Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
A cell-specific enhancer that specifies lin-3 expression in the C. elegans anchor cell for vulval development
Byung Joon Hwang, Paul W. Sternberg
Development 2004 131: 143-151; doi: 10.1242/dev.00924
Byung Joon Hwang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul W. Sternberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •     Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Spatial and temporal expression pattern of lin-3. (A) Different extents of 5′ noncoding and coding regions of lin-3 were cloned into a gfp reporter construct as described in the Materials and methods. Construct 1 begins near the 3′ end of the fourth intron, construct 2 begins from the 3′ half of the second lin-3 intron, and constructs 3 and 4 contain the first intron and the first promoter. The two arrows indicate lin-3 promoters; blue and red boxes represent two alternative signal peptides right after translational initiation codons; purple boxes are exons encoding an EGF domain; and yellow box represents a domain that exists only in one form of lin-3 and is created by alternative splicing. The arrow from ACEL (anchor cell-specific enhancer of lin-3) marks the position of an enhancer element that drives the expression of lin-3 in the AC. Cells expressing lin-3::gfp were summarized as –, no expression; and +, expression. (B-M) The expression of lin-3::gfp in pharynx (pha), spermatheca valve (spv), a subset of the primary vulval cells (vulF), male tail (F and U cells), and in the anchor cell (AC) and the pre-anchor (AC)/ventral uterine precursor cells (VU). (B-D,H-J) Nomarski images; (E-G,K-M) corresponding images of lin-3::gfp expression.

  •     Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    The anchor cell (AC)-specific enhancer element of lin-3. (A) The wild-type, but not`G to A', form of ACEL can activateΔ pes-10::gfp transcription in the AC. A base change from guanine (G) to adenine (A) was identified in the lin-3(e1417) allele (`G to A'). The wild-type and`G to A' forms of the putative ACEL elements (59 bp) were cloned into a Δpes-10::gfp enhancer assay vector. The number in parenthesis represents the number of animals in which gfp expression in the AC was examined. (B) Conservation of the ACEL sequence between C. briggsae (CB) and C. elegans (CE). The intron sequence (3′ part of the fourth intron of lin-3) is in lower case letters and the exon sequence (5′ part of the fourth exon of lin-3) is in upper case letters (purple underline). The e1417 mutation, indicated with a dot, is located in the conserved region of the FTZ-F1 NHR binding site, underlined in green. E boxes are underlined in red. Binding sites of POU homeodomain proteins are underlined in blue. The unbroken blue line indicates the site conserved in both species; the broken blue line represents the site that exists only in C. elegans.

  •     Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Deletion and site-directed mutagenesis analyses of ACEL. (A) Deletion analysis of ACEL. Deletions from the 5′ end of the ACEL were made with the endogenous lin-3 promoter (constructs 1-4). Deletions from the 5′ or the 3′ end of the ACEL were generated by PCR and the DNA fragments were fused with a Δpes-10::gfp enhancer assay vector (constructs 5-8). (B) Site-directed mutagenesis analysis of ACEL. Mutations in the ACEL were generated using PCR and the PCR products were cloned into theΔ pes-10::gfp vector. Construct 1 has no mutations and the others (2-18) have changes in the ACEL as indicated. For each construct, about 30 animals that express gfp in the tail were examined for gfp expression in the AC.

  •     Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    HLH-2 binds to both E-boxes in the ACEL. (A) Synthesis and purification of FLAG-Luciferase and FLAG-HLH-2 proteins. Both proteins were expressed in insect cells using a baculovirus expression system and then purified using Ni2-columns. The purified proteins were resolved on an SDS-PAGE gel for Coomassie staining and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibodies. (B) Probe A contains both E-boxes, probes B and C contain only one E-box, and probe D does not contain any E-boxes. The probes contain an extra 70 bp at the 3′ end of the ACEL. Thus, the first E-box (E-1) is near the 5′ end of the probe and the second E-box (E-2) is in the middle of the probe. (C) An EMSA that shows the binding of the HLH-2 protein to both E-boxes in the ACEL. The purified proteins were incubated with the wild-type and the mutated DNA probes of the ACEL (Fig. 3B). F indicates the migration of free DNA probe, B is the FLAG-HLH-2 protein/DNA probe complex, and Supershift is created by adding anti-FLAG antibodies (lanes 6 to 8).

  •     Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    The hlh-2 and nhr genes are involved in vulval induction and the expression of lin-3::gfp in the AC. (A-D) Defective lin-3::gfp expression in the AC was caused by soaking animals in the dsRNA solution against hlh-2. Transgenic animals that contain lin-3::gfp extrachromosomal arrays were soaked in the control dsRNA solution (RNA synthesized from blank vectors) and in the dsRNA solution against hlh-2. (B,D) GFP expression in the AC was examined in the animals that express gfp in pharynx at the early L4 stage. (E-G) Defects in vulval induction and vulval-uterine connection in animals treated with dsRNA against hlh-2. (E) Wild-type vulvae with control RNAi. (F) Defective vulval induction after hlh-2 RNAi. (G) Defective vulval-uterine connection after hlh-2 RNAi. (H-J) Defects in vulval induction and vulval-uterine connection in animals treated with dsRNA against nhr-25. (H) Defective vulval induction after nhr-25 RNAi. (I,J) Defective vulval-uterine connection after nhr-25 RNAi.

  •     Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    NHR-25 binds to the wild-type, but not the e1417, form of ACEL. (A) A cis-element in the ACEL, which contains the e1417 mutation site, is similar to the FTZ-F1 binding site consensus. (B) Two forms (α- and β-) of nhr-25 cDNA. DB represents a DNA binding domain and LB a ligand-binding domain. Both messages are trans-spliced with SL1 RNA. Theα -form contains an intact DNA-binding domain and the β-form partially deletes the domain. (C) Synthesis of both forms of the NHR-25 protein. The proteins were synthesized using in vitro transcription and translation (TNT) in rabbit reticulocyte lysates with 35S-methionine. The proteins were visualized by autoradiography after SDS-PAGE. (D) EMSA showing the binding of NHR-25 to the wild-type ACEL DNA probe. The α- and β- NHR-25 proteins, which were synthesized using in vitro TNT with cold methionine, were incubated with the 32P-labeled wild-type (wt) or e1417 form of ACEL DNA probes. The reaction mixtures were separated on a non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel and the radioactivity signals were detected by phosphoimager. F indicates the migration of free DNA probes, NS indicates the migration of a non-specific protein/DNA probe complex, and B is the NHR-25/DNA probe complex. An equal amount of non-specific protein/DNA probe complex (NS) was observed in all of the binding reactions, regardless of the synthesis of NHR-25, showing that equal amounts of the reticulocyte lysates were used for the binding assay.

  •     Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    A model for the AC-specific lin-3 expression. The AC-specific expression of lin-3, which is essential to induce proper fates of VPCs, is established via an enhancer element (ACEL, 59 bp) that contains two E-boxes and one FTZ-F1 NHR binding site. NHRs activate lin-3 transcription via the FTZ-F1 NHR binding site in the ACEL, which is the site of lin-3(e1417) mutation. HLH-2 binds to both E-boxes in the ACEL and activates the transcription of lin-3 in the AC, which activates the EGF signaling pathway in the VPCs.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A cell-specific enhancer that specifies lin-3 expression in the C. elegans anchor cell for vulval development
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
A cell-specific enhancer that specifies lin-3 expression in the C. elegans anchor cell for vulval development
Byung Joon Hwang, Paul W. Sternberg
Development 2004 131: 143-151; doi: 10.1242/dev.00924
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
A cell-specific enhancer that specifies lin-3 expression in the C. elegans anchor cell for vulval development
Byung Joon Hwang, Paul W. Sternberg
Development 2004 131: 143-151; doi: 10.1242/dev.00924

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Tissue growth constrains root organ outlines into an isometrically scalable shape
  • Stem integrity in Arabidopsis thaliana requires a load-bearing epidermis
  • A dynamic and mosaic basement membrane controls cell intercalation in Drosophila ovaries
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

A new society for regenerative biologists

Kenneth Poss and Elly Tanaka announce the launch of the International Society for Regenerative Biology (ISRB), which will promote research and education in the field of regenerative biology.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


An interview with Cagney Coomer

Over a virtual chat, we spoke to Cagney Coomer about her experiences in the lab, the classroom and the community centre, and why she thinks outreach and role models are vital to science.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992