Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
Research Article
Direct activation of Shroom3 transcription by Pitx proteins drives epithelial morphogenesis in the developing gut
Mei-I Chung, Nanette M. Nascone-Yoder, Stephanie A. Grover, Thomas A. Drysdale, John B. Wallingford
Development 2010 137: 1339-1349; doi: 10.1242/dev.044610
Mei-I Chung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nanette M. Nascone-Yoder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie A. Grover
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Drysdale
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John B. Wallingford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wallingford@mail.utexas.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Shroom3 is essential for morphogenesis of the developing Xenopus gut. (A) The expression pattern of Shroom3 in a normal stage 43 dissected gut. Shroom3 is robustly expressed in the foregut (arrow). (B,B′) Normal gut looping in a control stage 46 embryo injected with mRNA encoding GFP only (green in B′). (C,C′) Gut looping is disrupted following dominant-negative (DN)-Shroom3 expression (as marked by GFP, green in C′). (D,E) Control gut (D) and DN-Shroom3-injected (E) gut epithelium. GFP-positive gut epithelial cells display a high-columnar morphology in controls, whereas cells expressing GFP and DN-Shroom3 display more rounded shapes.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Shroom3 is essential for cell shape change during gut morphogenesis. (A) Diagram of a transverse section of the stage 32 Xenopus embryo. (B) Shroom3 expression in the endoderm at stage 32. Note the robust Shroom3 expression (arrow) in the archenteron floor and roof. (C) α-tubulin staining of the archenteron floor in a control embryo. The archenteron floor displays a V-shaped morphology. (D) Archenteron floor morphology is disrupted and microtubule (MT) arrays are reduced in cells lacking Shroom3. We observed a less acute archenteron floor angle in Shroom3 MO-injected embryos (P=0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test). Moreover, archenteron floor thickness is reduced from 68±1 μm (mean ± s.e.m.; n=13) in control embryos to 59±1 μm (n=21) (P=0.0003) in Shroom3 MO-injected embryos. (E) γ-tubulin staining of the archenteron floor in a control embryo. (F) γ-tubulin accumulation is reduced in archenteron floor cells lacking Shroom3 function. (G) ZO-1 staining of tight junctions in archenteron floor cells. (H) The apical surface of archenteron floor cells is less constricted in the Shroom3 morphant embryo. ZO-1 localization is not affected. Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Pitx1 and Shroom3 are co-expressed in the developing gut. (A-C) Expression patterns of (A) Pitx1 and (B) Shroom3 in a transverse section of the stage 32 Xenopus embryo, as schematized in C. Both Shroom3 and Pitx1 are expressed in the archenteron roof and floor (arrowheads). (D,E) At stage 44, a ventral view of dissected guts reveals that both (D) Pitx1 and (E) Shroom3 are expressed in the foregut (arrows).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Pitx1 controls Shroom3 expression in the developing gut. (A,B) Transverse sections showing Shroom3 expression in (A) a control Xenopus embryo and (B) the Pitx1 MO-injected embryo, where Shroom3 expression is reduced in the archenteron floor (arrows). The regions indicated by the arrows in A and B approximate to those shown at higher magnification in C,E and D,F, respectively. (C) α-tubulin staining of control archenteron floor cells. (D) α-tubulin staining of archenteron floor cells lacking Pitx1. The archenteron floor fails to take on its deep V-shaped morphology, showing an average archenteron floor angle 132±4° (mean ± s.e.m.; n=22), compared with 62±5° (n=16) (P<0.0001) in control embryos. Moreover, the archenteron thickness is reduced from 90±3 μm (mean ± s.e.m.; n=13) to 68±3 μm (n=17) (P<0.001). (E) γ-tubulin staining of the archenteron floor in the control embryo. (F) γ-tubulin accumulates less in archenteron floor cells lacking Pitx1. (G) ZO-1 staining of control archenteron floor cells. (H) The apical surface of archenteron floor cells is less constricted in the Pitx1 knockdown embryo, whereas ZO-1 localization is not affected. Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Pitx1 is essential for Xenopus gut morphogenesis. (A,A′,C,C′) Ventral (A,A′) and lateral (C,C′) views of a stage 44 dissected control gut reveal Shroom3 expression in the foregut (arrow in A). In the diagrams, Shroom3 expression is represented in purple and normal gut looping by the black line. (B,B′,D,D′) Ventral (B,B′) and lateral (D,D′) views of dissected guts lacking Pitx1 reveal reduced Shroom3 expression in the foregut (arrow in B). The Pitx1 morphant displays a failure of looping (red line) in the foregut, corresponding to regions of disrupted Shroom3 expression.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Ectopic Pitx1 activates Shroom3 expression. (A) Stage 19 control Xenopus embryo. (B) Ectopic expression of Pitx1 in the epidermis induces ectopic pigment accumulation, similar to that induced by Shroom3 expression (Haigo et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2007). (C) Shroom3 expression pattern in a control embryo. (D) Ectopic Pitx1 expression activates ectopic Shroom3 expression in the epidermis. (E,F) Control (E) and Pitx3-injected (F) embryos. Ectopic Pitx3 also induces pigment accumulation. (G) Control Shroom3 expression pattern. (H) Ectopic Pitx3 expression activates ectopic Shroom3 expression in the epidermis. (I) Experimental scheme for the animal cap assay. Pitx1 mRNA (100 pg) was injected into the animal pole at the 4-cell stage. Animal caps were dissected at stage 8 and cultured to stage 16. (J) Shroom3 and Shroom1 expression levels in whole embryos, control caps, and Pitx1-injected caps were analyzed by RT-PCR using Xag1 as a positive control and Ef1α as a loading control. Shroom3 expression is induced following Pitx1 expression. (K) Shroom3 expression is induced following Pitx3 expression in animal caps.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Pitx1 directly activates Shroom3 transcription. (A) Experimental scheme. Pitx1-GR mRNA was injected into the animal pole at the 4-cell stage. Animal caps were dissected at stage 8 and cultured. At stage 13, caps were first treated with cycloheximide (CHX) for 10 minutes and then treated with dexamethasone (DEX) and cultured to stage 16. (B) Shroom3 and Xag1 expression are induced by active Pitx1. Shroom3 is consistently induced in the presence of both CHX and DEX, although Xag1 is not activated by DEX in the presence of CHX. (C,D) The same experiment described in A, but using (C) Pitx2-GR and (D) Pitx3-GR mRNA. Similar data were obtained as for Pitx1-GR.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    A Pitx1-responsive enhancer is located 12 kb upstream of the Shroom3 transcription start site. (A) Three Pitx1 consensus binding sites are located in a cluster ∼12 kb upstream of the Xenopus Shroom3 transcription start site. (B) The fragment containing these three sites (shr3-12k) was cloned into the pGL3-Cska minimal promoter-luciferase vector. Embryos at the 4-cell stage were injected in each blastomere with luciferase reporter constructs and Pitx1 mRNA, as indicated in C. Embryos were collected at stage 12 for luciferase assays. (C) Normalized luciferase activity. Together with Pitx1 expression, inclusion of the shr3-12k region increases luciferase activity ∼18-fold above the basal level observed with the minimal promoter alone.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Ectopic Pitx1 expression induces epithelial cell shape change and the assembly of parallel microtubule arrays. (A) Control epidermis cells. α-tubulin staining reveals cell cortices. (B) Epidermis cells expressing ectopic Pitx1 are marked by His2B-GFP (red nuclei) and are stained for α-tubulin. Cells expressing Pitx1 apically constrict and elongate 4-fold (∼45 μm; n=32) as compared with control cells (∼11 μm; n=20). This difference is extremely significant (P<0.0001; Mann-Whitney U-test). Robust MT arrays emanate from the apical cell surface. (C) Epidermis cells expressing ectopic Pitx1 and DN-Shroom3 are marked by His2B-GFP (red nuclei) and are stained for α-tubulin. Apical constriction and apicobasal elongation revert to ∼24 μm for Pitx1 + DN-Shroom3 (n=29; P<0.0001). MT bundles observed in Pitx1-expressing cells are also eliminated following DN-Shroom3 expression. Scale bars: 10 μm. (D) The apicobasal cell height of control, Pitx1-expressing, and Pitx1 + DN-Shroom3-expressing epidermis cells. (E)RT-PCR analysis of the expression of Shroom3 effectors in animal cap assays. Shroom3 expression was induced ∼30-fold following Pitx1 expression. A modest increase in Mena expression (∼1.7-fold) was observed, whereas MyoIIb, Rap1a/b and Rock1/2 genes were unaffected. Ef1α provided a loading control.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct activation of Shroom3 transcription by Pitx proteins drives epithelial morphogenesis in the developing gut
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
Share
Research Article
Direct activation of Shroom3 transcription by Pitx proteins drives epithelial morphogenesis in the developing gut
Mei-I Chung, Nanette M. Nascone-Yoder, Stephanie A. Grover, Thomas A. Drysdale, John B. Wallingford
Development 2010 137: 1339-1349; doi: 10.1242/dev.044610
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Direct activation of Shroom3 transcription by Pitx proteins drives epithelial morphogenesis in the developing gut
Mei-I Chung, Nanette M. Nascone-Yoder, Stephanie A. Grover, Thomas A. Drysdale, John B. Wallingford
Development 2010 137: 1339-1349; doi: 10.1242/dev.044610

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Minimal in vivo requirements for developmentally regulated cardiac long intergenic non-coding RNAs
  • The role of integrins in Drosophila egg chamber morphogenesis
  • A developmental gene regulatory network for C. elegans anchor cell invasion
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Interviews — Bénédicte Sanson and Kate Storey

Bénédicte Sanson and Kate Storey

Hear from Bénédicte Sanson, winner of the BSDB’s Cheryll Tickle medal, and Kate Storey, winner of the BSDB’s Waddington Medal, as they discuss their research, the future of the field and the importance of collaboration.


Review Commons launches

We're excited to be an affiliate journal for Review Commons, the ASAPbio/EMBO platform for high-quality journal-independent peer-review in the life sciences, which went live on 09 December.


Have you heard about our Travelling Fellowships?

Peter Baillie-Johnson in Switzerland

Early-career researchers can apply for up to £2,500 to offset the cost of travel and expenses to make collaborative visits to other labs around the world. Read about Peter’s experience in Switzerland, where he joined forces with the Lutolf lab to refine a protocol for producing gastruloids.


Publishing peer review reports

To continue working towards transparency around the editorial process, Development now publishes a ‘Peer review history file’ alongside published papers. Read more about the policy and see the reports for yourself in one the first papers to publish the reports (under the ‘Info & metrics’ tab).


Development at a glance — Cell interactions in collective cell migration

Extract from the poster showing specific cell-cell interactions in metastasis.

Take a look at the latest poster and accompanying article by Denise Montell and her colleagues from the University of California, where they describe a sampling of both known and new cells that migrate collectively in vivo.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2019   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992