Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish combines mechanisms of wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals
Rebecca Richardson, Manuel Metzger, Philipp Knyphausen, Thomas Ramezani, Krasimir Slanchev, Christopher Kraus, Elmon Schmelzer, Matthias Hammerschmidt
Development 2016 143: 2077-2088; doi: 10.1242/dev.130492
Rebecca Richardson
1Institute of Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50674, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rebecca.richardson@bristol.ac.uk mhammers@uni-koeln.de
Manuel Metzger
1Institute of Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50674, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp Knyphausen
1Institute of Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50674, Germany
2Graduate School for Biological Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50674, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Ramezani
1Institute of Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50674, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krasimir Slanchev
3Georges-Koehler Laboratory, Max-Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg D-79108, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Kraus
1Institute of Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50674, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elmon Schmelzer
4Cell Biology, Max-Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne D-50829, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Hammerschmidt
1Institute of Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50674, Germany
5Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50931, Germany
6Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne D-50931, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthias Hammerschmidt
  • For correspondence: rebecca.richardson@bristol.ac.uk mhammers@uni-koeln.de
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult mammals takes days to complete and relies on numerous signalling cues and multiple overlapping cellular processes that take place both within the epidermis and in other participating tissues. Re-epithelialization of partial- or full-thickness skin wounds of adult zebrafish, however, is extremely rapid and largely independent of the other processes of wound healing. Live imaging after treatment with transgene-encoded or chemical inhibitors reveals that re-epithelializing keratinocytes repopulate wounds by TGF-β- and integrin-dependent lamellipodial crawling at the leading edges of the epidermal tongue. In addition, re-epithelialization requires long-range epithelial rearrangements, involving radial intercalations, flattening and directed elongation of cells – processes that are dependent on Rho kinase, JNK and, to some extent, planar cell polarity within the epidermis. These rearrangements lead to a massive recruitment of keratinocytes from the adjacent epidermis and make re-epithelialization independent of keratinocyte proliferation and the mitogenic effect of FGF signalling, which are only required after wound closure, allowing the epidermis outside the wound to re-establish its normal thickness. Together, these results demonstrate that the adult zebrafish is a valuable in vivo model for studying and visualizing the processes involved in cutaneous wound closure, facilitating the dissection of direct from indirect and motogenic from mitogenic effects of genes and molecules affecting wound re-epithelialization.

INTRODUCTION

The epidermis, which is composed of specialized epithelial cells called keratinocytes, protects the body from injury and invading pathogens (Presland and Jurevic, 2002). Therefore, damage to the epidermis must be promptly repaired to restore this essential barrier. Vertebrate organisms have developed varying mechanisms for wound closure and re-epithelialization by keratinocytes. Studies in embryonic mouse models have revealed an ability to rapidly re-epithelialize small skin wounds in the absence of strong inflammatory responses, involving the planar cell polarity (PCP) system regulating actin polymerization and keratinocyte polarity, as well as contractions of an actomyosin cable in the leading edge (LE) keratinocytes (Bement et al., 1993; Brock et al., 1996; Caddy et al., 2011; Cowin et al., 1998; Hopkinson-Woolley et al., 1994; Longaker et al., 1990; Martin and Lewis, 1992). By contrast, wound healing in adult mammals is a complex, multi-step process involving blood clot formation, inflammation, re-epithelialization by keratinocyte crawling and proliferation, granulation tissue formation, neovascularization and tissue contraction, which largely overlap in time (Barrientos et al., 2008; Martin, 1997; Shaw and Martin, 2009; Singer and Clark, 1999; Werner and Grose, 2003).

Studies in mammalian systems have further demonstrated that re-epithelializing keratinocytes are regulated by various cytokines and growth factors secreted by the damaged tissue or other participating cell types (Barrientos et al., 2008; Santoro and Gaudino, 2005; Sivamani et al., 2007; Werner and Grose, 2003). However, as a result of the temporal overlap of the various processes, it can be difficult to dissect direct effects on keratinocytes from indirect effects via other involved cell types, as well as the impact on keratinocyte migration versus proliferation.

In mice, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) with direct effects on keratinocytes are FGF7 (also known as keratinocyte growth factor, KGF) and its close relative FGF10, which act through high-affinity binding to the receptor splicing variant FGFR2IIIb that is found only in keratinocytes (Barrientos et al., 2008). Accordingly, transgenic mice expressing a dominant negative, truncated version of FGFR2IIIb in keratinocytes display a severe delay in wound re-epithelialization, coincident with strongly reduced keratinocyte proliferation at the edges of the wounds (Werner et al., 1994), pointing to an essential mitogenic effect of FGF7/10 signalling. However, concomitant motogenic effects of FGF signalling on keratinocyte migration, as for instance revealed in cell culture systems, cannot be ruled out (Barrientos et al., 2008; Meyer et al., 2012).

Data on the role of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signalling during wound closure are conflicting. In cell culture systems, TGF-β1 stimulates keratinocyte migration, possibly by inducing (partial) epithelial-mesenchymal transitioning (EMT), by promoting protrusive activity (Lamouille et al., 2014; Räsänen and Vaheri, 2010; Weber et al., 2012) and/or by shifting integrin populations in LE keratinocytes towards a more migratory phenotype (Gailit et al., 1994; Li et al., 2006; Margadant and Sonnenberg, 2010; Zambruno et al., 1995). However, in vivo data do not fully support such a stimulatory role of TGF-β signalling. Thus, mouse null mutants for Tgfb1 or the TGF-β-regulated transcription factor Smad3 show accelerated, rather than impaired wound closure (Ashcroft et al., 1999; Koch et al., 2000). This paradoxical result has been proposed to be due to concomitant and predominant effects of TGF-β signalling to suppress keratinocyte proliferation, which might counteract a direct stimulatory effect on epidermal migration (Ashcroft et al., 1999; Barrientos et al., 2008; Sivamani et al., 2007).

Here, we examine in vivo wound closure in adult zebrafish, analysing and dissecting the cellular mechanisms underlying the re-epithelialization of full-thickness (Richardson et al., 2013) and partial-thickness wounds. Using chemical treatments combined with in vivo imaging, we show that re-epithelialization utilizes TGF-β/integrin-dependent active keratinocyte crawling at the LE of the recovering epidermis, as well as epidermal re-arrangements, including cellular intercalations that progressively spread into more distant regions and lead to a reduction of epidermal cell layers, thereby providing the keratinocytes to populate the wound. However, re-epithelialization of adult zebrafish wounds is independent of FGF signalling and cell proliferation, which are only required for later remodelling and re-establishment of the epidermis outside the wound, exemplifying how the zebrafish system can be used to dissect mitogenic versus motogenic effects of growth factors on re-epithelializing keratinocytes in vivo.

RESULTS

Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds is extremely rapid

We studied re-epithelialization of both full- and partial-thickness cutaneous wounds. Circular full-thickness wounds of ∼1 mm or 2 mm in diameter were introduced onto the flank of adult zebrafish with a dermatology laser, ablating tissue to the level of the subcutaneous muscle layer (Richardson et al., 2013) (Fig. 1A,C). Partial-thickness wounds still containing the basal-most dermal layer were generated by manual removal of single scales (Fig. 1A,B). Time-lapse in vivo imaging of Tg(krt4:GFP) fish, where the superficial epidermal cells are labelled with GFP, revealed that partial-thickness wounds close very rapidly with a speed of ∼500 µm/h (Fig. 1D), in line with previously reported rates for partial-thickness wounds in the cichlid fish Hemichromis bimaculatus (Quilhac and Sire, 1999). By contrast, full-thickness wounds closed more slowly (∼250 µm/h; Fig. 1E); particularly in central wound regions where the wound bed is deeper and more uneven. Immunofluorescence analysis demonstrated that in contrast to unwounded epidermis, which is composed of three to four cell layers (Fig. 1F), and in contrast to the neo-epidermis at later stages, which is up to 10 cell layers thick (see below), the re-epithelializing epidermis was initially bi-layered, composed of GFP+ superficial cells and p63+ inner keratinocytes (Fig. 1G,H). Of note, full-thickness wounds were mainly re-epithelialized from the posterior side, although movement and elongation of keratinocytes was observed both on the anterior and posterior side (Movie 1; Fig. S1B,C). However, on the anterior side, keratinocytes accumulated at the tips of the scale remnants (Fig. S1A), whereas on the scale-free head, wounds were re-epithelialized from both sides and in a more concentric fashion (Fig. S1D).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Re-epithelialization of full- and partial-thickness wounds in adult zebrafish. (A-C) Schematic representations of normal adult zebrafish skin architecture (A), or following partial-thickness (B) or full-thickness (C) wound introduction. Arrows in B and C indicate the typical directions of epidermal re-epithelialization. (D,E) Single images from time-lapse recordings of Tg(krt4:GFP) fish following partial-thickness (D) or full-thickness (E) wounding at indicated time points post-wounding; red line marks LE. (F-H) Unwounded epidermis is 3-4 cell layers thick (F), the re-epithelializing neo-epidermis is bilayered, consisting of superficial GFP+ and inner p63+ keratinocytes (G,H). Arrow in G indicates LE, arrows in H, the wound margins, revealing full re-epithelialization at 8 hpw. Scale bars: 500 µm in D,E,H; 20 µm in F,G.

The leading edge: purse-string mechanisms and active keratinocyte migration

Cutaneous wounds of mammalian embryos close via purse-string mechanisms, involving coordinated actomyosin-dependent concentric constrictions of the epidermal sheet at the edge of the wound (Brock et al., 1996; Martin and Lewis, 1992), whereas closure of wounds in adult mammals involves active cell migration of keratinocytes. Zebrafish embryos also utilize purse-string mechanisms (Martin and Parkhurst, 2004) and small embryonic wounds displayed the characteristic concentric rings of actin fibres and activated (phosphorylated) non-muscle myosin at the wound edges (Fig. 2A). A similar concentric actomyosin ring at the wound edge was observed in small wounds of adult zebrafish, in addition to general cortical actomyosin formation in first-row keratinocytes possibly involved in other morphogenetic processes (Kim and Davidson, 2010) (Fig. 2B). By contrast, wound-facing domains of LE keratinocytes of larger partial-thickness wounds displayed an arrayed pattern of actin, which is characteristic of lamellipodial protrusions, whereas myosin was concentrated more posteriorly (Fig. 2C,D), another characteristic of migrating cells. Additionally, especially during the unilateral re-epithelialization of full-thickness wounds, the LE increased its width while spreading over the wound (Movie 1), whereas during purse-string driven concentric closure, the LE should become smaller. Together, this points to the existence of active keratinocyte migration during cutaneous wound closure in adult zebrafish, whereas purse-string mechanisms only occur in small wounds and, possibly, during the final steps of larger cutaneous wound closure.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

LE cells of partial-thickness wounds form lamellipodia but lack signs of purse-string mechanisms. (A) Puncture wound in fin of 3-day-old embryo shows circular, colocalized actin (left panel) and phosphorylated non-muscle myosin (middle panel) at the wound margin. Images are maximum projections, insets single z-planes in the centre of the wound. (B) Puncture wound in trunk of adult, with cortical p-myosin in adjacent keratinocytes, including the sides facing the wound (arrow). (C,D) Adult partial-thickness wound; actin fibres are present within the protruding lamellipodia (red), p-myosin is accumulated at the posterior of LE cells (magenta, arrow). (E-G) Live confocal images of partial-thickness wound of Tg(actb2:hras-egfp), Tg(krt4:mCherry) double transgenic. Lamellipodia are formed at the LE by inner keratinocytes (green), whereas superficial cells (red) remain further back (E,F). (G) Single plane confocal images, revealing the enormous lamellipodial size relative to the cell body of an LE keratinocyte (upper panel). Inner keratinocytes behind the LE also show restricted protrusive activity (G, bottom panel; lamellipodium, arrow). (H) Stills from a time-lapse movie at indicated relative time points. Rarely, usually when encountering an obstruction, LE cells undergo more pronounced EMT-like changes and retain only limited contact with following cells. Asterisks indicate the same blood vessel. Scale bars: 20 µm in A-H; 10 µm in insets in A.

To monitor cell migration processes at the LE, we performed high resolution in vivo imaging and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Time-lapse imaging of partial-thickness wounds of Tg(actb2:hras-egfp), Tg(krt4:mCherry) double transgenic fish revealed that inner keratinocytes extended large, lamellipodia-like processes toward the centre of the wound and remained in close contact to each other, while superficial cells lagged behind (Fig. 2E-G; Movie 2). Basal epidermal cells behind the LE also formed cryptic lamellipodia (Fig. 2G, lower panel), as has been suggested previously from in vitro experiments (Matsubayashi et al., 2011). Only in rare cases did individual LE keratinocytes form lamellipodia that projected beyond the otherwise homogeneous lamellipodial front (Fig. 2E) or even leave the epithelial sheet entirely (Fig. 2H). Altogether, this behaviour of LE keratinocytes is very similar to the collective ‘lamellipodial crawling’ observed in scratch wound assays of confluently cultured keratinocytes (Fenteany et al., 2000). Protrusive activity at the LE was also present in early-stage full-thickness wounds, when re-epithelializing keratinocytes were still on the surface of naked scale remnants (Fig. S2A,B), whereas during later stages, when LE keratinocytes had reached regions where the wounds were deeper (see Fig. 1C), no such protrusions were observed (Fig. S2C,D).

The following epidermis: radial intercalation, cellular flattening, directed elongation and tissue recruitment from inter-scale pockets

Striking morphological changes were also observed in the epidermis at a distance from the wound. At 4 h post wounding (hpw), the epidermis immediately adjacent to the LE of full-thickness wounds had become thinner and bi-layered (Fig. 3A,B,E,F), displaying a similar organization to the neo-epidermis on the wound bed (Fig. 1F-H). In more remote regions (2 mm distance), the epidermis displayed normal thickness and multi-layered organization at 4 hpw, but was also thinner and bi-layered at 12 hpw (Fig. 3C,D). Apoptosis of keratinocytes as a cause of this thinning is unlikely, because no TUNEL+ cells could be detected in the epidermis around the wound (Fig. S3). Rather, it seems to be driven by progressive cell flattening (Fig. 3E-L) and by radial intercalations between basal and suprabasal keratinocytes (Fig. 3J,L; see also below). Analysis of Tg(krt4:gfp) fish (Fig. 3I-L) and SEM analysis (Fig. 3N-P) further revealed a progressive elongation of cells. As in unwounded skin, superficial cells at a 5 mm distance from the wound displayed a hexagonal shape (Fig. 3P). However, closer to the wound they were strongly elongated in the direction of the wound and displayed a progressive loss of surface microridges, although epithelial integrity was maintained (Fig. 3N,O). Inner keratinocytes also underwent directed elongations, however, to a lesser extent than in the superficial layer (Fig. 3M).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Epidermal cells outside full-thickness wounds undergo progressive radial intercalation, flattening and elongation. (A-D) DAPI labelling of sections through unwounded epidermis (A) and epidermis at indicated stages and distances from wound (B-D). (E-H) DAPI labelling of sections through Tg(actb2:hras-egfp) fish as in A-D. Cell membranes are in green. Doubled-headed red arrows indicate the heights of individual basal keratinocytes. (I-L) Surface views (I,K) and z-projections (J,L) of Tg(krt4:GFP) fish; at 1 mm distance, superficial cells (outlined; green) display more pronounced flattening, and inner keratinocytes (E-cadherin; red; centres indicated by asterisks) more pronounced radial intercalations than at 2 mm distance from wound. (M) Single-plane confocal micrograph of Tg(actb2:hras-egfp) fish; superficial cells are labelled with Phalloidin (red), inner epidermal cells with p63 (pink) and cell membranes with GFP (green); wound is to the left. Arrow indicates superficial cells, brackets indicate lengths of inner keratinocytes, which are less elongated than superficial cells. (N-P) SEM images of superficial skin layer (single cells outlined) at indicated distances from wound, revealing spatially graded cell elongation and loss of surface microridges. Scale bars: 10 µm.

The cell shape changes in superficial cells outside the wound were also reflected by a progressive fading of the GFP fluorescence in superficial views of Tg(krt4:GFP) fish, encompassing regions up to 2 mm around the entire circumference of the wound at 5 hpw (Fig. S4A). Furthermore, the affected domain had lost the brighter fluorescence normally present in distal-most regions of the scales (Fig. S4A), reflecting the presence of epidermal pockets between adjacent scales (Fig. S4A, inset). These epidermal pockets are connected to the basal dermis via dermal tethers (Richardson et al., 2013), which in regions around the wound were stretched, whereas the pocket epidermis had moved up (Fig. S4B-E). This suggests that the inter-scale pockets serve as a reservoir of epidermal tissue that is recruited during wound re-epithelialization. Consistently, wounds on the forehead, which lacks scales, closed more slowly (Fig. S1D). Even more strongly reduced closure rates (∼100 µm/h) were observed in the flank of edar mutants (Fig. S4F-H), which lack scales due to a genetic blockage of scale induction (Harris et al., 2008). Of note, head wounds of edar mutants closed with similar rates as in wild-type siblings (Fig. S4I,J), suggesting that the reduced closure rates of trunk wounds in edar mutants are indeed due to the absence of the inter-scale pockets, rather than defects in epidermal cells themselves.

Re-epithelialization requires rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton and TGF-β/integrin and Rock/JNK activities

To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of re-epithelialization, we treated wounded adult zebrafish with different specific inhibitors: cytochalasin D, a potent inhibitor of actin polymerization (Casella et al., 1981); the TGF-β signalling inhibitor SB431542 (Inman et al., 2002), which upon application to early gastrula embryos induced phenotypes similar to those displayed by mutants in the TGF-β family members Ndr1 and Ndr2 (Fig. S5A,B; Feldman et al., 1998); RGD peptides competing with the respective ECM integrin ligands of the migration substrate (Kim et al., 1992), which have been formerly shown to abrogate multiple fibronectin-integrin-dependent morphogenetic processes during early zebrafish development (Matsui et al., 2007; Nair and Schilling, 2008; Jülich et al., 2009); the Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; Mapk8b – Zebrafish Information Network) inhibitor SP600125 (Bennett et al., 2001), which led to a significant reduction of pJNK levels in western blot analyses of extracts from adult skin (Fig. S5C); or Y27632 and inhibitor III Rockout, specific inhibitors of Rho-associated kinase (Rock), a crucial mediator of the small GTPase Rho during its regulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics (Yarrow et al., 2005; Lai et al., 2005; Weiser et al., 2007). All inhibitors tested resulted in significantly slower re-epithelialization of partial thickness wounds (Fig. 4A), whereas closure of full-thickness wounds was significantly compromised upon cytochalasin D treatment and inhibition of Rock and JNK, but not following inhibition of TGF-β signalling (Fig. 4B). However, for both wound types, completely arrested closure was only obtained by cytochalasin D treatment (Fig. 4B,F,K), suggesting that different actin cytoskeleton remodelling processes are at play that are differentially targeted by the other inhibitors.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Re-epithelialization requires TGF-β/GRGDS-dependent keratinocyte crawling at the LE and Rock/JNK-dependent epithelial morphogenesis in the following epidermis. (A-D) Quantification of effects caused by the indicated inhibitors on LE migration speeds in partial-thickness wounds (A), and on the extent of wound closure (B), the degree of circularity (C) and the orientation of the long axis (D) of adjacent superficial cells of full-thickness wounds at 10 hpw. Tg(DEP), transgenic inhibition of PCP. In A-C, mean values and s.d. are indicated. Values in A were determined from time-lapse movies (e.g. Movies 2-5; n≥5 per condition), values in B from Methylene Blue penetration assays as shown in Fig. S4F,G, and values in C,D from images as shown in O-S. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.005; ****P<0.001; n.s., not significant; one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett's post-hoc test. (E-N) Live confocal images of the LE of Tg(actb2:hras-egfp), Tg(krt4:mCherry) double transgenic fish at 5 min (E-I) and 30 min (J-N) after partial-thickness wounding (mpw), treated with indicated inhibitors. Lower panels of J-N show z-projections of the LE cell marked by the asterisk in the panels above. At 5 mpw, all cases except the CYT-D treatment display normal protrusive activity at the LE, whereas at 30 mpw, SB431542- and GRGDS-treated LE keratinocytes display roundish, shorter and thicker lamellipodia, indicative of lamellipodial retraction. (O-S) Phalloidin staining of the adjacent epidermis of full-thickness wounds at 10 hpw demonstrating compromised and uncoordinated cell elongation upon treatment with CYT-D (P) and Y27632 (S), but not SB431542 (Q) or GRGDS (S). (T-V) p63, GFP double immunofluorescence and DAPI labelling of sections through Tg(actb2:hras-egfp) fish at indicated conditions and distances from full-thickness wounds. Left panels, merge; right panels, p63 channels. Y27632-treated wound (V) displays reduced flattening of superficial cells (double-headed red arrows) and reduced frequency of radial intercalations, characterized by a partial overlap of the positions along the epidermal apical-basal axis occupied by adjacent basal and suprabasal p63+ nuclei (marked in U by red lines). Quantifications from three individual fish per condition (1-1.5 mm wound distance for U,V) yielded the following frequencies (no. of partially overlapping p63+ nuclei/total no. of p63+ nuclei). Unwounded in T, 6.1±5.3%; DMSO-treated wound in U, 51.3±3.7%; Y27632-treated wound in V, 17.2±4.9%. P=0.00027557 (T versus U); P=0.056567873 (T versus V); P=0.000651499 (U versus V); Student's t-test. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Effects on cellular behaviour were studied by in vivo imaging of keratinocytes at the LE of partial-thickness wounds (Fig. 4E-N and Movie 2) or Phalloidin labelling of the actin cytoskeleton in superficial cells of the following epidermis of full-thickness wounds (Fig. 4O-S). After control DMSO treatment, keratinocytes at the LE underwent active cell migration (Fig. 4E,J), whereas following cells elongated drastically (Fig. 4C,O). Cytochalasin D treatment, which blocked re-epithelialization completely, led to a loss of lamellipodia formation at the LE (Fig. 4F,K), whereas following cells maintained their hexagonal epithelial organization, as in unwounded skin (Fig. 4C,P). Upon TGF-β signalling inhibition, lamellipodia at the LE were initially formed normally (Fig. 4G); however, they later acquired more roundish shapes and collapsed (Fig. 4L), while forward cellular movement was compromised (Fig. 4A; Movies 3 and 4). By contrast, elongation of more-distant cells was unaffected by the failure of lamellipodial crawling at the LE (Fig. 4Q and Fig. S6). Very similar, but slightly weaker lamellipodial and keratinocyte migration defects were obtained upon treatment with RGD peptides (Fig. 4A,H,M; Movie 5). Together, this suggests that TGF-β signalling is required for proper lamellipodal substrate attachment and crawling of keratinocytes at the LE.

Rock inhibition did not affect lamellipodial shape and stability at the LE, and cells migrated in a less co-ordinated manner, projecting into different directions (Fig. 4I,N). Similarly, cells of the following epidermis did undergo cell shape changes and elongated. However, compared with DMSO-treated, TGF-β-inhibited or RGD-treated fish (Fig. 4C,D,O,Q,S), their elongation was less pronounced (Fig. 4C,S) and less directed (Fig. 4D,S). Similar effects were obtained upon inhibition of JNK (Fig. 4C,D).

Consistent with the effect on directed keratinocyte elongation, JNK and Rock have been described as components of the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway (Marlow et al., 2002; Munoz-Soriano et al., 2012; Seo et al., 2010). Accordingly, upon treatment of gastrulating embryos, SP600125, Y27632 and Rockout caused convergent extension defects (Fig. S7A-E) resembling those of mutants in other components of the PCP pathway (Marlow et al., 2002). In addition, the inhibitors led to compromised enveloping layer (EVL) and deep cell epiboly events (Fig. S8A-F) driven by flattening of superficial EVL cells and radial intercalations among deep cells (Warga and Kimmel, 1990; Slanchev et al., 2009), which are thus morphogenetic processes, as also evident in the following epidermis of adult wounds (see above; Fig. 3). Therefore, as a more specific approach to investigate the impact of PCP on wound closure, we generated a transgenic line expressing the DEP (Dishevelled, Egl-10 and Pleckstrin) domain of Dishevelled under the control of a heat-inducible hsp70 promoter for temporally controlled PCP pathway inhibition. Activation of the transgene during gastrulation caused convergent extension defects as obtained upon chemical Rock or JNK inhibition (Fig. S7F). However, despite strongly induced transgene expression (Fig. S7G-K), closure of adult full-thickness wounds was not significantly reduced compared with non-transgenic siblings (Fig. 4B; P=0.144), although effects on keratinocyte elongation and directionality were of similar strength as upon inhibition of Rock or JNK (Fig. 4C,D). This suggests that in addition to establishing proper PCP, Rock and JNK promote re-epithelialization via other morphogenetic processes. Indeed, Rock inhibition led to reduced flattening of superficial keratinocytes and reduced radial intercalation frequencies between basal and intermediary keratinocytes in the following epidermis (Fig. 4T-V), combined with reduced levels and an altered subcellular distribution of phosphorylated non-muscle myosin (Fig. S8G,H). Together, this suggests that Rock and JNK regulate multiple myosin-dependent rearrangements of keratinocytes in the following epidermis that are required for their collective displacement towards and onto the wound.

Re-epithelialization does not require keratinocyte proliferation

Keratinocyte proliferation is dispensable for wound closure in mammalian embryos (Ihara and Motobayashi, 1992), but is required for wound re-epithelialization in adult mammals, with inhibition or upregulation of this cellular process resulting in delayed or enhanced wound closure, respectively (Han et al., 2011; Tscharntke et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011). Histological analysis of the neo-epidermis of zebrafish wounds revealed a highly thickened neo-epidermis covering the wound at both 24 and 72 hpw, with up to 10 cell layers (Fig. 5A), whereas unwounded epidermis consists of 3-4 layers (Richardson et al., 2013). However, at 24 hpw, the epidermis at 1 and 2 mm distant from the wound was thinner and consisted of two cell layers, whereas it had recovered to its normal thickness at 72 hpw (Fig. 5B,C). Analysis of BrdU incorporation demonstrated an absence of cell proliferation within the wound epidermis during the first 24 hpw, when re-epithelialization occurs (Fig. 5D), and rather moderate labelling at 48 and 72 hpw (Fig. 5E,F). By contrast, high and progressively increasing cell proliferation rates were observed in the epidermis at a 1 mm distance from the wound (Fig. 5G-I). This suggests that keratinocyte proliferation is dispensable for wound re-epithelialization, but required for the recovery of normal epidermal thickness in adjacent regions, from which keratinocytes have been recruited to the neo-epidermis during wound closure. Consistent with this notion, treatment of wounded zebrafish with hydroxyurea, an inhibitor of cell proliferation, had no effect on re-epithelialization rates (Fig. 5J,K) and the thickness of the neo-epidermis in the wounded region (Fig. 5L,M), whereas the adjacent epidermis remained bi-layered even at 72 hpw (Fig. 5N,O).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Epidermal cell proliferation regenerates the surrounding epidermis but does not influence re-epithelialization. (A-C) Histological analysis reveals a highly thickened neo-epidermis at both 24 and 72 hpw (A). The epidermis 1 mm (B) and 2 mm (C) distant to the wound is much thinner at 24 hpw, but has recovered to normal thickness by 72 hpw. (D-I) BrdU-incorporation studies reveal few labelled cells in the wound epidermis from 24 hpw to 72 hpw (D-F), but a strong increase of BrdU+ cells in the epidermis 1 mm distant from the wound (G-I). (J-O) Fish treated with hydroxyurea (HU) exhibit the same rate of re-epithelialization as assessed by Methylene Blue assay at 8 hpw (J,K). Histological analysis between control and HU-treated fish reveals similar epidermal thicknesses in the wound at 24 hpw and 72 hpw (L,M), and 1 mm distant from the wound at 24 hpw (N,O). However, at 72 hpw, the latter has recovered to its normal thickness in the control, but remains thin in the HU-treated fish (N,O). Scale bars: 20 µm in A-C, L-O; 50 µm in D-J.

Transgenic inhibition of FGF signalling does not compromise wound re-epithelialization, but results in reduced keratinocyte proliferation and compromised epidermal regrowth

It has been shown that transgenic expression of a dominant-negative version of the FGF receptor FGFR2IIIb in keratinocytes compromises wound closure in adult mouse models (Werner et al., 1994). We have previously used a similar approach in transgenic Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-EGFP) zebrafish, which upon heat-shock application express a C-terminally truncated mutant form of Fgfr1a in which the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain is replaced by GFP. This truncated version is predicted to heterodimerise with, and to thereby block all FGF receptor subtypes (Lee et al., 2005; Lepilina et al., 2006). Activation of this transgene resulted in the almost complete failure of granulation tissue formation beneath the wound (Richardson et al., 2013). However, wounds of heat-shocked Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-EGFP) fish re-epithelialized at the same rate as in controls (Fig. 6A-D), with a normally stratified neo-epidermis evident at 24 hpw (Fig. 6E,F). Furthermore, LE protrusive activity appeared unaffected by blockage of FGF signalling (compare Fig. 6L with Fig. 4E), altogether pointing to unaltered wound re-epithelialization. By contrast, the epidermis at a 1 mm distance from the wound failed to regenerate to its normal thickness (Fig. 6G,H) and the number of BrdU-incorporating cells in the epidermis around the wound remained significantly reduced, even at 4 days after wounding (Fig. 6I-K), similar to the defects obtained upon hydroxyurea treatment (see above; Fig. 5). Together, this indicates that FGF signalling plays no essential motogenic role, but rather has an essential mitogenic role, being required for keratinocyte proliferation to govern the regrowth of the adjacent epidermis after re-epithelialization is complete.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

FGF signalling is dispensable for re-epithelialization, but is required for keratinocyte proliferation and epidermal regrowth. (A-D) Methylene Blue penetration assay at 7 hpw (A,B) and 24 hpw (C,D) revealing unaltered re-epithelialization rates of full-thickness wounds between heat-shocked control Tg(hsp70l:gfp) (A,C) and Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-egfp) (B,D). Insets show fluorescence of transgene-encoded GFP or dnFGFR-GFP fusion proteins, indicating strong transgene expression. (E,F) Histological analysis of wound epidermis at 24 hpw revealing unaltered thicknesses of neo-epidermis between heat-shocked wild-type control (E) and Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-egfp) fish (F). Right panels show magnified views of regions boxed in left panels. (G,H) At 96 hpw, the epidermis 1 mm distant from the wound of the heat-shocked Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-egfp) fish (H) is much thinner than in the heat-shocked non-transgenic control (G). Insets show magnified views. (I,J) BrdU incorporation revealing significantly reduced epidermal proliferation in heat-shocked (J) compared with non-heat shocked Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-egfp) fish (I) 1 mm distant from the wound. (K) Quantification of BrdU incorporation rates (percentage of cells) from images as in I,J. (L) Live image of LE of heat-shocked Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-egfp) fish after partial-thickness injury, revealing normal protrusive activity (see Fig. 4E as control). Scale bars: 2 mm in A-D; 500 µm in left panels of E,F; 50 µm in G-J and right panels of E,F; 10 µm in L.

DISCUSSION

Re-epithelialization of adult fish wounds combines mechanisms used during wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals

In mouse embryos, wound closure involves coordinated, actomyosin-dependent purse-string contractions in LE keratinocytes, whereas active keratinocyte migration is required for wound closure in adult mice. Several growth factors have been identified that can promote keratinocyte migration, such as TGF-β1 (Gailit et al., 1994; Zambruno et al., 1995), EGF (Haase et al., 2003), macrophage-stimulating protein (MSP) (Santoro et al., 2003) and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) (Chmielowiec et al., 2007), which stimulate EMT of keratinocytes by regulating integrin transmembrane receptors and/or small GTPases, thereby modulating cell-ECM interactions and the actin cytoskeleton, respectively. In healing wounds of adult zebrafish, we observed keratinocytes with mesenchymal-like shapes and the presence of filopodia and lamellipodia at the LE of the re-epithelializing epidermal tongue, indicative of (partial) EMT and active cell migration (Fig. 2 and Fig. S2), and consistent with the recent observation in large wounds of zebrafish embryos (Gault et al., 2014). Furthermore, inhibition of TGF-β signalling and interference with integrin-ECM binding compromised lamellipodial shape and stability, as well as re-epithelialization rates (Fig. 4). Strikingly, these effects were most pronounced in partial thickness wounds, which in contrast to full-thickness wounds, retain a basal dermal layer as a potential substrate for efficient keratinocyte migration, consistent with previous reports suggesting that TGF-β overexpression in mouse accelerates closure of only partial-thickness wounds (Tredget et al., 2005). Together, this suggests that, as in mammals, re-epithelialization of wounds of adult zebrafish involves integrin-dependent lamellipodial crawling of keratinocytes at the LE.

In cultured epithelial cells, closure of scratched wounds is not only achieved by activities at the front row, but also involves several rows of following epithelial cells that migrate as coherent cell sheets (Farooqui and Fenteany, 2005; Fenteany et al., 2000; Matsubayashi et al., 2011). We observed a similar phenomenon in keratinocytes following the LE in zebrafish wounds in vivo, with (cryptic) lamellipodia also formed by second and third row keratinocytes (Fig. 2G). In addition, we observed several other types of epithelial rearrangements that are not re-capitulated in the scratch assays. First, inner keratinocytes behind the LE undergo radial intercalations, which lead to a progressive reduction of cell layers and a concomitant two-dimensional growth of the remaining layers, thereby supplying the keratinocytes to cover the wound independent of cell proliferation (Figs 3 and 4). This is very similar to the radial intercalations driving deep cell epiboly in gastrulating embryos (Warga and Kimmel, 1990) and to the ‘leap-frog’ mechanism formerly described for the initiation of re-epithelialization at the LE of cutaneous wounds in the cichlid fish Hemichromis bimaculatus (Quilhac and Sire, 1999). However, our data show that these intercalations occur over a much broader temporal and spatial range, progressively (within hours) spreading into regions quite remote from the wound (distance larger than wound diameter). In addition, keratinocytes undergo directed and coordinated cell flattening, polarization and elongation (Fig. 3; Movie 4). This behaviour is most pronounced in the superficial layer, which apparently does not participate in the intercalation movements, but also takes place, to a lesser extent, in the deeper layers.

Chemical treatments indicate that the coordinated alignment of elongated cells as well as their radial intercalation and wound re-epithelialization depend on Rock and JNK activity (Fig. 4). Inhibition of Rho kinase has previously been shown to abrogate purse string formation and thereby wound closure in fly and fish embryos (Abreu-Blanco et al., 2014; Gault et al., 2014). However, our analyses point to the absence of purse-string mechanisms during most closure phases of large cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish, suggesting that other Rock-dependent processes must be affected. The identified requirement of Rock for proper non-muscle myosin activation/localization (Fig. S8), and for cell flattening and radial intercalations in the following epidermis (Fig. 4T-V) is in line with the formerly described myosin-II-dependent roles of Rock driving cell flattening during epidermal stratification in mammals (Vaezi et al., 2002) and radial cell intercalations during gut morphogenesis in Amphibia (Reed et al., 2009). In addition, Rock and JNK have been described as crucial components of the PCP pathway in multiple developmental contexts (Van Aelst and Symons, 2002). In zebrafish embryos, overexpression of a dominant-negative version of Rock2 results in compromised convergence extension movements, with cells elongating in rather random directions, rather than towards the midline, which is their supposed destination (Marlow et al., 2002). On the cellular level, these defects are very similar to those observed in the re-epithelializing epidermis after Rock and JNK inhibition. However, specific transgenic blockage of the PCP pathway affected wound closure much more moderately than inhibition of Rock or JNK, although all treatments had comparable effects on directed keratinocyte elongation (Fig. 4). Together, this indicates that Rock and JNK regulate multiple morphogenetic movements, all of which might be myosin-dependent: cell flattening, radial cell intercalations and, as part of the PCP pathway, coordinated cell elongation. However, the latter seems to have a rather weak and, possibly, indirect impact on wound closure, promoting radial cell intercalations, which could be compromised when cells were elongated in random directions. Interestingly, similar cell elongations have been reported for superficial skin cells during wound closure in mouse, zebrafish and Drosophila embryos (Gault et al., 2014; Martin and Parkhurst, 2004; McCluskey and Martin, 1995; Razzell et al., 2014) and mutant analyses have unravelled an essential role of the PCP pathway for embryonic wound closure in mouse (Caddy et al., 2011).

Together, our data indicate that wound re-epithelialization of adult zebrafish uses a combination of mechanisms employed during embryonic and adult wound closure in mammals. Such an ‘intermediary’ nature of the mechanisms of re-epithelialization is consistent with the intermediary overall organization of the unwounded epidermis of adult zebrafish, resembling that of mammalian embryos just before the onset of cornification (Fischer et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2014). In addition, our data indicate that in full-thickness zebrafish wounds, the major driving force of re-epithelialization is not generated by (TGF-β/RGD-dependent) active keratinocyte migration at the LE (‘pulling at the front’), probably because of the absence of a suitable migration substrate, but rather by (Rock/JNK-dependent) epithelial rearrangements of keratinocytes further away from the wound (‘pushing from the back’). By contrast, in partial-thickness wounds, both mechanisms are at play, explaining their higher closure rates (500 µm/h) compared with full-thickness wounds (250 µm/h). The even lower closure rates of cultured keratinocytes in scratch assays (50-70 µm/h) (Matsubayashi et al., 2011) might be due to the absence of such epithelial rearrangement further away from the LE, because here, cells are mono-layered and closure is solely dependent on active cell migration. Of note, this ‘pushing’ from the back, including the elongation/stretching of cells, seems to be largely independent of the ‘pulling’ at the front. Thus, in partial-thickness wounds, cell elongations in the following epidermis occur normally, even when lamellipodial crawling at the LE is blocked (Fig. S6). Similarly, keratinocytes in regions anterior of full-thickness wounds elongate and move forward, as in posterior regions (Fig. S1B,C; Movie 1), although the LE cannot reach the wound and cells pile up at the tip of the scales without any apparent contact to scale surfaces required for active migration on an ECM substrate (Fig. S1A). Future studies are required to reveal to what extent such pushing forces generated via long-range epithelial rearrangements further away from the LE also contribute to wound closure in adult mammals in vivo.

The zebrafish might assist in dissecting the different effects of growth factor signalling during mammalian wound healing

Direct comparisons of genetic control systems regulating in vivo re-epithelialization of fish and mammalian wounds are at first sight complicated by the differences in the time course with which the different steps of wound repair occur in the two vertebrate classes (Richardson et al., 2013). However, these differences, in combination with particular experimental strengths of the zebrafish system, might even help to dissect the described effects of different growth factors during mammalian wound closure at multiple levels. First, the temporal uncoupling of re-epithelialization from the other steps of wound healing helps to discriminate between direct/primary and indirect/secondary effects (e.g. via innate immune cells) on re-epithelializing keratinocytes. Second, the independence of re-epithelialization from keratinocyte proliferation (Fig. 5) helps to distinguish between motogenic and mitogenic effects. And third, the in vivo imaging of LE keratinocytes over several hours and at resolutions similar to those achieved in scratch assays in vitro, helps to distinguish between different cellular mechanisms underlying the motogenic effects.

During mouse wound repair, TGF-β fulfils multiple functions not only on keratinocytes, but also on other cell types involved in cutaneous wound repair. But even on keratinocytes, it has both a positive motogenic effect revealed in vitro, and a negative mitogenic effect revealed in vivo (see Introduction). In light of the positive in vivo effect of TGF-β on keratinocyte migration in zebrafish wounds revealed here (Fig. 4), it is tempting to speculate that despite the accelerated wound closure in mutant mice, TGF-β also has a positive effect on keratinocyte migration in closing mouse wounds in vivo, which is, however, overridden by other inhibitory effects, for instance on keratinocyte proliferation (Sivamani et al., 2007; Tredget et al., 2005).

Our data also allow first conclusions as to which particular processes of keratinocyte migration are regulated by TGF-β signalling. Re-epithelialization involves the dissociation of keratinocytes from the basement membrane zone at the undamaged wound margin, requiring the dissociation of hemidesmosomes and the formation of cellular protrusions pointing toward the wound. Subsequent directed migration over the wound bed requires the stimulation of focal adhesion proteins such as α5β1, α2β1, α3β1, αvβ5 and/or αvβ6 integrins, which mediate cell movement by the dynamic binding of extracellular matrix (ECM) components such as fibronectin and collagen to cell surfaces (Margadant and Sonnenberg, 2010; Tsuruta et al., 2011). Our chemical inhibitor experiments suggest that TGF-β signalling is dispensable for the protrusive activity of LE keratinocytes (Fig. 4), but is required for proper attachment of lamellipodia to the wound bed substrate and for keratinocyte migration. The latter are also sensitive to applied RGD peptides that are known to disrupt the physical interaction between RGD motif-containing ECM proteins and integrins (Fig. 4). This suggests that TGF-β promotes keratinocyte migration by modulating their integrin code, consistent with current concepts of TGF-β and integrin function in mammalian wound-healing systems (Fong et al., 2010; Gailit et al., 1994; Li et al., 2006; Margadant and Sonnenberg, 2010; Zambruno et al., 1995). Future zebrafish studies will reveal the nature of the relevant integrins and ECM proteins. In mammalian in vitro systems, RGD peptides selectively block the interaction of integrins with fibronectin (Kim et al., 1992), which might explain why in our in vivo assay, the effects of the RGD peptides were weaker than those obtained upon inhibition of TGF-β signalling (collagens, as alternative integrin ligands, should only be affected in the latter case) (Fig. 4). In addition, the relevant sources of the TGF-β signals need to be identified. Macrophages, a main source of TGF-β in mice, seem unlikely candidates, because re-epithelialization is initiated before inflammation (Richardson et al., 2013). Keratinocytes themselves might be a source, consistent with the reported TGF-β expression by keratinocytes of mammalian wounds (Schmid et al., 1993). In addition, injury might induce the release/activation of TGF-β stored in the ECM (Buscemi et al., 2011).

The aforementioned independence of re-epithelialization from keratinocyte proliferation in zebrafish might also underlie the seemingly different effects caused by loss of FGF signalling in zebrafish and mouse. In mouse, transgenic blockage of the FGF7/10/22 receptor FGFR2IIIb in keratinocytes results in decelerated wound closure (Werner et al., 1994). These defects could be due to decreased keratinocyte motility and/or proliferation, consistent with the migration-promoting effects revealed for FGF2 and FGF7/10 in vitro, and with their mitogenic effects demonstrated in vivo (auf demKeller et al., 2004; Sivamani et al., 2007; Werner et al., 1994). In contrast to mouse, in vivo blockage of FGF signalling in zebrafish affects neither wound re-epithelialization nor the protrusive activity of keratinocytes at the LE, suggesting that the motogenic function of FGF signalling is dispensable. However, treated fish do display significantly reduced proliferation rates of keratinocytes and failed regrowth of the adjacent epidermis to its normal thickness after wound closure is complete, pointing to an essential mitogenic effect of FGF signalling (Fig. 6). Together, this suggests that the cellular mechanisms of FGF signalling during wound re-epithelialization might be fully conserved between mammals and fish, and that the different net outcomes are solely due to the differential impacts of keratinocyte proliferation on wound closure in the different species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Zebrafish lines and wounding

Six- to twelve-month-old wild-type fish of the TL/Ekwill strain and the following published mutant and transgenic lines were used for adult wounding experiments: edarz3R367W (Harris et al., 2008), Tg(actb2:hras-egfp)vu119, Tg(krt4:egfp)gz7, Tg(hsp70l:EGFP) and Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-EGFP)pd1 (Cooper et al., 2005; Gong et al., 2002; Halloran et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2005). The Tg(krt4:mCherry)fr32 line and the Tg(hsp70l:DEP)fr37 line, containing the Xenopus Dishevelled DEP domain (aa 371-736; Tada and Smith, 2000), were generated using the gateway-based Tol2 kit (Kwan et al., 2007), followed by standard injection procedures.

Puncture wounds in embryonic median fins were manually introduced with a glass needle; puncture wounds in adult fish with a micro-point nitrogen ablation laser (Andor). Full-thickness wounds of adult fish (Richardson et al., 2013) with a diameter of ∼2 mm (unless stated otherwise) were introduced with a Dermablate laser, as described (trunk: 2 pulses at 500 mJ; head: 1 pulse at 400 mJ). For partial-thickness wounds, adult fish were anaesthetized in 0.13% Tricaine (w/v) and a scale removed manually with forceps. Adult Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-egfp) and Tg(hsp70l:DEP) fish were heat-shocked at 40°C for 1 h in pre-warmed water, then returned to 27°C water and wounded 1 h later.

All zebrafish experiments were approved by the National Animal Welfare Committee (LANUV Nordrhein-Westfalen; 8.87-50.10.31.08.134; 84-02.04.2012.A251; 84-02.04.2012.A253; City of Cologne; 576.1.36.6.3.01.10 Be).

Tissue labelling procedures

The Methylene Blue penetration assay and histological and immunofluorescence analyses were performed as described (Richardson et al., 2013). For Fig. 3E-H, Tg(actb2:hras-egfp) fish were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) overnight at 4°C, followed by cryosectioning and mounting of sections in Mowiol (Carl Roth) containing DAPI. Primary antibodies/labelling reagents used were: p63 (1:100, Santa Cruz, sc-8431), chicken anti-GFP (1:100, Invitrogen, A10262), phospho-myosin light chain 2 (Ser19) (1:100, Cell Signaling, 3671), E-cadherin (1:200, BD Biosciences, 610182), Rhodamine-Phalloidin (1:100, Invitrogen, R415). Epidermal cell proliferation was assessed by incubating adult fish in 100 µg/ml BrdU (Sigma) for 12 h prior to and specified times post wounding. BrdU water was exchanged every 24 h. TUNEL staining of apoptotic cells (Fischer et al., 2014), and myoD and Xenopus DEP (Tada and Smith, 2000) whole-mount in situ hybridizations were carried out as described (Hammerschmidt et al., 1996). Images were captured on a Zeiss Axiophot, Zeiss Apotome, Zeiss Confocal (LSM710 META) or Leica M165 FC dissecting microscope. SEM analysis was carried out as described (Fischer et al., 2014).

Drug treatments

Adult zebrafish were treated with 2 µM cytochalasin D (CYT-D; Sigma, C8273), 50 µM Y27632 (Calbiochem, 688000), 50 µM Rho Kinase Inhibitor III, Rockout (Calbiochem, 55553), 50 µM SB431542 (Sigma, S4317), 1 mM GRGDS peptide (Bachem, H1345), 10 µM SP600125 (Sigma, S5567) or 50 mM hydroxyurea (Calbiochem, 400046) in fish system water. Fish were treated starting 4 h prior to wounding and inhibitors were refreshed every 24 h when necessary. Efficacies of SB431542, Y27632, Rockout and SP600125 were tested in parallel treatments or microinjections (Y27632; Lai et al., 2005; Lou et al., 2012) of zebrafish embryos, analysing convergent extension by myoD in situ hybridization (Fig. S7), and epiboly and mesoderm formation by morphological inspection or Phalloidin staining, as described (Slanchev et al., 2009) (Figs S5 and S8).

In vivo imaging

Time-lapse in vivo imaging of re-epithelializing partial- or full-thickness wounds of adult zebrafish was carried out on a Zeiss Apotome as described (Xu et al., 2014) with the following modifications: fish were anaesthetized with 0.016% Tricaine and mounted in a home-made imaging chamber using 2% low-melting point agarose. The chamber was connected to a peristaltic pump (Gilson Minipuls 3), which provided an inflow and outflow of 0.016% Tricaine in system water in a circulatory manner. Agarose covering the gills and head was removed and fish were intubated with the inflow tube using a cut 200 µl pipette tip as a mouthpiece. The flow rate was set to ∼3 ml/min. The total volume of medium circulating in the system was generally 50 ml, but 500 ml was used for long-term imaging (>2 h). Images were processed using ImageJ (NIH) and its ‘extended depth of field’ plug-in, as described (Forster et al., 2004).

Quantification and statistics

For Fig. 4A-D, at least six individual fish, or ten individual cells from at least three individual fish were analysed using ImageJ software. Data collection and analysis was conducted with Microsoft Excel 2010 and GraphPad Prism6. For statistical analysis, mean values were determined for each analysed wound, if necessary, and then used as data points to determine mean values and standard deviations for all analysed wounds (n) with Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett's post-hoc test. Data for which representative images are shown without statistical calculations were obtained from at least six out of six investigated specimens from at least three independent experiments.

Acknowledgements

Excellent technical assistance from Evelin Fahle and Rainer Franzen is gratefully acknowledged. We are very grateful to Christel Schenkel for the sections shown in Fig. S1E,F, and to Arndt Siekmann for sharing their time-lapse in vivo imaging protocol for adult zebrafish. R.R. thanks Paul Martin for support.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    R.R., M.M. and M.H. conceived the project, designed the study, planned the experiments and analysed the data. R.R. and M.M. performed the experiments, with additional contributions from P.K. to the in vivo imaging of partial-thickness wounds, T.R. to the in vivo imaging of full-thickness wounds and the SEM analyses, K.S. to the first chemical inhibitor experiments, and C.K. to the Tg(hsp70l:dnfgfr1-egfp) analyses. E.S. supervised the SEM analyses. R.R. and M.H. wrote the manuscript.

  • Funding

    This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 829 to M.H.]; the European Union Seventh Framework Programme [HEALTH-F4-2010-242048 to M.H.]; and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM63904 to M.H.]. Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.

  • Supplementary information

    Supplementary information available online at http://dev.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/dev.130492/-/DC1

  • Received September 4, 2015.
  • Accepted April 12, 2016.
  • © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abreu-Blanco, M. T.,
    2. Verboon, J. M. and
    3. Parkhurst, S. M.
    (2014). Coordination of Rho family GTPase activities to orchestrate cytoskeleton responses during cell wound repair. Curr. Biol. 24, 144-155. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.048
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ashcroft, G. S.,
    2. Yang, X.,
    3. Glick, A. B.,
    4. Weinstein, M.,
    5. Letterio, J. L.,
    6. Mizel, D. E.,
    7. Anzano, M.,
    8. Greenwell-Wild, T.,
    9. Wahl, S. M.,
    10. Deng, C. et al.
    (1999). Mice lacking Smad3 show accelerated wound healing and an impaired local inflammatory response. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 260-266. doi:10.1038/12971
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. auf demKeller, U.,
    2. Krampert, M.,
    3. Kümin, A.,
    4. Braun, S. and
    5. Werner, S.
    (2004). Keratinocyte growth factor: effects on keratinocytes and mechanisms of action. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 83, 607-612. doi:10.1078/0171-9335-00389
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Barrientos, S.,
    2. Stojadinovic, O.,
    3. Golinko, M. S.,
    4. Brem, H. and
    5. Tomic-Canic, M.
    (2008). Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 16, 585-601. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Bement, W. M.,
    2. Forscher, P. and
    3. Mooseker, M. S.
    (1993). A novel cytoskeletal structure involved in purse string wound closure and cell polarity maintenance. J. Cell Biol. 121, 565-578. doi:10.1083/jcb.121.3.565
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bennett, B. L.,
    2. Sasaki, D. T.,
    3. Murray, B. W.,
    4. O'Leary, E. C.,
    5. Sakata, S. T.,
    6. Xu, W.,
    7. Leisten, J. C.,
    8. Motiwala, A.,
    9. Pierce, S.,
    10. Satoh, Y. et al.
    (2001). SP600125, an anthrapyrazolone inhibitor of Jun N-terminal kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13681-13686. doi:10.1073/pnas.251194298
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Brock, J.,
    2. Midwinter, K.,
    3. Lewis, J. and
    4. Martin, P.
    (1996). Healing of incisional wounds in the embryonic chick wing bud: characterization of the actin purse-string and demonstration of a requirement for Rho activation. J. Cell Biol. 135, 1097-1107. doi:10.1083/jcb.135.4.1097
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Buscemi, L.,
    2. Ramonet, D.,
    3. Klingberg, F.,
    4. Formey, A.,
    5. Smith-Clerc, J.,
    6. Meister, J.-J. and
    7. Hinz, B.
    (2011). The single-molecule mechanics of the latent TGF-beta1 complex. Curr. Biol. 21, 2046-2054. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.037
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Caddy, J.,
    2. Wilanowski, T.,
    3. Darido, C.,
    4. Dworkin, S.,
    5. Ting, S. B.,
    6. Zhao, Q.,
    7. Rank, G.,
    8. Auden, A.,
    9. Srivastava, S.,
    10. Papenfuss, T. A. et al.
    (2011). Epidermal wound repair is regulated by the planar cell polarity signaling pathway. Dev. Cell 19, 138-147. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Casella, J. F.,
    2. Flanagan, M. D. and
    3. Lin, S.
    (1981). Cytochalasin D inhibits actin polymerization and induces depolymerization of actin filaments formed during platelet shape change. Nature 293, 302-305. doi:10.1038/293302a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Chmielowiec, J.,
    2. Borowiak, M.,
    3. Morkel, M.,
    4. Stradal, T.,
    5. Munz, B.,
    6. Werner, S.,
    7. Wehland, J.,
    8. Birchmeier, C. and
    9. Birchmeier, W.
    (2007). c-Met is essential for wound healing in the skin. J. Cell Biol. 177, 151-162. doi:10.1083/jcb.200701086
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Cooper, M. S.,
    2. Szeto, D. P.,
    3. Sommers-Herivel, G.,
    4. Topczewski, J.,
    5. Solnica-Krezel, L.,
    6. Kang, H.-C.,
    7. Johnson, I. and
    8. Kimelman, D.
    (2005). Visualizing morphogenesis in transgenic zebrafish embryos using BODIPY TR methyl ester dye as a vital counterstain for GFP. Dev. Dyn. 232, 359-368. doi:10.1002/dvdy.20252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Cowin, A. J.,
    2. Brosnan, M. P.,
    3. Holmes, T. M. and
    4. Ferguson, M. W. J.
    (1998). Endogenous inflammatory response to dermal wound healing in the fetal and adult mouse. Dev. Dyn. 212, 385-393. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199807)212:3<385::AID-AJA6>3.0.CO;2-D
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Farooqui, R. and
    2. Fenteany, G.
    (2005). Multiple rows of cells behind an epithelial wound edge extend cryptic lamellipodia to collectively drive cell-sheet movement. J. Cell Sci. 118, 51-63. doi:10.1242/jcs.01577
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Feldman, B.,
    2. Gates, M. A.,
    3. Egan, E. S.,
    4. Dougan, S. T.,
    5. Rennebeck, G.,
    6. Sirotkin, H. I.,
    7. Schier, A. F. and
    8. Talbot, W. S.
    (1998). Zebrafish organizer development and germ-layer formation require nodal-related signals. Nature 395, 181-185. doi:10.1038/26013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Fenteany, G.,
    2. Janmey, P. A. and
    3. Stossel, T. P.
    (2000). Signaling pathways and cell mechanics involved in wound closure by epithelial cell sheets. Curr. Biol. 10, 831-838. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00579-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Fischer, B.,
    2. Metzger, M.,
    3. Richardson, R.,
    4. Knyphausen, P.,
    5. Ramezani, T.,
    6. Franzen, R.,
    7. Schmelzer, E.,
    8. Bloch, W.,
    9. Carney, T. J. and
    10. Hammerschmidt, M.
    (2014). p53 and TAp63 promote keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation in breeding tubercles of the zebrafish. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004048. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004048
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Fong, E.,
    2. Tzlil, S. and
    3. Tirrell, D. A.
    (2010). Boundary crossing in epithelial wound healing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19302-19307. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008291107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Forster, B.,
    2. Van De Ville, D.,
    3. Berent, J.,
    4. Sage, D. and
    5. Unser, M.
    (2004). Complex wavelets for extended depth-of-field: a new method for the fusion of multichannel microscopy images. Microsc. Res. Tech. 65, 33-42. doi:10.1002/jemt.20092
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Gailit, J.,
    2. Welch, M. P. and
    3. Clark, R. A. F.
    (1994). TGF-beta 1 stimulates expression of keratinocyte integrins during re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds. J. Invest. Dermatol. 103, 221-227. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12393176
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Gault, W. J.,
    2. Enyedi, B. and
    3. Niethammer, P.
    (2014). Osmotic surveillance mediates rapid wound closure through nucleotide release. J. Cell Biol. 207, 767-782. doi:10.1083/jcb.201408049
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Gong, Z.,
    2. Ju, B.,
    3. Wang, X.,
    4. He, J.,
    5. Wan, H.,
    6. Sudha, P. M. and
    7. Yan, T.
    (2002). Green fluorescent protein expression in germ-line transmitted transgenic zebrafish under a stratified epithelial promoter from keratin8. Dev. Dyn. 223, 204-215. doi:10.1002/dvdy.10051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Haase, I.,
    2. Evans, R.,
    3. Pofahl, R. and
    4. Watt, F. M.
    (2003). Regulation of keratinocyte shape, migration and wound epithelialization by IGF-1- and EGF-dependent signalling pathways. J. Cell Sci. 116, 3227-3238. doi:10.1242/jcs.00610
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Halloran, M. C.,
    2. Sato-Maeda, M.,
    3. Warren, J. T.,
    4. Su, F.,
    5. Lele, Z.,
    6. Krone, P. H.,
    7. Kuwada, J. Y. and
    8. Shoji, W.
    (2000). Laser-induced gene expression in specific cells of transgenic zebrafish. Development 127, 1953-1960.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. ↵
    1. Hammerschmidt, M.,
    2. Pelegri, F.,
    3. Mullins, M. C.,
    4. Kane, D. A.,
    5. Brand, M.,
    6. van Eeden, F. J. M.,
    7. Furutani-Seiki, M.,
    8. Granato, M.,
    9. Haffter, P.,
    10. Heisenberg, C. P. et al.
    (1996). Mutations affecting morphogenesis during gastrulation and tail formation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123, 143-151.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Han, G.,
    2. Li, F.,
    3. Ten Dijke, P. and
    4. Wang, X. J.
    (2011). Temporal smad7 transgene induction in mouse epidermis accelerates skin wound healing. Am. J. Pathol. 179, 1768-1779. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Harris, M. P.,
    2. Rohner, N.,
    3. Schwarz, H.,
    4. Perathoner, S.,
    5. Konstantinidis, P. and
    6. Nüsslein-Volhard, C.
    (2008). Zebrafish eda and edar mutants reveal conserved and ancestral roles of ectodysplasin signaling in vertebrates. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000206. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000206
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hopkinson-Woolley, J.,
    2. Hughes, D.,
    3. Gordon, S. and
    4. Martin, P.
    (1994). Macrophage recruitment during limb development and wound healing in the embryonic and foetal mouse. J. Cell Sci. 107, 1159-1167.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Ihara, S. and
    2. Motobayashi, Y.
    (1992). Wound closure in foetal rat skin. Development 114, 573-582.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    1. Inman, G. J.,
    2. Nicolas, F. J.,
    3. Callahan, J. F.,
    4. Harling, J. D.,
    5. Gaster, L. M.,
    6. Reith, A. D.,
    7. Laping, N. J. and
    8. Hill, C. S.
    (2002). SB-431542 is a potent and specific inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta superfamily type I activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) receptors ALK4, ALK5, and ALK7. Mol. Pharmacol. 62, 65-74. doi:10.1124/mol.62.1.65
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Jülich, D.,
    2. Mould, A. P.,
    3. Koper, E. and
    4. Holley, S. A.
    (2009). Control of extracellular matrix assembly along tissue boundaries via Integrin and Eph/Ephrin signaling. Development 136, 2913-2921. doi:10.1242/dev.038935
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Kim, H. Y. and
    2. Davidson, L. A.
    (2010). Punctuated actin contractions during convergent extension and their permissive regulation by the non-canonical Wnt-signaling pathway. J. Cell Sci. 124, 635-646. doi:10.1242/jcs.067579
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Kim, J. P.,
    2. Zhang, K.,
    3. Kramer, R. H.,
    4. Schall, T. J. and
    5. Woodley, D. T.
    (1992). Integrin receptors and RGD sequences in human keratinocyte migration: unique anti-migratory function of alpha 3 beta 1 epiligrin receptor. J. Invest. Dermatol. 98, 764-770. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12499947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Koch, R. M.,
    2. Roche, N. S.,
    3. Parks, W. T.,
    4. Ashcroft, G. S.,
    5. Letterio, J. J. and
    6. Roberts, A. B.
    (2000). Incisional wound healing in transforming growth factor-beta1 null mice. Wound Repair Regen. 8, 179-191. doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00179.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Kwan, K. M.,
    2. Fujimoto, E.,
    3. Grabher, C.,
    4. Mangum, B. D.,
    5. Hardy, M. E.,
    6. Campbell, D. S.,
    7. Parant, J. M.,
    8. Yost, H. J.,
    9. Kanki, J. P. and
    10. Chien, C.-B.
    (2007). The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev. Dyn. 236, 3088-3099. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21343
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Lai, S.-L.,
    2. Chang, C.-N.,
    3. Wang, P.-J. and
    4. Lee, S.-J.
    (2005). Rho mediates cytokinesis and epiboly via ROCK in zebrafish. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 71, 186-196. doi:10.1002/mrd.20290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Lamouille, S.,
    2. Xu, J. and
    3. Derynck, R.
    (2014). Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 178-196. doi:10.1038/nrm3758
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Lee, Y.,
    2. Grill, S.,
    3. Sanchez, A.,
    4. Murphy-Ryan, M. and
    5. Poss, K. D.
    (2005). Fgf signaling instructs position-dependent growth rate during zebrafish fin regeneration. Development 132, 5173-5183. doi:10.1242/dev.02101
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Lee, R. T. H.,
    2. Asharani, P. V. and
    3. Carney, T. J.
    (2014). Basal keratinocytes contribute to all strata of the adult zebrafish epidermis. PLoS ONE 9, e84858. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084858
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Lepilina, A.,
    2. Coon, A. N.,
    3. Kikuchi, K.,
    4. Holdway, J. E.,
    5. Roberts, R. W.,
    6. Burns, C. G. and
    7. Poss, K. D.
    (2006). A dynamic epicardial injury response supports progenitor cell activity during zebrafish heart regeneration. Cell 127, 607-619. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Li, Y.,
    2. Fan, J.,
    3. Chen, M.,
    4. Li, W. and
    5. Woodley, D. T.
    (2006). Transforming growth factor-alpha: a major human serum factor that promotes human keratinocyte migration. J. Invest. Dermatol. 126, 2096-2105. doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700350
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Longaker, M. T.,
    2. Whitby, D. J.,
    3. Adzick, N. S.,
    4. Crombleholme, T. M.,
    5. Langer, J. C.,
    6. Duncan, B. W.,
    7. Bradley, S. M.,
    8. Stern, R.,
    9. Ferguson, M. W. J. and
    10. Harrison, M. R.
    (1990). Studies in fetal wound healing, VI. Second and early third trimester fetal wounds demonstrate rapid collagen deposition without scar formation. J. Pediatr. Surg. 25, 63-69. doi:10.1016/S0022-3468(05)80165-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Lou, Q.,
    2. He, J.,
    3. Hu, L. and
    4. Yin, Z.
    (2012). Role of lbx2 in the noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway for convergence and extension movements and hypaxial myogenesis in zebrafish. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1823, 1024-1032. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.02.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Margadant, C. and
    2. Sonnenberg, A.
    (2010). Integrin–TGF-beta crosstalk in fibrosis, cancer and wound healing. EMBO Rep. 11, 97-105. doi:10.1038/embor.2009.276
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Marlow, F.,
    2. Topczewski, J.,
    3. Sepich, D. and
    4. Solnica-Krezel, L.
    (2002). Zebrafish Rho kinase 2 acts downstream of Wnt11 to mediate cell polarity and effective convergence and extension movements. Curr. Biol. 12, 876-884. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00864-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Martin, P.
    (1997). Wound healing--aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 276, 75-81. doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.75
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Martin, P. and
    2. Lewis, J.
    (1992). Actin cables and epidermal movement in embryonic wound healing. Nature 360, 179-183. doi:10.1038/360179a0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Martin, P. and
    2. Parkhurst, S. M.
    (2004). Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis. Development 131, 3021-3034. doi:10.1242/dev.01253
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Matsubayashi, Y.,
    2. Razzell, W. and
    3. Martin, P.
    (2011). ‘White wave’ analysis of epithelial scratch wound healing reveals how cells mobilise back from the leading edge in a myosin-II-dependent fashion. J. Cell Sci. 124, 1017-1021. doi:10.1242/jcs.080853
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Matsui, T.,
    2. Raya, A.,
    3. Callol-Massot, C.,
    4. Kawakami, Y.,
    5. Oishi, I.,
    6. Rodriguez-Esteban, C. and
    7. Izpisúa Belmonte, J. C.
    (2007). miles-apart-mediated regulation of cell–fibronectin interaction and myocardial migration in zebrafish. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cadiovasc. Med. 4 Suppl. 1, S77-S82. doi:10.1038/ncpcardio0764
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. McCluskey, J. and
    2. Martin, P.
    (1995). Analysis of the tissue movements of embryonic wound healing—DiI studies in the limb bud stage mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 170, 102-114. doi:10.1006/dbio.1995.1199
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Meyer, M.,
    2. Muller, A.-K.,
    3. Yang, J.,
    4. Moik, D.,
    5. Ponzio, G.,
    6. Ornitz, D. M.,
    7. Grose, R. and
    8. Werner, S.
    (2012). FGF receptors 1 and 2 are key regulators of keratinocyte migration in vitro and in wounded skin. J. Cell Sci. 125, 5690-5701. doi:10.1242/jcs.108167
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Munoz-Soriano, V.,
    2. Belacortu, Y. and
    3. Paricio, N.
    (2012). Planar cell polarity signaling in collective cell movements during morphogenesis and disease. Curr. Genomics 13, 609-622. doi:10.2174/138920212803759721
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Nair, S. and
    2. Schilling, T. F.
    (2008). Chemokine signaling controls endodermal migration during zebrafish gastrulation. Science 322, 89-92. doi:10.1126/science.1160038
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Presland, R. B. and
    2. Jurevic, R. J.
    (2002). Making sense of the epithelial barrier: what molecular biology and genetics tell us about the functions of oral mucosal and epidermal tissues. J. Dent. Educ. 66, 564-574.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  56. ↵
    1. Quilhac, A. and
    2. Sire, J.-Y.
    (1999). Spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of the epidermis after wounding a cichlid fish, Hemichromis bimaculatus. Anat. Rec. 254, 435-451. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990301)254:3<435::AID-AR15>3.0.CO;2-D
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Räsänen, K. and
    2. Vaheri, A.
    (2010). TGF-beta1 causes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in HaCaT derivatives, but induces expression of COX-2 and migration only in benign, not in malignant keratinocytes. J. Dermatol. Sci. 58, 97-104. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.03.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Razzell, W.,
    2. Wood, W. and
    3. Martin, P.
    (2014). Recapitulation of morphogenetic cell shape changes enables wound re-epithelialisation. Development 141, 1814-1820. doi:10.1242/dev.107045
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Reed, R. A.,
    2. Womble, M. A.,
    3. Dush, M. K.,
    4. Tull, R. R.,
    5. Bloom, S. K.,
    6. Morckel, A. R.,
    7. Devlin, E. W. and
    8. Nascone-Yoder, N. M.
    (2009). Morphogenesis of the primitive gut tube is generated by Rho/Rock/Myosin II-mediated endoderm rearrangements. Dev. Dyn. 238, 3111-3125. doi:10.1002/dvdy.22157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Richardson, R.,
    2. Slanchev, K.,
    3. Kraus, C.,
    4. Knyphausen, P.,
    5. Eming, S. and
    6. Hammerschmidt, M.
    (2013). Adult zebrafish as a model system for cutaneous wound-healing research. J. Invest. Dermatol. 133, 1655-1665. doi:10.1038/jid.2013.16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Santoro, M. M. and
    2. Gaudino, G.
    (2005). Cellular and molecular facets of keratinocyte reepithelization during wound healing. Exp. Cell Res. 304, 274-286. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.10.033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    1. Santoro, M. M.,
    2. Gaudino, G. and
    3. Marchisio, P. C.
    (2003). The MSP receptor regulates alpha6beta4 and alpha3beta1 integrins via 14-3-3 proteins in keratinocyte migration. Dev. Cell 5, 257-271. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00201-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Schmid, P.,
    2. Cox, D.,
    3. Bilbe, G.,
    4. McMaster, G.,
    5. Morrison, C.,
    6. Stähelin, H.,
    7. Lüscher, N. and
    8. Seiler, W.
    (1993). TGF-betaS and TGF-beta type II receptor in human epidermis: differential expression in acute and chronic skin wounds. J. Pathol. 171, 191-197. doi:10.1002/path.1711710307
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Seo, J.,
    2. Asaoka, Y.,
    3. Nagai, Y.,
    4. Hirayama, J.,
    5. Yamasaki, T.,
    6. Namae, M.,
    7. Ohata, S.,
    8. Shimizu, N.,
    9. Negishi, T.,
    10. Kitagawa, D. et al.
    (2010). Negative regulation of wnt11 expression by Jnk signaling during zebrafish gastrulation. J. Cell Biochem. 110, 1022-1037. doi:10.1002/jcb.22616
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Shaw, T. J. and
    2. Martin, P.
    (2009). Wound repair at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3209-3213. doi:10.1242/jcs.031187
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Singer, A. J. and
    2. Clark, R. A. F.
    (1999). Cutaneous wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 738-746. doi:10.1056/NEJM199909023411006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Sivamani, R. K.,
    2. Garcia, M. S. and
    3. Isseroff, R. R.
    (2007). Wound re-epithelialization: modulating keratinocyte migration in wound healing. Front. Biosci. 12, 2849-2868.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Slanchev, K.,
    2. Carney, T. J.,
    3. Stemmler, M. P.,
    4. Koschorz, B.,
    5. Amsterdam, A.,
    6. Schwarz, H. and
    7. Hammerschmidt, M.
    (2009). The epithelial cell adhesion molecule EpCAM is required for epithelial morphogenesis and integrity during zebrafish epiboly and skin development. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000563. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000563
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Tada, M. and
    2. Smith, J. C.
    (2000). XWnt11 is a target of Xenopus Brachyury: regulation of gastrulation movements via Dishevelled, but not through the canonical Wnt pathway. Development 127, 2227-2238. doi:10.2741/2277
    OpenUrlAbstract
  70. ↵
    1. Tredget, E. B.,
    2. Demare, J.,
    3. Chandran, G.,
    4. Tredget, E. E.,
    5. Yang, L. and
    6. Ghahary, A.
    (2005). Transforming growth factor-beta and its effect on reepithelialization of partial-thickness ear wounds in transgenic mice. Wound Repair Regen. 13, 61-67. doi:10.1111/j.1067-1927.2005.130108.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. Tscharntke, M.,
    2. Pofahl, R.,
    3. Chrostek-Grashoff, A.,
    4. Smyth, N.,
    5. Niessen, C.,
    6. Niemann, C.,
    7. Hartwig, B.,
    8. Herzog, V.,
    9. Klein, H. W.,
    10. Krieg, T. et al.
    (2007). Impaired epidermal wound healing in vivo upon inhibition or deletion of Rac1. J. Cell Sci. 120, 1480-1490. doi:10.1242/jcs.03426
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Tsuruta, D.,
    2. Hashimoto, T.,
    3. Hamill, K. J. and
    4. Jones, J. C.
    (2011). Hemidesmosomes and focal contact proteins: functions and cross-talk in keratinocytes, bullous diseases and wound healing. J. Dermatol. Sci. 62, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.01.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Vaezi, A.,
    2. Bauer, C.,
    3. Vasioukhin, V. and
    4. Fuchs, E.
    (2002). Actin cable dynamics and Rho/Rock orchestrate a polarized cytoskeletal architecture in the early steps of assembling a stratified epithelium. Dev. Cell 3, 367-381. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00259-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. Van Aelst, L. and
    2. Symons, M.
    (2002). Role of Rho family GTPases in epithelial morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 16, 1032-1054. doi:10.1101/gad.978802
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Warga, R. M. and
    2. Kimmel, C. B.
    (1990). Cell movements during epiboly and gastrulation in zebrafish. Development 108, 569-580.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Weber, C. E.,
    2. Li, N. Y.,
    3. Wai, P. Y. and
    4. Kuo, P. C.
    (2012). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, TGF-beta, and osteopontin in wound healing and tissue remodeling after injury. J. Burn Care Res. 33, 311-318. doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e318240541e
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    1. Weiser, D. C.,
    2. Pyati, U. J. and
    3. Kimelman, D.
    (2007). Gravin regulates mesodermal cell behavior changes required for axis elongation during zebrafish gastrulation. Genes Dev. 21, 1559-1571. doi:10.1101/gad.1535007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Werner, S. and
    2. Grose, R.
    (2003). Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol. Rev. 83, 835-870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    1. Werner, S.,
    2. Smola, H.,
    3. Liao, X.,
    4. Longaker, M. T.,
    5. Krieg, T.,
    6. Hofschneider, P. H. and
    7. Williams, L. T.
    (1994). The function of KGF in morphogenesis of epithelium and reepithelialization of wounds. Science 266, 819-822. doi:10.1126/science.7973639
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Xu, C.,
    2. Hasan, S. S.,
    3. Schmidt, I.,
    4. Rocha, S. F.,
    5. Pitulescu, M. E.,
    6. Bussmann, J.,
    7. Meyen, D.,
    8. Raz, E.,
    9. Adams, R. H. and
    10. Siekmann, A. F.
    (2014). Arteries are formed by vein-derived endothelial tip cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5758. doi:10.1038/ncomms6758
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Yarrow, J. C.,
    2. Totsukawa, G.,
    3. Charras, G. T. and
    4. Mitchison, T. J.
    (2005). Screening for cell migration inhibitors via automated microscopy reveals a Rho-kinase inhibitor. Chem. Biol. 12, 385-395. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.01.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  82. ↵
    1. Zambruno, G.,
    2. Marchisio, P. C.,
    3. Marconi, A.,
    4. Vaschieri, C.,
    5. Melchiori, A.,
    6. Giannetti, A. and
    7. De Luca, M.
    (1995). Transforming growth factor-beta 1 modulates beta 1 and beta 5 integrin receptors and induces the de novo expression of the alpha v beta 6 heterodimer in normal human keratinocytes: implications for wound healing. J. Cell Biol. 129, 853-865. doi:10.1083/jcb.129.3.853
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Zhang, M.,
    2. Liu, N.-Y.,
    3. Wang, X.-E.,
    4. Chen, Y.-H.,
    5. Li, Q.-L.,
    6. Lu, K.-R.,
    7. Sun, L.,
    8. Jia, Q.,
    9. Zhang, L. and
    10. Zhang, L.
    (2011). Activin B promotes epithelial wound healing in vivo through RhoA-JNK signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 6, e25143. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025143
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • FGF
  • Re-epithelialization
  • Skin
  • TGF-β
  • Wound healing
  • Cell proliferation

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish combines mechanisms of wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish combines mechanisms of wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals
Rebecca Richardson, Manuel Metzger, Philipp Knyphausen, Thomas Ramezani, Krasimir Slanchev, Christopher Kraus, Elmon Schmelzer, Matthias Hammerschmidt
Development 2016 143: 2077-2088; doi: 10.1242/dev.130492
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish combines mechanisms of wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals
Rebecca Richardson, Manuel Metzger, Philipp Knyphausen, Thomas Ramezani, Krasimir Slanchev, Christopher Kraus, Elmon Schmelzer, Matthias Hammerschmidt
Development 2016 143: 2077-2088; doi: 10.1242/dev.130492

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Hes1 overexpression leads to expansion of embryonic neural stem cell pool and stem cell reservoir in the postnatal brain
  • Oxygen regulates epithelial stem cell proliferation via RhoA-actomyosin-YAP/TAZ signal in mouse incisor
  • SMAD2 promotes myogenin expression and terminal myogenic differentiation
Show more STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Stem cells & regeneration

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

A new society for regenerative biologists

Kenneth Poss and Elly Tanaka announce the launch of the International Society for Regenerative Biology (ISRB), which will promote research and education in the field of regenerative biology.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


An interview with Cagney Coomer

Over a virtual chat, we spoke to Cagney Coomer about her experiences in the lab, the classroom and the community centre, and why she thinks outreach and role models are vital to science.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992