Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
Bmp and Fgf signaling are essential for liver specification in zebrafish
Donghun Shin, Chong Hyun Shin, Jennifer Tucker, Elke A. Ober, Fabian Rentzsch, Kenneth D. Poss, Matthias Hammerschmidt, Mary C. Mullins, Didier Y. R. Stainier
Development 2007 134: 2041-2050; doi: 10.1242/dev.000281
Donghun Shin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chong Hyun Shin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Tucker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elke A. Ober
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabian Rentzsch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth D. Poss
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Hammerschmidt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary C. Mullins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Didier Y. R. Stainier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  •     Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Bmp signaling is essential for hepatoblast specification. Embryos obtained from outcrossing a hemizygous Tg(hsp70l:dnBmpr-GFP) zebrafish were heat shocked at 18 hpf, and harvested at 29-32 (A-O) or 38-40 (P,Q) hpf. The expression of hhex (A-C), prox1 (D-F), gata4 (G-I), gata6 (J-L), foxa3 (M-O) and ceruloplasmin (cp) (P,Q) was then examined by in situ hybridization. The percentage of hemizygous embryos exhibiting a similar expression pattern is indicated in the lower left corner (n=8-10). (A-C) hhex expression in the liver region (arrows) was greatly reduced or almost absent in the hemizygous embryos, whereas its expression in the pancreatic islet (arrowheads) appeared unaffected. (D-F) prox1 expression in the liver region (arrows) was greatly reduced or almost absent in the hemizygous embryos, whereas its expression in the interrenal primordium (arrowheads) was less affected. To better visualize hepatic prox1 expression, a side-view image is shown in an inset. (G-L) gata4 and gata6 expression was reduced in the liver region (arrows), whereas their expression in the intestinal endoderm was barely affected (brackets). (M-O) The leftward bending of the gut, revealed by foxa3 expression, was often defective in the hemizygous embryos (brackets). (P,Q) Hepatocyte expression of cp was absent in the hemizygous embryos. All images, except insets, are dorsal views, anterior left.

  •     Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Alk8 is required for early liver development. Wild-type and alk8 mutant zebrafish embryos at 26 (A-H), 28 (I,J) and 48 (K,L) hpf were analyzed for hhex (A,B), prox1 (C,D), gata4 (E,F), gata6 (G,H), foxa3 (I,J) and cp (K,L) expression. (A,B) hhex expression in the liver region (arrows) is greatly reduced in the mutants, whereas its expression in the pancreatic islet appears unaffected (arrowheads). (C,D) prox1 expression in the liver region (arrows) is also greatly reduced in the mutants, whereas its expression in the interrenal primordium appears unaffected (arrowheads). To better visualize hepatic prox1 expression, a side-view image is shown in an inset. (E-H) gata4 and gata6 expression is reduced in the liver region (arrows), whereas their expression in the intestinal endoderm is only mildly affected (brackets). (I,J) The leftward bending of the gut appears unaffected in the mutants (brackets). (K,L) Hepatocyte expression of cp is completely absent in the mutants. All images, except insets, are dorsal views, anterior left.

  • Table 1.

    Expression profiles of hepatic markers in Tg(hsp70I:dnBmpr-GFP) and Tg(hsp70I:dnfgfr1-EGFP) hemizygous embryos heat shocked at 18, 22, 26 and 30 hpf

    hhex prox1 gata4 gata6 cp
    HS stagednBmprdnfgfr1dnBmprdnfgfr1dnBmprdnfgfr1dnBmprdnfgfr1dnBmprdnfgfr1
    18 hpf++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    22 hpf+++++++++++++++++++++++
    26 hpf++++++0++++
    30 hpfN.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.00N.D.N.D.00
    • + denotes the reduction level of each marker in the hemizygous embryos compared with wild-type siblings: ++++, strong reduction; +, weak reduction; 0, no reduction. N.D., not determined.

  •     Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Bmp signaling is not essential for the maintenance of specified liver progenitors. Embryos obtained from outcrossing a hemizygous Tg(hsp70l:dnBmpr-GFP) zebrafish were heat shocked at 22 (A-C,G-I,M-O) or 26 (D-F,J-L,P-R) hpf, harvested at 33 (A-C,G-I), 36 (D-F,J-L) or 38-40 (M-R) hpf, and examined for hhex (A-F), prox1 (G-L) and cp (M-R) expression. The percentage of hemizygous embryos exhibiting a similar expression pattern is indicated in the lower left corner (n=8-10). When embryos were heat shocked at 22 hpf, both hhex and prox1 expression in the liver region (arrows) were greatly reduced in the hemizygous embryos, whereas their expression in other regions (arrowheads) appeared unaffected (B,C,H,I). By contrast, when they were heat shocked at 26 hpf, both hhex and prox1 were clearly expressed in the liver region in all the hemizygous embryos (E,F,K,L, arrows). However, hhex and prox1 expression in the liver region (arrows) was somewhat reduced compared with wild-type siblings, whereas hhex expression in the pancreatic islet and prox1 expression in the interrenal primordium (arrowheads) appeared unaffected (D-F,J-L). Hepatocyte differentiation, assessed by cp expression, barely occurred in the hemizygous embryos heat shocked at 22 hpf (N,O, arrows), and was clearly reduced in those heat shocked at 26 hpf (Q,R, arrows). All images, except insets, are dorsal views, anterior left. Insets are side views, anterior left.

  •     Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Overexpression of wild-type alk8 under a heat-shock promoter rescued liver defects in alk8 mutant zebrafish embryos. (A-R) Embryos obtained from crossing alk8+/- females with Tg(hsp70:alk8);alk8+/- males were heat shocked at 18 (A,C,G,I,M,O) or 34 (D,F,J,L,P,R) hpf, and harvested at 34 (A-C,G-I), 42 (D-F,J-L), 47 (M-O) or 54 (P-R) hpf. The expression of hhex (A-F), prox1 (G-L) and cp (M-R) was then examined (arrows). When alk8 was overexpressed at 18 hpf, the expression of hhex, prox and cp in the mutant embryos (C,I,O, arrows) was comparable to that in wild-type siblings (A,G,M, arrows), whereas their expression in the mutant embryos that were not heat shocked was strongly reduced (B,H,N, arrows). Even when alk8 was overexpressed at 34 hpf, hhex, prox and cp expression was substantial in the mutant embryos (F,L,R, arrows) compared with the mutant embryos that were not head shocked (E,K,Q, arrows).

  •     Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Gata4 and Gata6 are required for the expansion and differentiation of liver progenitors. Wild-type zebrafish embryos were injected with 10 ng gata4 MO and/or 2.5 ng gata6 MO, harvested at 37-38 hpf and examined for hhex (A-E), prox1 (F-J) and cp (K-N) expression. Injections of gata4 or gata6 MO weakly reduced hhex and prox1 expression in the liver region (B,C,G,H); injections of both MOs together strongly reduced their expression (D,E,I,J), but did not completely abolish it. Injections of gata4, gata6 or both MOs severely affected hepatocyte differentiation, as shown by cp expression (L-N). All images are dorsal views, anterior left (n=13-20).

  •     Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Fgf signaling is essential for hepatoblast specification. Embryos obtained from outcrossing a hemizygous Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-EGFP) zebrafish were heat shocked at 18 hpf, harvested at 29-31 (A-N) or 38-40 (O,P) hpf, and examined for hhex (A-C), prox1 (D,E), gata4 (F-H), gata6 (I-K), foxa3 (L-N) and cp (O,P) expression. The percentage of hemizygous embryos exhibiting a similar expression pattern is indicated in the lower left corner (n=8-10). (A-C) hhex expression in the liver region (arrows) was greatly reduced or almost absent in the hemizygous embryos, whereas its expression in the pancreatic islet appeared unaffected (arrowheads). (D,E) prox1 expression in the liver region (arrows) was almost absent in the hemizygous embryos, whereas its expression in the interrenal primordium was less affected (arrowheads). To better visualize hepatic prox1 expression, a side-view image is shown in an inset. (F-K) gata4 and gata6 expression was greatly reduced in the liver region (arrows), whereas their expression in the intestinal endoderm was less affected (brackets). (L-N) The leftward bending of the gut did not occur in the hemizygous embryos (brackets). (P) Hepatocyte expression of cp was absent in the hemizygous embryos. All images, except insets, are dorsal views, anterior left.

  •     Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Fgf signaling is not essential for the maintenance of specified liver progenitors. Embryos obtained from outcrossing a hemizygous Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-EGFP) zebrafish were heat shocked at 22 (A-C,G,H,L-N) or 26 (D-F,I-K,O-Q) hpf, harvested at 35-36 (A-K) or 38-40 (L-Q) hpf and examined for hhex (A-F), prox1 (G-K), and cp (L-Q) expression. The percentage of the hemizygous embryos exhibiting a similar expression pattern is indicated in the lower left corner (n=8-10). When embryos were heat shocked at 22 hpf, hhex expression in the liver region (arrows) was greatly reduced (B) or almost absent (C) in the hemizygous embryos, whereas its expression in the pancreatic islet (arrowheads) appeared unaffected (B,C). prox1 expression in the liver (black arrows) and retina (white arrows) was also greatly reduced in the hemizygous embryos (H), whereas its expression in the interrenal primordium appeared unaffected (H, arrowheads). By contrast, when embryos were heat shocked at 26 hpf, both hhex and prox1 were clearly expressed in the liver region in all the hemizygous embryos (E,F,J,K, arrows). However, hhex and prox1 expression in the liver region was reduced compared with wild-type siblings, whereas hhex expression in the pancreatic islet and prox1 expression in the interrenal primordium appeared unaffected (E,F,J,K, arrowheads). Hepatocyte differentiation, assessed by cp expression, was severely defective in the hemizygous embryos heat shocked at 22 hpf (M,N, arrows) and weakly reduced in those heat shocked at 26 hpf (P,Q, arrows). All images, except insets, are dorsal views, anterior left. Insets are side views, anterior left.

  •     Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Overexpression of Bmp2b under a heat-shock promoter partially rescued hepatoblast specification in zebrafish embryos lacking Fgf signaling. Embryos obtained from crossing a hemizygous Tg(hsp70:bmp2b)fr13 female with a hemizygous Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-EGFP) male were heat shocked at 18 hpf and harvested at 30-32 (A-K) or 38-40 (L-Q) hpf. The expression of hhex (A-F), prox1 (G-K) and cp (L-Q) was then examined. hhex, prox and cp expression in the liver region mostly recovered in a majority of the embryos overexpressing Bmp2b and lacking Fgf signaling (E,F,J,K,P,Q, arrows), whereas their expression in embryos lacking Fgf signaling was strongly reduced (C,D,I,N,O, arrows). Twenty-five percent of the double hemizygous embryos did not show recovery of prox1 expression. The expression of hhex and prox1 in the embryos overexpressing Bmp2b (B,H, arrows) was comparable to that in wild-type siblings (A,G, arrows); cp expression was enhanced in the embryos overexpressing Bmp2b (M) compared with wild-type siblings (L). The percentage of the embryos exhibiting a similar expression is indicated in the lower left corner (n=11-12). All images are dorsal views, anterior up.

  •     Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Response of foregut endodermal cells to a transient block in Bmp signaling. (A-H) Embryos obtained from outcrossing a hemizygous Tg(hsp70l:dnBmpr-GFP) zebrafish were heat shocked at 18 hpf for 25 minutes, harvested at 2 (A,B), 3 (C-E) or 4 (F-H) dpf and examined for cp expression. Distinct, hepatocyte expression of cp in the heat-shocked hemizygous embryos was not detected at 2 dpf (B), but was detected in 20% of the embryos at 3 dpf and 60% at 4 dpf (E,H). The percentage of hemizygous embryos exhibiting a similar expression level is indicated in the lower left corner (n=9-11). Arrows point to the pectoral fins. (I) The percentage of embryos exhibiting distinct, hepatocyte cp expression in A-H together with that of embryos at 5 and 6 dpf is shown in the graph (n=9-11). Black circles and black squares denote wild-type siblings and hemizygous embryos, respectively. Embryos obtained from crossing a hemizygous Tg(hsp70l:dnBmpr-GFP) fish with a homozygous Tg(fabp1a:dsRed) fish were treated in the same way as above, and examined for DsRed expression under a dissecting fluorescence microscope. Distinct, DsRed expression in the hemizygous embryos was not detected by 4 dpf, but was detected in 33% of the embryos at 5 dpf (J-L). Red circles and red squares denote wild-type siblings and hemizygous embryos, respectively (n=20). Fluorescence (J), brightfield (K) and a merged (L) image of the embryos at 5 dpf are shown. Embryos transiently lacking Bmp signaling eventually initiated cp and fabp1a- DsRed expression, although with a delay. A-H, dorsal views, anterior left; J-L, ventrolateral views, anterior up.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bmp and Fgf signaling are essential for liver specification in zebrafish
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Bmp and Fgf signaling are essential for liver specification in zebrafish
Donghun Shin, Chong Hyun Shin, Jennifer Tucker, Elke A. Ober, Fabian Rentzsch, Kenneth D. Poss, Matthias Hammerschmidt, Mary C. Mullins, Didier Y. R. Stainier
Development 2007 134: 2041-2050; doi: 10.1242/dev.000281
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Bmp and Fgf signaling are essential for liver specification in zebrafish
Donghun Shin, Chong Hyun Shin, Jennifer Tucker, Elke A. Ober, Fabian Rentzsch, Kenneth D. Poss, Matthias Hammerschmidt, Mary C. Mullins, Didier Y. R. Stainier
Development 2007 134: 2041-2050; doi: 10.1242/dev.000281

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Regulation of otocyst patterning by Tbx2 and Tbx3 is required for inner ear morphogenesis in the mouse
  • The tolerance to hypoxia is defined by a time-sensitive response of the gene regulatory network in sea urchin embryos
  • An early global role for Axin is required for correct patterning of the anterior-posterior axis in the sea urchin embryo
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

The Node is looking for a new Community Manager!

If you're interested in science communication, publishing and the developmental biology community, we're hiring for a new Community Manager for our community site, the Node.

The position is an exciting opportunity to develop an already successful and well-known site, engaging with the academic, publishing and online communities. Find out more and how to apply.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


The people behind the papers - Clément Dubois, Shivam Gupta, Andrew Mugler and Marie-Anne Félix

A new paper investigates the robustness of neuroblast migration in the C. elegans larva in the face of both genetic and environmental variation. In an interview, the paper's four authors tell us more about the story.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Every talk is recorded and since launching in August last year, the series has clocked up almost 10k views on YouTube.

Here, Swann Floc'hlay discusses her work modelling dorsal-ventral axis specification in the sea urchin embryo.

Save your spot at our next session:

14 April
Time: 17:00 BST
Chaired by: François Guillemot

12 May
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Paola Arlotta

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992