Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES
An illustrated anatomical ontology of the developing mouse lower urogenital tract
Kylie M. Georgas, Jane Armstrong, Janet R. Keast, Christine E. Larkins, Kirk M. McHugh, E. Michelle Southard-Smith, Martin J. Cohn, Ekatherina Batourina, Hanbin Dan, Kerry Schneider, Dennis P. Buehler, Carrie B. Wiese, Jane Brennan, Jamie A. Davies, Simon D. Harding, Richard A. Baldock, Melissa H. Little, Chad M. Vezina, Cathy Mendelsohn
Development 2015 142: 1893-1908; doi: 10.1242/dev.117903
Kylie M. Georgas
1Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Armstrong
2Center for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet R. Keast
3Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine E. Larkins
4Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirk M. McHugh
5Centre for Molecular and Human Genetics, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital and Division of Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205/10, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Michelle Southard-Smith
6Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin J. Cohn
4Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
7Department of Biology, Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
8Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ekatherina Batourina
9Columbia University, Department of Urology, New York, NY 10032, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanbin Dan
9Columbia University, Department of Urology, New York, NY 10032, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerry Schneider
9Columbia University, Department of Urology, New York, NY 10032, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis P. Buehler
6Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carrie B. Wiese
6Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Brennan
2Center for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie A. Davies
2Center for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon D. Harding
10MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC IGMM, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Baldock
10MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC IGMM, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa H. Little
1Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: melissa.little@mcri.edu.au
Chad M. Vezina
11University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, WI 53706, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cathy Mendelsohn
9Columbia University, Department of Urology, New York, NY 10032, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Urogenital sinus development. (A-C) Schematics illustrating early development. (D-M) Immunohistochemistry of sagittal sections. Mesenchymal growth (red arrows, A-C) separates the hindgut and UGS. When it reaches the surface, the proximal urethral meatus is formed (C; arrowhead in H). Here, the perineum midline is derived from cloacal endoderm (C) and is β-catenin+ (H). NDs connect the UGS ridge (A-C) and are Cdh1+ (F,G). CND remodelling and ureter repositioning occur between E12 and E14 (B,C,I-M). NDs and CNDs are Hoxb7GFP+ (I-M). UGS ridge is Cdh1+ (I,J), Laminin+ (K-M) and surrounds the CNDs at E11-12 (A,B,I,J). The ureter directly connects the bladder at E13 (C; Hoxb7GFP+ in L). Very few Hoxb7+ CND cells remain at E14 (M). For abbreviations in all Figures, see supplementary material.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Genital tubercle development. (A-E) Schematics illustrating GT development. Preputial swellings grow ventrally around the GT (red arrows). Anogenital distance, perineum and scrotal swellings are larger in males (red asterisks). (F) Whole-mount β-galactosidase staining of ShhGFPCre;Rosa26RlacZ embryo shows lineage of Shh-expressing cells (blue) in epithelia lining the PHUR, PLUR, bladder, rectum, intestine, perineum, bulbourethral glands, preputial glands and UGS ridge. In males, the mesenchyme begins to septate the PHUR epithelium (red arrowheads in E,F).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Sexual differentiation of the external genitalia. (A-L) Whole-mount β-galactosidase staining of ShhGFPCre;Rosa26RlacZ embryos. Descendants of the Shh-expressing lineage (blue) contribute to preputial glands, epithelium of PHUR, perineum, rectum/intestine and hair follicles. (M-T) Schematics illustrate external genitalia. From E15.5-17.5 in males, mesenchyme grows distally, the urethra septates (red arrowheads), the proximal urethral meatus closes, the urethral seam forms and two right-angle bends develop in the urethra (red arrows). Male bulbourethral glands (black arrowheads), scrotal swelling/fold and perineum are larger. In both sexes, the preputial seam is seen as an indentation along the prepuce ventral midline (black asterisks in M,O). (U,V) H&E-stained external genitalia sections. (Q-V) At E17.5, the male urethra is patent along its length and open at the urethral meatus; in females, the urethral plate (upe) is present and the urethra opens at the proximal urethra meatus. (W-Y) Schematics illustrating adult male anatomy, showing the male urogenital mating protuberance (MUMP), corpora cavernosa (light purple), cartilage/bone (blue). Red arrowheads (in W) indicate position of cross-section (X). (Y) Two right-angle bends are present in the adult male urethra. The prostatic urethra (PRUR) is surrounded by prostate glands. Paired corpus cavernosum extend anteriorly to join the pubic bone (cc in Y).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Sexual differentiation of the reproductive ducts. Schematics illustrate 3D anatomy of reproductive ducts and their connection to the PLUR. At E15, the sexes are identical. Red arrows and associated text indicate sex-specific changes. Nephric and paramesonephric duct degeneration is complete by E17.5. (D) Section immunofluorescence of Hoxb7GFP embryo shows Hoxb7GFP+ ejaculatory ducts and seminal vesicles. Anterior prostate buds are seen (arrowheads). (F,G) The vagina grows in a posterior direction along the PLUR (red arrow), eventually separating from the PLUR and opening at the base of the clitoris (postnatally). (H) Section immunofluorescence shows differential expression in upper vagina (Pax2+) and SVB (Trp63+).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Sexual differentiation of the pelvic urethra. Schematics illustrate sagittal sections of bladder-PLUR junction at E17 (A,E) and adult (I,K). Sex differences (red asterisks) include: mesenchymal pad size/shape; thicker male lamina propria (lpplur) and thicker female muscle (muplur); muscle layer (muplur) continuous with detrusor in females (gap in males); and the bladder-PLUR (BL-PLUR) connection angle, close to 90° in males (I′), more linear in females (K′). (B,F) Whole-mount immunolabelling shows epithelial structures (Cdh1+). (C,G) Immunofluorescence of sagittal sections shows smooth muscle (green) and Upk (red) expression. Upk marks the bladder urothelium boundary (dotted arrows). (D,H) 3D illustrations of PLUR epithelium at birth (purple) shows prostate, ventral epithelial and urethral gland bud location; lateral (black), dorsal (white) and ventral (green) prostate glands and ventral epithelial buds (veb, blue) are outlined. (D′,H′) Underside views of ventral PLUR. (J) Cross-section through adult male PRUR shows labelling of epithelia (red), smooth muscle (green) and striated muscle (yellow), which marks the rhabdosphincter. Blood vessels (Acta2+, red arrowheads) and prostate glands (Cdh1+, white arrowheads) are seen. (K-N) In female adults, the vagina has elongated and a rhabdosphincter develops. (L-N) Sagittal BL-PLUR sections labelled with Upk (bladder urothelium) shows the adult BL-PLUR transition zone (dotted arrows). Urethral glands (arrowheads, L-N) are located close to the BL-PLUR boundary.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Morphology of the bladder fundus, neck, trigone and ureters. (A-E) Schematics illustrating location and morphology of the bladder regions, ureter and urethra connections at E15. Trigone and BL-PLUR boundaries are shown (red/black dotted lines). The bladder neck is more elongated in the adult (see Fig. 5M). (F) As the bladder grows, trigone morphology changes from an equilateral to an isosceles triangle. (G-L) Immunofluorescence of vibratome sections and whole-mounts of E18 ureter (G-I), adult ureter (J) and trigone (K,L), with labelling of urothelium (Upk), ureter muscle layer and detrusor muscle (Acta2) and Hoxb7-GFP in ureter urothelium (K). Approximate trigone boundary is shown (red dotted lines in I,K,L).

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Radial patterning of the bladder mesenchyme activates and maintains smooth muscle differentiation. (A-D) Schematics illustrate mesenchymal and smooth muscle layers. The urothelium expresses Shh, signalling the mesenchyme to express Bmp4, Ptch1 and Gli1-3. Relative gene expression (lower-higher) and presence/absence of smooth muscle cells are shown. Muscle differentiation begins at the fundus and progresses towards the PLUR (B,C). (E,F) β-galactosidase-labelled Gli1-lacZ tissue sections show differential Gli1 expression in the UGS and bladder mesenchyme. (G,H) Immunolabelled bladder sections show urothelium (Upk) and smooth muscle (Acta2). (I,J) β-galactosidase-labelled Gli1-lacZ tissue sections show location of Gli1 and Laminin. Expression of Gli1 is strongest in the suburothelial lamina propria (sulpbl) at E14 (I) and E16 (J) and weak or absent in the outer lamina propria (olpbl). The sulpbl also contains numerous blood vessels (Laminin+, white arrowheads, I,J). (K) Immunolabelled vibratome sections show urothelium (Upk) and detrusor muscle (Acta2). Bright field (on the right) shows the convoluted adult bladder urothelium.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Protein expression defines the bladder urothelium and PLUR epithelium cell types. (A-F) Schematics illustrate epithelial layers; urothelium (red) and caudal UGS (CUGS)/PLUR epithelium (blue). Cross-sections below each panel illustrate location and gene expression of urothelial cell types. (D-F) From E14, bladder urothelium is divided into superficial (S), intermediate (I) and basal (B) cell layers. (G-N) Immunolabelling of LUT tissues. Expression of Trp63 is stronger in CUGS at E12 (G). Krt5 is not expressed in the bladder until after E14; however, expression is seen in the dorsal PLUR epithelium at E13 (H,I), which also shows stronger Trp63 expression. The PLUR superficial cell layer does not express Trp63 at E14 (J,K). (L-N) In the E16 (L,M) and E18 (N) urothelium, Upk is expressed by superficial (SC) and intermediate (IC) cells, Trp63 by ICs and Krt5-basal cells (BCs), and Krt5 exclusively by Krt5-BCs; however, these cells are found in both the basal and intermediate layers. By birth, SCs (or umbrella cells) are large and multi-nucleated (N). Up2-Cfp reporter mice show Upk-expressing cells (green, N). (O-X) Expression patterns in PLUR versus bladder regions (trigone, red dotted lines/arrows). (O) From E15, the PLUR epithelium is subdivided into superficial (S), intermediate (I) and basal (B) cell layers (S), which are thicker than the bladder urothelium. (P) Schematic shows bladder fundus/ventral neck (yellow), bladder dorsal neck/trigone (red) and PLUR epithelium (grey). (Q) All bladder regions express Upk. (R) Krt14 expressed in bladder neck/trigone and PLUR at E17. (S,U-X) Immunolabelling in the BL-PLUR. (S) Krt14, Krt5 and Trp63 expression. (T) Summary of BL-PLUR expression profiles in the cell layers from E17 to adult (TS15-28). White circles indicate differences between bladder regions; black circles indicate differences between PLUR and bladder. Krt20 is expressed by mature SCs of the bladder from E18 to adult (blue ‘+’ in T). (U) Foxa2 is expressed in bladder neck/trigone (U) and PLUR, but absent in the bladder fundus (data not shown). (V) E17 BL-PLUR showing tissue regions, Upk (green arrows) and Krt13 (red arrows) expression borders, with BL-PLUR transition zone in between (white arrows). (W,X) Adult PLUR showing Krt14, Krt5 and Krt13 expression in the epithelial layers.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Nerves, pelvic ganglia and vasculature of the LUT. (A-F) E15 schematics illustrate nerves, pelvic ganglia (green) and vasculature. Pelvic ganglia extend their processes towards the PLUR midline (D) and bladder fundus (E,F). Only small areas of pelvic ganglia are visible in midline sagittal sections (A). (B,C) Bladder (E14 to adult) and PLUR (E17 to adult) ontology terms. Nerves are present in each tissue layer, in addition to nerves of blood vessels (arrowhead, B). (G,H) Whole-mount bladder-PLUR immunolabelled for VAChT show pelvic ganglion (white arrow), with axonal processes extending towards the bladder fundus (black arrows). (I) The pan-neuronal marker PGP9.5 labels axons, axon bundles (white arrow) and urothelial superficial cells in transverse section. (J) VAChT, marking cholinergic autonomic axons, labels varicose axons in whole-thickness adult detrusor. (K) CGRP marks a major population of sensory axons in whole-thickness lamina propria of adult bladder (focusing on suburothelial lamina propria). Arrows indicate terminating axons. (L) Tyrosine hydroxylase marking noradrenergic autonomic axons in whole-thickness lamina propria of adult bladder showing blood vessel innervation. (M) Pecam1-labelled vasculature (vascular endothelial cells) beneath the adult urothelium (PGP9.5+). Clustered PGP9.5+ neuronal cell bodies form an intramural ganglion. (N,O) CGRP-labelled sensory axons form a network in the lamina propria, especially the suburothelial region (transverse section). Usually terminating in basal and intermediate urothelial layers, some axons penetrate the superficial cell layer (arrows, N). CGRP+ axons show even density in the bladder fundus, but there is an increase in suburothelial axons closer to the bladder neck (right hand of image, O). (P) Anterior PLUR transverse section shows the dense plexus of CGRP+ sensory axons in the lamina propria. (Q-S) BL-PLUR sagittal sections showing pelvic ganglia. At E15, neuronal bodies (Hu+) within pelvic ganglia begin segregating into distinct clusters. Axonal processes (PGP9.5+) extend towards the bladder fundus and distal urethra (arrows, Q). VAChT immunolabelling highlights nerve fibre density and penetration, showing axons in the distal bladder fundus and PLUR (arrows, R). At E15, nerve fibres have not penetrated the detrusor. By contrast, urethral innervation is denser and close to the epithelium (R). At E17, clusters of Hu+ neuronal bodies are evident within intramural ganglia of the bladder neck (S).

Previous Article
Back to top
Previous Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Mouse embryogenesis
  • Murine urogenital system development
  • Lower urinary tract
  • Lower reproductive tract
  • Urogenital sinus
  • Urethral plate
  • External genitalia
  • Genital tubercle
  • bladder
  • Trigone
  • Ureter
  • Urethra
  • Pelvic urethra
  • Phallic urethra
  • Prostate gland
  • Pelvic ganglion

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An illustrated anatomical ontology of the developing mouse lower urogenital tract
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES
An illustrated anatomical ontology of the developing mouse lower urogenital tract
Kylie M. Georgas, Jane Armstrong, Janet R. Keast, Christine E. Larkins, Kirk M. McHugh, E. Michelle Southard-Smith, Martin J. Cohn, Ekatherina Batourina, Hanbin Dan, Kerry Schneider, Dennis P. Buehler, Carrie B. Wiese, Jane Brennan, Jamie A. Davies, Simon D. Harding, Richard A. Baldock, Melissa H. Little, Chad M. Vezina, Cathy Mendelsohn
Development 2015 142: 1893-1908; doi: 10.1242/dev.117903
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES
An illustrated anatomical ontology of the developing mouse lower urogenital tract
Kylie M. Georgas, Jane Armstrong, Janet R. Keast, Christine E. Larkins, Kirk M. McHugh, E. Michelle Southard-Smith, Martin J. Cohn, Ekatherina Batourina, Hanbin Dan, Kerry Schneider, Dennis P. Buehler, Carrie B. Wiese, Jane Brennan, Jamie A. Davies, Simon D. Harding, Richard A. Baldock, Melissa H. Little, Chad M. Vezina, Cathy Mendelsohn
Development 2015 142: 1893-1908; doi: 10.1242/dev.117903

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Widespread labeling and genomic editing of the fetal central nervous system by in utero CRISPR AAV9-PHP.eB administration
  • A developmental stage-specific network approach for studying dynamic co-regulation of transcription factors and microRNAs during craniofacial development
  • EPySeg: a coding-free solution for automated segmentation of epithelia using deep learning
Show more TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Kathryn Virginia Anderson (1952-2020)

Developmental geneticist Kathryn Anderson passed away at home on 30 November 2020. Tamara Caspary, a former postdoc and friend, remembers Kathryn and her remarkable contribution to developmental biology.


Zooming into 2021

In a new Editorial, Editor-in-Chief James Briscoe and Executive Editor Katherine Brown reflect on the triumphs and tribulations of the last 12 months, and look towards a hopefully calmer and more predictable year.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

Over 60 institutions in 12 countries are now participating in our Read & Publish initiative. Here, James Briscoe explains what this means for his institution, The Francis Crick Institute. Find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Sign up to join our next session:

10 February
Time: 13:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: preLights

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992