Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Feedback
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Tbx3 represses bmp4 expression and, with Pax6, is required and sufficient for retina formation
Zahra Motahari, Reyna I. Martinez-De Luna, Andrea S. Viczian, Michael E. Zuber
Development 2016 143: 3560-3572; doi: 10.1242/dev.130955
Zahra Motahari
1The Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reyna I. Martinez-De Luna
1The Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea S. Viczian
1The Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
3Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
4Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrea S. Viczian
  • For correspondence: zuberm@upstate.edu vicziana@upstate.edu
Michael E. Zuber
1The Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
3Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael E. Zuber
  • For correspondence: zuberm@upstate.edu vicziana@upstate.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Vertebrate eye formation begins in the anterior neural plate in the eye field. Seven eye field transcription factors (EFTFs) are expressed in eye field cells and when expressed together are sufficient to generate retina from pluripotent cells. The EFTF Tbx3 can regulate the expression of some EFTFs; however, its role in retina formation is unknown. Here, we show that Tbx3 represses bmp4 transcription and is required in the eye field for both neural induction and normal eye formation in Xenopus laevis. Although sufficient for neural induction, Tbx3-expressing pluripotent cells only form retina in the context of the eye field. Unlike Tbx3, the neural inducer Noggin can generate retina both within and outside the eye field. We found that the neural and retina-inducing activity of Noggin requires Tbx3. Noggin, but not Tbx3, induces Pax6 and coexpression of Tbx3 and Pax6 is sufficient to determine pluripotent cells to a retinal lineage. Our results suggest that Tbx3 represses bmp4 expression and maintains eye field neural progenitors in a multipotent state; then, in combination with Pax6, Tbx3 causes eye field cells to form retina.

INTRODUCTION

Normal brain development requires the coordinated activity of both extrinsic and intrinsic regulators. These factors first repress bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling in the early ectoderm to induce the formation of multipotent neural progenitor cells, then specify and determine the neural plate to form distinct regions of the adult nervous system. High levels of BMP signaling specify epidermis, while low BMP signaling results in a neural fate. Excessive bmp4 expression in the anterior neural plate results in a reduction or total absence of anterior neural structures, including eyes (Hartley et al., 2001, 2002). Noggin, and other BMP antagonists, bind BMP and prevent it from activating BMP receptors (Lamb et al., 1993; Re'em-Kalma et al., 1995). Noggin may also indirectly regulate bmp4 transcription, since BMP4 protein can regulate its own transcription in a positive-autoregulatory feedback loop (Jones et al., 1992; Schmidt et al., 1995; Hammerschmidt et al., 1996; Piccolo et al., 1997; Gammill and Sive, 2000; Gestri et al., 2005). Together, these activities result in pluripotent ectoderm cells being determined to form multipotent neural, then retinal progenitors. Noggin not only drives pluripotent cells to form retina in the context of the eye field, but also determines cells to form retina on the embryonic flank and even in culture (Lan et al., 2009; Viczian et al., 2009; Wong et al., 2015).

In Xenopus laevis, the eye field transcription factor Tbx3 was originally identified as ET (eye T-box) (Li et al., 1997). Of the eye field transcription factors, Tbx3 has the most restricted eye field expression domain and is expressed prior to all EFTFs except Six3 (Zuber et al., 2003). Tbx3 functions downstream of Noggin and upstream of other EFTFs, and is a necessary component of the eye field transcription factor network sufficient to induce ectopic and functional eyes (Zuber et al., 2003; Viczian et al., 2009). In direct contrast to other EFTFs, Tbx3 misexpression does not induce ectopic retina or even enlarge the retina in Xenopus embryos (Mathers et al., 1997; Andreazzoli et al., 1999; Chow et al., 1999; Zuber et al., 1999; Bernier et al., 2000; Takabatake et al., 2002; Wong et al., 2002). Tbx3 is important for both the establishment and maintenance of stem cell pluripotency and can inhibit differentiation of progenitor cells, yet its role in early eye formation has not been determined (Davenport et al., 2003; Ivanova et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2011).

Here, we report that during early neural development, Tbx3 represses bmp4 expression and maintains eye field cells in a multipotent neural progenitor state. Our results suggest that the local environment, not Tbx3, determines the differentiated fate of Tbx3-induced neural progenitor cells. We show that Tbx3, like Noggin, is a neural inducer, and the ability of Noggin to drive neural and retinal formation is Tbx3 dependent. The repressor activity of Tbx3 is required for proper patterning of the anterior neural plate at eye field stages and retinal progenitor cells lacking Tbx3 die during retinal development, resulting in abnormal eye formation. Lastly, we show that, together, Tbx3 and Pax6 are sufficient for retinal determination. Our results indicate that Tbx3 is important for maintaining neural progenitors of the early eye field in a multipotent state, allowing them to respond to local cues that determine a retinal fate.

RESULTS

Tbx3 and Pax6 are the only EFTFs sufficient to drive pluripotent cells to a retinal lineage in the context of the eye field

We asked which EFTFs can specify retina by injecting both blastomeres of 2-cell staged embryos with EFTFs and YFP, then transplanted donor animal cap cells to the stage 15 eye field of host embryos. We then sectioned the resulting retinas and analyzed the expression of the rod photoreceptor marker XAP-2 (animal cap transplant to eye field, ACT→EF, Fig. 1) (Harris and Messersmith, 1992; Viczian et al., 2009; Viczian and Zuber, 2010). Transplanted cells isolated from embryos expressing YFP only, or YFP with Otx2, Rax, Six3, Six6 or Nr2e1, formed only epidermis (Fig. 1B,C and not shown). Only tbx3 and pax6 were sufficient to specify retinal cells (Fig. 1B,E,F). The number of embryos with donor cells forming retina was greater with tbx3 than pax6 (Fig. 1B, tbx3 35%; pax6 12%). In contrast, both noggin (nog) and the complete EFTF cocktail (otx2 and the EFTFs tbx3, pax6, rax, six3, six6 and nr2e1), efficiently specified retina (Fig. 1B,D; noggin, 80%; EFTF cocktail, 83%). Taken together, these results indicate that only Tbx3 and Pax6 are competent to specify pluripotent cells to a retinal lineage in the context of the eye field (Zuber et al., 2003; Viczian et al., 2009).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Tbx3 is sufficient to specify pluripotent cells to a retinal lineage. (A) Schematic illustrating the animal cap transplant (ACT) to eye field assay (ACT→EF; Viczian and Zuber, 2010). (B) Histogram showing the percentage of tadpoles in which transplanted cells formed retina in response to the expression of YFP only, YFP with the indicated EFTF, an EFTF cocktail or Noggin (YFP only, 500 pg; Otx2, 25 pg; Tbx3, 50 pg; Rax, 50 pg; Pax6, 100 pg; Six3, 25 pg; Six6, 25 pg; Nr2e1, 25 pg; EFTF cocktail; Noggin, 2.5 pg). (C-F) Sections of tadpoles receiving transplants expressing (C) YFP and (D) Noggin, (E) Pax6 or (F) Tbx3. XAP-2 (red), DAPI (blue) and YFP (green) detect rod photoreceptors, nuclei and transplanted cells, respectively. Dorsal is up. N=2; n≥40; *P≤0.05. Scale bar: 50 μm.

Tbx3 is required for normal eye formation

Tbx3 is expressed in the anterior neural plate at eye field stages (Li et al., 1997; Wong et al., 2002; Zuber et al., 2003; Weidgang et al., 2013). We used in situ hybridization to more precisely define the tbx3 expression pattern (Fig. S1). Although detected in previously unreported tissues, the expression pattern of tbx3 was consistent with a role in eye field specification (Fig. S1A-H). In addition, we discovered both tbx3 homeologs are expressed in the developing eye field (Fig. S1I). We used tbx3-specific morpholinos (MOs) to determine whether Tbx3 is required for normal eye formation. Tbx3MO-LS targets a sequence predicted to inhibit translation of both tbx3 homeologs (light blue, Fig. 2A; Fig. S2), whereas Tbx3MO-S only targets tbx3.S (dark blue, Fig. 2A; Fig. S2). Because antibodies recognizing Xenopus laevis Tbx3 are not available, we generated fusion constructs to test the translation blocking ability of the morpholinos (Fig. 2B; Fig. S2C-H″). Tbx3MO-LS inhibited translation of both Tbx3.L and Tbx3.S, while Tbx3MO-S only inhibited Tbx3.S expression (Fig. 2B; Fig. S2C-H″).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Tbx3 is required for normal eye formation. Design and test of Tbx3 morpholino activity. (A) Comparison of X. laevis tbx3.L and tbx3.S homeologs showing the position of morpholino target sequences. (B) Western blots were used to detect the expression of YFP and β-actin (loading control) in extracts prepared from embryos injected at the 2-cell stage (both blastomeres) with 10 ng of the indicated morpholino and Tbx3.L/.S-YFP RNA. (C-E) Injected side of tadpoles treated with 10 ng CoMO (C), Tbx3MO-S (D) or Tbx3MO-LS (E). (F) Uninjected side of tadpole in E. (G,H) The percentage reduction in eye size was determined by comparing the dorsoventral (D/V) eye diameter on the uninjected and injected sides. Histograms show eye diameter reduction in tadpoles injected with YFP RNA and the indicated morpholino (G) or combination of morpholinos (H). N=2; n≥29; ****P<0.0001; ns, not significant. Scale bar: 200 μm.

Embryos unilaterally injected into one dorsal blastomere (D1) at the 8-cell stage with MOs were grown to stage 43 tadpoles for analysis (Fig. 2C-F). The eye on the injected side of tadpoles treated with 10 ng of CoMO or Tbx3MO-S morpholino were indistinguishable from control, wild-type embryos (Fig. 2C,D). In contrast, injection with 10 ng of Tbx3MO-LS morpholino reduced eye size in 94% of tadpoles (Fig. 2E).

Eye size varied little in wild-type, uninjected tadpoles or embryos injected with YFP, CoMO or Tbx3MO-S (Fig. 2G). In contrast, knockdown with Tbx3MO-LS reduced dorsoventral eye diameter by 29±1.6% (Fig. 2G). Similar effects were observed in the anteroposterior eye width (Fig. S2I). In addition to the reduction in overall eye diameter, the lens diameter and pigmentation of the RPE were also noticeably reduced. Injection into non-retinogenic blastomeres did not alter eye formation (V1, 0%, n=65; D2, 0%, n=58; V2, 0%, n=63, not shown) (Moody and Kline, 1990).

To determine if both homeologs were required, we co-injected MOs at suboptimal levels. When injected individually, 5 ng of either MO did not alter eye size significantly (Fig. 2H). Co-injection of CoMO with Tbx3MO-S or Tbx3MO-LS (10 ng total) also did not alter eye size (Fig. 2H). However, injection of Tbx3MO-S and Tbx3MO-LS together synergistically reduced both the dorsoventral and anteroposterior eye diameter relative to controls (Fig. 2H, DV 21±1.6%; Fig. S2J, AP 11±1.6%).

To confirm the reduction in eye size produced by Tbx3 knockdown was due to an eye field-specific reduction of Tbx3, we injected Tbx3MO-LS into the most retinogenic dorsal blastomeres of 16- and 32-cell staged embryos (Moody, 1987a,b; Huang and Moody, 1993). Tbx3MO-LS reduced eye size in 57% of embryos injected into blastomere D1.1 at the 16-cell stage (n=35) and 75% of embryos injected in D1.1.1 at the 32-cell stage (n=24; data not shown). Finally, as an independent test to confirm eye defects were caused by Tbx3 knockdown, we generated a MO targeting the exon 1 splice donor sites of both tbx3.L and tbx3.S (Tbx3MO-SP), resulting in an in-frame stop codon in the unspliced transcripts (Fig. S3A,B). Injection of Tbx3MO-SP increased the amount of unspliced tbx3.L and tbx3.S transcripts and resulted in eye defects similar to those observed with Tbx3MO-LS (Fig. S3C-H). Together, these results indicate that eye field expression of Tbx3 is required for normal eye formation, and either Tbx3.L or Tbx3.S may be sufficient for eye formation.

Tbx3 is required for the neural and retinal-specifying activity of Noggin

To determine whether Tbx3 knockdown altered the retina-specifying activity of Noggin, we repeated the experiments of Fig. 1, but co-injected Tbx3MO-LS (for simplicity, referred to as Tbx3MO from here on) with Noggin and asked if cells formed retina). Cells injected with YFP alone, with CoMO or with Tbx3MO never formed retina (Fig. 3A-C). Transplantation of donor cells expressing Noggin, however, generated mosaic retinas in 89% of animals (Fig. 3D,G). Although co-injection of CoMO did not significantly alter retina-inducing activity of Noggin (76%, P=0.32; Fig. 3E,G), Tbx3MO significantly reduced the number of embryos with YFP+ mosaic retinas (22%, P≤0.001; Fig. 3F,G). To determine if Tbx3MO blocked both the neural, as well as retinal-inducing activity of Noggin, we evaluated expression of Class II β-tubulin (Tubb2b) (Moody et al., 1996). Tubb2b protein was detected in the inner and outer plexiform layers (Fig. 3H,H′). The processes of retinal neurons generated from Noggin-expressing pluripotent cells expressed Tubb2b (Fig. 3I,I′). Surprisingly, Tbx3MO dramatically reduced the expression of Tubb2b in transplants derived from Noggin-expressing cells (Fig. 3J,J′). Together, these results suggest Tbx3 is required for the ability of Noggin to specify pluripotent cells to both a retinal and neural fate in the context of the eye field.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Tbx3 knockdown inhibits the retinal- and neural-inducing activity of Noggin. (A-F) Retinal sections of tadpoles that received grafts at stage 15 (ACT→EF). (A-C) Donor cells expressed (A) YFP only, or were co-injected with (B) CoMO or (C) Tbx3MO-LS (Tbx3MO). (D-F) Donor cells expressed (D) YFP plus Noggin (Nog) alone, or in combination with (E) CoMO or (F) Tbx3MO. (G) Histogram showing the average percentage of tadpoles in which donor cells formed retina. (H-J′) Retinas of tadpoles receiving donor cells expressing (H,H′) YFP alone, or in combination with (I,I′) Noggin or (J,J′) Noggin with Tbx3MO. Staining marks nuclei (DAPI; blue), donor-derived cells (YFP; green) and neural tissue (Tubb2b; red). Dashed line in J and J′ indicates location of donor cells. Dorsal side up. N=3; n≥40; ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. Scale bar: 50 μm.

Tbx3 is a neural inducer, but unlike Noggin, is not sufficient to determine retina, yet is required for retinal determination of ectopically grafted eye fields

To further test the hypothesis that Tbx3 is required for both neural- and retinal-inducing activities of Noggin, we transplanted animal cap donor cells to the flank of stage 15 host embryos (ACT→Flank), which were then grown to tadpoles. YFP-expressing donor cells only generated epidermis (Fig. 4A,A′,F,K; Fig. S4A). Tbx3-expressing donor cells formed non-pigmented spheres that expressed the neural marker Tubb2b in 83% of transplants (Fig. 4B,B′,G,P; Fig. S4B), but never the rod photoreceptor marker XAP-2 (Fig. 4L,Q). Noggin-expressing controls generated pigmented, ectopic eye-like structures in 35% (YFP) and 33% (YFP+CoMO) of donor transplants (Fig. 4C-D′; Fig. S4C,D), which expressed both Tubb2b (Fig. 4H,I,P) and XAP-2, markers (Fig. 4M,N,Q), and had a morphology consistent with retina formation (Fig. 4M,N). In contrast, donor cells with Noggin and Tbx3MO formed a more lightly pigmented tissue mass, suggesting Tbx3 knockdown resulted in a change from a neural and retinal, to cement gland fate (Fig. 4E,E′,J,O; Fig. S4E). Consistent with this interpretation, transplants were labeled with the cement gland marker Erythrina cristagalli lectin (ECL; Fig. S5) (Turton et al., 2004). Tbx3 knockdown reduced the ability of Noggin to induce both neural (Fig. 4J,P) and retinal markers (Fig. 4O,Q) by 78-80%, resulting in the cells taking on a more anterior, non-neural, cement gland morphology.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Tbx3 induces neural but not retinal tissue and is required for Noggin to determine pluripotent cells to a neural and retinal fate. (A-O) Donor cells expressing the indicated RNAs and morpholinos were grafted to the flank of stage 15 host embryos (ACT→Flank). Arrowheads (A-E′) indicate location of grafted cells in brightfield (A-E) and YFP fluorescence (A′-E′) images. Dashed boxes in A-E outline magnified regions in A′-E′. Sections are stained for YFP (F-O, green), the neural marker Tubb2b (F-J, orange) and rod photoreceptor marker, XAP-2 (K-O, red). (P,Q) Histograms showing percentage of donor transplants that were YFP+/Tubb2b+ or YFP+/XAP-2+. (R-Z) Donor eye fields expressing YFP only, with CoMO or Tbx3MO were transplanted to the flank of stage 15 host embryos (EF→Flank). R′-T′ show the location of YFP fluorescence in the flank of embryos in R-T. DAPI-labeled tadpole sections were stained for YFP (green) and Tubb2b (U-W, orange) or XAP-2 (X-Z, red). N=2; n≥39; *P≤0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. Scale bars: 400 μm (E′,T), 50 μm (Z).

We next asked whether Tbx3 knockdown has the same effect on intrinsic (rather than Noggin-induced) eye field cells (EF→Flank). Stage 15 eye field cells from embryos injected in one blastomere at the 8-cell stage with YFP alone, or with CoMO or Tbx3MO, were transplanted to the flank of host embryos. Eye field fragments isolated from YFP-only control or CoMO-injected embryos formed ectopic eyes, including retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE), in 90% and 85% of flank transplants, respectively (Fig. 4R,S). In contrast, YFP-positive donor eye field cells from Tbx3MO-injected embryos were never pigmented or laminated (Fig. 4T). Only 27% and 25% of the structures expressed Tubb2b or XAP-2, respectively (Fig. 4W,Z). Transplanted cells were disorganized and regions expressing either Tubb2b or XAP-2 were YFP negative. Eight-cell stage injection labels most, but not all donor eye field cells, therefore YFP-negative regions most likely originated from donor eye field cells that did not receive Tbx3MO. These results suggest that Tbx3 is a neural inducer, sufficient to determine pluripotent cells to a neural, but not retinal lineage. Furthermore, Noggin requires Tbx3 to generate both neural and retinal tissues from pluripotent cells.

Tbx3 specifies spinal cord but not retina, while Noggin-expressing cells remain determined to form retina in posterior neural plate transplants

Tbx3-expressing cells formed retina when transplanted to the stage 15 eye field, but not in the stage 15 flank. To test whether the neural plate provides a factor(s) necessary for retina formation that is not present in the flank, we generated ectodermal explants as before, but transplanted the Tbx3-expressing animal cap cells to the stage 15 posterior neural plate instead (ACT→PNP). Transplanted cells only generated epidermis when grafted into the posterior neural plate (Fig. 5A). Cells expressing Noggin generated ectopic eye-like structures in 61% of the transplants (Fig. 5B). Tbx3-expressing donor cells never generated ectopic eye-like structures (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Tbx3-expressing cells are specified to a spinal cord, not retinal fate when transplanted to the posterior neural plate. (A-L) Ectodermal explants expressing the indicated RNAs were transplanted to the posterior neural plate of stage 15 embryos and grown to tadpoles (ACT→PNP). Arrowheads (A-C) indicate location of YFP donor tissue. (D-L) Donor cells expressing YFP alone (D,G,J) or with Noggin (E,H,K) or Tbx3 (F,I,L). Sections were stained to detect neural (Tubb2b, orange, D-F), retinal (XAP-2, red, G-I) and spinal cord (Sox2, magenta, ventricular zone; Islet-1/2, yellow, Rohon-Beard and motor neuron, J-L) cells. DAPI (blue) and YFP (green) label nuclei and donor cells, respectively. To better visualize cell fate markers, D′-L′ insets show D-L without YFP channel. (M) Histogram showing the percentage of host embryos expressing the indicated markers in mosaic spinal cords. (N) Ectodermal explants isolated from stage 9 embryos injected bilaterally at the 2-cell stage with the indicated RNA were cultured in vitro to stage 21. RT-PCR was used to detect ncam1, tubb2b, t (xbra), actc1 and histone H4 (h4: loading control). Whole embryos processed with (WE) and without (WE-RT) reverse transcriptase served as positive and negative controls, respectively, N=2; n≥32; ns, not significant. Scale bars: 400 μm (C), 100 μm (L).

To determine the differentiated fate of donor cells, we analyzed the presence of neural, retinal and spinal cord markers in stage 43 tadpoles. In controls, Tubb2b stains the bilaterally symmetrical spinal cord (Fig. 5D). In the enlarged Tubb2b-expressing spinal cord, in addition to ectopic eye-like structures, Noggin-expressing donor cells were present and often distorted the normal symmetry of the tissue (Fig. 5E,M). Although no ectopic eyes were detected in tadpoles that received transplants expressing Tbx3, 88% of the spinal cords were mosaic and 86% expressed Tubb2b (Fig. 5F,M). Noggin-expressing donor cells expressed XAP-2 and rod photoreceptor outer segments in 76% of transplants (Fig. 5H,M). Despite being transplanted to the neural plate, neither control nor Tbx3-expressing cells ever expressed XAP-2 and no evidence of RPE, rod outer segments or lamination was detected (Fig. 5G,I,M).

To determine if transplanted tissues were being specified to spinal cord, we looked for expression of Sox2 and islet proteins (Fig. 5J-L). In the spinal cord, Sox2 is expressed in the ventricular zone (Gaete et al., 2012) (Fig. 5J). Islet-1/2 is expressed in the dorsal Rohon-Beard cells and ventral motor neurons (MNs) (Diez del Corral and Storey, 2001; Olesnicky et al., 2010; Yajima et al., 2014) (Fig. 5J; Fig. S6). Noggin-expressing, YFP-positive donor cells were co-labeled with antibodies against both Sox2 and Islet-1/2 in 91% and 57% of transplants, respectively (Fig. 5K,M; Fig. S6). Islet-1/2-expressing cells are present at positions consistent with the location of motor neurons, as well as throughout the majority of the donor tissue (Fig. 5K; Fig. S6). Expression of the rod photoreceptor marker in these same regions (Fig. 5H) suggests the majority of the stained cells distant from the midline may be retinal ganglion, amacrine, bipolar and/or horizontal cells. Donor cells expressing Tbx3 also expressed Sox2 and Islet-1/2, but in a more restricted expression pattern that is consistent with the expected location of spinal neurons. YFP+/Sox2+ cells were detected in the ventricular zone in 85% of transplants, while YFP+/Islet-1/2+ cells (78% of transplants) were observed in regions consistent with the location of the ventral motor neurons (Fig. 5L,M; Fig. S6).

To determine whether the induction of neural markers occurs in culture, in contrast to grafting Tbx3-expressing cells into an embryo, explants were grown in culture and analyzed for the expression of the neural markers neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (ncam1) and tubb2b at the equivalent of stage 21. Tbx3 was sufficient to induce expression of both ncam1 and tubb2b, while Noggin strongly induced only ncam1 (Fig. 5N). To determine if Tbx3 induced neural markers directly, or indirectly through mesoderm induction, we analyzed the expression of the pan-mesodermal marker xbra, and the dorsal mesoderm marker cardiac muscle α-actin 1 (actc1). Neither Noggin, nor Tbx3 induced mesodermal markers, indicating that both are direct neural inducers (Fig. 5N).

Together, these results indicate that Tbx3, like Noggin, induces neural tissue directly. However, unlike Noggin, Tbx3 is unable to determine pluripotent cells to a retinal lineage outside the eye field, even when cells are transplanted to other regions of the neural plate (ACT→PNP).

Tbx3 represses bmp4 expression in pluripotent cells and the anterior neural plate during eye field specification

Noggin can repress bmp4 expression. Since Tbx3 is required for the neural- and retinal-inducing activity of Noggin and both Noggin and Tbx3 are neural inducers, we asked if Tbx3 could also repress bmp4. All YFP-expressing explants express bmp4 (Fig. 6A). In contrast, bmp4 expression was reduced in explants expressing either Noggin or Tbx3 (Fig. 6B,C). Prior to gastrulation, bmp4 expression is detected in the dorsal ectoderm (future neural plate) but by stage 12.5, expression is excluded from the neural plate and detected in more anterior and ventrolateral regions of the embryo (Fig. 6D). Unilateral expression of either Noggin or Tbx3 reduced bmp4 expression on the injected side of embryos (Fig. 6E,F).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Noggin and Tbx3 repress bmp4 expression in vitro and in vivo. bmp4 expression was detected by in situ hybridization in ectodermal explants and intact embryos. (A-C,G-N) Ectodermal explants were isolated at stage 9 from embryos injected bilaterally at the 2-cell stage with the indicated RNA. Explants were left untreated (A-C,G-J) until stage 22, or treated from stage 15 with dexamethasone (K-N). The percentage of explants with reduced bmp4 expression is indicated, N=4; n≥36. (D-F,O-V) 4-cell stage embryos were injected in one dorsal blastomere with the indicated RNA. Embryos were left untreated (D-F,O-R) until stage 12.5, or treated from stage 9 with dexamethasone (S-V). The percentage with reduced bmp4 expression is indicated, N=3; n≥48. (V) 100% of embryos showed posterior ectopic bmp4 expression (arrow), while 73% showed reduced bmp4 expression anteriorly. RNA injected: 500 pg YFP, 2.5 pg Noggin, 50 pg Tbx3, 100 pg Tbx3-GR, 250 pg DBD-EnR-GR, 5 pg VP16-DBD-GR (doubled for explants). Dorsal view, anterior toward the bottom. Scale bars: 200 μm (N), 400 μm (V).

To determine if the ability of Noggin to repress bmp4 expression is also dependent on Tbx3, we isolated ectodermal explants from embryos expressing Noggin in the presence or absence of Tbx3 MOs. Neither control MO nor Tbx3MO alone altered the expression of bmp4 relative to YFP-expressing explants (Fig. S7A-C). Noggin repressed bmp4 expression in 91% and 81% of explants when expressed alone or with control MO, respectively (Fig. S7D,E). When Noggin was injected with Tbx3MO, however, bmp4 expression recovered and was repressed in only 37% of explants (Fig. S7F), indicating that Tbx3 is also necessary for the ability of Noggin to repress bmp4 expression.

To determine how Tbx3 regulates bmp4 expression, we generated repressor and activator versions. To avoid disrupting possible roles of Tbx3 function prior to eye field stages, hormone-inducible versions were generated using the ligand binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and activated by dexamethasone treatment (Kolm and Sive, 1995). Dexamethasone did not alter bmp4 expression in explants of pluripotent cells (compare Fig. 6G with K). Fusion of the entire coding region of Tbx3 to GR (Tbx3-GR) renders Tbx3 activity dexamethasone dependent. Bmp4 expression was unaltered by Tbx3-GR expression (Fig. 6H), but hormone treatment reduced expression in 87% of explants (Fig. 6L). Similar results were obtained using only the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of Tbx3 fused to the engrailed repressor domain and GR (DBD-EnR-GR). In explants expressing DBD-EnR-GR, bmp4 expression was reduced in only 8% of explants (Fig. 6I), but reduction of expression increased to 91% when treated with hormone (Fig. 6M). No change in bmp4 expression was detected when Tbx3 was fused to the transactivation domain of VP16 (VP16-DBD-GR) (Fig. 6N). In explants expressing VP16-DBD-GR, Bmp4 was detected throughout explants with or without dexamethasone treatment (compare Fig. 6J with N). Together, these results suggest that Tbx3 functions as a transcriptional repressor and is necessary for Noggin to repress bmp4 expression in cultured explants.

We next asked if Tbx3-GR, DBD-EnR-GR and VP16-DBD-GR can regulate bmp4 expression in vivo. Embryos were injected unilaterally, treated with hormone to activate the fusion constructs and analyzed at early eye field stage (12.5). Dexamethasone did not alter the expression pattern of bmp4 in control, YFP-injected embryos (compare Fig. 6O with S). In contrast, the frequency of bmp4 repression was nearly 5-fold greater with hormone treatment in embryos expressing either Tbx3-GR (compare Fig. 6P with T) or DBD-EnR-GR (compare Fig. 6Q with U). VP16-DBD-GR did not alter the expression pattern of bmp4 in any of the untreated embryos (Fig. 6R). In contrast to explants, however, dexamethasone treatment dramatically altered the expression pattern of bmp4 in VP16-DVD-GR-expressing embryos. We observed ectopic expression in the posterior neural plate and reduced expression anterior to the neural plate (Fig. 6V). These results suggest that both Noggin and Tbx3 repress bmp4 expression, and can do so both in isolated ectodermal explants as well as in the anterior neural plate during eye field specification.

The repressor activity of Tbx3 is required for normal neural patterning during eye field stages and for eye formation

Continuous inhibition of BMP signaling is required for normal anterior neural development (Hartley et al., 2001; Gestri et al., 2005) and Tbx3 represses bmp4 transcription (Fig. 6). To determine if normal anterior neural patterning is regulated by Tbx3 activity, we assessed the effects of DBD-EnR-GR and VP16-DBD-GR on eye field (rax and pax6), forebrain and midbrain (otx2), prospective telencephalon (foxg1) and cement gland (ag1) markers. In the absence of dexamethasone, marker expression patterns were unaltered (Fig. 7 and not shown). In contrast, activation of DBD-EnR-GR by dexamethasone treatment starting at stage 12.5 resulted in an expansion of the rax, pax6, otx2 and to a lesser extent foxg1 expression domains (Fig. 7H-K), while the expression domain of the cement gland marker ag1 was reduced in most embryos (Fig. 7L). Activation of VP16-DBD-GR had the opposite effect. rax, pax6, otx2 and foxg1 expression domains were either reduced or completely lost (Fig. 7N-Q), while the ag1 expression domain appeared diffuse in most embryos (Fig. 7R).

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Tbx3 repressor activity is required at eye field stages for normal neural patterning and eye formation. (A-R) In situ hybridization was used to detect changes in rax, pax6, otx2, foxg1 and ag1 transcript levels at stage 15. Eight-cell embryos were injected in one blastomere with β-gal alone (150 pg, A-F), and in combination with DBD-EnR-GR (12.5 pg, G-K; 50 pg, L) or VP16-DBD-GR (5 pg, M-R) RNA. At stage 12.5, embryos were untreated (A,G,M) or treated with dexamethasone (B-F, H-L and N-R). The percentage showing a change in expression is indicated, N=2; n≥41. (S-Z) The repressor activity of Tbx3 is required at eye field stages for normal eye formation. Control (S-V)- and VP16-DBD-GR (W-Z)-injected embryos were untreated (S,W) or treated with dexamethasone starting at the indicated stage. (AA) Histogram shows the percentage of tadpoles with the indicated eye defects, N=2; n≥35. Scale bars: 300 μm (R), 400 μm (Z).

To determine if, and when, the repressor activity of Tbx3 was required for normal eye formation, we activated the VP16-DBD-GR protein in embryos at different time points, grew embryos to tadpoles, and determined the effect on eye formation. YFP alone had no detectable effect on eye formation, both in the absence and presence of dexamethasone (Fig. 7S-V). The eyes of embryos injected with VP16-DBD-GR without dexamethasone were only slightly smaller on the injected side in some tadpoles (Fig. 7W,AA). By contrast, VP16-DBD-GR activation with dexamethasone starting at stage 12.5, resulted in eyeless embryos 77% and coloboma 23% of the time, respectively (Fig. 7X,AA). The frequency and severity of eye defects was reduced when dexamethasone treatment was started at later developmental stages (stg. 15, 20, 24), with relatively little effect on eye formation after eye field stages (Fig. 7Y,Z,AA). Therefore, the repressor activity of Tbx3 is required at eye field stages (stg. 12.5-15) not only for reducing bmp4 expression, but also for normal anterior neural patterning and eye formation.

To address why Tbx3 knockdown in eye field cells results in eye defects, we grafted eye field cells from YFP+ donor embryos injected at the 8-cell stage to wild-type host eye fields when they reached stage 15 (Fig. S8). When eye field cells containing YFP and YFP/CoMO were grafted, the eyes developed normally and YFP+ donor cells could be detected in the eyes of living and sectioned retinas (Fig. S8A-L). In contrast, eyes were smaller and YFP fluorescence was significantly reduced with grafts of YFP/Tbx3MO-expressing eye field cells (Fig. S8M-R). By stage 39, YFP fluorescence was noticeably reduced in live embryos and by stage 43, the total volume of YFP+ donor cells in sectioned retinas was reduced to less than 5% of that in controls (Fig. S8S,T). No increase in YFP fluorescence was detected elsewhere in the embryos, suggesting the reduction in retinal YFP expression observed in YFP/Tbx3MO grafts, was not due to cell migration.

To determine if cell death might explain the loss of donor eye field cells following Tbx3 knockdown, we tested for apoptosis using TUNEL (Fig. 8). At optic vesicle stage (stg. 22) YFP-positive donor cells were present, vesicle morphology appeared normal, and no TUNEL-positive cells were detected in transplants derived from untreated, CoMO- or Tbx3MO-LS-injected hosts (Fig. 8A,A′,E,E′,I,I′,M). In contrast, from stage 25 to 39, there was a significant increase in the number of TUNEL-positive donor eye field cells transplanted from host embryos injected with Tbx3MO-LS (Fig. 8M). In addition, lens and eye formation appeared delayed at these stages, and eyes were smaller in embryos receiving YFP/Tbx3MO-LS eye field transplants (Compare Fig. 8B-D′ and F-H′ to J-L′). A similar number of TUNEL-positive cells were present at stage 35 when the splice-blocking morpholino Tbx3MO-SP was used to knockdown Tbx3 expression in donor eye field cells (Fig. 8N). We conclude that knockdown of Tbx3 in eye field cells resulted in their death during the late optic vesicle and optic cup stages of eye development.

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Tbx3 knockdown results in retinal progenitor apoptosis and eye defects. Eye field cells isolated from embryos expressing YFP (A-D′), CoMO (E-H′) or Tbx3MO-LS (I-L′) were grafted into the eye field of untreated embryos (EF→EF). TUNEL staining was used to detect cell death of the transplanted (YFP-positive) cells at stage 22 (A,A′,E,E′,I,I′), 25 (B,B′,F,F′,J,J′), 35 (C,C′,G,G′,K,K′), and 39 (D,D′,H,H′,L,L′). Dotted lines indicate the outline of the optic vesicle (stgs 22 and 25), optic cup and lens (stgs 35 and 39). (M) Line graph indicates the number of TUNEL-positive donor (YFP-positive) cells per unit volume of transplanted cells as a function of developmental stage. (N) Number of TUNEL/YFP double-positive cells per unit volume that were detected in the stage 35 retina of tadpoles that received eye field transplants from embryos injected with YFP only, CoMO, Tbx3MO-LS and Tbx3MO-SP at stage 15. Dorsal retina is the top of each panel. Graphs show mean±s.e.m.; N=3, n≥9; **P≤0.01, ***P≤0.001, ****P≤0.0001. Scale bar: 50 μm.

Neither is sufficient, but together Tbx3 and Pax6 can determine retina

We previously demonstrated that Noggin induces pax6 transcription, while Tbx3 does not (Zuber et al., 2003). We asked if together, Tbx3 and Pax6 could generate retina from pluripotent cells (Fig. 9). Similar to YFP alone (Fig. 9A,F), Pax6-expressing cells generated skin epidermis in flank transplants (Fig. 9B,G). Neither the neural marker Tubb2b nor the rod photoreceptor marker rod transducin were present in YFP (Fig. 9K,P,U) or Pax6-expressing cells (Fig. 9L,Q,U). Despite the fact that Tbx3 induced Tubb2b, rod transducin (Gαt1) was never detected (Fig. 9C,H,M,R,U). In striking contrast, co-expression of Pax6 with Tbx3 not only induced the expression of rod transducin, but cells expressing Tbx3 and Pax6 organized into an eye-like structure (Fig. 9D,I,N). Rod transducin-expressing cells were detected adjacent to the pigmented RPE (Fig. 9I,N,S), similar to expression observed in the ectopic eyes generated from Noggin-expressing cells (Fig. 9E,J,O,T,U). These results suggest, that in addition to inhibiting BMP signaling, Noggin (but not Tbx3) also induces Pax6 expression, and this induction is sufficient, when combined with Tbx3, to drive retinal determination (Fig. 9V).

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Together, Tbx3 and Pax6 are sufficient to determine retina from pluripotent cells. (A-T) Pluripotent cells isolated from embryos injected with the indicated RNAs were transplanted to the flank of stage 15 embryos then grown to tadpoles (ACT→Flank). Arrowheads (A-E) show location of transplant (green fluorescence, A′-E′). (F-T) Sections were stained for a neural marker (Tubb2b, orange), rod photoreceptor marker transducin (Gαt1, magenta) and nuclei (DAPI, blue). (U) Percentage of transplants with YFP+/Tubb2b+ and YFP+/Gαt1+ cells, N=2; n≥29; *P≤0.05, ***P<0.001, ****P≤0.0001. (V) Schematic graphically summarizing results obtained from transplants performed in Figs 1,3-5 and 9; GOI, gene of interest. Scale bars: 400 μm (E), 50 μm (T).

DISCUSSION

We previously proposed Noggin functions upstream of Tbx3 and other EFTFs, yet little was known about the role of Tbx3 in early eye field formation (Zuber et al., 2003). Our results suggest that Noggin may repress bmp4 expression and drive retina formation by inducing tbx3 expression. However, Noggin instead represses tbx3 expression in ectodermal explants [Fig. S9A and Zuber et al. (2003)]. Otx2 blocks the repression of tbx3 by Noggin in ectodermal explants, and is coexpressed with Noggin and Tbx3 in the dorsal blastopore lip and early anterior neural plate suggesting that tbx3 might be regulated by Otx2 in these regions (Fig. S1; Pannese et al., 1995; Kablar et al., 1996; Zuber et al., 2003). However, otx2 expression does not overlap that of tbx3 during eye field specification or determination (Zuber et al., 2003). Noggin can expand the eye field expression domain of tbx3 in vivo (Fig. S9B,C). Together, these results indicate that unidentified regulator(s) are required in vivo (possibly with Noggin) to maintain Tbx3 expression in the eye field (Fig. 10). It will also be important to determine if Tbx3 is regulated by and/or required for the neural-inducing activity of other known direct neural inducers (Ozair et al., 2013).

Fig. 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 10.

Model illustrating the role of Tbx3 during eye field determination. Noggin protein binds BMP4 directly blocking BMP receptor activation in the early neural plate (light blue), which includes the presumptive eye field (dark blue). Tbx3 is required to repress bmp4 transcript levels, resulting in continued BMP inhibition in the eye field. The combined activity of Tbx3 and Pax6 is sufficient to determine the eye field to form retina. Solid and dashed lines indicate direct and possible indirect interactions, respectively.

Repression of BMP signaling during neural development

Acquisition and stabilization of a neural fate requires constant inhibition of BMP signaling in the neural plate. Since Tbx3 expression is restricted, could other T-box family members also repress BMP signaling in the neural plate? Xenopus Tbx1-Tbx5 are all expressed during neural development and have non-identical expression patterns (Li et al., 1997; Takabatake et al., 2000; Sasagawa et al., 2002; Showell et al., 2006). Tbx1 suppresses BMP signaling in the mouse hair follicle stem cell niche and cardiomyocytes, while Tbx4 and Tbx5 both repress BMP2 during chick limb development (Rodriguez-Esteban et al., 1999; Fulcoli et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2012). Tbx2, in contrast, activates BMP signaling in the mouse limb bud (Farin et al., 2013). T-box family members have complex and sometimes combinatorial roles in multiple tissues, developmental processes and species (Washkowitz et al., 2012; Papaioannou, 2014). Therefore, additional T-box family members may also regulate BMP signaling to specify and determine other regions of the developing nervous system (including the eye) in Xenopus and other species. In addition to the EFTFs Six3 and Tbx3, there is a growing number of transcription factors expressed in the early neural plate that can repress BMP signaling (Gestri et al., 2005; Moody et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2014). What remains to be determined is if other inhibitors of BMP signaling serve a Tbx3-like function during the specification and determination of other neural plate regions.

Tbx3 expression in the presumptive cement gland is also consistent with a role in BMP repression. A dorsoventral BMP signaling gradient determines neural (low signaling) versus cement gland (intermediate signaling) versus epidermal tissues (high signaling) (reviewed in Eivers et al., 2008 and Gammill and Sive, 2000; Wardle and Sive, 2003; Dickinson and Sive, 2007). Noggin strongly represses bmp4 levels in ectodermal explants, which form retina when grafted to embryos (Figs 4,6; Figs S4,S7). Co-injection of Tbx3MO with Noggin resulted in intermediate bmp4 expression and generated cement gland (Fig. 4, Figs S4,S5,S7). We hypothesize that Tbx3 expression anterior to the neural plate reduces BMP signaling to intermediate levels, thereby specifying cement gland.

Tbx3 regulates a diverse list of developmental processes, and cofactors often function with Tbx3 in a tissue-specific manner (reviewed in Washkowitz et al., 2012). Similar to our results, Tbx3 represses bmp4 expression in the mesenchyme of the mouse anterior palatal shelf and mammary gland – although direct repression was not demonstrated (Cho et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2007b). In contrast, Tbx3 activates bmp2 and bmp7 transcription during chick digit formation (Suzuki et al., 2004). Clearly, additional work is necessary to determine if Tbx3 represses bmp4 directly or via expression of a bmp4 transcriptional activator and if Tbx3 requires cofactors to reduce bmp4 levels during eye field specification and determination (Fig. 10).

Maintaining neural progenitors in a proliferative and multipotent state

For the eye to reach its normal size, neural progenitor cells of the anterior plate that eventually form the retina must remain pluripotent and continue to proliferate (reviewed in Zuber, 2010; Sinn and Wittbrodt, 2013). Tbx3 plays important roles in establishing and maintaining the pluri- and multipotency of stem and progenitor cells (Ivanova et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2007a; Lüdtke et al., 2009; Niwa et al., 2009; Han et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2011; Esmailpour and Huang, 2012). The ability of Tbx3-expressing Xenopus cells to integrate into and differentiate as anterior (retinal) or posterior (spinal cord) neural plate cells, suggests that Tbx3 maintains neural cells in a multipotent neural progenitor state. We propose that, in addition to its function as a repressor of bmp4 transcription, Tbx3 also prevents premature differentiation of eye field cells. Once a sufficient number of cells to form a normal-sized eye are generated, eye field cells can then still respond to local cues, which determine them to a retinal lineage.

Signaling required for retinal determination

Noggin is sufficient to specify and determine retina, while Tbx3 can only specify retina. We previously proposed that the EFTFs form a self-regulating feedback network that is required for retina formation (Zuber et al., 2003). The work presented here indicates that Tbx3 and Pax6 are together sufficient to initiate this network (Fig. 10). As a result of the more potent activity of Noggin, however, we propose that Tbx3 and Pax6 lack an activity provided by Noggin that potentiates and possibly secures retinal determination.

Noggin1, -2 and -4 are all expressed in the Xenopus anterior neural plate (Fletcher et al., 2004; Eroshkin et al., 2006). The expression domains and relative expression levels of the three Noggin proteins are distinct, suggesting they may have non-redundant roles during eye field determination. In addition, the ligand binding affinity of the Noggin proteins are distinct (Bayramov et al., 2011). Although Tbx3, through its role in bmp4 inhibition, may be sufficient to inhibit BMP signaling, Noggin(s) repression of Activin, Nodal and possibly Wnt signaling may be required as well (Bayramov et al., 2011; Eroshkin et al., 2016; Wong et al., 2015). It will be important to discover which Noggin proteins can determine retina in the developing embryo, the mechanisms by which they induce expression of the EFTFs, and the signaling pathways regulated by Noggin(s) that stabilize the EFTF network. In addition, identifying the distinct and possibly common transcriptional targets of Tbx3 and Pax6 will be necessary to fully understand the molecular and genetic basis of retinal determination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Outcrossed Xenopus laevis were obtained from Nasco (Fort Atkinson, WI). Embryos and tadpoles were obtained by in vitro fertilization or natural mating and staged according to Nieuwkoop and Faber (1994). The State University of New York Upstate Medical University Committee for the Humane Use of Animals approved all procedures.

Plasmids

Tbx3MO target sequences from 5′UTR of tbx3.L and tbx3.S were PCR amplified (see Table S1 for primers) from X. laevis genomic DNA (gDNA) and cloned in-frame with YFP to generate pCS2R.Tbx3.L-YFP and pCS2R.Tbx3.S-YFP. To generate pCS2R.XlTbx3GR, GR was amplified from pCS2+Tbx5-EnR-GR (Horb and Thomsen, 1999) and inserted in-frame with XlTbx3. tbx3.L DNA-binding domain amplified from pCS2.Tbx3L and EnR-GR domain from pCS2+Tbx5-EnR-GR (Horb and Thomsen, 1999) were cloned into pCS2R to create pCS2R.Tbx3LDBD-EnR-GR. RN3P-VP16-DBD-GR was obtained from Dr Takeshima (Takabatake et al., 2002). Detailed maps, construct sequences and plasmids are all available upon request.

Microinjection and tissue transplants

Tbx3 (Table S1) and control (25-N random control oligo) morpholinos were obtained from Gene Tools LLC (Philomath, OR). Capped RNA was synthesized using SP6 mMessage Machine Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Figure legends contain developmental stages and amounts of RNA/morpholino injected. For in situ hybridization, stage 15 caps [collected in 0.7× Marc's Modified Ringer's (MMR) at stage 9, from bilaterally injected 2-cell-stage embryos] were transferred to 0.1× MMR (with or without 10 μM dexamethasone) and fixed at stage 22 (Kolm and Sive, 1995); 10 μM dexamethasone was also used on whole embryos. Animal cap transplant (ACT) was performed at stage 15, as previously described (Viczian and Zuber, 2010). For eye field transplants, dorsal animal blastomeres (D1) of 8-cell staged embryos were unilaterally injected with YFP and gene(s) of interest. A central region of stage 15 donor eye field (∼1/3 of eye field) was transplanted to host after removing tissue of a similar size from the graft location.

In situ hybridization

In situ hybridizations were performed as previously described (Zuber et al., 2003). RNA probes were generated from pCS2R.Tbx3L, pBSSKII.Bmp4, pGEMTEZ.Rax, pCS2R.Pax6, pCS2.Otx2, pBSSKII.Xag1, and pCS2+.XlFoxG1 using RNA Polymerase-Plus (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Reverse transcription PCR

Total RNA was extracted from animal caps (10 per condition), dissected tissue (20 per condition) or whole embryos (5 per condition) using RNAzol RT (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) and cDNA was synthesized with M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI). See Table S1 for full list of primers used.

Western blotting

Samples were prepared as previously described using 30 μg total protein (Wong et al., 2015). Details of all primary antibodies can be found in Table S2.

Immunostaining and imaging

Sections (12 μm) of stage 43 tadpoles were stained as previously described (Viczian et al., 2003; Martinez-De Luna et al., 2013), or according to conditions in Table S2. Whole embryo and section images were captured and processed as previously described (Viczian et al., 2009). TUNEL was performed using an ApopTag(R) Red In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (EMD Millipore).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with Prism version 6.0f (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) using an ordinary one-way ANOVA, with a Bonferroni's multiple comparison test. Statistical significance was determined by P≤0.05. All graphs show mean±s.e.m. normalized to controls. Significance denoted by ns (not significant, P>0.05), *P≤0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. All successful transplants (YFP+ donor cells observed in host) were included in analyses. All analyses were performed by an experimenter blind to sample groups. N=biological replicates, n=animal number.

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Takeshima, E.M. De Robertis, N. Papalopulu, H. Sive and M. Horb/G.H. Thomsen for RN3P+VP16-DBD-GR, pBSK-.XlBmp4, pCS2+.XlFoxG1, pBSK-.Xlag1a, and pCS2+Tbx5-EnR-GR plasmids, respectively. We also thank Matthew Mellini, Robert Antalek, Jennifer Roscoe, and Karisa Rawlins for technical assistance, and Drs Dale Hunter and Francesca Pignoni for excellent suggestions on the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    Conceptualization: M.E.Z. and A.S.V.; Methodology: M.E.Z. and A.S.V.; Investigation: Z.M.; Writing - Original draft: Z.M. and M.E.Z.; Writing - Review & Editing: R.I.M-DL., A.S.V. and M.E.Z.; Visualization: Z.M., A.S.V. and M.E.Z.; Funding Acquisition: A.S.V. and M.E.Z.; Supervision: A.S.V. and M.E.Z.

  • Funding

    Portions of this work were supported by the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01 EY017964 and R01 EY015748 (M.E.Z.), R01 EY019517 (A.S.V.)]; Hendricks Bridge Grant Award (M.E.Z.); a Research to Prevent Blindness unrestricted grant to the Upstate Medical University Department of Ophthalmology; and the Lions Club of Central New York. Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.

  • Supplementary information

    Supplementary information available online at http://dev.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dev.130955.supplemental

  • Received September 20, 2015.
  • Accepted August 5, 2016.
  • © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    1. Andreazzoli, M.,
    2. Gestri, G.,
    3. Angeloni, D.,
    4. Menna, E. and
    5. Barsacchi, G.
    (1999). Role of Xrx1 in Xenopus eye and anterior brain development. Development 126, 2451-2460.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  2. ↵
    1. Bayramov, A. V.,
    2. Eroshkin, F. M.,
    3. Martynova, N. Y.,
    4. Ermakova, G. V.,
    5. Solovieva, E. A. and
    6. Zaraisky, A. G.
    (2011). Novel functions of Noggin proteins: inhibition of Activin/Nodal and Wnt signaling. Development 138, 5345-5356. doi:10.1242/dev.068908
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bernier, G.,
    2. Panitz, F.,
    3. Zhou, X.,
    4. Hollemann, T.,
    5. Gruss, P. and
    6. Pieler, T.
    (2000). Expanded retina territory by midbrain transformation upon overexpression of Six6 (Optx2) in Xenopus embryos. Mech. Dev. 93, 59-69. doi:10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00271-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Chen, T.,
    2. Heller, E.,
    3. Beronja, S.,
    4. Oshimori, N.,
    5. Stokes, N. and
    6. Fuchs, E.
    (2012). An RNA interference screen uncovers a new molecule in stem cell self-renewal and long-term regeneration. Nature 485, 104-108. doi:10.1038/nature10940
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Cho, K.-W.,
    2. Kim, J.-Y.,
    3. Song, S.-J.,
    4. Farrell, E.,
    5. Eblaghie, M. C.,
    6. Kim, H.-J.,
    7. Tickle, C. and
    8. Jung, H.-S.
    (2006). Molecular interactions between Tbx3 and Bmp4 and a model for dorsoventral positioning of mammary gland development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16788-16793. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604645103
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Chow, R. L.,
    2. Altmann, C. R.,
    3. Lang, R. A. and
    4. Hemmati-Brivanlou, A.
    (1999). Pax6 induces ectopic eyes in a vertebrate. Development 126, 4213-4222.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  7. ↵
    1. Davenport, T. G.,
    2. Jerome-Majewska, L. A. and
    3. Papaioannou, V. E.
    (2003). Mammary gland, limb and yolk sac defects in mice lacking Tbx3, the gene mutated in human ulnar mammary syndrome. Development 130, 2263-2273. doi:10.1242/dev.00431
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Dickinson, A. and
    2. Sive, H.
    (2007). Positioning the extreme anterior in Xenopus: cement gland, primary mouth and anterior pituitary. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 525-533. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.04.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Diez del Corral, R. and
    2. Storey, K. G.
    (2001). Markers in vertebrate neurogenesis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 835-839. doi:10.1038/35097587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Eivers, E.,
    2. Fuentealba, L. C. and
    3. De Robertis, E. M.
    (2008). Integrating positional information at the level of Smad1/5/8. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18, 304-310. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2008.06.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Eroshkin, F. M.,
    2. Ermakova, G. V.,
    3. Bayramov, A. V. and
    4. Zaraisky, A. G.
    (2006). Multiple noggins in vertebrate genome: cloning and expression of noggin2 and noggin4 in Xenopus laevis. Gene Expr. Patterns 6, 180-186. doi:10.1016/j.modgep.2005.06.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Eroshkin, F. M.,
    2. Nesterenko, A. M.,
    3. Borodulin, A. V.,
    4. Martynova, N. Y.,
    5. Ermakova, G. V.,
    6. Gyoeva, F. K.,
    7. Orlov, E. E.,
    8. Belogurov, A. A.,
    9. Lukyanov, K. A.,
    10. Bayramov, A. V. et al.
    (2016). Noggin4 is a long-range inhibitor of Wnt8 signalling that regulates head development in Xenopus laevis. Sci. Rep. 6, 23049. doi:10.1038/srep23049
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Esmailpour, T. and
    2. Huang, T.
    (2012). TBX3 promotes human embryonic stem cell proliferation and neuroepithelial differentiation in a differentiation stage-dependent manner. Stem Cells 30, 2152-2163. doi:10.1002/stem.1187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Farin, H. F.,
    2. Lüdtke, T. H.,
    3. Schmidt, M. K.,
    4. Placzko, S.,
    5. Schuster-Gossler, K.,
    6. Petry, M.,
    7. Christoffels, V. M. and
    8. Kispert, A.
    (2013). Tbx2 terminates shh/fgf signaling in the developing mouse limb bud by direct repression of gremlin1. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003467. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003467
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Fletcher, R. B.,
    2. Watson, A. L. and
    3. Harland, R. M.
    (2004). Expression of Xenopus tropicalis noggin1 and noggin2 in early development: two noggin genes in a tetrapod. Gene Expr. Patterns 5, 225-230. doi:10.1016/j.modgep.2004.08.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Fulcoli, F. G.,
    2. Huynh, T.,
    3. Scambler, P. J. and
    4. Baldini, A.
    (2009). Tbx1 regulates the BMP-Smad1 pathway in a transcription independent manner. PLoS ONE 4, e6049. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006049
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Gaete, M.,
    2. Muñoz, R.,
    3. Sánchez, N.,
    4. Tampe, R.,
    5. Moreno, M.,
    6. Contreras, E. G.,
    7. Lee-Liu, D. and
    8. Larraín, J.
    (2012). Spinal cord regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles proceeds through activation of Sox2-positive cells. Neural Dev. 7, 13. doi:10.1186/1749-8104-7-13
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Gammill, L. S. and
    2. Sive, H.
    (2000). Coincidence of otx2 and BMP4 signaling correlates with Xenopus cement gland formation. Mech. Dev. 92, 217-226. doi:10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00342-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Gestri, G.,
    2. Carl, M.,
    3. Appolloni, I.,
    4. Wilson, S. W.,
    5. Barsacchi, G. and
    6. Andreazzoli, M.
    (2005). Six3 functions in anterior neural plate specification by promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting Bmp4 expression. Development 132, 2401-2413. doi:10.1242/dev.01814
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Hammerschmidt, M.,
    2. Serbedzija, G. N. and
    3. McMahon, A. P.
    (1996). Genetic analysis of dorsoventral pattern formation in the zebrafish: requirement of a BMP-like ventralizing activity and its dorsal repressor. Genes Dev. 10, 2452-2461. doi:10.1101/gad.10.19.2452
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Han, J.,
    2. Yuan, P.,
    3. Yang, H.,
    4. Zhang, J.,
    5. Soh, B. S.,
    6. Li, P.,
    7. Lim, S. L.,
    8. Cao, S.,
    9. Tay, J.,
    10. Orlov, Y. L. et al.
    (2010). Tbx3 improves the germ-line competency of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 463, 1096-1100. doi:10.1038/nature08735
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Harris, W. A. and
    2. Messersmith, S. L.
    (1992). Two cellular inductions involved in photoreceptor determination in the Xenopus retina. Neuron 9, 357-372. doi:10.1016/0896-6273(92)90174-C
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Hartley, K. O.,
    2. Hardcastle, Z.,
    3. Friday, R. V.,
    4. Amaya, E. and
    5. Papalopulu, N.
    (2001). Transgenic Xenopus embryos reveal that anterior neural development requires continued suppression of BMP signaling after gastrulation. Dev. Biol. 238, 168-184. doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0398
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Hartley, K. O.,
    2. Nutt, S. L. and
    3. Amaya, E.
    (2002). Targeted gene expression in transgenic Xenopus using the binary Gal4-UAS system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1377-1382. doi:10.1073/pnas.022646899
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Horb, M. E. and
    2. Thomsen, G. H.
    (1999). Tbx5 is essential for heart development. Development 126, 1739-1751.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. ↵
    1. Huang, S. and
    2. Moody, S. A.
    (1993). The retinal fate of Xenopus cleavage stage progenitors is dependent upon blastomere position and competence: studies of normal and regulated clones. J. Neurosci. 13, 3193-3210.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  27. ↵
    1. Ivanova, N.,
    2. Dobrin, R.,
    3. Lu, R.,
    4. Kotenko, I.,
    5. Levorse, J.,
    6. DeCoste, C.,
    7. Schafer, X.,
    8. Lun, Y. and
    9. Lemischka, I. R.
    (2006). Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature 442, 533-538. doi:10.1038/nature04915
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Jones, C. M.,
    2. Lyons, K. M.,
    3. Lapan, P. M.,
    4. Wright, C. V. and
    5. Hogan, B. L.
    (1992). DVR-4 (bone morphogenetic protein-4) as a posterior-ventralizing factor in Xenopus mesoderm induction. Development 115, 639-647.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  29. ↵
    1. Kablar, B.,
    2. Vignali, R.,
    3. Menotti, L.,
    4. Pannese, M.,
    5. Andreazzoli, M.,
    6. Polo, C.,
    7. Giribaldi, M. G.,
    8. Boncinelli, E. and
    9. Barsacchi, G.
    (1996). Xotx genes in the developing brain of Xenopus laevis. Mech. Dev. 55, 145-158. doi:10.1016/0925-4773(96)00497-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Kolm, P. J. and
    2. Sive, H. L.
    (1995). Efficient hormone-inducible protein function in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 171, 267-272. doi:10.1006/dbio.1995.1279
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Lamb, T. M.,
    2. Knecht, A. K.,
    3. Smith, W. C.,
    4. Stachel, S. E.,
    5. Economides, A. N.,
    6. Stahl, N.,
    7. Yancopolous, G. D. and
    8. Harland, R. M.
    (1993). Neural induction by the secreted polypeptide noggin. Science 262, 713-718. doi:10.1126/science.8235591
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Lan, L.,
    2. Vitobello, A.,
    3. Bertacchi, M.,
    4. Cremisi, F.,
    5. Vignali, R.,
    6. Andreazzoli, M.,
    7. Demontis, G. C.,
    8. Barsacchi, G. and
    9. Casarosa, S.
    (2009). Noggin elicits retinal fate in Xenopus animal cap embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 27, 2146-2152. doi:10.1002/stem.167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Lee, H. S.,
    2. Cho, H. H.,
    3. Kim, H. K.,
    4. Bae, Y. C.,
    5. Baik, H. S. and
    6. Jung, J. S.
    (2007a). Tbx3, a transcriptional factor, involves in proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stromal cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 296, 129-136. doi:10.1007/s11010-006-9306-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Lee, J.-M.,
    2. Kim, J.-Y.,
    3. Cho, K.-W.,
    4. Lee, M.-J.,
    5. Cho, S.-W.,
    6. Zhang, Y.,
    7. Byun, S.-K.,
    8. Yi, C.-K. and
    9. Jung, H.-S.
    (2007b). Modulation of cell proliferation during palatogenesis by the interplay between Tbx3 and Bmp4. Cell Tissue Res. 327, 285-292. doi:10.1007/s00441-006-0271-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Lee, H.-K.,
    2. Lee, H.-S. and
    3. Moody, S. A.
    (2014). Neural transcription factors: from embryos to neural stem cells. Mol. Cells 37, 705-712. doi:10.14348/molcells.2014.0227
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Li, H.,
    2. Tierney, C.,
    3. Wen, L.,
    4. Wu, J. Y. and
    5. Rao, Y.
    (1997). A single morphogenetic field gives rise to two retina primordia under the influence of the prechordal plate. Development 124, 603-615.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  37. ↵
    1. Lu, R.,
    2. Yang, A. and
    3. Jin, Y.
    (2011). Dual functions of T-box 3 (Tbx3) in the control of self-renewal and extraembryonic endoderm differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 8425-8436. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.202150
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Lüdtke, T. H.-W.,
    2. Christoffels, V. M.,
    3. Petry, M. and
    4. Kispert, A.
    (2009). Tbx3 promotes liver bud expansion during mouse development by suppression of cholangiocyte differentiation. Hepatology 49, 969-978. doi:10.1002/hep.22700
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Martinez-De Luna, R. I.,
    2. Ku, R. Y.,
    3. Lyou, Y. and
    4. Zuber, M. E.
    (2013). Maturin is a novel protein required for differentiation during primary neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 384, 26-40. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.09.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Mathers, P. H.,
    2. Grinberg, A.,
    3. Mahon, K. A. and
    4. Jamrich, M.
    (1997). The Rx homeobox gene is essential for vertebrate eye development. Nature 387, 603-607. doi:10.1038/42475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Moody, S. A.
    (1987a). Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell-stage Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol. 122, 300-319. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(87)90296-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Moody, S. A.
    (1987b). Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stage Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol. 119, 560-578. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(87)90059-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Moody, S. A. and
    2. Kline, M. J.
    (1990). Segregation of fate during cleavage of frog (Xenopus laevis) blastomeres. Anat. Embryol. 182, 347-362. doi:10.1007/BF02433495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Moody, S. A.,
    2. Miller, V.,
    3. Spanos, A. and
    4. Frankfurter, A.
    (1996). Developmental expression of a neuron-specific beta-tubulin in frog (Xenopus laevis): a marker for growing axons during the embryonic period. J. Comp. Neurol. 364, 219-230. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960108)364:2<219::AID-CNE3>3.0.CO;2-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Moody, S. A.,
    2. Klein, S. L.,
    3. Karpinski, B. A.,
    4. Maynard, T. M. and
    5. Lamantia, A. S.
    (2013). On becoming neural: what the embryo can tell us about differentiating neural stem cells. Am. J. Stem Cells 2, 74-94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Nieuwkoop, P. D. and
    2. Faber, J.
    (1994). Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin), 252 pp. New York: Garland Publishing.
  47. ↵
    1. Niwa, H.,
    2. Ogawa, K.,
    3. Shimosato, D. and
    4. Adachi, K.
    (2009). A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature 460, 118-122. doi:10.1038/nature08113
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Olesnicky, E.,
    2. Hernandez-Lagunas, L. and
    3. Artinger, K. B.
    (2010). prdm1a Regulates sox10 and islet1 in the development of neural crest and Rohon-Beard sensory neurons. Genesis 48, 656-666. doi:10.1002/dvg.20673
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Ozair, M. Z.,
    2. Kintner, C. and
    3. Brivanlou, A. H.
    (2013). Neural induction and early patterning in vertebrates. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2, 479-498. doi:10.1002/wdev.90
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Pannese, M.,
    2. Polo, C.,
    3. Andreazzoli, M.,
    4. Vignali, R.,
    5. Kablar, B.,
    6. Barsacchi, G. and
    7. Boncinelli, E.
    (1995). The Xenopus homologue of Otx2 is a maternal homeobox gene that demarcates and specifies anterior body regions. Development 121, 707-720.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  51. ↵
    1. Papaioannou, V. E.
    (2014). The T-box gene family: emerging roles in development, stem cells and cancer. Development 141, 3819-3833. doi:10.1242/dev.104471
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Piccolo, S.,
    2. Agius, E.,
    3. Lu, B.,
    4. Goodman, S.,
    5. Dale, L. and
    6. De Robertis, E. M.
    (1997). Cleavage of Chordin by Xolloid metalloprotease suggests a role for proteolytic processing in the regulation of Spemann organizer activity. Cell 91, 407-416. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80424-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Re'em-Kalma, Y.,
    2. Lamb, T. and
    3. Frank, D.
    (1995). Competition between noggin and bone morphogenetic protein 4 activities may regulate dorsalization during Xenopus development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 12141-12145. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.26.12141
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Rodriguez-Esteban, C.,
    2. Tsukui, T.,
    3. Yonei, S.,
    4. Magallon, J.,
    5. Tamura, K. and
    6. Izpisua Belmonte, J. C.
    (1999). The T-box genes Tbx4 and Tbx5 regulate limb outgrowth and identity. Nature 398, 814-818. doi:10.1038/19769
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Sasagawa, S.,
    2. Takabatake, T.,
    3. Takabatake, Y.,
    4. Muramatsu, T. and
    5. Takeshima, K.
    (2002). Axes establishment during eye morphogenesis in Xenopus by coordinate and antagonistic actions of BMP4, Shh, and RA. Genesis 33, 86-96. doi:10.1002/gene.10095
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    1. Schmidt, J. E.,
    2. Suzuki, A.,
    3. Ueno, N. and
    4. Kimelman, D.
    (1995). Localized BMP-4 mediates dorsal/ventral patterning in the early Xenopus embryo. Dev. Biol. 169, 37-50. doi:10.1006/dbio.1995.1124
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    1. Showell, C.,
    2. Christine, K. S.,
    3. Mandel, E. M. and
    4. Conlon, F. L.
    (2006). Developmental expression patterns of Tbx1, Tbx2, Tbx5, and Tbx20 in Xenopus tropicalis. Dev. Dyn. 235, 1623-1630. doi:10.1002/dvdy.20714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Sinn, R. and
    2. Wittbrodt, J.
    (2013). An eye on eye development. Mech. Dev. 130, 347-358. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2013.05.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Suzuki, T.,
    2. Takeuchi, J.,
    3. Koshiba-Takeuchi, K. and
    4. Ogura, T.
    (2004). Tbx genes specify posterior digit identity through Shh and BMP signaling. Dev. Cell 6, 43-53. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00401-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. Takabatake, Y.,
    2. Takabatake, T. and
    3. Takeshima, K.
    (2000). Conserved and divergent expression of T-box genes Tbx2-Tbx5 in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 91, 433-437. doi:10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00329-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Takabatake, Y.,
    2. Takabatake, T.,
    3. Sasagawa, S. and
    4. Takeshima, K.
    (2002). Conserved expression control and shared activity between cognate T-box genes Tbx2 and Tbx3 in connection with Sonic hedgehog signaling during Xenopus eye development. Dev. Growth Differ. 44, 257-271. doi:10.1046/j.1440-169X.2002.00640.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Turton, K.,
    2. Natesh, R.,
    3. Thiyagarajan, N.,
    4. Chaddock, J. A. and
    5. Acharya, K. R.
    (2004). Crystal structures of Erythrina cristagalli lectin with bound N-linked oligosaccharide and lactose. Glycobiology 14, 923-929. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwh114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Viczian, A. S. and
    2. Zuber, M. E.
    (2010). Tissue determination using the animal cap transplant (ACT) assay in Xenopus laevis. J. Vis. Exp. 39, 1932. doi: 10.3791/1932
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Viczian, A. S.,
    2. Vignali, R.,
    3. Zuber, M. E.,
    4. Barsacchi, G. and
    5. Harris, W. A.
    (2003). XOtx5b and XOtx2 regulate photoreceptor and bipolar fates in the Xenopus retina. Development 130, 1281-1294. doi:10.1242/dev.00343
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Viczian, A. S.,
    2. Solessio, E. C.,
    3. Lyou, Y. and
    4. Zuber, M. E.
    (2009). Generation of functional eyes from pluripotent cells. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000174. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Wardle, F. C. and
    2. Sive, H. L.
    (2003). What's your position? the Xenopus cement gland as a paradigm of regional specification. Bioessays 25, 717-726. doi:10.1002/bies.10294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Washkowitz, A. J.,
    2. Gavrilov, S.,
    3. Begum, S. and
    4. Papaioannou, V. E.
    (2012). Diverse functional networks of Tbx3 in development and disease. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 4, 273-283. doi:10.1002/wsbm.1162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Weidgang, C. E.,
    2. Russell, R.,
    3. Tata, P. R.,
    4. Kuhl, S. J.,
    5. Illing, A.,
    6. Muller, M.,
    7. Lin, Q.,
    8. Brunner, C.,
    9. Boeckers, T. M.,
    10. Bauer, K. et al.
    (2013). TBX3 directs cell-fate decision toward mesendoderm. Stem Cell Reports 1, 248-265. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.08.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    1. Wong, K.,
    2. Peng, Y.,
    3. Kung, H.-F. and
    4. He, M.-L.
    (2002). Retina dorsal/ventral patterning by Xenopus TBX3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290, 737-742. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.6266
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    1. Wong, K. A.,
    2. Trembley, M.,
    3. Abd Wahab, S. and
    4. Viczian, A. S.
    (2015). Efficient retina formation requires suppression of both Activin and BMP signaling pathways in pluripotent cells. Biol. Open 4, 573-583. doi:10.1242/bio.20149977
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Yajima, H.,
    2. Suzuki, M.,
    3. Ochi, H.,
    4. Ikeda, K.,
    5. Sato, S.,
    6. Yamamura, K.-I.,
    7. Ogino, H.,
    8. Ueno, N. and
    9. Kawakami, K.
    (2014). Six1 is a key regulator of the developmental and evolutionary architecture of sensory neurons in craniates. BMC Biol. 12, 40. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-12-40
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Zuber, M. E.
    (2010). Eye field specification in xenopus laevis. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 93, 29-60. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385044-7.00002-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Zuber, M. E.,
    2. Perron, M.,
    3. Philpott, A.,
    4. Bang, A. and
    5. Harris, W. A.
    (1999). Giant eyes in Xenopus laevis by overexpression of XOptx2. Cell 98, 341-352. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81963-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. Zuber, M. E.,
    2. Gestri, G.,
    3. Viczian, A. S.,
    4. Barsacchi, G. and
    5. Harris, W. A.
    (2003). Specification of the vertebrate eye by a network of eye field transcription factors. Development 130, 5155-5167. doi:10.1242/dev.00723
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Noggin
  • Eye field transcription factor
  • Retinal specification
  • Retinal determination
  • Xenopus laevis

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tbx3 represses bmp4 expression and, with Pax6, is required and sufficient for retina formation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Tbx3 represses bmp4 expression and, with Pax6, is required and sufficient for retina formation
Zahra Motahari, Reyna I. Martinez-De Luna, Andrea S. Viczian, Michael E. Zuber
Development 2016 143: 3560-3572; doi: 10.1242/dev.130955
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Tbx3 represses bmp4 expression and, with Pax6, is required and sufficient for retina formation
Zahra Motahari, Reyna I. Martinez-De Luna, Andrea S. Viczian, Michael E. Zuber
Development 2016 143: 3560-3572; doi: 10.1242/dev.130955

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Neural tube closure requires the endocytic receptor Lrp2 and its functional interaction with intracellular scaffolds
  • Ceramides mediate positional signals in Arabidopsis thaliana protoderm differentiation
  • Zebrafish model for spondylo-megaepiphyseal-metaphyseal dysplasia reveals post-embryonic roles of Nkx3.2 in the skeleton
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

Kathryn Virginia Anderson (1952-2020)

Developmental geneticist Kathryn Anderson passed away at home on 30 November 2020. Tamara Caspary, a former postdoc and friend, remembers Kathryn and her remarkable contribution to developmental biology.


Zooming into 2021

In a new Editorial, Editor-in-Chief James Briscoe and Executive Editor Katherine Brown reflect on the triumphs and tribulations of the last 12 months, and look towards a hopefully calmer and more predictable year.


Read & Publish participation extends worldwide

Over 60 institutions in 12 countries are now participating in our Read & Publish initiative. Here, James Briscoe explains what this means for his institution, The Francis Crick Institute. Find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Sign up to join our next session:

10 February
Time: 13:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: preLights

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992