Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Report
Suppression of the immune response potentiates tadpole tail regeneration during the refractory period
Taro Fukazawa, Yuko Naora, Takekazu Kunieda, Takeo Kubo
Development 2009 136: 2323-2327; doi: 10.1242/dev.033985
Taro Fukazawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuko Naora
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takekazu Kunieda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takeo Kubo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • DEV033985 Supplementary Material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Tables S1 - Adobe PDF
    • Supplemental Tables S2 - Adobe PDF
    • Supplemental Tables S3 - Adobe PDF
    • Supplemental Figure S1 -

      Fig. S1. The wound epidermis completely covers the amputated tail plane in most of the tadpoles within 8 to 12 hours post amputation. (A) Amputated tadpole tail at 0 hours post amputation (hpa) during the post-refractory regeneration period. The amputation plane was rough, as no wound epidermis formed. (B) Amputated tail at 12 hpa. The amputation plane was covered by wound epidermis (arrow). (C) Follow-up observation of covering of wound stump by the wound epidermis. Wound stumps were observed every 2 hours after amputation and the number of tadpoles with complete wound epidermis coverage was counted.

    • Supplemental Figure S2 -

      Fig. S2. Proliferating cells appear in the tail wound stump within 18 to 24 hpa. (A,B) Immunostaining using anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen antibody (purple) and counterstaining of the nuclei (green) of tadpole tails 6 (A) and 24 (B) hpa during the post-refractory regeneration period. Proliferating cells (white) thought to form the blastema appeared near the amputation plane (circled with dashed line). (C) Number of tadpoles in which proliferating cells were observed.

    • Supplemental Figure S3 -

      Fig. S3. FK506 antagonizes elevation of immune-related gene expression in amputated Xenopus tadpole tails during the refractory period. (A-E) We examined the effect of FK506 on the expression of five genes that were upregulated during the refractory period: CXCLh, CCLb, CCL5L1, CCL5L2 and MHC class II genes (Fig. 2D-H). In all cases, FK506 treatment decreased the expression of these genes: in particular, CCLb expression was significantly repressed at 48 hpa. (F) Furthermore, we cloned a X. laevis homolog of FASL (GenBank: AB435242), a major effector molecule that is utilized by natural killer cells and activated T cells to destroy target cells in mammals, and found that its expression was also significantly downregulated in FK506-treated groups. The relative amounts of transcripts obtained by qRT-PCR were determined by taking the value at 0 hpa as 1, after normalization using the EF-1α transcripts. Open square and dashed line, dimethyl sulfoxide-treated control groups; solid square and black line, FK506-treated groups. *P<0.05, **P<0.001 (Student�s t-test).

    • Supplemental Figure S4 -

      Fig. S4. MO injection has negative effects on regenerative ability. In our MO experiments, MO injection itself seemed to have some negative effects on regenerative ability. For example, in this experiment (experiment 2 using PU.1-MO2), in which the experimental condition was the same as experiment 1 using PU.1-MO2, as presented in Fig. 3K, tadpoles injected with PU.1-MO2 showed significantly higher regenerative ability than tadpoles injected with 5mis PU.1-MO2 (P<0.001, χ2 test). Noninjected tadpoles, however, also showed significantly higher regenerative ability than tadpoles injected with 5mis PU.1-MO2 (P<0.001). The number of tadpoles classified in this experiment is presented in Table S2 in the supplementary material. A similar phenomenon was also observed in experiments 1 and 2 using PU.1-MO1 (Fig. 3J) and experiment 1 using PU.1-MO2 (Fig. 3K), although the extent varied among experiments. In this experiment (experiment 2 using PU.1-MO2), the regenerative ability of PU.1-MO2-injected and noninjected tadpoles was not significantly different (P>0.05), possibly due to a counteraction of the positive effect of PU.1-MO2 by a depletion of normal leukocytes and nonspecific negative effects of the MO itself. The negative effect of the MO injection on regenerative ability was not related to the inhibition of PU.1 because CD45 expression differed significantly between PU.1-MO1/MO2-injected groups and noninjected groups, whereas there was no significant difference between 5mis PU.1-MO1/MO2-injected and noninjected groups (Fig. 3M,L).

    • Supplemental Figure S5 -

      Fig. S5. Thematic model of the developmental stage-dependent regenerative ability in Xenopus tadpole tails.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Suppression of the immune response potentiates tadpole tail regeneration during the refractory period
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Report
Suppression of the immune response potentiates tadpole tail regeneration during the refractory period
Taro Fukazawa, Yuko Naora, Takekazu Kunieda, Takeo Kubo
Development 2009 136: 2323-2327; doi: 10.1242/dev.033985
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Report
Suppression of the immune response potentiates tadpole tail regeneration during the refractory period
Taro Fukazawa, Yuko Naora, Takekazu Kunieda, Takeo Kubo
Development 2009 136: 2323-2327; doi: 10.1242/dev.033985

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • Introduction
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Electrostatic plasma membrane targeting contributes to Dlg function in cell polarity and tumorigenesis
  • PHOSPHORYLETHANOLAMINE CYTIDYLYLTRANSFERASE 1 modulates flowering in a florigen-independent manner by regulating SVP
  • Morphogenesis is transcriptionally coupled to neurogenesis during peripheral olfactory organ development
Show more RESEARCH REPORTS

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

The Node is looking for a new Community Manager!

If you're interested in science communication, publishing and the developmental biology community, we're hiring for a new Community Manager for our community site, the Node.

The position is an exciting opportunity to develop an already successful and well-known site, engaging with the academic, publishing and online communities. Find out more and how to apply.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


The people behind the papers - Clément Dubois, Shivam Gupta, Andrew Mugler and Marie-Anne Félix

A new paper investigates the robustness of neuroblast migration in the C. elegans larva in the face of both genetic and environmental variation. In an interview, the paper's four authors tell us more about the story.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Every talk is recorded and since launching in August last year, the series has clocked up almost 10k views on YouTube.

Here, Swann Floc'hlay discusses her work modelling dorsal-ventral axis specification in the sea urchin embryo.

Save your spot at our next session:

14 April
Time: 17:00 BST
Chaired by: François Guillemot

12 May
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Paola Arlotta

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992