Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Research Article
Feedback interactions between MKP3 and ERK MAP kinase control scleraxis expression and the specification of rib progenitors in the developing chick somite
Terence Gordon Smith, Dylan Sweetman, Margaret Patterson, Stephen M. Keyse, Andrea Münsterberg
Development 2005 132: 1305-1314; doi: 10.1242/dev.01699
Terence Gordon Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dylan Sweetman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret Patterson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen M. Keyse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Münsterberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •     Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Expression of Mkp3 during chick somite development correlates with the expression of scleraxis in somites and with the expression of Fgf4 and Fgf8 in myotomes. (A-C,G-L) Whole-mount in situ hybridisation of HH15, HH19, HH20 and HH23 chick embryos. (A,J) Mkp3. (J) Hind-limb buds were removed to show expression in posterior somites. (B,K) scleraxis, blue asterisk indicates the axial level of expression in somites, red arrow indicates scleraxis expression in presegmented mesoderm; (C,L) spry2; (G) Fgf4; (H) Fgf8; and (I) FGFR4/FREK. (D-F) Frontal sections through HH24 somites stained with MF20 antibody to visualise myosin heavy chain protein in the myotome (green) together with (D) Mkp3 transcripts (dark purple) in the dorsal sclerotome along the anterior and posterior somite edges. (E) MF20 and scleraxis transcripts (red). (F) MF20 and spry2. Brackets in J,G indicate the triangular shaped expression in posterior somites. ba, branchial arches; dm, dermomyotome; is, isthmus; lb, limb bud; my, myotome; ol, olfactory epithelium; op, optic vesicle; ot, otic vesicle; s, somite; sc, sclerotome; tb, tail bud.

  •     Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    FGFs regulate Mkp3 transcripts through ERK MAP kinase in the dorsal sclerotome. (A-E) Whole-mount in situ hybridisation with Mkp3 following FGF4 bead grafts. (A) HH13 embryo, (B) transverse section through the trunk of an HH15 embryo, showing ectopic transcripts throughout somite tissue, (C-E) Mkp3 expression after FGF and pharmacological inhibitor bead implants, indicated by asterisks. (C) SU5402 (n=3/4), (D) PD184352 (n=8/8) and (E) LY294002 (n=8/10). (F) Western blot probed with anti-phospho-ERK antibody and tubulin. Protein isolated from untreated somites (-) or somites dissected after exposure to PD184352 beads (+). (G) SU5402 bead implants resulted in reduced endogenous Mkp3 expression (n=7/7). Double arrowheads indicate the `twin-stripe' expression of Mkp3. (H,I) PD184352 bead implants (H) resulted in reduced endogenous Mkp3 expression (red arrowhead n=11/16), whereas a bead soaked in LY294002 (I) did not have any effect (red arrowhead n=19/19). (J,K) In situ hybridisation for Mkp3 after injection of (J) 2 mM PD184352 into somites (n=15/15) or (K) DMSO (n=10/10). (L,M) Whole-mount in situ hybridisation for scleraxis after injection of (L) 2 mM PD184352 into somites (n=12/13) or (M) DMSO (n=10/10). Brackets in J-M show injected somites. Bead grafts and inhibitor injections were analyzed after 5 hours. (N-Q) FGF receptor and ERK MAP kinase activity is required for Mkp3 expression in somites. Whole-mount in situ hybridisation for chick Mkp3 after electroporation of a FGFR1c-EYFP fusion construct (n=5/5) (N), of pCS2+ encoding a FREK:Fc fusion protein (n=5/10) (O), or of pCS2+ encoding mouse Spry2 (n=10/15) (Q). (O) Expression of sFREK:Fc is detected using a probe against the Fc domain (red). (P) Electroporation of EGFP expression vector alone (n=11/11). GFP transcripts were detected by in situ hybridisation (red). Brackets indicate electroporated somites.

  •     Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    The expression of Mkp3 over time correlates with differential levels of phosphorylated ERK in response to FGF bead implants. (A-C) Whole-mount in situ hybridisation of Mkp3 in chick embryos with FGF bead grafts, harvested after a 1-hour (A), 5-hour (B) or 24-hour exposure (C). (D) Western blot of untreated somites (-) or somites exposed to an FGF4 bead (+), harvested at the times indicated and probed with anti-phospho-ERK andα -tubulin antibodies. (E) scleraxis was induced by an FGF4 bead after 5 hours. (F,G) Sections demonstrating the distribution of ectopic transcripts after bead grafting, (F) Mkp3 and (G) scleraxis. Red asterisks in C,E indicate the bead.

  •     Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    MKP3 regulates its own expression by regulating ERK MAP kinase. (A) Western blot of protein extracted from untreated somites (lane 1), somites electroporated with EGFP vector (lane 2) or electroporated with hMKP3-GFP vector (lane 3); 15 μg was loaded in each lane. Asterisks on the right identify the EGFP protein (lane 2) and the hMKP3-GFP fusion protein (lane 3).α -tubulin served as a loading control. (B) PCR performed on plasmid DNA with specific primers. Human MKP3-GFP plasmid was detected with hMKP3-GFP primers but not with cMkp3 primers (lane 1). Chick Mkp3 plasmid was detected with cMkp3 primers but not with hMKP3-GFP primers (lane 2). (C) RT-PCR on cDNA obtained from somites expressing EGFP vector (lane 1) or hMKP3-GFP fusion protein (lane 2). (B,C) Templates used indicated at the top, primers used indicated on the left. (D) Immunohistochemistry on a frontal section using MF20 antibody detecting myosin heavy chain (green) and dpERK anti-body detecting active phosphorylated ERK MAP kinase (red). White arrowheads indicate rostrocaudal boundaries between somites. Dorsal root ganglia indicated by a blue arrow; dorsal sclerotome region indicated by a yellow arrow. (E) Section of somites electroporated with a GFP vector (in red) and hybridised with a probe detecting MyoD (dark blue). Arrows indicate extent of tissue electroporated, including dermomyotome, myotome and dorsal sclerotome. (F-I) Manipulating dpERK levels in somites results in loss of scleraxis transcripts, the following vectors were electroporated: (F,G) hMKP3-GFP, (H,I) hMKP3ΔKIM-GFP. Single and double in situ hybridisation of electroporated embryos with the probes indicated on each panel. (F) Mkp3, bracket indicates detection of high levels of human transcripts, which crossreact; (G) scleraxis and hMKP3-GFP detected using a GFP probe (n=19/22); (H) scleraxis and hMKP3ΔKIM-GFP detected using a GFP probe (n=8/8); (I) GFP fluorescence.

  •     Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Manipulating dpERK levels leads to loss of scleraxis expression and rib defects. (A,D,F) Whole-mount in situ hybridisation of (A,D) scleraxis (dark blue) and (F) scleraxis with GFP (red). (A) hMKP3-GFP electroporation and (D) caMEK1 electroporation resulted in loss of scleraxis transcripts (n=19/22 and n=10/14). (F) GFP electroporation had no effect (n=16/16). (B,C,E,G) Alcian Blue staining of cartilage. Loss of dpERK resulted in loss of the distal part of rib one (B, n=8/12) or rib seven (C, n=9/16), depending on the somites targeted. (E) High levels of dpERK caused loss of the distal part of rib one (n=9/15). (G) GFP alone had no effect on rib development (n=12/12). (H) Infection of thoracic somites with RCAS-sFREK:Fc, at day 10 of development, multiple ribs failed to form (n=2/16). (I) In situ hybridisation detecting RCAS gag transcripts 48 hours after infection (red). (J) Transverse section through RCAS infected somite demonstrates presence of transcripts predominantly in the dorsal somite. Asterisks indicate missing ribs (B,C,E,H) compared with rib present in control (G). dm, dermomyotome; my, myotome; sc, sclerotome.

  •     Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    High levels of dpERK activity in somites results in loss of MyoD and Mkp3. (A) In situ hybridisation for Mkp3 after electroporation of a plasmid encoding caMEK1, a constitutively active form of MKK1; arrow indicates ectopic Mkp3 transcripts in the neural tube, bracket indicates the loss of Mkp3 transcripts in targeted somites (n=30/35). (B) Western blot detecting dpERK in somites electroporated with caMEK1 plasmid (+) compared with control somites (-); 7.5 μg of protein was loaded in each lane, compared with twice that amount in Fig. 3D and Fig. 4A. (D-G) In situ hybridisation for MyoD. (D) hMKP3-GFP electroporation has no effect on MyoD expression (n=16/16). INT/BCIP was used to detect GFP probe (red), it was washed out using methanol to visualise MyoD (E). (F) caMEK1 electroporation caused complete loss of MyoD transcripts (blue, indicated by bracket; n=10/15) but Pax3 (C) was not affected (n=16/16). (G) FGF8 beads (asterisk) resulted in loss of MyoD in adjacent somites (n=7/11). (H) caMEK1 electroporation caused a significant loss of Fgf4 transcripts (blue, indicated by bracket; n=13/18).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feedback interactions between MKP3 and ERK MAP kinase control scleraxis expression and the specification of rib progenitors in the developing chick somite
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Feedback interactions between MKP3 and ERK MAP kinase control scleraxis expression and the specification of rib progenitors in the developing chick somite
Terence Gordon Smith, Dylan Sweetman, Margaret Patterson, Stephen M. Keyse, Andrea Münsterberg
Development 2005 132: 1305-1314; doi: 10.1242/dev.01699
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Feedback interactions between MKP3 and ERK MAP kinase control scleraxis expression and the specification of rib progenitors in the developing chick somite
Terence Gordon Smith, Dylan Sweetman, Margaret Patterson, Stephen M. Keyse, Andrea Münsterberg
Development 2005 132: 1305-1314; doi: 10.1242/dev.01699

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Roles of developmentally regulated KIF2A alternative isoforms in cortical neuron migration and differentiation
  • Vasohibin 1 selectively regulates secondary sprouting and lymphangiogenesis in the zebrafish trunk
  • HoxB genes regulate neuronal delamination in the trunk neural tube by controlling the expression of Lzts1
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.


Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Brandon Carpenter talks about how inherited histone methylation defines the germline versus soma decision in C. elegans. 

Sign up to join our next session:

10 March
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992