Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
DEVELOPMENT AND STEM CELLS
The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway regulates intestinal stem cell regeneration
Phillip Karpowicz, Jessica Perez, Norbert Perrimon
Development 2010 137: 4135-4145; doi: 10.1242/dev.060483
Phillip Karpowicz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: perrimon@receptor.med.harvard.edu pkarpowicz@genetics.med.harvard.edu
Jessica Perez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norbert Perrimon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: perrimon@receptor.med.harvard.edu pkarpowicz@genetics.med.harvard.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • DEV060483 Supplementary Material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Figure S1 -

      Fig. S1. Yki overexpression and RNAi controls. (A) Confocal images showing that Yki antibody signal is reduced, although not completely absent, in yki RNAi-1 clones (yki RNAi-1 is hsFlp/+; UAS-GFP, act>CD2>Gal4/+; yki RNAi-1/+). Arrows show where Yki(+) signal is low in a Dl(+) ISC, when compared with an adjacent wild-type Dl(+) ISC (arrowhead), whose signal is higher. (B) Confocal micrographs of wild type (left panels are esg>GFP: w1118/+; esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+), RNAi against yki (middle panels are esg>yki RNAi-1: esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+; yki RNAi-1/+) and overexpression of yki (right panels are esg>yki: esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+; UAS-yki/+) stained for Yki protein. RNAi against yki decreases but does not completely abolish signal (compare arrowheads in esg>GFP with esg>yki RNAi-1), whereas overexpression of yki increases signal. Even when yki is overexpressed in ISCs (arrows), the predominant localization is still cytoplasmic and not nuclear. These results are consistent with the predominantly cytoplasmic localization observed during Yki-GFP overexpression in developing imaginal discs (Oh and Irvine, 2008). (C) Proliferation is increased 18 hours after yki or ykiS168A overexpression using the esg-Gal4 driver, as well as after yki overexpression using the myo1A-Gal4 driver, or combination of both esg-Gal4 and myo1A-Gal4 drivers.

    • Supplemental Figure S2 -

      Fig. S2. Characterization of Yki overexpression and Yki/Hpo RNAi by clonal analysis. (A) Similar to wild-type clones (w1118), hpo RNAi clones contain Dl(+) cells, and in some cases clones show an expansion in Dl(+) cell number. Clones overexpressing ykiS168A (a constitutively activated allele) or depleted of hpo show the ability to produce differentiated progeny. Similar to wild-type clones (see Fig. 1F and Fig. 2E), these clones contain large polyploid EC nuclei and (Pros+) ee cells. (B) The same mosaic analysis that was carried out in Fig. 2, was carried out using the flip out system to generate overexpression and RNAi clones. An expansion in clone number was observed in hpo RNAi-1 (hpo RNAi-1 is hsFlp/+; UAS-GFP, act>CD2>Gal4/+; hpo RNAi-1/+) and yki (yki is hsFlp/+; UAS-GFP, act>CD2>Gal4/+; UAS-yki/+) clones, but not in yki RNAi-1 clones (yki RNAi-1 is hsFlp/+; UAS-GFP, act>CD2>Gal4/+; yki RNAi-1/+), which are similar to wild type (w1118 (Ctrl) is hsFlp/+; UAS-GFP, act>CD2>Gal4/+). Frequencies are shown as percentage normalized to the 4-day timepoint when each gut contained 2-10 clones in total (n=8-10 guts examined at each timepoint). Error bars indicate s.e.m. (P<0.05) (C) Histograms show that large clones are more frequent among yki and hpo RNAi-1 clones than in wild type or yki RNAi-1 (compare with Fig. 2F).

    • Supplemental Figure S3 -

      Fig. S3. Perturbation of Hippo signaling does not impair differentiation. (A) Similarly, wtsX1 mutant clones (hsFlp, Tub-Gal4, UAS-nlsGFP/+; wtsX1, FRT82B/Gal80TS, FRT82B) and exe1 mutant clones (hsFlp, Tub-Gal4, UAS-nlsGFP/+; exe1, FRT40A/Gal80TS, FRT40A) do not show obvious differentiation defects. (B) Both yki and hpo mutant clones show the ability to produce Pros(+) ee cells and large polyploid EC cells. (C) Quantification of the different cell types in MARCM clones confirms that differentiation is not affected by the loss of Hpo or Yki. A small increase in Dl(+) cell frequency is noted in hpo mutant clones. Graph shows the frequency of each cell type per genotype examined 14 days following clone induction.

    • Supplemental Figure S4 -

      Fig. S4. Characterization of Hippo signaling in the midgut. (A) Quantification of Esg(+) cell frequency in one field of view in the posterior region of the midgut at 12 hours following temperature shift. At this timepoint, little difference is apparent between any of the lines described. Error bars show ±s.d. We examined whether division was increased at these timepoints and whether this increase was reversible. A 1-day temperature shift induced a 18.4±2.6 times increase (relative to controls) in the number of phosphorylated-Histone3(+) cells when yki was overexpressed, and, similarly, a 3-day temperature shift induced 6.8±1.0 times increase using hpo RNAi-1. When these same shifted flies were returned to 18°C to terminate transgene expression, relative to controls, yki overexpressing/shifted flies returned to 1.3±0.3 times and hpo RNAi-1 overexpressing/shifted flies returned to 0.8±0.2 times, respectively. (B) Quantification of Esg(+) cell frequency in one field of view in the posterior region of the midgut 6 days after temperature shift. At this timepoint, differences appear between all Hippo pathway components and wild-type (Ctrl), except ds RNAi which is equivalent to wild-type at all timepoints examined. Error bars show ±s.d. (C) Quantification of the frequency of Dl(+) and Pros(+) cells in the posterior midgut epithelium. A slight increase in Dl(+) frequency is observed upon Yki overexpression in the ISC/Eb cells. In all lines examined, no obvious differentiation effects were noted. Large polyploid EC nuclei and Pros(+) ee cells are present even at 11 days following temperature shift. As above, this suggests that Hippo signaling does not overly affect differentiation processes, unlike Notch (Micchelli and Perrimon, 2006; Ohlstein and Spradling, 2007), and that Eb cells undergoing knockdown are able to differentiate normally. Error bars show ±s.d. (D) Confocal images show Pdm1 antibody staining in the midgut of wild-type (esg>GFP: w1118/+; esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+), yki (esg>yki: esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+; UAS-yki/+) and hpo RNAi-1 (esg>hpo RNAi-1: esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+; hpo RNAi-1/+). Esg(+) cells are usually negative for Pdm1 but larger Esg(+), possibly those differentiating into ECs, at times show some Pdm1(+) signal. This may reflect some perdurance of the GFP protein. However, we note that at 11 days temperature shift, most of the surrounding mature, Pdm1(+), polyploid ECs are GFP(−), even though these are the progeny of the Esg(+)/Pdm1(−) ISC/Ebs. This suggests that the rapid proliferation of ISCs observed in yki and hpo RNAi-1 midguts results in a minority of Esg(+)/Pdm1(+) cells that still retain some GFP from their time as Ebs, but before their differentiation is complete. Such a minority is even lower in wild-type cells, the division of which is slower − allowing GFP to disappear as Pdm1 is expressed.

    • Supplemental Figure S5 -

      Fig. S5. ISCs express Fat/pros-Gal4 expression analysis. (A) Confocal micrograph shows Fat staining (red) in wild-type ISCs (esg>GFP: w1118/+; esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+), which positive for both Dl (magenta) and Esg (green). Doublets of Esg(+)/Fat(+) cells show that Fat expression is present in both ISCs and Eb cells. (B) Micrographs showing the myo1A-Gal4 driver line after shift to 29°C (Tub-Gal80TS/+; myo1A-Gal4, UAS-GFP/+). Images show slightly different section through the pseudostratified epithelium as ECs and ISCs are at slightly different positions in the tissue. GFP expression is generally limited to cells stained for the Pdm1 antibody which marks differentiated ECs (left panels), though some large polyploid GFP(+) cells were observed that do not stain for Pdm1 (not shown). These may be ECs during early stages of differentiation from Ebs, as most Pdm1(+) cells colocalize with GFP(+) and are recognizable ECs by their large nucleus and morphology. It is possible that the expression of pdm1 and myo1A, though both present in mature ECs, is not completely coincident during differentiation and myo1A expression precedes pdm1 expression. As shown, Pros(+) cells (middle panels) and Dl(+) (right panels) cells are never GFP(+). Thus, the myo1A-Gal4 driver is restricted to ECs in this tissue.

    • Supplemental Figure S6 -

      Fig. S6. Yki localizes to the nucleus following damage or Hpo knockdown. (A) Yki antibody staining shows that its localization changes in some of the wild-type Esg(+) ISCs and progenitors upon injury with DSS. Confocal micrograph shows Yki staining, Esg(+) and DAPI labeling of the same cells. Arrows indicate nuclei where Yki signal is now nuclear and cytoplasmic rather than exclusively cytoplasmic (compare with Fig. 1B.). (B) Confocal image showing that Yki expression is altered also in Esg(+) ISCs or Eb cells where Hpo is depleted by RNAi (esg>hpo RNAi-1: esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+; hpo RNAi-1/+). Arrows indicate nuclei where Yki signal is nuclear and cytoplasmic, rather than just cytoplasmic (compare with Fig. 1B and Fig. S1). (C) Confocal images showing when JAK/STAT is activated by overexpressing either upd (esg>upd: esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/UAS-upd) or constitutively active hopTUML (esg> hopTUML: esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/UAS- hopTUML), Esg(+) cells still show a mostly cytoplasmic signal resembling that in wild-type cells (Fig. 1), rather than when yki is overexpressed (Fig. S1) or when hpo is depleted (see above). Arrows indicate nuclei where Yki signal is chiefly cytoplasmic.

    • Supplemental Figure S7 -

      Fig. S7. No increase in TUNEL labeling is observed in Yki mutant cells. Confocal images show ykiB5 mutant cells, 14 days after three heat shocks to induce polyclones composed of multiple fused ISC clones. TUNEL-positive cells (arrows) were not common, and were observed in both wild-type (GFP−) and ykiB5 (GFP+) cells. These results suggest that ykiB5 clones are not reduced in frequency, or size, owing to an increase in cell death.

    • Supplemental Figure S8 -

      Fig. S8. Yki targets are activated following injury. (A) Confocal micrographs showing the posterior midguts of control flies (fed sucrose) versus those fed DSS or Pseudomonas. All samples were prepared identically and images were taken using the same parameters. Genotypes are as indicated; esg>Gal4 refers to the esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+ genotype. Insets confirm the increase in Esg(+) cell frequency as an outcome of damage. An increased number of lacZ(+)/Esg(+) cells is seen for CycE and, more weakly, for the ex reporter. DIAP1 signal is increased primarily in EC cells following damage. When Hpo is depleted using RNAi, an increase in ex-lacZ expression is observed, similar to the RT-qPCR results shown in Fig. 6B. When yki is depleted by RNAi, and the midgut is injured using DSS, an increase in ex-lacZ is not observed, suggesting that this Yki target gene remains at baseline levels. (B) Similar micrographs show the expression of the microRNA bantam, another Yki target, in response to damage. The bantam sensor is a GFP construct, the downregulation of which is caused by increases in the bantam microRNA (Brennecke et al., 2003). The decrease in GFP expression following injury demonstrates that this Yki target is upregulated relative to controls, in which GFP is more uniformly distributed among the cells present.

      Additional reference

      Brennecke, J., Hipfner, D. R., Stark, A., Russell, R. B. and Cohen, S. M. (2003). bantam encodes a developmentally regulated microRNA that controls cell proliferation and regulates the proapoptotic gene hid in Drosophila. Cell 113, 25-36.

    • Supplemental Figure S9 -

      Fig. S9. Yki targets are activated in ISCs following injury. (A) Confocal micrographs showing increased magnification of ISCs from the same analyses shown in Fig. S8. Genotypes are as indicated; esg>Gal4 refers to the esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+ genotype. ISCs are labeled using Dl antibody (red). An increased in lacZ(+) reporter (purple) is seen in ISCs for CycE, DIAP1 and, as above, more weakly for the ex reporter (arrows).

    • Supplemental Figure S10 -

      Fig. S10. JAK/STAT pathway knockdown. (A) When Stat92E was depleted in conjunction with Hpo (esg>hpo RNAi-1, stat92E RNAi: esg-Gal4, UAS-GFP, Tub-Gal80TS/+; hpo RNAi-1/stat92E RNAi), 11/43 guts examined contained one hyperplasia as shown. The simultaneous knockdown of Hop and Hpo also produced one hyperplasia per gut in two out of 32 samples. Localized overgrowths were also observed upon simultaneous overexpression of yki and knockdown of either stat92E (seven out of 19 hyperplasia per gut) or hop (two out of 17 hyperplasia per gut). This effect appears to be a result of JAK/STAT pathway perturbation, as knockdown of stat92E alone produced localized hyperplasia in eight out of 15 guts examined. (B) Quantification of the frequency of Esg(+) cells in one field of view in the posterior region of the midgut (top), as well as total phosphorylated-Histone3(+) mitoses scored in the entire midgut (bottom) when yki is overexpressed. The depletion of hop and stat92E suppress the overproliferation in yki overexpressing midgets, similar to when hpo is depleted (see Fig. 5A,B), error bars indicate s.e.m. (P<0.05). Simultaneous overexpression of yki and hpo slightly reduces overproliferation from the overexpression of yki alone but is insufficient to completely prevent overgrowth. This may be due to differences in the expression levels of these randomly inserted transgenes.

    • Supplemental Figure S11 -

      Fig. S11. Similar integration of Hippo and JAK/STAT signaling following injury. The same effects are observed during injury with DSS as under normal homeostatic conditions. (A-C) The quantification of total phosphorylated-Histone3(+) mitoses scored in the entire midgut (at left) and the frequency of Esg(+) cells in one field of view in the posterior region of the midgut (at right). (A) The depletion of hop and stat92E suppress the overproliferation observed due to hpo depletion alone. Error bars indicate s.e.m. (P<0.05). (B) Similar effects are observed when yki is overexpressed, error bars indicate s.e.m. (P<0.05). (C) When both yki and hop, or yki and stat92E are depleted, no significant differences are observed from yki depletion alone. Error bars indicate s.e.m. (P<0.05).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway regulates intestinal stem cell regeneration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
DEVELOPMENT AND STEM CELLS
The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway regulates intestinal stem cell regeneration
Phillip Karpowicz, Jessica Perez, Norbert Perrimon
Development 2010 137: 4135-4145; doi: 10.1242/dev.060483
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
DEVELOPMENT AND STEM CELLS
The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway regulates intestinal stem cell regeneration
Phillip Karpowicz, Jessica Perez, Norbert Perrimon
Development 2010 137: 4135-4145; doi: 10.1242/dev.060483

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • A dynamic code of dorsal neural tube genes regulates the segregation between neurogenic and melanogenic neural crest cells
  • Scx+/Sox9+ progenitors contribute to the establishment of the junction between cartilage and tendon/ligament
  • The homeobox gene Gsx2 controls the timing of oligodendroglial fate specification in mouse lateral ganglionic eminence progenitors
Show more DEVELOPMENT AND STEM CELLS

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

A new society for regenerative biologists

Kenneth Poss and Elly Tanaka announce the launch of the International Society for Regenerative Biology (ISRB), which will promote research and education in the field of regenerative biology.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


An interview with Cagney Coomer

Over a virtual chat, we spoke to Cagney Coomer about her experiences in the lab, the classroom and the community centre, and why she thinks outreach and role models are vital to science.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992