Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
Research Article
SOX9 is a major negative regulator of cartilage vascularization, bone marrow formation and endochondral ossification
Takako Hattori, Catharina Müller, Sonja Gebhard, Eva Bauer, Friederike Pausch, Britta Schlund, Michael R. Bösl, Andreas Hess, Cordula Surmann-Schmitt, Helga von der Mark, Benoit de Crombrugghe, Klaus von der Mark
Development 2010 137: 901-911; doi: 10.1242/dev.045203
Takako Hattori
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hattorit@md.okayama-u.ac.jp kvdmark@molmed.uni-erlangen.de
Catharina Müller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonja Gebhard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva Bauer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Friederike Pausch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Britta Schlund
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Bösl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Hess
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cordula Surmann-Schmitt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helga von der Mark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benoit de Crombrugghe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus von der Mark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hattorit@md.okayama-u.ac.jp kvdmark@molmed.uni-erlangen.de
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Delayed bone marrow formation and growth retardation in BAC-Col10-Sox9 transgenic mice. (A) BAC-Col10a1-Sox9 construct prepared by insertion of a full-length Sox9 cDNA and a FRT-flanked Neo cassette into exon 2 of Col10a1 of the BAC clone RP23-192A7 by homologous recombination. The position of oligonucleotide primers P1, PSoxRev, P3 and P4 for verification of correct homologous recombination is indicated. En, Col10a1 enhancer. (B) Identification of transgenic (tg) animals by PCR using primers P1 and P2 (PSox9rev) (PCR2) and a wild-type (wt) control with primers P1 and P4 (PCR1) resulting in an amplicon of 538 bp only in the wt allele. Lanes 1,4: transgenic founder #4778; lanes 2,5: water control; lanes 3,6: BAC-Col10a1-Sox9 DNA. (Ca-c) Absence of bone marrow in a newborn BAC-Col10a-Sox9 transgenic tibia (a); retarded bone marrow formation in a postnatal day 5 (P5) tibia (b); and P8 metatarsals (c). (D) Reduced bone length in Sox9 transgenic arms and legs at P4 and P21. (E) The size difference between transgenic and wild-type bones of one BAC-Col10a1-Sox9 litter (P4) is reproducibly 20±4%. (F) In 3-week-old transgenic mice, transgenic ribs are distorted. (G) Transgenic and wild-type tibiae of a 3-week-old BAC-Coll10a1-Sox9 litter. The average length difference between transgenic (n=5) and wild-type (n=4) tibiae is in the range of 10-15%.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Impaired cartilage resorption, vascular invasion and endochondral ossification in Sox9-misexpressing mice. (Aa-h) Alcian Blue staining of longitudinal sections through the center of BAC-Col10-Sox9 transgenic (tg) and wild-type (wt) long bones shows that Sox9 misexpression causes substantial inhibition of cartilage resorption, leaving behind cones of non-resorbed hypertrophic cartilage. At E16.5 (a,b) and E18.5 (c,d) the growth plate organization in the transgenic femur is disturbed. At P8 (e,f), resorption of the transgenic cartilage cone has started by bone marrow sprouts invading from the periphery rather from the diaphyis (see also Fig. S4 in the supplementary material). At P18 (g,h), much of the transgenic cartilage cone has been resorbed and the process of secondary ossification of the epiphysis is significantly delayed. (Ba-e) Delayed vascular invasion into Sox9 transgenic hypertrophic cartilage. Immunofluorescence staining for the endothelial marker CD31 (PECAM) shows the beginning of capillary invasion into the hypertrophic cartilage in a E15.5 wild-type (wt) humerus (b,c), but no capillaries in the diaphysis of a transgenic littermate (a). Only at E16.5 do capillaries first appear in the diaphysis of a transgenic (d) tibia (e, wild-type). (Ca-d) TRAP staining reveals retarded invasion of osteoclasts into the diaphysis of a E15.5 Sox9 transgenic femur (a) as compared with a wild-type littermate femur (b). At E18.5, the density of osteoclasts seems reduced in transgenic bones (c) as compared with wild-type littermates (d). (Da-h) Staining for collagen I indicates somewhat disorganized and thickened cortical bone of Sox9 transgenic mice at E19 (a) and P1 (c) as compared with wild-type (b,d) bones, shown here for the femur. At P8 (e-h), the failure of columnar arrangement of hypertrophic chondrocytes and lack of subchondral trabecular bone in a Sox9 transgenic humerus becomes apparent, while the differences in thickness of cortical bone disappear (g,h: distal humerus). Scale bars: 100 μm in Aa-f,Cc,d; 200 μm in Ag,h,De,g; 50 μm in Bc,e,Ca,b; 0.5 mm in Da-d.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Downregulation of Vegfa, Mmp13, OpnN and Runx2 in transgenic hypertrophic cartilage. (Aa-l) E16.5 and (Ba-l) E18.5 tibia. Expression of transgenic Sox9 (Aa,Ba) in the resting and proliferating zones largely coincides with the Col10a1 expression pattern (Ac,Bc) in the transgenic humerus and exceeds the level of endogenous Sox9 in wild-type animals. (Ae,f) Vegfa mRNA is completely absent from the cartilage cone of the transgenic tibia but strongly expressed in the lower hypertrophic zone of wild-type littermates. (Be,f) Starting at E18, in the centre of the epiphysis above the Sox9 overexpressing zone, Vegfa expression is probably upregulated by hypoxic conditions, both in the wild-type and transgenic tibia. Mmp13 mRNA is seen in bone marrow cells but not in hypertrophic chondrocytes of transgenic bones (Ag,Bg), whereas in the wild-type littermate, the majority of Mmp13 signal is located in hypertrophic chondrocytes (Ah,Bh) (see also Fig. 4A). Osteopontin (Opn) is absent from transgenic hypertrophic cartilage (Ai) but expressed in the lower wild-type hypertrophic chondrocytes (Aj). At E18.5, Opn is strongly expressed in periosteal and subchondral tissue both in transgenic (Bi) and wild-type (Bj) animals. The zone of Runx2 expression that is highest in the wild-type prehypertrophic zone (Al,Bl) appears extended in the upper part of transgenic cartilage towards the diaphysis (Ak,Bk). In the lower part of transgenic cartilage cones, however, Runx2 is strongly reduced (Ak,Bk). tg, transgenic; wt, wild-type. Scale bars: 100 μm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Altered gene expression in BAC-Col10a1-Sox9 transgenic cartilage. (A,B) Higher magnification of Mmp13 expression starting in the diaphysis of E15.5 and E16.5 tibiae showing that Mmp13 is not expressed in transgenic cartilage, only in bone marrow cells. (C,D) Mmp9 is expressed by osteoclasts but not in hypertrophic cartilage; however, the total expression area seems reduced in transgenic cartilage (C). (E,F) Focal expression of Ihh in the transgenic cartilage cone (arrow in E) indicates that cells might be maintained in a prehypertrophic stage. (G,H) Chondromodulin is absent from both wild-type (H) and transgenic (G) hypertrophic cartilage, whereas its expression in epiphyseal cartilage is similar in wild-type and transgenic bones. (I,J) Antibody staining for SOX9 revealed a strong nuclear reaction and enhanced SOX9 protein levels in transgenic hypertrophic chondrocytes (I), confirming the in situ result (see Fig. 3Aa,Ba). In the wild-type growth plate (J), SOX9 protein was only stained in cells of the resting, proliferating and prehypertrophic zones. h, hypertrophic zone (tibia, E18.5); tg, transgenic; wt, wild-type. Scale bars: 50 μm in A,B; 100 μm in E,I,J; 200 μm in G,H.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Quantitative mRNA analysis of epiphyseal and hypertrophic chondrocytes from transgenic and wild-type cartilage by real-time PCR. Runx2, Vegfa, Mmp9, Mmp13 and RANKL were strongly downregulated in hypertrophic chondrocytes prepared from Sox9-transgenic epiphyses in comparison to mRNA levels of wild-type littermates. Sox9 mRNA levels were several fold higher in transgenic hypertrophic chondrocytes than in wild-type chondrocytes, as expected. The data represent typical results from 1 out of 4 independent real-time PCR reactions, each in triplicate, obtained with two different chondrocyte preparations. Runx2 was standardized to cyclophilin mRNA, Vegfa and RANKL to actin, and the others to GAPDH. Standard deviations were calculated from triplicate values. P values were calculated by the Student's t-test; P<0.01 is considered significant. The low levels of Col1a1 in transgenic hypertrophic chondrocytes might indicate that the transgenic cartilage cones prepared from P5 transgenic animals contain less endochondral bone trabeculae than that of wild-type hypertrophic cartilage. Col2a1 mRNA levels in hypertrophic cartilage were not altered in tg chondrocytes; Ihh levels were altogether reduced in tg hypertrophic cartilage despite focal upregulation (see Fig. 4E). Epi, epiphyses; Hyp, hypertrophic chondrocytes; Tg, transgenic; Wt, wild-type.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Direct binding of SOX9 to SRY sites in the VEGFA gene and repression of VEGFA transcription activity. (A) (Top) Genomic map of the human VEGFA gene with cis acting elements (boxes). Numbers indicate the distance (bp) of fragments relative to transcription start site (arrow). (Bottom) Reporter gene constructs containing a +1/379 or a +1/230 bp wild-type (wt) fragment of the VEGFA gene, or a SRY mutant of the +1/230 fragment, followed by an SV 40 large T promoter and firefly luciferase (Luc) gene. The SRY sites are conserved in three species. (Ba-c) (a) SOX9 suppresses the transcriptional activity of the +1/230 luciferase reporter construct in COS7 cells in a dose-dependent manner. (b,c) Reporter gene assays in COS7 cells with various VEGFA reporter gene constructs indicate that the SRY elements in the +1/230 region are responsible for the high transcriptional activity of the +1/230 reporter gene; their activity is reduced after co-transfection with Sox9 (b) and the suppressive effect of SOX9 is reduced after mutation of the SRY element (c). (C) Gel shift assay using recombinant Sox9 and a 32P-labeled VEGFA promoter-2SRY oligonucleotide (5 fmol). SOX9 binds to the SRY probe (lane 3) and addition of SOX9 antibody (2.5 μg) shows a supershift band (lane 5*). The shift is effectively competed by the addition of the non-labelled wild-type probe (lane 9) but not by the mutant SRY oligonucleotide (lane 10). (Da-c) Transfection of primary mouse rib chondrocytes with Sox9 siRNA enhanced Vegfa expression (a) but caused reduced Sox9 mRNA (b) and protein (c) levels (western blotting). Sox9 and Vegfa mRNA were measured by quantitative RT-PCR; the mean value of three independent experiments is shown. (Ea,b) (a) Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis shows that SOX9 binds to the SRY sites in the Vegfa gene in mouse primary chondrocytes in vivo. PCR analysis of the precipitate (IP) shows specific binding of the SRY-containing Vegfa promoter region indicated in A in Sox9-HaloTag-transfected cells (+), but not in untransfected cells (−). Total, total genomic DNA of Sox9-transfected and - untransfected cells (control). (b) ChIP of endogenous Sox9 with chromatin from primary mouse chondrocytes isolated from the resting and hypertrophic zones of newborn rib cartilage, using anti-SOX9 antibodies for immunoprecipitation and the same PCR primers as in Ea. Lane1, PCR of total cell lysate; lane 2, PCR of anti-SOX9 immunoprecipitate; lane 3, PCR of non-immune IgG precipitate.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    MicroCT images of Sox9 transgenic and wild-type mouse tibiae. (A-D) Analysis of bone development by high resolution microCT confirms a substantial deficiency in trabecular bone in a Sox9-transgenic 3-week-old tibia, whereas cortical bone appears to be less affected. The microCT analysis also illustrates the enhanced number of invasion pits (arrows) in the distal shaft of the transgenic tibia (A) versus the wild-type tibia (B). The distal end of the transgenic diaphysis is still filled with cartilage (see also Fig. 2), which does not show up in microCT (C,D). (E,F) Vertical and horizontal section planes illustrate a strong deficit of trabecular bone in transgenic tibia (E) as compared with the wild-type tibia (F); a-d or a′-d′ mark corresponding horizontal section planes of transgenic or wild-type long bones, respectively. Bone formation in the secondary ossification centre in the epiphysis is also reduced in the Sox9 transgenic tibia (E).

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SOX9 is a major negative regulator of cartilage vascularization, bone marrow formation and endochondral ossification
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
SOX9 is a major negative regulator of cartilage vascularization, bone marrow formation and endochondral ossification
Takako Hattori, Catharina Müller, Sonja Gebhard, Eva Bauer, Friederike Pausch, Britta Schlund, Michael R. Bösl, Andreas Hess, Cordula Surmann-Schmitt, Helga von der Mark, Benoit de Crombrugghe, Klaus von der Mark
Development 2010 137: 901-911; doi: 10.1242/dev.045203
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
SOX9 is a major negative regulator of cartilage vascularization, bone marrow formation and endochondral ossification
Takako Hattori, Catharina Müller, Sonja Gebhard, Eva Bauer, Friederike Pausch, Britta Schlund, Michael R. Bösl, Andreas Hess, Cordula Surmann-Schmitt, Helga von der Mark, Benoit de Crombrugghe, Klaus von der Mark
Development 2010 137: 901-911; doi: 10.1242/dev.045203

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Regulation of otocyst patterning by Tbx2 and Tbx3 is required for inner ear morphogenesis in the mouse
  • The tolerance to hypoxia is defined by a time-sensitive response of the gene regulatory network in sea urchin embryos
  • An early global role for Axin is required for correct patterning of the anterior-posterior axis in the sea urchin embryo
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

The Node is looking for a new Community Manager!

If you're interested in science communication, publishing and the developmental biology community, we're hiring for a new Community Manager for our community site, the Node.

The position is an exciting opportunity to develop an already successful and well-known site, engaging with the academic, publishing and online communities. Find out more and how to apply.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


The people behind the papers - Clément Dubois, Shivam Gupta, Andrew Mugler and Marie-Anne Félix

A new paper investigates the robustness of neuroblast migration in the C. elegans larva in the face of both genetic and environmental variation. In an interview, the paper's four authors tell us more about the story.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Every talk is recorded and since launching in August last year, the series has clocked up almost 10k views on YouTube.

Here, Swann Floc'hlay discusses her work modelling dorsal-ventral axis specification in the sea urchin embryo.

Save your spot at our next session:

14 April
Time: 17:00 BST
Chaired by: François Guillemot

12 May
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Paola Arlotta

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992