Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Analysis of embryonic motoneuron gene regulation: derepression of general activators function in concert with enhancer factors
Soo-Kyung Lee, Linda W. Jurata, Junichi Funahashi, Esmeralda C. Ruiz, Samuel L. Pfaff
Development 2004 131: 3295-3306; doi: 10.1242/dev.01179
Soo-Kyung Lee
Gene Expression Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda W. Jurata
Gene Expression Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junichi Funahashi
Gene Expression Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esmeralda C. Ruiz
Gene Expression Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel L. Pfaff
Gene Expression Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •     Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Characterization of a motoneuron enhancer. (A) Schematic representation of mouse genomic sequences of Hb9. Gray boxes represent areas of high homology between mouse and human. Percent nucleotide conservation is shown and percent gapping in the alignment is listed for each area of homology. Mouse promoter sequences (black line) were fused to the reporter GFP gene to determine the activity of each DNA fragment. The presence (+) or absence (–) of high level GFP expression in motoneurons from HH stage 24 chicks electroporated with each reporter construct is listed on the right (MN Expr.). Each result is representative of ∼20 embryos. (B) Fragments of the 2.5 kb distal fragment –8129 to –5575 were subcloned into aΔ NheI:GFP or TATA:GFP vector as indicated, electroporated into chick embryos and GFP expression was analyzed at HH stage 24. Gray rectangles correspond to evolutionarily conserved sequences 5′-CD (5′ conserved domain), M50 (∼50 nucleotide segment from enhancer), M100 (∼100 nucleotide segment from enhancer) and 3′-CD (3′ conserved domain). A 231 nucleotide segment (M250, –7121 to –6890) contains an enhancer active in embryonic motoneurons. (C-G) GFP expression in HH stage 24 chick embryos following electroporation of Hb9:GFP reporter constructs listed in A and B. (C) The upstream 9.2 kb region of Hb9 directs motoneuron-specific expression of GFP. (D) The proximalΔ NheI fragment of Hb9 drives weak GFP expression along the entire dorsoventral axis of the neural tube. (E) The 2.5 kb distal element produces a strong GFP signal (green) in Hb9+ motoneurons (red). Medial red cells lacking GFP are probably Mnr2+ motoneuron progenitors that label with the anti-Hb9 antibody. (F) A 231 nucleotide fragment (M250), drove high levels of GFP in motoneurons (MN), but some ectopic expression of the reporter is also detected in the dorsal neural tube (non-MN). The M250+ΔNheI construct corresponds to MNE::GFP in Lee and Pfaff (Lee and Pfaff, 2003). (G) M250 linked to synthetic TATA box is active in motoneurons without labeling ectopic cells. (H) E11.5 transgenic mouse embryos with M250+ΔNheI:GFP reporter stained with anti-GFP antibody. (I,J) Hb9::d4GFP (destabilized GFP) reporter activity in HH stage 20 chick embryos. The 9.2 kb promoter of Hb9 and M250 enhancer (–7121 to –6890) are both active in `mature' (laterally-located) motoneurons (MN, bracket). (K) The enhancer of Hb9 (MNE) mediates activation (blue factors) and maintenance (yellow factors) of transcription in developing motoneurons.

  • Table 1.

    Expression of GFP in independent lines of E11.5 transgenic mouse embryos containing wild-type and mutant derivates of M250 linked to theΔ NheI:GFP construct

    Total number of transgenic embryosNumber of embryos with GFP+ motoneurons (%)
    Wild type54 (80.0)
    E box mt122 (16.7)
    A/T mt61* (16.7)
    • ↵* A small number of weak GFP+ motoneurons were detected per section. This embryo was selected for the image in Fig. 4L

  •     Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Enhancer function is dependent on bHLH factors. (A) Two evolutionarily conserved blocks, M50 and M100, are found in the M250 enhancer. Mouse, rat and human sequences of M50 and M100 are aligned, and nucleotide coordinates of the mouse and human sequences are indicated. Two canonical E box sites are marked with asterisks (*). (B) Mutations were introduced into the E boxes as shown, and functional activity was tested in the context of the M250+ΔNheI:GFP construct shown in Fig. 1B,F. (C,D) GFP expression in HH stage 24 chick embryos following electroporation of each reporter construct. (E,F) GFP expression in E11.5 transgenic mouse embryos containing wild-type or E box mutant constructs.

  •     Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    NeuroD contributes to the activation of Hb9. (A) P19 cells were transfected with a luciferase reporter containing reiterated E boxes and increasing amounts of expression constructs encoding bHLH factors. Ngn2 strongly activated transcription, whereas NeuroM (NeuM) and NeuroD (NeuD) exhibited markedly less inherent trans-activating function. (B) NeuroD activates M250 enhancer-mediated transcription in a synergistic manner with Isl1 and Lhx3 in P19 cells. (C) NeuroD/E47 dimer binding to the M250 enhancer was examined using gel retardation assays. Myc-tagged NeuroD [NrD(Myc)] and HA-tagged E47 were translated in vitro separately and incubated with the M50 oligonucleotide in the presence or absence of antibodies directed against each epitope. This translation condition favored the formation of E47:E47 complexes. Similar results were seen with oligos containing the M100 E box (not shown). (D) The binding of co-translated NeuroD/E47 on M50 was challenged by 20- or 100-fold molar excess of wild type (self), E-box mutated (E-mt) or unrelated (non-self) DNA. Co-translation of proteins favored the formation of NeuroD:E47 heterodimers, which bind with high specificity to the E box sites within the enhancer. (E-H) The co-expression of NeuroD with Isl1 and Lhx3 triggers the differentiation of Hb9+ motoneurons in >70% of the transfected P19 cells. This activity is comparable with that seen with NeuroM (Lee and Pfaff, 2003).

  •     Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Identification of multiple positive-acting elements within the M250 enhancer for motoneuron expression. (A) Point mutations were introduced into nine sites (M1-M9) as indicated. (B-K) GFP expression in HH stage 24 chick embryos with each mutant reporter tested in the context of the M250+ΔNheI:GFP construct (see Fig. 1B,F). (L) E11.5 transgenic mouse embryo generated with the M250 reporter containing M1 and M9 mutations and stained with anti-GFP antibody. (M) Location of oligonucleotides (indicated by rectangles) in the Hb9 promoter used for gel retardation assays. The sequence of these regions is highly conserved between mouse and human. (N) The binding of Isl1/Lhx3 to the M50 DNA segment was challenged by 20-, 100-fold molar excess of the unlabeled probes indicated above the lanes. M50 and M100C competed efficiently for Isl1/Lhx3 DNA binding, while the M3-oligo and 3′CD-oligos failed to do so. This suggests the M3 element is not a binding site for the LIM-HD factors Isl1 and Lhx3.

  •     Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    General-activators of Hb9 in non-motoneurons. (A) Fragments of the mouse Hb9 promoter were linked to the reporter nuclear lacZ or GFP. (B-H) DNA constructs were electroporated into chick embryos and reporter expression was detected using immunocytochemistry at HH stage 24. (B) The 9.2 kb promoter of Hb9 drives motoneuron-specific gene expression. (C) Deletion of the distal 5.6 kb BamHI fragment impairs the motoneuron-specific activity leading to widespread ectopic reporter expression. (D,E) Likewise, large 5′ deletions to the NheI and HindIII sites leaving only 1386 and 550 nucleotides of Hb9 sequences, respectively, continued to promote widespread ectopic reporter expression. (F-H) The 2.5 kb distal element (–8129 to –5575) was linked to three different proximal fragments of Hb9 as indicated in A. 2.5 distal + ΔNheI or ΔHindIIII drove high levels of GFP expression in motoneurons, but 2.5 distal + NI-HIII was less active, suggesting the –550 proximal segment of Hb9 is necessary for enhancer function. (I) General activators are predicted to interact with the proximal (prox.) region of Hb9 and promote widespread transcription of the gene. The enhancer of Hb9 (MNE) in combination with general-activators drive motoneuron-specific expression. Deletion of the proximal segment of Hb9 disrupts enhancer function. (J) The nucleotide sequence of the proximal 550 nucleotide region of Hb9 from mouse and human are aligned. The conserved sequences in both species are marked in bold, and potential binding sites for activators are boxed and labeled. This sequence lacks an obvious TATA box motif. The longest cDNA extends to –195 in mouse Hb9 (–181 in human). Because the precise start of transcription has not been mapped, we use the start of translation as the reference point for the coordinates shown with the sequences (see Materials and methods). (K) CV1 cells were transfected with increasing concentrations of plasmids encoding E2F1 and/or Sp1 together with a luciferase reporter linked to Hb9 (2.5 distal+ΔNheI).

  •     Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Repressors interacting with dispersed elements suppress ectopic Hb9 expression. (A) Distal fragments were linked to the proximal– 1386 segment (ΔNheI) of Hb9 to map elements involved in repressing ectopic gene expression. (B-E) DNA clones were electroporated into chick embryos, and immunocytochemistry was used to detect lacZ (green) and Hb9 (red) at HH stage 24. White bar indicates dorsal limit of Hb9+ motoneuron population. (B) The proximal segment of Hb9 drives widespread reporter expression. (C) The 1 kb distal fragment does not restrict the ectopic expression of Hb9. (D) The 4.6 kb distal fragment limited reporter expression to motoneurons. (E) The 2.5 kb distal fragment expressed nlacZ in motoneurons and a few cells in the V2 interneuron region. (F) The proximal 550 nucleotide segment of Hb9 activates transcription throughout the spinal cord. In non-motoneurons (non-MNs), this activation is suppressed by factors that require elements in the 4.6 kb distal region of the promoter.

  •     Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Repression of Hb9 by homeodomain transcription factors. (A) Plasmids encoding progenitor factors, Nkx2.2, Nkx6.1, Pax6 and Irx3, were co-transfected with the 2.5 kb distal+TK:luciferase reporter into 293 cells and luciferase activity was used to monitor the fold repression relative to vector-only transfections. (B) Hb9 and EnR-Hb9 (Hb9 homeodomain linked to eh1 engrailed repressor domain) repressed the synergistic activation of M250 by Isl1/Lhx3/NeuroM in transfected P19 cells. By contrast, Hb9-HD and Hb9-HD fused VP16 activation domain (VP16-Hb9) did not. (C,D) Gel retardation analysis reveals that Hb9 binds to the M50 and M100 (not shown) portions of its enhancer. Antibodies against Hb9 supershifted or disrupted the DNA:protein complex, whereas IgG control serum had no effect on DNA binding. Mutation of the ATTA sequences within M50 (ATTAm) disrupted Hb9 binding. The protein complex formed by Isl1/Lhx3 relies on the same ATTA elements for binding (Lee and Pfaff, 2003), suggesting Hb9 may compete with the LIM factors for access to the enhancer.

  •     Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Model of transcriptional regulation for motoneuron-specific gene expression. (A) Progenitor cell domains (blue, green, red) in the ventral neural tube express specific combinations of transcription factors involved in cell fate specification (Briscoe et al., 2000). The floor plate (gray, FP) is shown. Progenitor cell factors from the p2 and p3 domains repress the general-activators of Hb9, providing direct evidence for the derepression model of gene regulation in the neural tube (Muhr et al., 2001) (reviewed by Lee and Pfaff, 2001). To achieve high level expression of Hb9 in motoneurons, however, enhancer factors Isl1, Lhx3 and NeuroM cooperate with general activators. (B) The spatial pattern of Hb9 expression in motoneurons is regulated by repressors (red) in non-motoneuron cells binding to dispersed sites. This report demonstrates that Irx3 and Nkx2.2 repress Hb9, but it remains unclear whether they function directly or indirectly. The postmitotic repression of Hb9 in non-motoneurons may be mediated by additional repressors (XR). In differentiating motoneurons activators (green) bind to the enhancer (M250) and proximal 550 nucleotide segment of the promoter. Together this ensemble of specific and general proteins triggers high level transcription in motoneurons, which is modulated through negative feedback regulation by Hb9 protein.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Motoneuron
  • Development
  • Hb9
  • Enhancer
  • Gene regulation
  • Derepression

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analysis of embryonic motoneuron gene regulation: derepression of general activators function in concert with enhancer factors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Analysis of embryonic motoneuron gene regulation: derepression of general activators function in concert with enhancer factors
Soo-Kyung Lee, Linda W. Jurata, Junichi Funahashi, Esmeralda C. Ruiz, Samuel L. Pfaff
Development 2004 131: 3295-3306; doi: 10.1242/dev.01179
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Analysis of embryonic motoneuron gene regulation: derepression of general activators function in concert with enhancer factors
Soo-Kyung Lee, Linda W. Jurata, Junichi Funahashi, Esmeralda C. Ruiz, Samuel L. Pfaff
Development 2004 131: 3295-3306; doi: 10.1242/dev.01179

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Regulation of otocyst patterning by Tbx2 and Tbx3 is required for inner ear morphogenesis in the mouse
  • The tolerance to hypoxia is defined by a time-sensitive response of the gene regulatory network in sea urchin embryos
  • An early global role for Axin is required for correct patterning of the anterior-posterior axis in the sea urchin embryo
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

The Node is looking for a new Community Manager!

If you're interested in science communication, publishing and the developmental biology community, we're hiring for a new Community Manager for our community site, the Node.

The position is an exciting opportunity to develop an already successful and well-known site, engaging with the academic, publishing and online communities. Find out more and how to apply.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


The people behind the papers - Clément Dubois, Shivam Gupta, Andrew Mugler and Marie-Anne Félix

A new paper investigates the robustness of neuroblast migration in the C. elegans larva in the face of both genetic and environmental variation. In an interview, the paper's four authors tell us more about the story.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Every talk is recorded and since launching in August last year, the series has clocked up almost 10k views on YouTube.

Here, Swann Floc'hlay discusses her work modelling dorsal-ventral axis specification in the sea urchin embryo.

Save your spot at our next session:

14 April
Time: 17:00 BST
Chaired by: François Guillemot

12 May
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Paola Arlotta

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992