Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
Research Article
CLIPR-59: a protein essential for neuromuscular junction stability during mouse late embryonic development
Aurélie Couesnon, Nicolas Offner, Véronique Bernard, Nathalie Chaverot, Stéphanie Backer, Ariane Dimitrov, Franck Perez, Jordi Molgó, Evelyne Bloch-Gallego
Development 2013 140: 1583-1593; doi: 10.1242/dev.087106
Aurélie Couesnon
1 Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8104, Paris, France.
2 Inserm, U1016, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolas Offner
1 Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8104, Paris, France.
2 Inserm, U1016, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Véronique Bernard
3 INSERM Unité 952, CNRS UMR7224, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Chaverot
1 Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8104, Paris, France.
2 Inserm, U1016, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphanie Backer
1 Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8104, Paris, France.
2 Inserm, U1016, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ariane Dimitrov
4 Institut Curie, Paris, France.
5 CNRS UMR144, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franck Perez
4 Institut Curie, Paris, France.
5 CNRS UMR144, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jordi Molgó
6 CNRS, Institut de Neurobiologie Alfred Fessard - FRC2118, Laboratoire de Neurobiologie et Développement UPR3294, Gif sur Yvette, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelyne Bloch-Gallego
1 Institut Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, CNRS UMR 8104, Paris, France.
2 Inserm, U1016, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: evelyne.bloch-gallego@inserm.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    CLIPR-59 is enriched in embryonic and adult mouse brain and spinal cord. (A) In situ hybridization on mouse brain and spinal cord cryosections. (a) Clipr-59 expression increases during embryonic development in several motoneuronal (nVII, nXII; Spi, spinal; arrowhead) and precerebellar nuclei (ION, inferior olive nucleus, arrow). (b) Peripherin is highly expressed at E18.5 in different motoneuronal pools (arrowheads) where Clipr-59 expression is also detected. (B) CLIPR-59 protein levels detected by western blot are high in lysates from different regions of the brain (Olf, olfactory bulb; Hip, hippocampus; Cor, cortex; Cer, cerebellum; Hind, hindbrain) and spinal cord (Spi) of E18.5 mouse embryos, but are very low in lysates from other tissues (Hea, heart; Lun, lung; Dia, diaphragm; Liv, liver; Sto, stomach; Kid, kidney; Int, intestine; Pla, placenta). (C) The protein levels of CLIPR-59 increase from E12.5 to E18.5 in both hindbrain and spinal cord lysates. Data are mean±s.e.m. (D) CLIPR-59 is localized juxtaposed to the Golgi network labeled with anti-GM130, and along the axon and in the growth cones (see higher magnification) of dissociated spinal motoneurons. Scale bars: 5 μm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    CLIPR-59-deficient mice die at birth from respiratory failure. (A) Schematic representation of the wild-type and recombined CLIPR-59 loci after insertion of loxP sites and excision of exons 2-5 by Cre recombinase. (B) CLIPR-59 protein is undetectable by western blot in spinal cord lysates from E18.5 mutants, whereas the levels of CLIP-115 and CLIP-170 are similar to those of controls. (C) The genotype ratio in litters from heterozygous mating is Mendelian at different embryonic stages. (D) Following Cesarean section of pregnant mice and stimulation of the E18.5 embryos by tail pinching, mutants are never able to breathe, become cyanosed and die. By contrast, control embryos are able to breathe and their open lungs are evident by thoracic transparency (arrow).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Innervation of the diaphragm is impaired in Clipr-59-/- embryos from E15.5 to E18.5. Anti-peripherin and α-bungarotoxin were used to label nerve intermediate filaments and nAChRs, respectively before macroscopic imaging of diaphragm whole mounts (orientation of the diaphragm: D, dorsal; V, ventral; R, right; L, left). (A) The innervation patterns of the diaphragms are similar for control and mutant embryos until E15.5, as the dorsal and ventral primary branches of the phrenic nerve reach both muscle extremities. (B) In the absence of CLIPR-59, the innervation pattern becomes incomplete from E15.5 until E18.5, in particular in the ventral region of the diaphragm muscle. (C) At E18.5, both ventral and dorsal branches of phrenic nerves do not reach the most distal part of the mutant diaphragm where clusters of nAChRs are normally distributed (arrows). (D) At E15.5, the dorsal and ventral nerve branches in embryos of all three genotypes exhibit no significant differences in length. (E) At E18.5 the ventral and dorsal primary branches of the phrenic nerve are both significantly shorter in the mutant. (F) In the right hemi-diaphragm, the lengths of the major secondary nerve branches are longer in Clipr-59-/- mice. (G) In the ventral part of the left hemi-diaphragm, the band of nAChR clusters is slightly but not significantly larger in mutants. Data are means±s.e.m. *P<0.05; **P<0.001; Mann-Whitney U test. NS, non significant. Scale bars: 500 μm.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    The isometric contraction force of the diaphragm muscle is impaired in CLIPR-59-deficient embryos at E18.5. (A) In the mutant, the isometric twitch tension elicited by single nerve stimulation is markedly reduced compared with that obtained by single direct muscle stimulation. (B) The percentage of maximum contraction as a function of the stimulation frequency are similar in nerve-stimulated hemi-diaphragms from both control and mutant embryos. (C) Example of sustained tetanic contraction in diaphragms obtained by nerve stimulation at 40 Hz for 6 seconds show that the tension dropped faster in the absence of CLIPR-59 (black) than in the control (gray). (D) The percentage of maximal contraction is more substantially reduced for Clipr-59-/- embryos than in Clipr-59+/- embryos after 1.5 seconds of nerve stimulation (solid bars), and to an even greater extent after 6 seconds of nerve stimulation (hatched bars). (E) An example of the tension recording graphs obtained by a direct tetanic stimulation at 40 Hz for 6 seconds of the muscle in presence of d-tubocurarine shows that the contraction patterns for mutant (black) and control (gray) diaphragms are very similar. (F) The percentage of maximal contraction upon direct stimulation remains high after 1.5 and 6 seconds for diaphragms from either Clipr-59-/- or Clipr-59+/- embryos. Data are mean±s.e.m.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Selective and premature denervation of ear muscles in Clipr-59-/- mice. Two muscle layers located between the ears of the mouse and innervated by a branch of the facial nerve were studied for innervation defects. (A) The properties of these ear muscles are summarized using information taken from Murray et al. [*(Murray et al., 2008); **(Murray et al., 2010b)]. (B) Innervation was revealed with anti-peripherin labeling, and the nerve trunk was highlighted by a color-coded broken line. The orientation of the muscles on the mouse head is indicated in the center of the figure (F, front; L, left ear). The innervation pattern of the superficial layer is severely impaired in E18.5 mutants. In particular the LALr (orange) is denervated in distal regions of the muscle, with fewer nerve branches in the mutant compared with the control, whereas the innervation of the LALc (red) is relatively normal in mutant mice. (C) In the muscle deep layer of E18.5 mutant, innervation is more affected in the AAL (a fast-twitch muscle, purple) with a severe axon loss and thinner axon branches than in the AS (slow-twitch muscle, blue). (D) Innervation defects in mutant ear muscles are already noticeable as early as E15.5, with thinner and less ramified nerve branches. Scale bars: 100 μm.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    NMJs appear to have formed normally but are not maintained in distal regions of the diaphragm at E18.5. (A) Nerve terminals and nAChRs were labeled with anti-peripherin (red) and α-bungarotoxin (green), respectively, in diaphragms and imaged by confocal microscopy. (B) Terminal Schwann cells were labeled with anti-S-100 (red) and neuronal tubulin was labeled with a Tuj1 antibody (blue). This series of images shows the ventral region of the left hemi-diaphragm of E18.5 embryos at the core of the nerve branch and at its end. (A) In the core of the nerve branch, normal NMJs are evident and the presynaptic nerve terminals are apposed to post-synaptic nAChRs in control (a) and mutant (b) diaphragms. At the tip of the nerve branch (c,d), the thinning of the nerve is much more pronounced in the absence of CLIPR-59 than in the control, with visible retraction bulbs (arrowhead) and uninnervated nAChRs (star). (B) S-100-positive terminal Schwann cells capping the NMJs both in control and in CLIPR-59-deficient mice. In the core of the nerve branch upstream of the nerve tip, Schwann cell morphologies are very similar in control (a) and CLIPR-59-deficient (b) diaphragms. However, at the tip of the nerve branch in CLIPR-59-deficient embryos (d), abnormally shaped Schwann cells can be observed (thick arrows) next to shedding segments of disconnected axons (arrowheads). By comparison, normally shaped Schwann cells cap healthy NMJs in control diaphragms (c). Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    The ultrastructure is modified in some NMJs of E18.5 mutant diaphragms. Presynaptic nerve terminals and terminal Schwann cells were artificially colored in light red and green, respectively. (A) Bundle of nerve terminals capped by a Schwann cell process in a control NMJ. Numerous pre-synaptic synaptic vesicles and some mitochondria (asterisks) are present in nerve terminals. (B,C) Clipr-59 mutant NMJs showing either the chain-like arrangement of nerve terminals (B), or the single arrangement of the terminal (C) covered by thin Schwann cell processes. Both types of nerve terminals exhibit small clear synaptic vesicle accumulation and mitochondria. (D) Clipr-59 mutant NMJ exhibiting abnormal nerve terminals (stars), totally wrapped up in Schwann cell processes containing few synaptic vesicles. Scale bars: 1 μm.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    The number of facial and cervical MN cell bodies is similar in control and mutant embryos at E18.5. (A) In situ hybridization with anti-peripherin probe on brain and spinal cord cryosections from E18.5 embryos. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Cell number is not significantly changed in the facial nucleus and in the cervical MN pools of mutants. Data are mean±s.e.m. NS, not significant.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Axon development
  • Cytoskeleton
  • Motoneurons
  • Mouse embryo
  • Neuromuscular junction
  • Clip3

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CLIPR-59: a protein essential for neuromuscular junction stability during mouse late embryonic development
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Research Article
CLIPR-59: a protein essential for neuromuscular junction stability during mouse late embryonic development
Aurélie Couesnon, Nicolas Offner, Véronique Bernard, Nathalie Chaverot, Stéphanie Backer, Ariane Dimitrov, Franck Perez, Jordi Molgó, Evelyne Bloch-Gallego
Development 2013 140: 1583-1593; doi: 10.1242/dev.087106
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Research Article
CLIPR-59: a protein essential for neuromuscular junction stability during mouse late embryonic development
Aurélie Couesnon, Nicolas Offner, Véronique Bernard, Nathalie Chaverot, Stéphanie Backer, Ariane Dimitrov, Franck Perez, Jordi Molgó, Evelyne Bloch-Gallego
Development 2013 140: 1583-1593; doi: 10.1242/dev.087106

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Summary
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • E2F1 regulates testicular descent and controls spermatogenesis by influencing WNT4 signaling
  • Androgen action in cell fate and communication during prostate development at single-cell resolution
  • A csf1rb mutation uncouples two waves of microglia development in zebrafish
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Kathryn Virginia Anderson (1952-2020)

Developmental geneticist Kathryn Anderson passed away at home on 30 November 2020. Tamara Caspary, a former postdoc and friend, remembers Kathryn and her remarkable contribution to developmental biology.


Zooming into 2021

In a new Editorial, Editor-in-Chief James Briscoe and Executive Editor Katherine Brown reflect on the triumphs and tribulations of the last 12 months, and look towards a hopefully calmer and more predictable year.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

Over 60 institutions in 12 countries are now participating in our Read & Publish initiative. Here, James Briscoe explains what this means for his institution, The Francis Crick Institute. Find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Sign up to join our next session:

10 February
Time: 13:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: preLights

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992