type embryos (Fig. 7). In addition, endoderm was more severely disrupted in sqt-/-; cyc+/- than in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ mutants, supporting the proposal that different levels of Nodal signaling establish the mesoderm and endoderm at different positions along the animal-vegetal axis (Gritsman et al., 2000; Thisse et al., 2000; Chen and Schier, 2001). The analysis of sqt-/-; cyc+/+ or sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants extends previous fate mapping studies of Nodal pathway mutants (Feldman et al., 2000; Gritsman et al., 2000; Carmany-Rampey and Schier, 2001) by demonstrating a dosage-sensitive role for Nodal genes in patterning the animal-vegetal axis in dorsal and ventrolateral marginal regions.

Our genetic analyses indicate that mesendodermal progenitors at different positions along the dorsoventral axis have distinct requirements for nodal-related genes. In sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants, dorsal axial structures and dorsal expression of early mesendodermal genes such as gsc, axial, sox17, ntl and cyc, are strongly reduced or eliminated, whereas ventrolateral fates are relatively mildly affected (Figs 2, 5 and 6). This shows that a nodal gene dosage sufficient to induce mesendoderm at the ventrolateral margin is insufficient to induce dorsal mesendoderm. In addition, we noted that dorsal, but not ventrolateral, mesendoderm development is quite sensitive to nodal-related gene dosage. Dorsal mesendoderm is reduced in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ mutants, reduced more strongly in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants, and, as shown in previous studies (Feldman et al., 1998; Gritsman et al., 1999), completely lacking in the absence of Nodal signaling. These differences along the dorsoventral axis are not anticipated by simple models in which Nodal signals act uniformly to induce dorsal and ventrolateral mesendoderm (Fig. 1B).

Differential regulation of sqt and cyc in dorsal and ventrolateral mesendoderm

Dorsal sqt expression is activated by β-catenin (Fig. 9) (Shimizu et al., 2000; Kelly et al., 2000). Previous work (Schneider et al., 1996) has shown that β-catenin localized to dorsal nuclei in the YSL at the 2000-cell stage (3.3 h). We found that β-catenin was detectable in the nuclei of dorsal blastomeres as early as the 128-cell stage (2.25 h) (Fig. 10), prior to formation of the YSL. These results show that dorsoventral asymmetry is established in the blastoderm before the YSL forms. In addition, RNase treatment experiments indicate that RNAs in the YSL are not essential for specification of dorsal identity in overlying blastomeres (Chen and Kimelman, 2000). Taken together, these results establish that β -catenin in dorsal blastomeres specifies dorsal expression of target genes including sqt and boz (Shimizu et al., 2000; Kelly et al., 2000) and show that the YSL is not required for the initial dorsal identity within the blastoderm. By contrast, the YSL is required for expression of sqt and cyc in ventrolateral marginal blastomeres (Chen and Kimelman, 2000).

We found that differential regulation of sqt and cyc expression in dorsal and ventrolateral marginal cells of the late blastula accounts, at least in part, for the differential requirement of nodal-related genes along the dorsoventral axis. In the late blastula, cyc is expressed in a marginal ring that includes cells at all positions along the dorsoventral axis, but our results show that different mechanisms control cyc expression in dorsal and ventrolateral cells. Several observations indicate that sqt activates dorsal cyc expression in response to the maternal dorsal determinant β-catenin. Overexpression of β-catenin induces sqt expression soon after the midblastula transition (Fig. 9K) (Shimizu et al., 2000), and nuclear β-catenin protein is present at the correct time and place to directly activate sqt expression (Fig. 10). In addition, β -catenin requires sqt function for high-level activation of dorsal gene expression (Fig. 9G-J). Dorsal expression of cyc in the late blastula is reduced in sqt mutants (Fig. 3Q), and overexpression of β-catenin does not activate cyc expression until the early gastrula stage (Fig. 9A,C,E). This suggests that β-catenin directly activates sqt, which in turn induces dorsal cyc expression in the late blastula. At later stages, dorsal cyc expression is dependent on an autoregulatory loop, as evidenced by the strong reduction of dorsal cyc mRNA in sqt-/-; cyc+/- when compared with sqt-/-; cyc+/+ mutants (Fig. 3) and by previous studies of cyc expression in Nodal pathway mutants (Meno et al., 1999; Pogoda et al., 2000; Sirotkin et al., 2000a).

By contrast, ventrolateral expression of cyc is induced independently of Nodal signals but requires Nodal activity to achieve normal levels. cyc expression is induced normally in ventrolateral marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos, indicating that this expression does not depend on sqt function (Fig. 3). In embryos lacking all nodal gene function, cyc expression is initiated in ventrolateral marginal cells, but does not reach normal levels, whereas dorsal cyc expression is not detectable (Meno et al., 1999). These observations indicate that ventrolateral cyc expression is induced by as yet unknown factors and maintained at normal levels by an autoregulatory loop. Thus cyc expression is controlled differently in dorsal and ventrolateral marginal cells, with dorsal cyc expression entirely dependent on sqt and cyc gene function.

The marked dependence of dorsal, but not ventrolateral, cyc expression on Nodal signaling results in a non-uniform reduction of Nodal signals in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants. Some dorsal marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants adopt neural fates because they are exposed to little or no Nodal signals before gastrulation. By contrast, ventrolateral marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants are exposed to sufficient levels of cyc at the late blastula stage to induce ventrolateral mesendoderm. Thus, the role of autoregulation in the reinforcement of dorsal cyc expression can explain the severe reduction of dorsal but not ventrolateral fates in sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants.

Experiments in zebrafish, frogs and mice indicate that autoregulation is a conserved feature of the transcriptional control of nodal-related genes (this work) (Meno et al., 1999; Hyde and Old, 2000; Osada et al., 2000; Norris et al., 2002). Our results extend this observation by demonstrating that, in zebrafish, cells differ in their sensitivities to the autoregulatory feedback loop depending on their position. cyc expression was completely eliminated from dorsal marginal cells in late blastula stage sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos, but was present at reduced levels in ventrolateral marginal cells (Fig. 3P-S). This aspect of the autoregulatory control of nodal-related gene expression may also be conserved in other systems, introducing a point of caution in interpreting experiments in which Nodal signaling activity is reduced by genetic methods or by overexpression of Nodal antagonists. It is possible that some cell types are preferentially affected in these experiments.

Dorsoventral patterning of mesendoderm is independent of Nodal signals

Our cell-tracing and gene expression experiments are inconsistent with models proposing that the graded action of Nodal signals patterns the dorsoventral axis (Fig. 1A). Such models predict that dorsal marginal clones should contain fates normally arising at ventrolateral positions, such as muscle, when Nodal signaling is reduced. Rather than muscle or other ventrolateral derivatives, dorsal marginal cells in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ and sqt-/-; cyc+/- mutants often adopt neural fates (Fig. 7B,C). In addition, ventrolateral gene expression was not expanded into dorsal regions (Fig. 6), as would be expected if dorsal marginal cells adopted ventrolateral fates in these mutants. Thus, despite the elevated dorsal requirement for sqt and cyc, we found no evidence supporting a role for nodal-related genes instructing cell fates along the dorsoventral axis. Instead it seems that factors including Chordin, Boz and BMP signals, which are expressed in the absence of Nodal signaling (Gritsman et al., 1999), are able to pattern the dorsoventral axis without an additional instructive role for Nodal signals.

Overlapping and unique functions of squint and cyclops

Despite the absence of the embryonic shield and dorsal mesendodermal gene expression in all sqt-/- embryos at early stages, many sqt mutants have dorsal mesodermal derivatives such as notochord at 24 h, and some survive to adulthood (Table 1). The basis of the variability in the sqt mutant phenotype at late stages is not known. Nevertheless, the recovery of dorsal mesendoderm in some sqt mutants depends on cyc function, because all sqt; cyc double mutants lack head and trunk mesendodermal derivatives (Fig. 3) (Feldman et al., 1998). Thus, cyclops activity can compensate for the loss of squint function, either directly or perhaps by activating a parallel pathway that can overcome the loss of sqt. This genetic evidence for overlapping functions of the sqt and cyc genes contrasts with their distinct expression profiles and different activities in misexpression assays (Rebagliati et al., 1998a; Erter et al., 1988).

In misexpression experiments, Cyc acts only over short distances to induce mesodermal gene expression, whereas Sqt acts as a morphogen, directly specifying patterned gene expression over long distances (Chen and Schier, 2001). Thus, the formation of dorsal mesendoderm in sqt mutants demonstrates that Cyc activity can support normal patterning of the late gastrula and viability in the absence of the Sqt morphogen. This suggests that both Sqt and Cyc may act over long distances in their endogenous context, or that the long-range action of a Nodal morphogen is not always essential for viability.

Timing of developmental response to Nodal signals

In light of the different expression profiles of sqt and cyc, it is interesting that Cyc activity can compensate for loss of sqt function. sqt expression initiates at the midblastula stage in dorsal marginal cells, while cyc transcripts first appear in the late blastula in dorsal and ventral marginal cells. In wild-type embryos, cyc expression accumulates to high levels in involuting axial mesoderm, but this expression is reduced and delayed in sqt mutants (Fig. 3). Expression of dorsal mesendodermal markers closely follows cyc expression in sqt-/-; cyc+/+ embryos (Fig. 4). For example, gsc expression is nearly absent in the late blastula, when cyc mRNA is greatly reduced in the dorsal marginal region of these embryos. gsc transcripts begin to accumulate at the onset of gastrulation, when cyc expression begins to increase at the dorsal midline. Thus, late exposure of dorsal marginal cells to Nodal signals is sufficient for them to adopt dorsal mesendodermal fates. Conversely, dorsal mesendoderm in sqt+/+; cyc-/- embryos is induced entirely by sqt function and sqt expression in these mutants is mostly gone by the beginning of gastrulation (Fig. 3). Thus, exposure of dorsal marginal cells to sqt function before gastrulation, or cyc function after gastrulation has initiated, is sufficient to specify dorsal mesendoderm. This suggests that the timing of the response to Nodal signaling is not a crucial factor in the specification of dorsal mesendoderm in zebrafish.

Acknowledgments

We thank David Kimelman, Ariel Ruiz i Altaba, Howie Sirotkin, Ian Woods and Heather Stickney for critical comments on the manuscript; Peter Hausen for supplying β-catenin antibodies; Michele Mittman and Melissa Martin for fish care; and members of our laboratories for helpful discussions. This work was supported by NIH grants GM57825 (W.S.T.), GM56211 (A.F.S.) and GM58513 (D.A.K.). A.F.S. is a Scholar of the McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience, a Irma T. Hirschl Trust Career Scientist and an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. W.S.T. and D.A.K. were supported by the Pew Scholars Program in the Biomedical Sciences.

Footnotes

    • Accepted January 9, 2003.
  • © 2003.

References

  1. ↵
    Agius, E., Oelgeschlager, M., Wessely, O., Kemp, C. and de Robertis, E. M. (2000). Endodermal Nodal-related signals and mesoderm induction in Xenopus. Development 127,1173 -1183.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  2. ↵
    Alexander, J. and Stainier, D. Y. (1999). A molecular pathway leading to endoderm formation in zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 9,1147 -1157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Bisgrove, B. W., Essner, J. J. and Yost, H. J. (1999). Regulation of midline development by antagonism of lefty and nodal signaling. Development 126,3253 -3262.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    Carmany-Rampey, A. and Schier, A. F. (2001). Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation. Curr. Biol. 11,1261 -1265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Chen, S.-R. and Kimelman, D. (2000). The role of the yolk syncytial layer in germ layer patterning in zebrafish. Development 127,4681 -4689.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  6. ↵
    Chen, Y. and Schier, A. F. (2001). The zebrafish Nodal signal Squint functions as a morphogen. Nature 411,607 -610.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Christian, J. L., Olson, D. J. and Moon, R. T. (1992). Xwnt-8 modifies the character of mesoderm induced by bFGF in isolated Xenopus ectoderm. EMBO J. 11, 33-41.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Clements, D., Friday, R. V. and Woodland, H. R. (1999). Mode of action of VegT in mesoderm and endoderm formation. Development 126,4903 -4911.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    Conlon, F. L., Lyons, K. M., Takaesu, N., Barth, K. S., Kispert, A., Herrmann, B. and Robertson, E. J. (1994). A primary requirement for nodal in the formation and maintenance of the primitive streak in the mouse. Development 120,1919 -1928.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. ↵
    Cooper, M. S. and D'Amico, L. A. (1996). A cluster of noninvoluting endocytic cells at the margin of the zebrafish blastoderm marks the site of embryonic shield formation. Dev. Biol. 180,184 -198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Crease, D. J., Dyson, S. and Gurdon, J. B. (1998). Cooperation between the activin and Wnt pathways in the spatial control of organizer gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95,4398 -4403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    De Robertis, E. M., Larrain, J., Oelgeschlager, M. and Wessely, O. (2000). The establishment of Spemann's organizer and patterning of the vertebrate embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1, 171-181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Erter, C. E., Solnica-Krezel, L. and Wright, C. V. E. (1998). Zebrafish nodal-related 2 encodes an early mesendodermal inducer signaling from the extraembryonic yolk syncytial layer. Dev. Biol. 204,361 -372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Faure, S., Lee, M. A., Keller, T., ten Dijke, P. and Whitman, M. (2000). Endogenous patterns of TGFbeta superfamily signaling during early Xenopus development. Development 127,2917 -2931.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. ↵
    Fekany, K., Yamanaka, Y., Leung, T., Sirotkin, H. I., Topczewski, J., Gates, M. A., Hibi, M., Renucci, A., Stemple, D., Radbill, A. et al. (1999). The zebrafish bozozok locus encodes Dharma, a homeodomain protein essential for induction of gastrula organizer and dorsoanterior embryonic structures. Development 126,1427 -1438.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  16. ↵
    Feldman, B., Gates, M. A., Egan, E. S., Dougan, S. T., Rennebeck, G., Sirotkin, H. I., Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S. (1998). Zebrafish organizer development and germ-layer formation require nodal- related signals. Nature 395,181 -185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Feldman, B., Dougan, S. T., Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S. (2000). Nodal-related signals establish mesendodermal fate and trunk neural identity in zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 10,531 -534.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Gates, M. A., Kim, L., Egan, E. S., Cardozo, T., Sirotkin, H. I., Dougan, S. T., Lashkari, D., Abagyan, R., Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S. (1999). A genetic linkage map for zebrafish: comparative analysis and localization of genes and expressed sequences. Genome Res. 9,334 -347.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Green, J. B., New, H. V. and Smith, J. C. (1992). Responses of embryonic Xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm. Cell 71,731 -739.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Griffin, K. J., Amacher, S. L., Kimmel, C. B. and Kimelman, D. (1998). Molecular identification of spadetail: regulation of zebrafish trunk and tail mesoderm formation by T-box genes. Development 125,3379 -3388.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Gritsman, K., Zhang, J., Cheng, S., Heckscher, E., Talbot, W. S. and Schier, A. F. (1999). The EGF-CFC protein one-eyed pinhead is essential for nodal signaling. Cell 97,121 -132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Gritsman, K., Talbot, W. S. and Schier, A. F. (2000). Nodal signaling patterns the organizer. Development 127,921 -932.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  23. ↵
    Harland, R. and Gerhart, J. (1997). Formation and function of Spemann's organizer. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13,611 -667.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Hatta, K., Kimmel, C. B., Ho, R. K. and Walker, C. (1991). The cyclops mutation blocks specification of the floor plate of the zebrafish central nervous system. Nature 350,339 -341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Heasman, J. (1997). Patterning the Xenopus blastula. Development 124,4179 -4191.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. ↵
    Heisenberg, C. P. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1997). The function of silberblick in the positioning of the eye anlage in the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol. 184, 85-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Hug, B., Walter, V. and Grunwald, D. J. (1997). tbx6, a Brachyury-related gene expressed by ventral mesendodermal precursors in the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol. 183,61 -73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Hyde, C. E. and Old, R. W. (2000). Regulation of the early expression of the Xenopus nodal-related 1 gene, Xnr1. Development 127,1221 -1229.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  29. ↵
    Jones, C. M., Kuehn, M. R., Hogan, B. L., Smith, J. C. and Wright, C. V. E. (1995). Nodal-related signals induce axial mesoderm and dorsalize mesoderm during gastrulation. Development 121,3651 -2662.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    Joseph, E. M. and Melton, D. A. (1997). Xnr4: a Xenopus nodal-related gene expressed in the Spemann organizer. Dev. Biol. 184,367 -372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Kawahara, A., Wilm, T., Solnica-Krezel, L. and Dawid, I. B. (2000). Antagonistic role of vega1 and bozozok/dharma homeobox genes in organizer formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97,12121 -12126.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Kelly, G. M., Erezyilmaz, D. F. and Moon, R. T. (1995). Induction of a secondary embryonic axis in zebrafish occurs following the overexpression of beta-catenin. Mech. Dev. 53,261 -273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Kelly, C., Chin, A. J., Leatherman, J. L., Kozlowski, D. J. and Weinberg, E. S. (2000). Maternally controlled β -catenin-mediated signaling is required for organizer formation in the zebrafish. Development 127,3899 -3911.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  34. ↵
    Kimelman, D., Christian, J. L. and Moon, R. T. (1992). Synergistic principles of development: overlapping patterning systems in Xenopus mesoderm induction. Development 116,1 -9.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  35. ↵
    Kimelman, D. and Griffin, K. J. (2000). Vertebrate mesendoderm induction and patterning. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10,350 -356.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. and Schilling, T. F. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203,253 -310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    Kimmel, C. B., Warga, R. M. and Schilling, T. F. (1990). Origin and organization of the zebrafish fate map. Development 108,581 -594.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Koos, D. S. and Ho, R. K. (1998). The nieuwkoid gene characterizes and mediates a Nieuwkoop-center-like activity in the zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 8,1199 -1206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Kudoh, T., Tsang, M., Hukriede, N. A., Chen, X., Dedekian, M., Clarke, C. J., Kiang, A., Schultz, S., Epstein, J. A., Toyama, R. and Dawid, I. B. (2001). A gene expression screen in zebrafish embryogenesis. Genome Res. 11,1979 -1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Lee, M. A., Heasman, J. and Whitman, M. (2001). Timing of endogenous activin-like signals and regional specification of the Xenopus embryo. Development 128,2939 -2952.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    McDowell, N. and Gurdon, J. B. (1999). Activin as a morphogen in Xenopus mesoderm induction. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10,311 -317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Melby, A. E., Warga, R. M. and Kimmel, C. B. (1996). Specification of cell fates at the dorsal margin of the zebrafish gastrula. Development 122,2225 -2237.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  43. ↵
    Melby, A. E., Beach, C., Mullins, M. and Kimelman, D. (2000). Patterning the early zebrafish by the opposing actions of bozozok and vox/vent. Dev. Biol. 224,275 -285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    Meno, C., Gritsman, K., Ohishi, S., Ohfuji, Y., Heckscher, E., Mochida, K., Shimono, A., Kondoh, H., Talbot, W. S., Robertson, E. J. et al. (1999). Mouse Lefty2 and zebrafish antivin are feedback inhibitors of nodal signaling during vertebrate gastrulation. Mol. Cell 4,287 -298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Moon, R. T. and Kimelman, D. (1998). From cortical rotation to organizer gene expression: toward a molecular explanation of axis specification in Xenopus. BioEssays 20,536 -545.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Norris, D. P., Brennan, J., Bikoff, E. K. and Robertson, E. J. (2002). The Foxh1-dependent autoregulatory enhancer controls the level of Nodal signals in the mouse embryo. Development 129,3455 -3468.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    Osada, S. I., Saijoh, Y., Frisch, A., Yeo, C. Y., Adachi, H., Watanabe, M., Whitman, M., Hamada, H. and Wright, C. V. (2000). Activin/nodal responsiveness and asymmetric expression of a Xenopus nodal-related gene converge on a FAST-regulated module in intron 1. Development 127,2503 -2514.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  48. ↵
    Pelegri, F. and Maischein, H. M. (1998). Function of zebrafish beta-catenin and TCF-3 in dorsoventral patterning. Mech. Dev. 77,63 -74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    Pogoda, H. M., Solnica-Krezel, L., Driever, W. and Meyer, D. (2000). The zebrafish forkhead transcription factor FoxH1/Fast1 is a modulator of nodal signaling required for organizer formation. Curr. Biol. 10,1041 -1049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    Rebagliati, M. R., Toyama, R., Fricke, C., Haffter, P. and Dawid, I. B. (1998a). Zebrafish nodal-related genes are implicated in axial patterning and establishing left-right asymmetry. Dev. Biol. 199,261 -272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    Rebagliati, M. R., Toyama, R., Haffter, P. and Dawid, I. B. (1998b). cyclops encodes a nodal-related factor involved in midline signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95,9932 -9937.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Ruiz i Altaba, A. and Melton, D. A. (1989). Interaction between peptide growth factors and homoeobox genes in the establishment of antero-posterior polarity in frog embryos. Nature 341,33 -38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    Sampath, K., Rubinstein, A. L., Cheng, A. M., Liang, J. O., Fekany, K., Solnica-Krezel, L., Korzh, V., Halpern, M. E. and Wright, C. V. E. (1998). Induction of the zebrafish ventral brain and floorplate requires cyclops/nodal signalling. Nature 395,185 -189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    Schier, A. F. (2001). Axis formation and patterning in zebrafish. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11,393 -404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    Schier, A. F. and Shen, M. M. (2000). Nodal signalling in vertebrate development. Nature 403,385 -389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S. (1998). The zebrafish organizer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 464-471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S. (2001). Nodal signaling and the zebrafish organizer. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 45,289 -297.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    Schier, A. F., Neuhauss, S. C., Helde, K. A., Talbot, W. S. and Driever, W. (1997). The one-eyed pinhead gene functions in mesoderm and endoderm formation in zebrafish and interacts with no tail. Development 124,327 -342.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  59. ↵
    Schneider, S., Steinbeisser, H., Warga, R. M. and Hausen, P. (1996). Beta-catenin translocation into nuclei demarcates the dorsalizing centers in frog and fish embryos. Mech. Dev. 57,191 -198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    Schohl, A. and Fagotto, F. (2002). Beta-catenin, MAPK and SMAD signaling during early Xenopus development. Development 129, 37-52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    Schulte-Merker, S., Ho. R. K., Herrmann, B. G. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1992). The protein product of the zebrafish homologue of the mouse T gene is expressed in nuclei of the germ ring and the notochord of the early embryo. Development 116,1021 -1032.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    Shimizu, T., Yamanaka, Y., Ryu, S. L., Hashimoto, H., Yabe, T., Hirata, T., Bae, Y. K., Hibi, M. and Hirano, T. (2000). Cooperative roles of Bozozok/Dharma and Nodal-related proteins in the formation of the dorsal organizer in zebrafish. Mech. Dev. 91,293 -303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    Sirotkin, H. I., Gates, M. A., Kelly, P. D., Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S. (2000a). Fast1 is required for the development of dorsal axial structures in zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 10,1051 -1054.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    Sirotkin, H. I., Dougan, S. T., Schier, A. F. and Talbot, W. S. (2000b). bozozok and squint act in parallel to specify dorsal mesoderm and anterior neuroectoderm in zebrafish. Development 127,2583 -2592.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  65. Smith, J. C., Yaqoob, M. and Symes, K. (1998). Purification, partial characterization and biological effects of the XTC mesoderm-inducing factor. Development 103,591 -600.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    Stachel, S. E., Grunwald, D. J. and Myers, P. Z. (1993). Lithium perturbation and goosecoid expression identify a dorsal specification pathway in the pregastrula zebrafish. Development 117,1261 -1274.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  67. ↵
    Strahle, U., Blader, P., Henrique, D. and Ingham, P. W. (1993). Axial, a zebrafish gene expressed along the developing body axis, shows altered expression in cyclops mutant embryos. Genes Dev. 7,1436 -1446.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    Takahashi, S., Yokota, C., Takano, K., Tanegashima, K., Onuma, Y., Goto, J. and Asashima, M. (2000). Two novel nodal-related genes initiate early inductive events in Xenopus Nieuwkoop center. Development 127,5319 -5329.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  69. ↵
    Talbot, W. S., Egan, E. S., Gates, M. A., Walker, C., Ullmann, B., Neuhauss, S. C., Kimmel, C. B. and Postlethwait, J. H. (1998). Genetic analysis of chromosomal rearrangements in the cyclops region of the zebrafish genome. Genetics 148,373 -380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    Thisse, B., Wright, C. V. and Thisse, C. (2000). Activin- and Nodal-related factors control antero-posterior patterning of the zebrafish embryo. Nature 403,425 -428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    Thisse, C., Thisse, B., Halpern, M. E. and Postlethwait, J. H. (1994). Goosecoid expression in neurectoderm and mesendoderm is disrupted in zebrafish cyclops gastrulas. Dev. Biol. 164,420 -429.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. ↵
    Thisse, C. and Thisse, B. (1999). Antivin, a novel and divergent member of the TGFβ superfamily, negatively regulates mesoderm induction. Development 126,229 -240.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  73. ↵
    Varlet, I., Collignon, J. and Robertson, E. J. (1997). nodal expression in the primitive endoderm is required for specification of the anterior axis during mouse gastrulation. Development 124,1033 -1044.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  74. ↵
    Warga, R. M. and Kimmel, C. B. (1990). Cell movements during epiboly and gastrulation in zebrafish. Development 108,569 -580.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. Warga, R. M. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1998). spadetail-dependent cell compaction of the dorsal zebrafish blastula. Dev. Biol. 203,116 -121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    Warga, R. M. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1999). Origin and development of the zebrafish endoderm. Development 126,827 -838.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  77. ↵
    Watabe, T., Kim, S., Candia, A., Rothbacher, U., Hashimoto, C., Inoue, K. and Cho, K. W. (1995). Molecular mechanisms of Spemann's organizer formation: conserved growth factor synergy between Xenopus and mouse. Genes Dev. 9,3038 -3050.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    Weinberg, E. S., Allende, M. L., Kelly, C. S., Abdelhamid, A., Murakami, T., Andermann, P., Doerre, O. G., Grunwald, D. J. and Riggleman, B. (1996). Developmental regulation of zebrafish MyoD in wild-type, no tail and spadetail embryos. Development 122,271 -280.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  79. ↵
    White, J. A., Guo, Y. D., Batez, K., Beckett-Jones, B., Bonasoro, J., Hsu, K. E., Dilworth, F. J., Jones, G. and Petkovich, M. (1996). Identification of the retinoic acid-inducible all-trans-retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 271,29922 -29927.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    Whitman, M. (2001). Nodal signaling in early vertebrate embryos: themes and variations. Dev. Cell 1, 605-617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The role of the zebrafish nodal-related genes squint and cyclops in patterning of mesendoderm
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
Share
Research Article
The role of the zebrafish nodal-related genes squint and cyclops in patterning of mesendoderm
Scott T. Dougan, Rachel M. Warga, Donald A. Kane, Alexander F. Schier, William S. Talbot
Development 2003 130: 1837-1851; doi: 10.1242/dev.00400
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
The role of the zebrafish nodal-related genes squint and cyclops in patterning of mesendoderm
Scott T. Dougan, Rachel M. Warga, Donald A. Kane, Alexander F. Schier, William S. Talbot
Development 2003 130: 1837-1851; doi: 10.1242/dev.00400

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Use of hPSC-derived 3D organoids and mouse genetics to define the roles of YAP in the development of the esophagus
  • Neuronal differentiation influences progenitor arrangement in the vertebrate neuroepithelium
  • FGF signaling in mammary gland fibroblasts regulates multiple fibroblast functions and mammary epithelial morphogenesis
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

The people behind the papers – George Britton and Aryeh Warmflash

George and Aryeh

First author George Britton and his supervisor Aryeh Warmflash discuss their new Development paper in which they apply advanced in vitro culturing techniques to investigate embryonic ectoderm patterning.


Travelling Fellowship – New imaging approach unveils a bigger picture

Highlights from Travelling Fellowship trips

Find out how Pamela Imperadore’s Travelling Fellowship grant from The Company of Biologists took her to Germany, where she used new imaging techniques to investigate the cellular machinery underlying octopus arm regeneration. Don’t miss the next application deadline for 2020 travel, coming up on 29 November. Where will your research take you?


Primer – Principles and applications of optogenetics in developmental biology

Schematic demonstrating the approaches to controlling protein activity using optogenetics.

Protein function can be controlled by light using optogenetic techniques. In their new Primer, Stefano De Renzis and his colleagues in Heidelberg provide an overview of the most commonly used optogenetic tools and their application in developmental biology.


preLights – Self-organised symmetry breaking in zebrafish reveals feedback from morphogenesis to pattern formation

Sundar Naganathan

preLighter Sundar Naganathan explains his selected preprint by Vikas Trivedi, Benjamin Steventon and their co-workers on pescoids, a new in vitro model system to study early zebrafish embryogenesis.


Spotlight – Can laboratory model systems instruct human limb regeneration?

An extract from a schematic demonstrating the possible pipeline for how discovery in lab model systems can influence applications for regenerative therapies.

One of the most challenging objectives of tissue regeneration research is regrowth of a lost or amputated limb. Here, Ben Cox, Maximina Yun and Kenneth Poss outline the research avenues yet to be explored to move closer to this capstone achievement.


Articles of interest in our sister journals

Tox4 modulates cell fate reprogramming

Lotte Vanheer, Juan Song, Natalie De Geest, Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talon, Caterina Provenzano, Taeho Oh, Joel Chappell, Vincent Pasque
Journal of Cell Science

Drosophila melanogaster: a simple system for understanding complexity

Stephanie E. Mohr, Norbert Perrimon
Disease Models & Mechanisms

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992