Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Research Article
Notochord-derived Shh concentrates in close association with the apically positioned basal body in neural target cells and forms a dynamic gradient during neural patterning
Chester E. Chamberlain, Juhee Jeong, Chaoshe Guo, Benjamin L. Allen, Andrew P. McMahon
Development 2008 135: 1097-1106; doi: 10.1242/dev.013086
Chester E. Chamberlain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juhee Jeong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chaoshe Guo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin L. Allen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew P. McMahon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • DEV013086 Supplementary Material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Figure S1 -

      Fig. S1. Properties of Shh::GFP. (A) Western analysis of Shh proteins present in cell pellets and media fractions from cells transfected with Shh expression constructs. Cos-7 cells were transfected with pcDNA3 plasmid containing coding sequence for N-Shh, Shh or Shh::GFP, using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen). About 48 hours after transfection, the cells were rinsed with PBS twice and treated with 4 mM cyclodextrin in 0.5 ml OptiMEM (Invitrogen) at 37°C for 5 hours, the medium was collected and protein precipitated using trichloroacetic acid, with 2 mg BSA as a carrier. Cells were washed with PBS twice, and then lysed in TENT (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) by scraping. Cell debris was removed by spinning the lysate for 25 minutes at 4°C and collecting only the supernatant. The protein samples from the medium and cell lysate were heated at 95°C for 10 minutes in SDS sample buffer (2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.1 M DTT, 60 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.1% bromophenol blue) and used for standard SDS-PAGE in a 10% gel. The protein bands were blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked in 5% skimmed milk in TBST (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) for 3 hours. Primary antibody against the N-terminal domain of Shh Ab80 (Bumcrot et al., 1995) was applied at 1:200 dilution in TBST for 2 hours, washed in TBST four times for 5 minutes, and secondary antibody anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-linked whole antibody (donkey) was applied at 1:5000 for 1 hour. The membrane was washed and peroxidase reaction performed using ECL reagent (PerkinElmer). Western analysis of N-Shh (a truncated, non-cholesterol modified ligand), Shh and Shh::GFP proteins from cells confirms that Shh::GFP undergoes correct processing, although a comparison of the ratio of processed to un-processed Shh::GFP and Shh protein indicated that Shh::GFP processing was somewhat less efficient. To determine whether Shh::GFP ligand (N-Shh::GFPp) shows appropriate lipid-modification activities, we examined cell-surface retention in producing cells, a process that is cholesterol-dependent. As expected, western analysis of conditioned media demonstrated that only N-Shh was efficiently secreted into the medium. However, treatment of cells with cyclodextran, a ringed compound that extracts cholesterol from cells, resulted in efficient removal of both N-Shhp and N-Shh::GFPp from transfected cells into the media, whereas Shh and Shh::GFP precursor protein remained in the cell pellet. These biological properties indicate that N-Shh::GFPp was most likely cholesterol modified and cell-surface retained, comparable to its untagged, wild-type counterpart, N-Shhp. (B) N-Shh::GFPp activity was assayed in C3H10T1/2 cells, a mesenchymal stem cell line that expresses alkaline phosphatase (AP) in response to Shh signals (Kinto et al., 1997; Nakamura et al., 1997). Treatment of cells with increasing concentrations of N-Shhp or N-Shh::GFPp from conditioned media resulted in equivalent activation of AP activity indicating that these two forms shared similar specific activity. To address this more directly, we mutated the N-terminal cysteine where palmitoylation occurs (Pepinsky et al., 1998). This modification resulted in a sharp reduction of AP-inducing activity in both N-Shhp and N-Shh::GFPp at physiological concentrations (0-10 nM). As normal activity depends on N-terminal palmitoylation, these results indicate that N-Shh::GFPp was likely to be palmitoylated at its N-terminus, similar to wild-type Shh protein. (C) Western blots of fractions eluted from gel filtration chromatography probed with anti-Shh. Procedures for gel filtration were performed as described (Chen et al., 2004). Position of molecular-weight standards is shown; monomeric Shh proteins are indicated with green arrows and oligomeric forms with red. N-Shh::GFPp could form soluble multimeric complexes (SMCs), higher-order oligomeric complexes that have been suggested to mediate long-range Shh signaling activities and require both lipid modifications of Shh (Chen et al., 2004). Western analysis of gel filtration fractions reveals the presence of SMCs in both N-Shhp and N-Shh::GFPp conditioned media. However, N-Shh::GFPp continues to produce SMCs when the conserved amino acid for palmitoylation is mutated, suggesting that GFP may have some additional oligomerizing activity.

      Bumcrot, D. A., Takada, R. and McMahon, A. P. (1995). Proteolytic processing yields two secreted forms of sonic hedgehog. Mol. Cell. Biol.15, 2294-2303.

      Kinto, N., Iwamoto, M., Enomoto-Iwamoto, M., Noji, S., Ohuchi, H., Yoshioka, H., Kataoka, H., Wada, Y., Yuhao, G., Takahashi, H. E. et al. (1997). Fibroblasts expressing Sonic hedgehog induce osteoblast differentiation and ectopic bone formation. FEBS Lett.404, 319-323.

      Nakamura, T., Aikawa, T., Iwamoto-Enomoto, M., Iwamoto, M., Higuchi, Y., Pacifici, M., Kinto, N., Yamaguchi, A., Noji, S., Kurisu, K. et al. (1997). Induction of osteogenic differentiation by hedgehog proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.237, 465-469.

    • Supplemental Figure S2 -

      Fig S2. GFP targeting of the Shh locus. (A) A targeted insertion was introduced into the murine Shh locus by homologous recombination in embryonic stem (ES) cells. Homologous integration of this vector into the Shh locus introduces GFP into the Shh protein immediately 3′ to the glycine-encoding triplet (position 198 in the amino acid sequence) and adds 10 amino acids downstream of GFP including the intein cleavage-cholesterol attachment site. A PGK-neo positive-selection cassette was flanked by FRT recognition sequences (gray triangles). This allele generates a GFP-tagged form of Shh protein (Shh::GFP). Exons 2 and 3 are shown as white boxes and the GFP coding sequence is shown as a green box. The 10 amino acid sequence containing the cholesterol attachment site (GC in red) is shown as a blue box. The location of PCR primers and probes that hybridize to particular restriction enzyme fragments used for genotyping are indicated. GFP, green fluorescent protein; PGK-Neo, phosphoglycerate kinase-neomycin positive-selection cassette; DTA, diphtheria toxin A negative-selection cassette. (B) The targeted Shh::gfp allele was identified in recombinant ES cells by Southern analysis of genomic DNA using probes that lie both upstream (5′ probe) and downstream (3′ probe) of targeting vector sequences. The 5′ probe hybridized to 6.1 kb and 8.4 kb NcoI restriction enzyme fragments generated from the Shh::gfp and wild-type alleles, respectively. The 3′ probe detected 10.5 kb and 11 kb SphI restriction fragments from the Shh::gfp and wild-type alleles, respectively. (C) Amplification products characteristic of the wild-type and Shh::gfp alleles were detected using a PCR assay. The primers (P1 and P2) located in intron 2 and exon 3. These primers amplify 250 and 1000 bp products from the wild-type and Shh::gfp alleles, respectively.

    • Supplemental Figure S3 -

      Fig. S3. Activity and processing of Shh::GFP in vivo. (A-C) E10.5 embryos of indicated genotypes. (D-F) Skeletal preparations of E18.5 embryos. (G,H) Western analysis of Shh proteins from 293 cells and E9.5 embryos of indicated genotypes. Bands representing processed and unprocessed forms of Shh proteins indicated by arrows. Shh, full-length, unprocessed wild-type Shh protein; Shh::GFP, full-length unprocessed GFP-tagged Shh fusion protein; N-Shhp, N-terminal processed Shh active signaling moiety; N-Shh::GFPp, N-terminal processed form of GFP-tagged Shh protein (Shh::GFP ligand). Note the non-specific band just below the N-Shh::GFPp band in E9.5 embryos (asterisk).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Notochord-derived Shh concentrates in close association with the apically positioned basal body in neural target cells and forms a dynamic gradient during neural patterning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Notochord-derived Shh concentrates in close association with the apically positioned basal body in neural target cells and forms a dynamic gradient during neural patterning
Chester E. Chamberlain, Juhee Jeong, Chaoshe Guo, Benjamin L. Allen, Andrew P. McMahon
Development 2008 135: 1097-1106; doi: 10.1242/dev.013086
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Notochord-derived Shh concentrates in close association with the apically positioned basal body in neural target cells and forms a dynamic gradient during neural patterning
Chester E. Chamberlain, Juhee Jeong, Chaoshe Guo, Benjamin L. Allen, Andrew P. McMahon
Development 2008 135: 1097-1106; doi: 10.1242/dev.013086

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Precision of tissue patterning is controlled by dynamical properties of gene regulatory networks
  • Roles of developmentally regulated KIF2A alternative isoforms in cortical neuron migration and differentiation
  • Vasohibin 1 selectively regulates secondary sprouting and lymphangiogenesis in the zebrafish trunk
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.


Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Brandon Carpenter talks about how inherited histone methylation defines the germline versus soma decision in C. elegans. 

Sign up to join our next session:

10 March
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992