Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
Research Article
Alpha sarcoglycan is required for FGF-dependent myogenic progenitor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo
Marco Cassano, Arianna Dellavalle, Francesco Saverio Tedesco, Mattia Quattrocelli, Stefania Crippa, Flavio Ronzoni, Agnese Salvade, Emanuele Berardi, Yvan Torrente, Giulio Cossu, Maurilio Sampaolesi
Development 2011 138: 4523-4533; doi: 10.1242/dev.070706
Marco Cassano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arianna Dellavalle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Saverio Tedesco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mattia Quattrocelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefania Crippa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Flavio Ronzoni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agnese Salvade
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emanuele Berardi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yvan Torrente
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giulio Cossu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurilio Sampaolesi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maurilio.sampaolesi@med.kuleuven.be
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Clonal and proliferative analyses of wild-type and Sgca-null myogenic progenitor cells. (A) Myogenic progenitor cells (MPCs) from the soleus and tibialis anterior muscles of 3-month-old wild-type (wt), Sgca-null and mdx mice. Insets show MPCs at higher magnification. n=3. (B) Total number of MPC clones from Sgca-null (white), wt (black) and mdx (red) mice. n=100; *, P<0.01 for Sgca null versus wt. (C) Total number of cells from single clones of Sgca-null (white), wt (black) and mdx (red) MPCs. n=100; *, P<0.01 for Sgca null versus wt. (D) Mean number of nuclei per myotube in wt (black), Sgca-null (white) and mdx (red) MPCs at day 5 of differentiation. n=100; *, P<0.01 for Sgca null versus wt. Error bars (B-D) indicate s.e.m. (E) MyHC staining of differentiated MPCs from wt, Sgca-null and mdx mice. n=3. (F-H′) Isolated myofibers from EDL and tibialis anterior muscles of 8-week-old wt (F,F′), Sgca-null (G,G′) and mdx (H,H′) mice fixed at time of isolation and stained for PAX7 (green in F,G,H) or MYF5 (red in F′,G′,H′). n=5. (I) Total number of MPCs per single fiber at day 5 following isolation. n=5; *, P<0.01 for PAX7+/MYF5– Sgca null versus wt; **, P<0.05 for PAX7–/MYF5+ Sgca null versus wt; square, P<0.05 for PAX7+/MYF5+ Sgca null versus wt. (J-L′) Representative images from EDL and tibialis anterior isolated myofibers associated with their MPC progeny following 5 days of culture in proliferation medium. Isolated myofibers were obtained from 8-week-old wt (J,J′), Sgca-null (K,K′) and mdx (L,L′) mice and immunostained for PAX7 (green) and MYF5 (red) as satellite cell markers. Scale bars: 100 μm in A,E; 50 μm in F-H′,J-L′.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Expression pattern of SGCA in MPCs. (A) Western blot analysis showing SGCA expression in C2C12, wt or Sgca-null mouse MPCS in proliferating (p) or differentiating (d) conditions. Skeletal muscle tissue extract (sk muscle) was used as positive control. n=3. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (B) Western blot (WB) analysis of SGCA and myogenin (Myog) expression in differentiating wt MPCs. n=3. β-tubulin (βTub) was used as internal control. (C-C′′) Immunofluorescence staining for SGCA (red in C′) and myogenin (green in C′) expression during early stages of differentiation in wt MPCs (day 1 after starvation). Yellow arrows indicate double-positive cells. n=4. (D-D′′) Representative images of wt MPCs co-expressing SGCA (red in D′) and PAX7 (green in D′). Yellow arrows indicate PAX7+/SGCA+ wt MPCs. Scale bars: 100 μm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Proliferative ability following cytokine treatment. (A) Total number of cells per clone from wt, Sgca-null and mdx mouse MPCs grown for 5 days in conditioned media containing bFGF (gray lines) or HGF (dashed lines). CTRL, growth curves of MPCs in non-conditioned media (black lines). n=5; *, P<0.01 for CTRL versus bFGF; **, P<0.01 for CTRL versus HGF; square, P<0.01 CTRL versus bFGF. Error bars indicate s.e.m. (B) WB for CycD expression in wt and Sgca-null MPCs stimulated with bFGF or HGF. ctrl, MPCs grown in non-conditioned media. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (C) Growth curves of wt MPC clones infected with shFGFR1 (gray line) or with scramble control shRNA (black dashed line) stimulated with bFGF. The shFGFR1 wt MPC curve strongly overlaps with that of Sgca-null MPCs grown with or without bFGF (compare gray line with Sgca-null gray line in A). n=3; *, P<0.01 for shFGFR1 versus scramble. (D) Growth curves of Sgca-null MPCs treated with YP-740 (black dashed line) or PMA (gray line). n=3; *, P<0.05 for Sgca null + bFGF versus PMA; **, P<0.01 for Sgca null + bFGF versus YP-740. (E) WB analysis for CycD expression in wt MPCs infected with shFGFR1 (lane 1) or with scramble (lane 2), and Sgca null treated with YP-740 (lane 3) or PMA (lane 4). n=3. (F) Human myoblasts isolated from healthy (30XY, left graph) or LGMD2D (32XY, right graph) patients were stimulated with bFGF (gray lines) or HGF (dashed lines) and the total number of cells was counted (n=5). Black lines, control growth curves of myoblasts in non-conditioned media. n=2 patient biopsies for LGMD2D and healthy myoblasts, respectively. *, P<0.05 for healthy control versus bFGF; **P<0.05 for healthy bFGF versus HGF; square, P<0.001 for LGMD2D bFGF versus HGF using two-way ANOVA test. (G) WB analysis for CycD expression in human myoblasts treated with bFGF and HGF. ctrl, human myoblasts grown in non-conditioned media. n=3.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    SGCA directly cooperates with FGFR1. (A) qPCR for Fgfr1 and Fgfr4 in proliferating Sgca-null (white) and wt (black) MPCs. n=5; *, P<0.01 and **, P<0.01 for Sgca null versus wt. Error bars indicate s.e.m. (B) WB analysis for FGFR1 and syndecan 1 (Syn-1) expression in wt and Sgca-null MPCs in proliferating (p) and differentiating (d) conditions. n=3. (C-D′) Immunofluorescence staining for FGFR1 (green) and SGCA (red) expression in early differentiating MPCs (day 1 after starvation) showing a diverse cellular localization of FGFR1 in Sgca-null (C′) and wt (D′) MPCs. SGCA signal in D′ was slightly overexposed to highlight cell membrane borders. n=3. (E-E′) Immunofluorescence staining for FGFR1 (E, green) and SGCA (E′, red) showed protein colocalization in wt MPCs at an early step of differentiation (day 1 to 2) (E′, white arrows). Such colocalization was not observed in fibroblasts, which were found to be exclusively positive for FGFR1 (E′, yellow arrow). n=3. (F-F′) Confocal images of early differentiating MPCs (day 1) representing areas of partial colocalization (F′, white arrows) of FGFR1 (green in F) with SGCA (red in F′). n=3. (G-G′) A newly formed myotube and fibroblasts (G′, yellow arrows) show no colocalization of FGFR1 (green in G) and SGCA (red in G′) signal. n=3. (H) Surface protein biotinylation assay showing that FGFR1 is expressed both by wt (wt lysate) and Sgca-null (Sgca-null lysate) MPCs but can localize on the cell membrane together with SGCA only in wt MPCs (wt cell surface). No FGFR1 signal was detected in the surface protein fraction of Sgca-null MPCs (Sgca-null cell surface). β-tubulin was used as an internal control for the cell lysate fractions. n=3. (I) Immunoprecipitation analysis in 293T cells co-expressing SGCA and FGFR1, revealing an interaction of SGCA with FGFR1 (top, SGCA/Fgfr1). No signal was detected in 293T cells transfected only with vectors expressing Sgca (top, SGCA) or Fgfr1 (top, Fgfr1). n=3. (J) WB analysis of wt MPCs and muscle tissue extracts from wt and Sgca-null mice immunoprecipitated with SGCA polyclonal antibodies and detected with FGFR1 (top) and SGCA (bottom) monoclonal antibodies. FGFR1 co-immunoprecipitates with SGCA in samples derived from early differentiating wt MPCs (1d and 3d), skeletal muscle tissue extract (wt) and muscle crushed with cardiotoxin (wt + ctx). No signal was obtained from proliferating wt MPCs (0d) or Sgca-null skeletal muscle. n=3. Scale bars: 30 μm in C-D′; 50 μm in E-G′.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    In vivo transplantation of dystrophic MPCs failed to reconstitute the myogenic compartment. (A-B′) MPCs isolated from wt (A,A′) and Sgca-null (B,B′) mice backcrossed with GFP transgenic mice. MPC purity was evaluated by double staining for MYOD (red in A,B) and GFP (green in A′,B′) expression. (C) Percentage MYOD+/GFP+ cells from wt (black) and Sgca-null (white) mice. n=200 clones. (D) qPCR for GFP expression at 2, 4 and 6 days following intramuscular injections of wt (black) and Sgca-null (white) GFP+ MPCs into the tibialis anterior of Sgca-null juvenile mice. Three mice were injected per time point for a total of nine mice per group. n=18 mice; *, P<0.01 and **, P<0.01 for Sgca null versus wt. (E) nlacZ+ MPCs (5×105) were injected into the tibialis anterior of juvenile 3-week-old Sgca-null mice. Global cell death rate was calculated by counting TUNEL+ cells at three different time points (20 hours, 3 and 10 days). Three mice were injected per time point for a total of nine mice per group. n=18; *, P<0.01 and **, P<0.01 for Sgca-null versus wt. (F) Double staining for β-gal and TUNEL revealed the apoptotic rate of injected MPCs. Approximately 100 muscle sections were analyzed at each time point. n<100; *, P<0.01 for day 3 versus day 10; **, P<0.01 for day 3 versus 20 hours. Error bars (C-F) indicate s.e.m. (G-G′) Representative images of TUNEL+ Sgca-null donor cells. At day 3 after injection, massive cell death of dystrophic MPCs was observed. Apoptotic donor cells are β-gal+ (G′, red) and TUNEL+ (G′, green). (H) High-magnification images of donor MPCs (white arrows) following transplantation. In the bottom panel, a TUNEL+/β-gal+ Sgca-null MPC is situated close to an endogenous apoptotic cell (TUNEL+/β-gal–, yellow arrow). Scale bars: 100 μm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Genetic correction restores the myogenic potential of Sgca-null MPCs. (A,B) Phase contrast images of single clones from corrected (B) and non-corrected (A) Sgca-null MPCs. (C) Number of cells per clone of corrected (gray) and non-corrected (white) Sgca-null MPCs. Black bars indicate wt MPCs. n=5; *, P<0.01 for corrected versus non-corrected MPCs. (D,D′) MyHC (red) and V5 (green) staining of Sgca-null corrected cells. n=5. (E) Number of nuclei per myotube of corrected (gray) and non-corrected (white) Sgca-null MPCs. Black bars indicate wt MPCs. n=5 experiments performed in triplicate; *, P<0.01 for corrected versus non-corrected MPCs. (F) WB analysis of protein extracts from corrected Sgca-null and wt MPCs immunoprecipitated with SGCA polyclonal antibodies and detected with FGFR1 (top) and SGCA (middle) monoclonal antibodies. No SGCA signal was obtained from the immunodepleted (ID) fraction (bottom). n=3. (G) qPCR for GFP expression at 2, 4 and 6 days following intramuscular injections of wt (black), corrected Sgca-null (gray) and non-corrected Sgca-null (white) GFP+ MPCs into the tibialis anterior of Sgca-null juvenile mice. Three mice were injected per time point for a total of nine mice per group. n=18 mice; *, P<0.01 and **, P<0.01 for corrected versus non-corrected MPCs. Error bars (C,E,G) indicate s.e.m. Scale bars: 200 μm in A,B; 100 μm in D,D′.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    SGCA/bFGF signaling during proliferation of MPCs. (A) wt MPCs respond to bFGF by augmenting their proliferation and consequently increasing the myogenic-committed pool. SGCA plays an important role during the proliferation and early differentiation phases in MPCs by cooperating with FGFR1 and thus stabilizing the complex on the cell membrane. (B) In the absence of Sgca expression, FGFR1 is mainly localized in the nucleus and Sgca-null MPCs lack sensitivity to bFGF stimulation. Under these conditions, Sgca-null MPCs fail to activate a proliferative input, having instead as a final readout an impairment in self-renewal and homing.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Alpha sarcoglycan is required for FGF-dependent myogenic progenitor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
Alpha sarcoglycan is required for FGF-dependent myogenic progenitor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo
Marco Cassano, Arianna Dellavalle, Francesco Saverio Tedesco, Mattia Quattrocelli, Stefania Crippa, Flavio Ronzoni, Agnese Salvade, Emanuele Berardi, Yvan Torrente, Giulio Cossu, Maurilio Sampaolesi
Development 2011 138: 4523-4533; doi: 10.1242/dev.070706
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
Alpha sarcoglycan is required for FGF-dependent myogenic progenitor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo
Marco Cassano, Arianna Dellavalle, Francesco Saverio Tedesco, Mattia Quattrocelli, Stefania Crippa, Flavio Ronzoni, Agnese Salvade, Emanuele Berardi, Yvan Torrente, Giulio Cossu, Maurilio Sampaolesi
Development 2011 138: 4523-4533; doi: 10.1242/dev.070706

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Tissue growth constrains root organ outlines into an isometrically scalable shape
  • Stem integrity in Arabidopsis thaliana requires a load-bearing epidermis
  • A dynamic and mosaic basement membrane controls cell intercalation in Drosophila ovaries
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.


Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Brandon Carpenter talks about how inherited histone methylation defines the germline versus soma decision in C. elegans. 

Sign up to join our next session:

10 March
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992