Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
The G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5B contributes to neurogenesis in the developing mouse neocortex
Nobuhiro Kurabayashi, Minh Dang Nguyen, Kamon Sanada
Development 2013 140: 4335-4346; doi: 10.1242/dev.099754
Nobuhiro Kurabayashi
1 Molecular Genetics Research Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minh Dang Nguyen
2 Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Cell Biology and Anatomy, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, HMRB 153, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kamon Sanada
1 Molecular Genetics Research Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kamon_sanada@gen.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    GPRC5B expression in the developing mouse brain. (A) Expression of Gprc5a, Gprc5b and Gprc5c was analysed by RT-PCR using cDNAs derived from mouse cortical progenitor cells and the tissues indicated. (B) Expression of Gprc5b and Gprc5b_v2 in the neocortex at different developmental stages. (C,D) In situ hybridisation analyses with Gprc5b probes. (C) Coronal section of E10 embryo (left) and magnified view of the head region (right). (D) E14 brain sections probed with sense (left) and antisense (right) RNA. (E) E14 neocortical sections immunostained with anti-GPRC5B (green) and anti-pan cadherin (red) antibodies. Images of the entire immunostained cerebral wall are shown. (F) High-magnification images of apical regions of GFP plasmid-electroporated (left four panels) and GFP plasmid + GPRC5B shRNA-electroporated (right four panels) progenitors in E14 neocortical sections immunostained with antibodies against GPRC5B and cadherin. GFP-labelled descending processes are outlined with dashed lines. Insets are magnified views of the apical region of the GFP-labelled processes. FB, forebrain; V, ventricle; LV, lateral ventricle; SC, spinal cord. Scale bars: 100 μm in E; 20 μm in F.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    GPRC5B knockdown promotes progenitor differentiation. Plasmid expressing either GPRC5B shRNA (right) or control shRNA (left) was electroporated, together with the GFP-expressing plasmid, into E13 embryos. E15 brain sections were immunostained with antibodies against (A) PAX6, (B) TBR2 or (C) CUX1. Images of the entire cerebral wall are shown, with the boxed regions magnified to the right. Images are projections of four serial z-sections (1 μm intervals) for PAX6/TBR2 and two z-sections (1 μm interval) for CUX1. The graphs on the right show the fraction of cells positive for PAX6 (A), TBR2 (B) or CUX1 (C) among GFP-positive cells. Mean ± s.e.m. (n=3-5). *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Con, control shRNA; RNAi, GPRC5B shRNA. Scale bars: 20 μm for entire cerebral wall; 10 μm in magnified views. CP, cortical plate; IZ, intermediate zone; VZ, ventricular zone.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    GPRC5B knockdown impairs neurogenesis. Plasmid expressing either GPRC5B shRNA or control shRNA was electroporated, together with the GFP-expressing plasmid, into E14 embryos. E18 brain sections were immunostained with antibodies against (A) MAP2, (B) CUX1 or (C) PAX6. Images of the entire cerebral wall are shown. Magnified views of the CP or IZ regions (boxed areas) are shown to the right. Con, control shRNA; RNAi, GPRC5B shRNA. Scale bars: 20 μm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    GPRC5B-depleted cells fail to adopt a neuronal fate. (A) Plasmid expressing control shRNA, GPRC5B shRNA, GPRC5B shRNA#2 and both GPRC5B shRNA and GPRC5Bres (GPRC5B that contains two silent mutations within the GPRC5B shRNA-targeted sequence) was electroporated, together with the GFP-expressing plasmid, into E14 embryos. Neocortical cell cultures were prepared from E16 embryos and immunostained at DIV6 with antibodies against TUJ1 and GFAP. (B) Magnified views of the cells indicated by arrowheads a-h in A. (C) The fraction of GFP-positive cells that were also positive for GFAP (left) or TUJ1 (right). **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. Mean ± s.e.m. Scale bars: 50 μm in A; 20 μm in B.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    GPRC5B knockdown generates astrocytes. Plasmid expressing either GPRC5B shRNA or control shRNA was electroporated, together with the GFP-expressing plasmid, into E14 embryos, and embryos were harvested at P14. (A) Representative images of GFP-labelled cells throughout the entire cerebral wall in brains electroporated with control shRNA (left) and GPRC5B shRNA (middle and right). Arrowheads indicate GFP-labelled bushy cells. (B) Typical morphology of GFP-labelled cells in the CP and SVZ regions in GPRC5B shRNA neocortices. Shown are cells with bushy morphology in the CP (top), cells that do not have bushy morphology in the CP (middle), and cells in the SVZ region (bottom). (C) GFP-labelled cells in electroporated neocortices immunostained with anti-NeuN antibody. Shown are high-magnification images of GFP-labelled cells in control shRNA brain (row 1) and GPRC5B shRNA brains (row 2, cells with bushy morphology; row 3, cells without bushy morphology; row 4, cells in the SVZ region). (D,E) GFP-labelled cells in GPRC5B shRNA neocortices immunostained with antibodies against GFAP (D) and S100 (E). High-magnification images of GFP-labelled cells with bushy morphology are shown. WM, white matter; SVZ, subventricular zone. Scale bars: 100 μm in A; 20 μm in C-E.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    GPRC5B couples with the G12/13 class of heterotrimeric G proteins. (A) COS7 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding GFP (pCAGIG, 0.5 μg/well), GPRC5B (0.5 μg/well), pertussis toxin (PTX or PT; 0.5 μg/well) and myc epitope-tagged Gα-CTs (Gs, Gq, G12, and G13; 1.5 μg/well). Cells were fixed 48 hours later and then immunostained with antibodies against GFP (green), GPRC5B (blue) and myc epitope (red). Expression of GPRC5B induces cell rounding, whereas co-expression of either Gα12-CT or Gα13-CT prevents GPRC5B-induced rounding of the cells. (B) The fraction of GFP-labelled cells showing a rounded morphology was measured from at least four separate experiments (a total of 66-210 cells were counted in each condition). Mean ± s.e.m. ***P<0.001 versus GPRC5B cells. Scale bar: 100 μm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Effects of GPRC5B on the distribution of β-catenin. (A) Effects of GPRC5B on the distribution of β-catenin in Vero cells. Vero cells transiently transfected with plasmids expressing the indicated proteins were immunostained with anti-β-catenin antibody (red). Arrowheads indicate GFP-labelled cells that show increased cytoplasmic signals for β-catenin. (B) The β-catenin fluorescence intensity of the intracellular area (except for the plasma membrane area) of GFP-positive cells and that of neighbouring GFP-negative cells were measured, and the ratio of these intensity values is plotted (red circles). Yellow circles with error bars indicate mean ± s.e.m. ***P<0.001 versus control by two-tailed Welch’s t-test. (C) Effects of GPRC5B on the distribution of β-catenin in cortical progenitor cells. Plasmids expressing the indicated proteins were electroporated, together with the GFP-expressing plasmid, into E14 embryos. Neocortical cell cultures were prepared from the brains immediately after electroporation. Neocortical cells were then fixed at DIV2 and immunostained with antibodies against GFP (green), β-catenin (red) and SOX2 (blue). Representative images are shown. Green and white arrowheads indicate GFP-positive and GFP-negative dividing progenitors, respectively. Magnified views of the cells indicated by arrowheads a-f are shown to the right. (D) The β-catenin fluorescence intensity of the intracellular area (except for the plasma membrane area) of GFP-positive dividing cells and that of nearby GFP-negative dividing cells were measured, and the ratio of these intensity values is plotted as in B. Scale bars: 20 μm in A; 10 μm in C.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Effects of GPRC5B knockdown on β-catenin signalling in neural progenitor cells. (A) E14 embryos were electroporated with plasmids expressing control shRNA (row 1), GPRC5B shRNA (row 2), GPRC5B shRNA#2 (row 3), and both GPRC5B shRNA and GPRC5Bres (GPRC5B that contains two silent mutations within the GPRC5B shRNA-targeted sequence) (row 4), along with the β-catenin activity reporter construct TOPdGFP-CAGmCherry. Embryos were harvested 24 hours later. Brain sections were stained with antibodies against GFP (green) and PAX6 (blue). Images of the VZ are shown. Two examples of mCherry+/PAX6+ cortical progenitors are indicated by white arrowheads. An example of mCherry+/PAX6- differentiated cells is indicated by the open arrowhead. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Magnified images of the cells indicated by arrowheads in A. mCherry+/PAX6+ cells are in the left six columns, and mCherry+/PAX6- cells are in the right three columns. The expression of dGFP in PAX6-positive control cells is substantially downregulated by GPRC5B depletion (compare row 1 with rows 2 and 3), and this is largely reversed by the introduction of GPRC5Bres (row 4). Less dGFP expression is observed in PAX6-negative cells. (C) The ratio of the fluorescence intensity of dGFP to that of mCherry in the soma of individual cells expressing mCherry was defined as the β-catenin activity index and is shown. Mean ± s.e.m. (n=3 embryos). *P<0.05, ***P<0.001.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • G protein-coupled receptor
  • Developing neocortex
  • Neurogenesis

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5B contributes to neurogenesis in the developing mouse neocortex
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
The G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5B contributes to neurogenesis in the developing mouse neocortex
Nobuhiro Kurabayashi, Minh Dang Nguyen, Kamon Sanada
Development 2013 140: 4335-4346; doi: 10.1242/dev.099754
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
The G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5B contributes to neurogenesis in the developing mouse neocortex
Nobuhiro Kurabayashi, Minh Dang Nguyen, Kamon Sanada
Development 2013 140: 4335-4346; doi: 10.1242/dev.099754

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Ecdysone regulates the Drosophila imaginal disc epithelial barrier, determining the length of regeneration checkpoint delay
  • PRDM16 regulates a temporal transcriptional program to promote progression of cortical neural progenitors
  • Mechanosensory neuron regeneration in adult Drosophila
Show more STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

The Node is looking for a new Community Manager!

If you're interested in science communication, publishing and the developmental biology community, we're hiring for a new Community Manager for our community site, the Node.

The position is an exciting opportunity to develop an already successful and well-known site, engaging with the academic, publishing and online communities. Find out more and how to apply.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


The people behind the papers - Clément Dubois, Shivam Gupta, Andrew Mugler and Marie-Anne Félix

A new paper investigates the robustness of neuroblast migration in the C. elegans larva in the face of both genetic and environmental variation. In an interview, the paper's four authors tell us more about the story.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Every talk is recorded and since launching in August last year, the series has clocked up almost 10k views on YouTube.

Here, Swann Floc'hlay discusses her work modelling dorsal-ventral axis specification in the sea urchin embryo.

Save your spot at our next session:

14 April
Time: 17:00 BST
Chaired by: François Guillemot

12 May
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Paola Arlotta

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992