Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
The miR-124 family of microRNAs is crucial for regeneration of the brain and visual system in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea
Vidyanand Sasidharan, Srujan Marepally, Sarah A. Elliott, Srishti Baid, Vairavan Lakshmanan, Nishtha Nayyar, Dhiru Bansal, Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado, Praveen Kumar Vemula, Dasaradhi Palakodeti
Development 2017 144: 3211-3223; doi: 10.1242/dev.144758
Vidyanand Sasidharan
1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK campus, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
2Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srujan Marepally
1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK campus, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah A. Elliott
3Stowers Institute for Medical Research and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
4Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srishti Baid
1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK campus, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vairavan Lakshmanan
1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK campus, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nishtha Nayyar
1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK campus, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dhiru Bansal
1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK campus, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
2Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado
3Stowers Institute for Medical Research and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
4Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Praveen Kumar Vemula
1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK campus, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: praveenv@instem.res.in dasaradhip@instem.res.in
Dasaradhi Palakodeti
1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, GKVK campus, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dasaradhi Palakodeti
  • For correspondence: praveenv@instem.res.in dasaradhip@instem.res.in
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Expression of miR-124 family miRNAs in the planarian CNS. (A) Double fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) colocalization for miR-124 family miRNAs with the pan-neuronal marker pc2. The merged images of double FISH show the expression of the miRNAs in the cephalic ganglia. (B) Differential expression of miR-124 family miRNAs in the region indicated. (C-D′) miR-124b and miR-124c colocalize with different neuronal subtypes. (C,D) Double FISH was performed for miR-124b or miR-124c and cholinergic (chat), GABAergic (gad), dopaminergic (th) and serotonergic (tph) neuronal markers. (C′,D′) Higher magnification of the boxed regions from C and D. (E) miR-124b and miR-124c expression during regeneration. Dashed lines indicate the site of amputation. Scale bars: 100 µm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Biophysical characterization of liposomes/lipoplexes and their fusogenicity with membranes. (A) Structures of symmetric and asymmetric cationic lipids. (B) Biophysical parameters of liposomes prepared using various ratios of lipids. (C) Fluorescence anisotropy measurement of diphenylhexatriene (DPH) in three types of liposomes, showing higher membrane fluidity of liposomes prepared using either asymmetric lipid or a 1:1 ratio of Sym-Lip and Asym-Lip. Error bars indicate s.d. (D) Schematic of lipoplex formation with anti-miRs and liposomes. (E) Scheme for reconstitution of the membrane using planarian lipids and fluorophore-tagged lipids (FRET pair of NBD-PE and Rho-PE). The proximity of the two fluorescent lipids in reconstituted planarian membrane enables FRET. Fusion of liposomes leads to separation of the fluorophores and inhibits FRET. Thus, emission of NBD-PE can be recovered. (F) Recovery of emission fluorescence at 530 nm indicates the higher fusogenic ability of cationic lipids over Lipofectamine. (G) TEM images of liposomes. (H) Confocal microscopy of planarians that were transfected with fluorescent dye-tagged anti-miRs using either the commercial agent Lipofectamine LTX or cationic liposomes. The bar chart shows the fluorescence intensity of Lipofectamine LTX and cationic liposomes (calculated using ImageJ). Error bars indicate s.d. Scale bar: 200 μm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Validation of liposome-mediated ovo and miR-124 KD. (A) ovo(RNAi) animals (15/15) showed an eyeless regeneration phenotype in the first round of anterior regeneration after 7 dpa. (B) WISH showing the expression of miR-124c at 7 dpa during the second round of regeneration in KD animals (n=5). (C) Animals treated with 100 μM scrambled miRs rarely showed regeneration defects (4/90, 4.4%), whereas 10 μM (7/33, 21.2%), 50 μM (12/33, 36%) or 100 μM (91/112, 81%) anti-miR-treated animals frequently showed eye regeneration defects. Arrows indicate eye in the scrambled-treated or anti-miR-treated animals. Scale bars: 100 µm. (D) The percentage of animals that show various categories of photoreceptor (PR) defects observed in regenerated animals following 100 µM anti-miR treatment.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    miR-124 KD disrupts regeneration of the eyes and brain. (A) Immunostaining of the optic chiasm (anti-ARRESTIN) in scrambled-treated versus anti-miR-124-treated animals (100 μM each) at 7 dpa after the second round of regeneration. 13/16 KD animals showed diverse eye defects. Arrowheads indicate defects in KD animals. (B) FISH showing the expression of ovo in the eye and immunostaining for photosensory neurons (anti-ARRESTIN) in miR-124 KD (n=10) and scrambled-treated (n=7) animals. (C) Quantification of the size of the eyes determined by the ratio of the area of ovo staining to the total body area in scrambled-treated (n=6) versus anti-miR-124-treated (n=5) animals. (D) FISH showing the expression of ovo in the eye and trail cells posterior to the eye in scrambled-treated and miR-124 KD animals at 4 dpa (n=6 animals per treatment condition). ovo+ trail cells were quantified in each condition. (E) Quantification of anti-SYNORF-1 staining of anteriorly regenerating animals normalized to body area in scrambled-treated versus anti-miR-124-treated (100 μM) animals (n=5 each). (F) Organization of the brain, ventral nerve cords, (anti-SYNORF-1, green) and photosensory neurons (anti-ARRESTIN, red) in scrambled (10/10) versus miR-124 KD animals regenerating either a head (10/10; top) or tail (13/16; bottom). Illustrations show the amputation plane (dashed line) and lighter colored areas indicate regenerated tissue. (G) FISH for neuronal subtypes in the brain of scrambled-treated versus miR-124 KD animals, including dopaminergic (th, red; n=6), GABAergic (gad, red; n=6) and cholinergic neurons (chat, green; n=6). Nuclei are stained with Hoechst (blue). Arrowheads indicate the neural subtypes. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (Student's t-test). Error bars indicate s.d. Scale bars: 50 µm in A,B,D; 100 µm in F,G.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    miR-124 is required for eye-specific regeneration. (A) Methodology of eye-specific regeneration experiments. ovo dsRNA was administered by injection for 5 days, and on the sixth day the animals were amputated pre-pharyngeally. LNA anti-miRs were administered on alternative days for 8 days after 25 days of head regeneration. (B) Live images and anti-SYNORF-1 staining of ovo KD animals after 25 days of RNAi (n=15 animals). (C) Live images of ovo KD animals showing recovery of eyes after scrambled treatment (n=15/15 recovery) but not after anti-miR-124 treatment (n=12/15 failure). (D) Molecular characterization of eye phenotypes using anti-ARRESTIN (photosensory neurons and axons), opsin (photosensory neuron cell bodies) and tyrosinase (pigment cup cells). miR-124 KD animals (10/12) showed drastic reduction in opsin and tyrosinase staining, along with mispatterned photoreceptor neurons. Scale bars: 100 µm in B; 50 µm in C,D.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Target prediction to identify miR-124 targets. (A) Luciferase assay was carried out to validate miRNA targets. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 (Student's t-test). Error bars indicate s.d. (B) FISH for porcupine-1 revealed that the organization of the intestine is indistinguishable between scrambled-treated and anti-miR-124-treated animals. (C) WISH for notum in scrambled-treated and anti-miR-124-treated animals (D) Colorimetric WISH showing slit-1 expression in scrambled-treated and anti-miR-124-treated animals at 7 dpa from the second round of regeneration. Arrows indicate the expression of slit-1 in the midline region. Scale bars: 100 µm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Regulation of notch-2 and slit-1 by miR-124. (A) Colorimetric WISH shows broad expression of notch-2 in uninjured planarian. (B-C″) notch-2 KD leads to cyclopia (B′ versus C′; 14 dpa) and fusion of posterior gut branches (B″ versus C″; mat, green; DAPI, blue; 17 dpa). (D) Colorimetric WISH for slit-1 after long-term notch-2 RNAi. slit-1 is significantly reduced in notch-2(RNAi) planarians compared with controls. (E) Colorimetric WISH shows broad expression of numb-1 in uninjured planarian. (F) Colorimetric WISH for slit-1 in control versus numb-1(RNAi) planarians at 23 dpa. Higher magnification images of the head show ectopic slit-1+ cells in numb-1(RNAi) planarians. (G,G′) Double FISH showing colocalization (arrows) of miR-124c (red) and notch-2 (green). (H,H′) Double FISH for slit-1 and miR-124c during anterior regeneration. miR-124c colocalizes with slit-1 (arrows) at 3 dpa, but not at 7 dpa. Scale bars: 100 µm.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Summary of miR-124 function during planarian regeneration. (A) Schematic of the brain, eye and midline after head regeneration in miR-124 KD versus control planarians. KD of miR-124 causes a reduction in the size of the cephalic ganglia, a loss of eye cells, disorganization of the optic chiasm, and an expansion of the slit-1+ midline population. (B) Proposed genetic interaction in which miR-124 modulates slit-1 via inhibition of notch-2 expression. The schematic also summarizes the organization of the regenerated brain (green), gut (pink) and slit-1+ midline (black) following KD of miR-124 or notch-2.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Planarian
  • Schmidtea mediterranea
  • miR-124
  • Brain Regeneration
  • Photoreceptors
  • Notch
  • miRNA

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The miR-124 family of microRNAs is crucial for regeneration of the brain and visual system in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
The miR-124 family of microRNAs is crucial for regeneration of the brain and visual system in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea
Vidyanand Sasidharan, Srujan Marepally, Sarah A. Elliott, Srishti Baid, Vairavan Lakshmanan, Nishtha Nayyar, Dhiru Bansal, Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado, Praveen Kumar Vemula, Dasaradhi Palakodeti
Development 2017 144: 3211-3223; doi: 10.1242/dev.144758
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION
The miR-124 family of microRNAs is crucial for regeneration of the brain and visual system in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea
Vidyanand Sasidharan, Srujan Marepally, Sarah A. Elliott, Srishti Baid, Vairavan Lakshmanan, Nishtha Nayyar, Dhiru Bansal, Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado, Praveen Kumar Vemula, Dasaradhi Palakodeti
Development 2017 144: 3211-3223; doi: 10.1242/dev.144758

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Hes1 overexpression leads to expansion of embryonic neural stem cell pool and stem cell reservoir in the postnatal brain
  • Oxygen regulates epithelial stem cell proliferation via RhoA-actomyosin-YAP/TAZ signal in mouse incisor
  • SMAD2 promotes myogenin expression and terminal myogenic differentiation
Show more STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Stem cells & regeneration
  • Neural development

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.


Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Brandon Carpenter talks about how inherited histone methylation defines the germline versus soma decision in C. elegans. 

Sign up to join our next session:

10 March
Time: TBC
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992