Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Endocrine and local signaling interact to regulate spermatogenesis in zebrafish: follicle-stimulating hormone, retinoic acid and androgens
Diego Crespo, Luiz H. C. Assis, Henk J. G. van de Kant, Sjors de Waard, Diego Safian, Moline S. Lemos, Jan Bogerd, Rüdiger W. Schulz
Development 2019 146: dev178665 doi: 10.1242/dev.178665 Published 4 November 2019
Diego Crespo
1Reproductive Biology Group, Division Developmental Biology, Department Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Diego Crespo
Luiz H. C. Assis
1Reproductive Biology Group, Division Developmental Biology, Department Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Luiz H. C. Assis
Henk J. G. van de Kant
1Reproductive Biology Group, Division Developmental Biology, Department Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sjors de Waard
1Reproductive Biology Group, Division Developmental Biology, Department Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diego Safian
1Reproductive Biology Group, Division Developmental Biology, Department Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Diego Safian
Moline S. Lemos
2Laboratory of Cellular Biology, Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Moline S. Lemos
Jan Bogerd
1Reproductive Biology Group, Division Developmental Biology, Department Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rüdiger W. Schulz
1Reproductive Biology Group, Division Developmental Biology, Department Biology, Science Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
3Research Group Reproduction and Developmental Biology, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen NO-5817, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rüdiger W. Schulz
  • For correspondence: r.w.schulz@uu.nl
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Retinoic acid (RA) is crucial for mammalian spermatogonia differentiation, and stimulates Stra8 expression, a gene required for meiosis. Certain fish species, including zebrafish, have lost the stra8 gene. While RA still seems important for spermatogenesis in fish, it is not known which stage(s) respond to RA or whether its effects are integrated into the endocrine regulation of spermatogenesis. In zebrafish, RA promoted spermatogonia differentiation, supported androgen-stimulated meiosis, and reduced spermatocyte and spermatid apoptosis. Follicle-stimulating hormone (Fsh) stimulated RA production. Expressing a dominant-negative RA receptor variant in germ cells clearly disturbed spermatogenesis but meiosis and spermiogenesis still took place, although sperm quality was low in 6-month-old adults. This condition also activated Leydig cells. Three months later, spermatogenesis apparently had recovered, but doubling of testis weight demonstrated hypertrophy, apoptosis/DNA damage among spermatids was high and sperm quality remained low. We conclude that RA signaling is important for zebrafish spermatogenesis but is not of crucial relevance. As Fsh stimulates androgen and RA production, germ cell-mediated, RA-dependent reduction of Leydig cell activity may form a hitherto unknown intratesticular negative-feedback loop.

INTRODUCTION

All-trans retinoic acid (RA) is crucial for mammalian spermatogenesis (Griswold, 2016). In mice, RA action, usually mediated by RA receptor (RAR) γ (Gely-Pernot et al., 2012; Ikami et al., 2015; Lord et al., 2018), is required for spermatogonia to differentiate (Busada and Geyer, 2016). A vitamin A (RA precursor)-deficient diet arrests spermatogonial differentiation (McLean et al., 2002; Van Beek and Meistrich, 1990; van Pelt et al., 1995), which is reversed by retinoid supplementation (Morales and Griswold, 1987; van Pelt and de Rooij, 1990). RA also stimulates Stra8 (stimulated by retinoic acid 8) gene expression in the testis (Endo et al., 2017, 2015). However, although Stra8 is required for meiosis, recent genetic studies suggest that its expression does not depend on RA (Teletin et al., 2019). Moreover, STRA8-independent pathways fine-tune RA action in the testis, as shown for SALL4 (spalt-like transcription factor 4; Gely-Pernot et al., 2015) and REC8 (REC8 meiotic recombination protein; Koubova et al., 2014). Dominant-negative mutant models of RARα have allowed further characterization of its essential molecular functions for germ cell development (Chen et al., 2016; Hasegawa and Saga, 2012).

It is not clear whether the RA dependency of mammalian spermatogenesis represents an evolutionary conserved feature, as little is known in this regard in non-mammalian vertebrates. stra8-like genes were lost during the evolution of the Acanthomorpha and Cypriniformes fish lineages, including a number of model species [e.g. zebrafish (Danio rerio) and medaka (Oryzias latipes)]. Although stra8 was identified in other fishes (Pasquier et al., 2016; Rodríguez-Marí et al., 2013), functional studies in the Southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis) showed that entry into meiosis is a stra8-sensitive but not stra8-dependent process (Dong et al., 2013; Li et al., 2016). On the other hand, in species lacking stra8, RA nevertheless promoted meiotic initiation (Adolfi et al., 2016; Feng et al., 2015). In zebrafish, chemical inhibition of RA production reduced sperm production/fecundity (Pradhan and Olsson, 2015), but the males remained fertile.

In addition to RA signaling, other signaling systems contribute to the regulation of spermatogenesis. Androgens, which are produced by Leydig cells, are crucial for mammalian spermatogenesis (McLachlan et al., 2002; Sharpe et al., 1992), and promote germ cell development in GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone)-deficient mice (Singh et al., 1995) and hypophysectomized rats (El Shennawy et al., 1998). Sertoli cell-specific androgen receptor (Ar) knockout led to meiotic arrest and the absence of spermatids (De Gendt and Verhoeven, 2012). Testosterone also promoted spermatogonial differentiation by suppressing the Sertoli cell production of WNT5A that would otherwise stimulate spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) self-renewal (Tanaka et al., 2016). On the other hand, testosterone stimulated myoid cells to produce glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), in turn promoting SSC self-renewal (Chen et al., 2014). Hence, androgen signaling is important for the mitotic, meiotic as well as spermiogenic phases of mammalian spermatogenesis.

In teleost fish, 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) is the main androgen (Borg, 1994) and its stimulatory effect on testicular gene expression (Martinović-Weigelt et al., 2011; Rolland et al., 2013; Sambroni et al., 2013) or spermatogenesis has been described in different species (de Castro Assis et al., 2018; Leal et al., 2009b; Miura et al., 1991). However, loss of the enzyme required for androgen production inhibits male reproductive behavior but not spermatogenesis in medaka and zebrafish (Sato et al., 2008; Zhai et al., 2018), and loss of ar gene function still allows the production of some sperm, although testis weight and sperm numbers become clearly reduced (Crowder et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2018). Apparently, pathways operate that support spermatogenesis but do not depend on androgens. In fish, follicle-stimulating hormone (Fsh) is not only a potent steroidogenic hormone (García-López et al., 2010), but also modulates somatic cell growth factor production (Assis et al., 2016; Crespo et al., 2016; Miura et al., 2002; Nóbrega et al., 2015; Sawatari et al., 2007; Skaar et al., 2011), in turn regulating proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonia. Hence, there is a substantial amount of information on how Fsh, androgens and growth factors regulate spermatogenesis in fish while little is known regarding the potential role(s) of RA. Therefore, we decided to first analyze testicular gene expression during an experimentally induced recovery of adult spermatogenesis to determine whether we can identify RA signaling among the modulated pathways. Having seen that RA signaling was one of them, we generated experimental evidence on the effects of RA signaling on zebrafish spermatogenesis. Finally, we investigated potential interactions of RA with androgen and Fsh signaling.

RESULTS

Gene expression profiling during spermatogenic recovery from busulfan treatment

To investigate which signaling systems are modulated during the initial stages of spermatogenesis, we interrupted the process experimentally, using the cytostatic agent busulfan in combination with elevated water temperature, and then allowed spermatogenesis to recover spontaneously from surviving stem cells (Nóbrega et al., 2010) (Fig. S1A-B). Subsequently, we analyzed testis tissue morphologically and by RNA-sequencing (RNAseq) in control (before treatment), depleted (maximum germ cell loss) and recovering (enriched in spermatogonia) testes.

Maximum germ cell depletion occurred 10 days post-injection (Fig. S1Biii). Most spermatogenic tubuli contained only Sertoli cells and very few type Aund spermatogonia (Fig. S1, inset in Biii). By 4 days post-injection, many tubules already contained type Adiff and B spermatogonia and spermatocytes (Fig. S1Biv), demonstrating the regenerative capacity of the surviving type Aund spermatogonia. In recovering testes, the relative areas occupied by differentiating (i.e. type Adiff and B) spermatogonia, but also by Leydig cells, was significantly larger than in the untreated control group; the area occupied by spermatozoa, however, was still half that in controls (Fig. 1A,B).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Morphometric and transcriptomic analyses of zebrafish testis during spermatogenic recovery from a cytotoxic (busulfan) insult. (A,B) Qualitative (A) and quantitative (B) evaluation of the recovery of different germ and somatic cell types when compared with untreated control testes. Aund, type A undifferentiated spermatogonia; Adiff, type A differentiating spermatogonia (arrowheads); SPB, type B spermatogonia (arrows); SPC, spermatocytes; SPT, spermatids; SPZ, spermatozoa (dashed line); Leydig, Leydig cells (yellow background, including other interstitial cells). Data are mean±s.e.m. (n=5; *P<0.05, ***P<0.001). Scale bar: 25 µm. (C) Up (red)- and down (green)-regulated genes identified by RNAseq at the beginning of the recovery period (n=5, P<0.005, fold change [FC]≥3.0). (D) Common and specific recovery-associated genes retrieved when tested against the depleted (gray set) and control (white set) testis transcriptomes. (E) KEGG pathways modulated in recovering testes. Each pathway is highlighted in red (up-) or green (downregulated). (F) Functional enrichment of recovery-induced gene expression. Groups of closely related GO terms are encircled and labeled (numbers of regulated genes are shown). The groups labeled as ‘developmental process’ and ‘hormone metabolic process’ are outlined with dashed lines and examples of identified DEGs in those sets are shown.

In depleted testes, containing only surviving Aund spermatogonia as germ cells, marker gene expression for SSCs and self-renewal factors (Hammoud et al., 2014) was strong, while expression of these genes decreased in recovering testes containing more and also other germ cell types (Fig. S1C). In contrast, markers for differentiating spermatogonia were reduced in germ cell-depleted and elevated in recovering testes (Fig. S1C). Comparison of the mRNA profiles of untreated and germ cell-depleted testes revealed that two-thirds of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were downregulated in depleted testes (1940 of 2934, respectively; Fig. S2A). Similarly, the majority of KEGG terms significantly enriched in germ cell-depleted testes were downregulated (Fig. S2A), including pathways related to cell cycle and meiosis, as well as others involved in developmental processes (i.e. Jak-STAT, Hedgehog, ErbB or mTOR signaling). Interestingly, among the minority of upregulated KEGG terms, retinol metabolism (e.g. aldh1a2 and cyp26b1) and steroid hormone biosynthesis were identified. Most of the significantly modulated signaling pathways in germ cell-depleted testes were also observed in recovering testes but followed the opposite expression pattern (Fig. S2A-B), and the number of upregulated DEGs exceeded the downregulated ones (2344 and 1613 or 59.2% and 40.8%, respectively; Fig. S2B).

Comparing recovering and control testes provided the much lower number of 442 DEGs (Fig. 1C), most of which (371 or 83.9%) were upregulated. Similarly, all KEGG pathways significantly affected were upregulated (Fig. 1E), including TGFβ, steroid hormone, GnRH, PPAR, MAPK signaling systems, as well as extracellular matrix (ECM) structure and remodeling-related pathways (such as focal adhesion, cell-adhesion molecules and ECM-receptor interaction). When searching for common and specific DEGs, 123 genes were found in both datasets and 3834 or 319 specifically regulated during recovery with respect to the depleted or control conditions, respectively (Fig. 1D). Examining the biological functions enriched among 442 recovery-regulated genes by GO analysis showed numerous overlapping gene sets (sharing a similar function/GO identifier) that were grouped in eight different clusters (encircled in Fig. 1F). One-hundred and thirty-one DEGs form the main cluster (Developmental process; Fig. 1F), which includes genes associated with organ development (e.g. clu, dcn, cx43, mmp2, krt4, cxcl12b and fabp7a), cell differentiation [e.g. tnfa, tcf23, ecscr, sox18, ppdpfa, Wnt-related (sfrp2, fzd9a and ndp)], growth factor activity [e.g. insulin-like (ins, igfbp7 and igf3), TGFβ (fstl1b, tgfbi and lft2), and FGF (fgf1a, fgf10a and fgf12a) family members]. However, Gdnf or Gdnf receptor genes were not among the DEGs in this (recovery to control) or other comparisons, and expression levels in general were rather low (below 20 reads in most cases; data not shown but deposited in GEO under accession number GSE116611).

After demonstrating retinol metabolism and steroid hormone biosynthesis as pathways upregulated in depleted testes, it was remarkable to find retinoic acid signaling [e.g. crabp2b, rdh10a, rbp1a (rbp5) and rbp4] also among the enriched biological functions when comparing recovering and control testes (see developmental process cluster). Furthermore, the hormone metabolic process cluster contained several genes encoding steroidogenic enzymes with increased transcript levels (e.g. hsd3b1, hsd11b2 and cyp17a1). Taken together, gene expression profiling suggests that, among the signaling systems modulated in the zebrafish testis in response to busulfan treatment and recovery from it, retinoid metabolism/retinoic acid signaling is clearly represented, as is steroidogenesis.

Retinoid-mediated stimulation of spermatogonial development

To study the potential role of RA signaling system in zebrafish spermatogenesis, we examined first whether the gene expression data can be supported experimentally, using a previously established primary testis tissue culture system. Upon ex vivo exposure to the RA precursor retinol (RE), the area in testis sections occupied by type Adiff and B spermatogonia increased (Fig. 2A,B), and so did the proliferation activity of these germ cell types (Fig. 2D-E). Along with the morphological data, the mRNA levels of germ cell-markers increased in response to retinoid treatment (piwil1 and nanos2; Fig. S3A). Regarding retinoid metabolism, we found that aldh1a2 expression was exclusively stimulated by RE, while cyp26a1 mRNA levels increased in response to both, RE and RA, although more clearly to RA (Fig. S3A). Transcript levels of selected growth factors were unaffected (amh, igf3 and insl3; data not shown). Consistent with the RE-induced increase in type Adiff and B spermatogonia (Fig. 2B), chemical inhibition of RA production by DEAB decreased the frequency of these spermatogonia in tissue culture (Fig. 2C). DEAB treatment increased germ cell apoptosis (Fig. 2C), while exposure to RE reduced the volume fraction of apoptotic cells (Fig. 2B). These data indicate that RA signaling promotes differentiating spermatogonia (Adiff and B) numbers by stimulating their proliferation. RA signaling also reduced germ cell apoptosis, but the changes in cell morphology associated with cell death (cell shrinkage and nuclear condensation/fragmentation) did not allow identification of the affected germ cell type(s).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Retinoid effects on spermatogonial development. (A-F) Evaluation of the proportions of different germ cells (A-C) and of the proliferation activity of spermatogonia (D-F) in testes cultured for 4 days under different experimental conditions: in the absence or presence of retinol (RE, 10 µM; A,B and D,E), and in the absence or presence of DEAB (10 µM; C,F). Adiff are indicated by arrowheads, SPB by arrows in A; Apop, apoptotic cells. Data are mean±s.e.m. (n=6; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). Scale bars: 25 µm.

sall4 and rec8 mediate the effects of RA in the zebrafish testis

To determine the mechanisms potentially mediating the effects of RA in the zebrafish, we tested the expression of sall4 and rec8 (a and b paralogs), components of Stra8-independent pathways that mediate RA signaling in mammals (Gely-Pernot et al., 2015; Koubova et al., 2014). RA and RE increased the transcript levels of sall4 and rec8 (Fig. 3A). Conversely, treatment with DEAB slightly decreased sall4 and rec8a transcript levels, an effect that was clearer when using testicular cell suspensions (Fig. 3A). We then examined whether knocking down sall4, rec8a or rec8b transcripts modulated germ cell marker transcript levels. Specific GapmeRs for sall4, rec8a and rec8b reduced target transcript levels, reduced the expression of piwi1l and dazl, marker genes in differentiating spermatogonia, and reduced expression of meiotic (sycp3) and post-meiotic markers (odf3b; Fig. 3B-D). Using testicular cell suspensions from Tg(vasa:EGFP) testes (Fig. 3E) sorted for EGFP-negative and -positive cells for qPCR analysis, we found (Fig. 3F) that sall4 transcripts were enriched in EGFP-positive cells, indicating its preferential expression in germ cells in general (see Fig. S3B for further details), probably starting in type A spermatogonia that preferentially express EGFP (Fig. 3E; whole testis). sall4 and rec8b transcripts were reduced after busulfan treatment (−6.6- to −8.5-fold; Table S1), indicating germ cell expression. Altogether, these observations suggest that part of the retinoid effects on zebrafish spermatogenesis occur in a sall4- and rec8-dependent manner.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Involvement of sall4, rec8a and rec8b in mediating RA effects in the zebrafish testis. (A) Modulation of sall4, rec8a and rec8b mRNA levels in response to retinoids. Testicular explants were cultured for 4 days with RA, RE or DEAB (each at 10 µM). Data are mean fold change±s.e.m. (n=6-15; *P<0.05, **P<0.01) and are shown relative to the control condition, which is set at 1 (dashed line). DEAB effects were also tested using testicular cell suspensions cultured for 3 days in the absence or presence of 10 µM DEAB (n=3, technical replicates; *P<0.05). (B-D) Effects of GapmeR (1 µM)-mediated knockdown of sall4, rec8 or rec8b after 4 days of tissue culture, on the targeted and selected germ cell-marker genes. Data are mean fold change±s.e.m. (n=3, technical replicates; *P<0.05, **P<0.01) and are normalized to the GapmeR control (Ctrl), which is set at 1. (E) A pooled testicular cell suspension was obtained from 20 Tg(vasa:EGFP) testes and subjected to FACS. Black and white arrowheads indicate EGFP− and EGFP+ cells, respectively. Localization of the vasa:EGFP signal by CLSM in a whole-mount preparation of adult testis shows preferential expression of EGFP in single germ cells and in small germ cell groups, demonstrating expression in type Aund and Adiff spermatogonia. (F) Relative mRNA expression of sall4, rec8a and rec8b in FACS-sorted fractions. Data are shown as mean fold change±s.e.m. (n=3, technical replicates; *P<0.05) and are expressed relative to the EGFP− condition, which is set at 1. Scale bars: 25 μm.

A dominant-negative raraa transgene targeted to germ cells disturbs spermatogenesis

To obtain further evidence for the germ cell-specific role(s) of RA signaling, we generated transgenic zebrafish (named dn-raraa) expressing a truncated form of RARα a (Raraa) in germ cells, in a similar way to that described for mice (Damm et al., 1993) and zebrafish (Kikuchi et al., 2011). Transgenesis efficiency was first analyzed in larvae at 3-4 days post-fertilization, based on EGFP-positive hearts and mCherry-positive germ cells in the genital ridge (Fig. 4A). Transgene expression was confirmed in adult males in both heart and testis tissue, where mCherry staining was found in spermatogonia and spermatocytes but not in haploid germ cells (Fig. S4A). Morphological evaluation of 6-month-old adult dn-raraa testes revealed clear defects in spermatogenesis, including germ cell-depleted areas, abnormal cystic organization and increased germ cell apoptosis (Fig. 4Biii-vi, Fig. S4B). Quantitative evaluation of spermatogenesis showed relative smaller areas occupied by type Adiff spermatogonia and spermatocytes. The category ‘Others’ (including empty areas and germ cell-depleted tissue), was also higher in 6-month-old adult dn-raraa testes (Fig. 4C). Unexpectedly, the germinal epithelium had largely recovered in 9-month-old adult dn-raraa males (Fig. 4Bvii-viii, C). This took place despite the even higher level of transgene expression (Fig. 4F), which may reflect in part the recovery-associated increase in germ cell numbers expressing the transgene. Moreover, dn-raraa testes hypertrophied at 9 months of age with a more than 100% increase in weight compared with wild-type siblings or 6-month-old transgenic fish (Fig. 4D). We furthermore observed a high incidence of DNA damage/apoptosis among post-meiotic germ cells in 9-month-old transgenic males (Fig. 4Bix-xi). In addition, problems with respect to fertilization and even more so regarding embryo survival were associated with the overexpression of the raraaDN391 transgene compared with wild-type males (Fig. 4E). These experiments started with 6-month-old males and were repeated two to four times per month until 9 months of age, with similar results throughout the 3-month period. Analysis of RA-related gene expression showed a consistent downregulation of rec8a in adult dn-raraa males and raraaDN391 transgene mRNA levels were strongly enhanced when compared with wild type (Fig. 4F).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Inactivation of retinoid signaling in germ cells results in severe testicular defects. (A) Confirmation of transgenesis 3 days post-fertilization in zebrafish larvae microinjected as 1-cell stage embryos. EGFP and mCherry expression was detected in the heart (arrows) and genital ridge (broken lines) of dn-raraa larvae, respectively. Scale bars: 200 μm in i,ii; 50 μm in iii. (B-D) Qualitative (B) and quantitative (C,D) analysis of spermatogenesis (C) and gonadosomatic (D) indices of wild-type and dn-raraa males 6 and 9 months post-fertilization (data are mean±s.e.m.; n=3-5; *P<0.05, **P<0.01). Scale bars: 25 µm. Red asterisks indicate germ cell-depleted tissue; black asterisk indicates an empty area. Myoid, myoid cells; others, germ cell-depleted tissue plus empty areas. In Bix-xi, detection of germ cell apoptosis/DNA damage by TUNEL analysis is presented. TUNEL+ cells/cysts are shown in green and PI (propidium iodide) counterstain is in red. Arrowheads indicate isolated TUNEL+ cells among spermatozoa in the tubular lumen; representative spermatid cysts containing several TUNEL+ cells are encircled with a dashed line. Scale bars: 25 µm. (E) Fertilization rate (gray bars) and embryo survival of fertilized eggs (black bars) from adult wild-type and dn-raraa transgenic males. Mating was repeated every 7-14 days (data are mean±s.e.m.; n=4-6; **P<0.01, ***P<0.001), and fertilization and survival recorded 2 and 24 h post-fertilization (hpf), respectively. (F) qPCR quantification of RA-related gene and raraaDN391 transgene transcripts in 6- and 9-month-old wild-type and dn-raraa testicular samples. Data are mean fold-change±s.e.m. (n=3 or 4; *P<0.05, **P<0.01) and are expressed relative to the wild-type group, which is set at 1. (G) Transcript levels of steroidogenesis-related (star, hsd3b1, cyp17a1 and ar), Leydig cell (insl3) and myoid cell (tagln) genes in wild-type and dn-raraa transgenic adult testes. Data are shown as mean fold-change±s.e.m. (n=3 or 4; *P<0.05, **P<0.01) and are expressed relative to the wild-type group, which is set at 1 (dashed line). (H) 11-KT plasma levels from 6- and 9-month-old wild-type and dn-raraa males. Data are mean fold change±s.e.m. (n=3 or 4; *P<0.05).

Transcript levels of steroid production/signaling genes (star, hsd3b1 and ar) were significantly higher, but only in the 6-month-old dn-raraa males (Fig. 4G). Similarly, plasma 11-KT levels were higher in 6- but not in 9-month-old transgenic compared with wild-type males (Fig. 4H). In addition, we found that the relative area occupied by Leydig cells and the expression levels of the Leydig cell-derived growth factor insl3 increased above wild-type levels (but not the myoid cell-specific tagln; Fig. 4G). Taken together, our observations suggest that the increased production of Leydig cell products, such as 11-KT and Insl3, as well as increased sensitivity to androgens, may promote the spermatogenic recovery in the absence of germ cell RA signaling. The recovery process had reached a new equilibrium at 9 months of age, presenting full spermatogenesis but still not normal considering the duplicated testis weight and high level of DNA damage/apoptosis; in addition, sperm quality remained poor.

Androgen and RA signaling interact to drive spermatogenesis

We found that hindering RA signaling in germ cells increased androgen production, implying that, via mechanisms awaiting clarification, consequences of RA signaling in germ cells dampen androgen production. This suggests that androgen and RA signaling interact to promote spermatogenesis. To study this, we first examined androgen effects alone. Testis tissue responded to 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT), the main teleost androgen, by an upregulation of several germ cell-marker genes (Fig. 5A,B). Morphometric evaluation showed that 11-KT slightly increased the proportion of Adiff spermatogonia and more clearly of spermatids, while reducing the incidence of apoptosis (Fig. 5C). Inhibiting RA production reduced the stimulatory effect of 11-KT on four out of seven germ cell markers (Fig. 5D-E), and was reflected in reduced proportions of spermatocytes and spermatids, the latter just not reaching significance (Fig. 5F). Remarkably, the presence of 11-KT could not prevent the DEAB-induced increase in apoptosis (Fig. 5F). TUNEL analysis confirmed that inhibiting RA synthesis increased the incidence of DNA fragmentation, mainly in spermatids but also in spermatocytes that were identified by the shape and size of their DAPI-stained nuclei (Fig. 5G,H and Fig. S5), despite the presence of androgens. This suggests that in the case where RA and 11-KT interact to reduce apoptosis, 11-KT would be upstream of RA signaling. Hence, blocking steroid synthesis should not modulate apoptosis in the presence of RE, which indeed was not the case (Fig. 6A). Testing whether androgens use RA signaling to modulate spermatogenesis, we found that short-term (4 days) ex vivo and long-term (5 weeks) in vivo exposure to androgen increased aldh1a2 transcript levels; cyp26a1 transcript levels also increased, although not significantly in the in vivo experiment (Fig. 6C). One explanation for these observations is that androgens increase RA production. If true, then androgen effects on RA-sensitive gene expression should be modulated by blocking RA production. Accordingly, we found that DEAB reduced rec8 transcript levels in the presence of androgen (Fig. 6D). Blocking steroid production in the presence of RE, on the other hand, did not modulate RE-stimulated sall4 or rec8a transcript levels, confirming the notion that androgens are upstream of RA in this context.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Retinoid involvement in androgen-stimulated spermatogenesis. (A-C) Transcript levels of selected spermatogonial (A) and meiotic (B) markers, and the frequency of different germ cell types and apoptotic cells (C) in testes incubated for 4 days in basal conditions or with 200 nM 11-KT. Data are mean fold change±s.e.m. (n=8; *P<0.05, **P<0.01) and are expressed relative to the respective control condition, which is set at 1. (D-F) Transcript levels of germ cell-marker genes (D,E) and frequency of different germ cell types and apoptotic cells (F) in testes incubated for 4 days with 200 nM 11-KT, in the absence or presence of DEAB (10 µM). Data are mean±s.e.m. (n=7 or 8; *P<0.05, **P<0.01). (G) Germ cell apoptosis in testicular explants incubated with 11-KT in the absence or presence of DEAB. Arrowheads indicate isolated DNA damage/apoptotic cells and representative spermatocyte or spermatid cysts are encircled with a red or white dashed line, respectively. (H) Detection of germ cell DNA damage/apoptosis by TUNEL analysis. TUNEL+ cells/cysts are shown in green and DAPI counterstain is blue. Arrowheads indicate isolated TUNEL+ cells and representative spermatocyte or spermatid (TUNEL+ or TUNEL−) cysts are encircled with a red or white dashed line, respectively. Scale bars: 15 µm in G; 10 µm in H.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

The influence of steroids on the regulation of retinoid-modulated spermatogenesis. (A,B) Frequency of germ cell types and apoptotic cells (A) and BrdU labeling indices (B) in testicular explants cultured for 4 days in the presence of 10 µM RE or plus 25 µg/ml trilostane (TRIL). Data are mean±s.e.m. (n=6; **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). (C) Ex vivo and in vivo androgen effects on aldh1a2 and cyp26a1 expression. In the left panel, testis tissue was cultured for 4 days to study the effects of 11-KT (200 nM) on the mRNA abundance of RA-related enzymes compared with the control group. In the right panel, adult zebrafish males were exposed to 100 nM OA in vivo for 5 weeks. Data are expressed as fold change±s.e.m. (n=7 or 8; *P<0.05, **P<0.01) and shown relative to the control condition, which is set at 1. ns, no significant difference. (D) RA target gene expression in testicular explants cultured for 4 days under RE (10 µM)-stimulated conditions, in the absence or presence of 25 µg/ml TRIL, or under 11-KT (200 nM)-stimulated conditions, in the absence or presence of 10 µM DEAB. Data are mean fold change±s.e.m. (n=7-12; *P<0.05) and are shown as relative to the control condition (RE- and 11-KT-induced levels, respectively), which is set at 1 (dashed line).

Inhibiting steroid production in the presence of RE also provided evidence for a so far undetected steroid effect: Aund spermatogonia accumulated in the absence of steroids (Fig. 6A) without affecting their proliferative activity (Fig. 6B). This suggests that, in zebrafish, steroid hormones stimulate the transition of Aund to Adiff spermatogonia. Considering that the RE-induced changes of sall4 and rec8a transcript levels remained unaffected when inhibiting steroid production by trilostane (TRIL; Fig. 6D), it seems unlikely that steroids modulate retinoid effects but may support RA production as suggested above (see Fig. 6C). Similarly, the observed accumulation of spermatocytes (Fig. 6A) suggests that steroid hormones stimulate spermatocyte development, which is in line with the androgen-induced increase in spermatid numbers (Fig. 5C).

Retinoid signaling contributes to Fsh-stimulated spermatogonial differentiation

Androgen action was supported by RA signaling (Fig. 5), and it is possible that androgens increased RA production (Fig. 6). As Fsh is a major regulator of androgen production in fish, we asked whether Fsh modulates testicular RA production and whether the effects of Fsh on spermatogenesis are modulated by RA signaling.

Blocking RA production reduced the Fsh-stimulated proliferation of A and B spermatogonia, decreased the frequency of type Adiff and B (but not Aund) spermatogonia, and increased the incidence of apoptosis among germ cells (Fig. 7A,B). Interestingly, Fsh increased testicular RA production (Fig. 7C) and also the expression of the RA target genes sall4, rec8a and rec8b. This stimulation occurred in a steroid-independent manner but was blocked when inhibiting RA synthesis (Fig. 7D). It appears that part of the biological activity of Fsh is mediated via the stimulation of RA production.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

RA signaling contributes to Fsh-stimulated spermatogonial differentiation. Determination of BrdU labeling indices (A) and of the frequency (B) of type A and B spermatogonia and apoptotic cells. Testicular explants were cultured for 4 days under Fsh-stimulated (100 ng/ml) conditions, in the absence or presence of 10 µM DEAB. (C) Quantification of RA production by testis tissue cultured for 4 days in response to basal medium, 100 ng/ml Fsh alone or with 10 µM DEAB. (D) Expression of RA target genes in testicular explants cultured for 4 days under Fsh-stimulated (100 ng/ml) conditions, in the absence or presence of 25 µg/ml TRIL or of 10 µM DEAB. (E-H) Retinoid signaling directly stimulates spermatogonial proliferation during spermatogenetic recovery. (E) Testis tissue was collected from adult males exposed to 10 nM estradiol (E2) in vivo for 21 days and then cultured for 2 days in the presence of BMS493 (10 µM) and DEAB (10 µM) inhibitors, followed by another 7 days incubation with different treatments (25 µg/ml TRIL plus 100 ng/ml Fsh) in the absence or presence of 10 µM RE. (F-H) Detection of BrdU (F) and quantification of BrdU labeling indices (G) and the areas occupied by type A spermatogonia (H). Data are expressed as mean±s.e.m. (n=5-12; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001). In D, results are shown as relative to the basal control condition, which is set at 1 (dashed line). Scale bars: 25 µm in F. BrdU-positive Aund cells are indicated by dashed black lines, Adiff by arrowheads.

To further investigate Fsh/retinoid interactions with spermatogonial proliferation, we used an experimental model based on estrogen-inhibited Fsh and androgen levels causing an accumulation of type A spermatogonia (de Castro Assis et al., 2018; de Waal et al., 2009) (see Fig. 7E); testis tissue enriched in type A spermatogonia was then used in tissue culture experiments. The cultured testes were first exposed for 2 days to DEAB and BMS493, a pan-RA receptor antagonist, to block both RA synthesis and action. Then, while blocking steroid synthesis, we challenged testis tissue with Fsh and asked whether additional RE would modulate Fsh effects. Under these conditions, RE further stimulated the proliferation of type Aund and Adiff spermatogonia (Fig. 7F,G), which was mainly differentiating proliferation, as suggested by the decrease of the area occupied by type Aund and the increase of the area occupied by type Adiff spermatogonia (Fig. 7H). It appears that independently of steroid production, Fsh stimulates the differentiating proliferation of type A spermatogonia in part via increasing RA synthesis, and that in the presence of Fsh, addition of RE further promotes the differentiation of type A spermatogonia, partially depleting the pool of type Aund spermatogonia.

DISCUSSION

The initial stages of spermatogenic recovery after pharmaceutical germ cell depletion included activation of a transcriptional network with growth and differentiation factors, retinoid and androgen signaling. For the first time in fish, we have identified specific germ cell stages responding to RA signaling (stimulating the proliferation of differentiating spermatogonia, reducing the apoptotic loss of spermatocytes and spermatids). Moreover, we present the first evidence in vertebrates for a regulatory link between the reproductive hormones Fsh and androgens, and RA production and action, potentially forming an intratesticular feedback loop to prevent testis hypertrophy (summarized schematically in Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Proposed intratesticular feedback loop to prevent testis hypertrophy in adult zebrafish via RA-mediated inhibition of androgen production. Schematic illustration of the intratesticular feedback of RA signaling in germ cells reducing androgen production, and the main stages of zebrafish spermatogenesis affected by RA (orange) and/or androgens (green), both of which are regulated by Fsh (black). The shaded areas surrounding germ cells represent Sertoli cell cytoplasm containing orange nuclei with nucleoli.

Transcriptomic profiling identifies retinoid and steroid signaling pathway activation during germ cell recovery

Using an established experimental model, depletion of most germ cells resulted in spermatogenic tubules containing Sertoli cells and a small number of Aund spermatogonia, probably surviving SSCs, which fueled the spermatogenic recovery observed some days later. Depleted testis tissue was characterized by the transcriptional enrichment of the “Retinol metabolism” and of the “Steroid hormone biosynthesis” pathways, among others, the latter being consistent with the enhanced androgen production found previously in busulfan-depleted zebrafish testis (Nóbrega et al., 2010). Increased androgen signaling may have supported the spermatogenic recovery (Crowder et al., 2018; de Castro Assis et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2018) (Fig. 5).

Genes encoding SSC self-renewal factors expressed in Thy+ undifferentiated mammalian spermatogonia (Hammoud et al., 2014), were upregulated in depleted zebrafish testes (Fig. S1C). This gene set included colony stimulating factor 1 receptors (csf1ra and csf1rb). Enhanced expression of Csf1 ligand (csf1a) then followed during recovery (Table S1). In mice, macrophages, peritubular myoid and Leydig cells located adjacent to the seminiferous tubules secrete CSF1 (Potter and DeFalco, 2017), which promotes SSC self-renewal (Oatley et al., 2009) and – together with RA signaling – spermatogonia differentiation (DeFalco et al., 2015). We found a remarkable increase of differentiating spermatogonia during recovery, suggesting that after SSC regeneration, rapid and widespread differentiation of spermatogonia is the response of the zebrafish testis to the cytostatic insult, involving retinoid and steroid signaling. These coincident changes prompted us to examine experimentally retinoid/androgen signaling interactions.

Retinoids directly control spermatogonia differentiation in zebrafish

As in mammals (Chen et al., 2016; Endo et al., 2017; McLean et al., 2002), RA promotes spermatogonia differentiation in zebrafish. However, besides RA, androgens (de Castro Assis et al., 2018) and Fsh (Crespo et al., 2016) also stimulate spermatogonia differentiation in zebrafish. Yet the inhibitory effect of blocking RA production and the stimulatory effect of adding RE, were evident in the presence of Fsh (Fig. 7A-B,G-H). Moreover, the effect of RE in stimulating differentiating spermatogonia proliferation was evident in the absence of sex steroids (Fig. 7G,H). These observations demonstrate that RA signaling also has effects that are independent of Fsh or androgens. In addition, Fsh can create a growth factor environment with reduced Amh (Skaar et al., 2011), and increased Wnt5a (Safian et al., 2018), Insl3 (Crespo et al., 2016) and Igf3 levels (Nóbrega et al., 2015) in which retinoids can further stimulate the differentiating proliferation of type A spermatogonia.

RA-stimulated spermatogonia differentiation in mice involves KIT (reviewed by Busada and Geyer, 2016). In zebrafish, we did not observe a modulation of Kit receptor transcript levels in response to RE or DEAB, in particular transcript levels of kitb (Fig. S6A,B), the receptor probably expressed by germ cells, as suggested by the changes in its transcript levels after busulfan treatment (Fig. S6E). However, the previously described mouse RA-regulated germ cell factors SALL4 (Gely-Pernot et al., 2015; Hobbs et al., 2012) and REC8 (Koubova et al., 2014), may induce germ cell differentiation in zebrafish. Our gene expression studies on FACS-enriched germ cells suggest direct retinoid effects on these transcripts. In mice, the germ cell-specific expression of Sall4 is controlled by RARγ (Gely-Pernot et al., 2015) and genetic ablation of Sall4 in spermatogonia results in the loss of differentiating germ cells (Hobbs et al., 2012). In zebrafish testis tissue, RA signaling increased sall4 transcript levels, and knockdown of sall4 decreased expression of germ cell-marker genes, in line with a reduction of differentiating spermatogonia cell numbers after blocking RA synthesis. REC8 is a meiosis-specific cohesin component expressed in early spermatocytes in rodents (Eijpe et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2003). Loss of Rec8 in mice results in high mortality rates and sterility in both sexes; in males surviving until adulthood, haploid germ cells are absent (Xu et al., 2005). As both isoforms of the rec8 gene are upregulated by retinoids, it is possible that Rec8 also mediates RA-stimulated germ cell development in zebrafish. Indeed, knockdown of rec8a and rec8b causes a significant decrease in germ cell-marker gene expression, suggesting that rec8 may mediate part of the effects of RA on zebrafish germ cells.

Although the relevance of RARγ has been established with respect to the differentiation of spermatogonia in adult mice (Gely-Pernot et al., 2012; Ikami et al., 2015), it has also been discussed whether the level of RARγ expression, or rather RA availability, is relevant for the RA-mediated differentiation of spermatogonia (Lord et al., 2018; Velte et al., 2019). The four Rar and six Rxr paralogs present in zebrafish are all expressed in testis tissue (see GEO deposit with accession number GSE116611), but there is no information on the exact cellular location of these proteins.

Germ cell-specific inhibition of RA signaling

Our dominant-negative transgenic zebrafish model with a germ cell-specific inactivation of RA signaling showed partial germ cell depletion and increased apoptosis at 6 months of age. Spermatogonia differentiation, meiosis and the production of mature sperm still took place, resulting in a quite heterogeneous testis histology. This differs from the generalized block of spermatogonia differentiation found in mice using a similar transgenic approach (Chen et al., 2016). However, sperm quality was clearly compromised in transgenic zebrafish, with reduced fertilization rates and a high mortality of the (few) resulting embryos within the first 24 h of development. Interestingly, we also found higher numbers of interstitial cells, duplicated plasma androgen levels and elevated levels of steroidogenesis-related and androgen receptor transcripts. Hindering RA signaling in germ cells apparently leads, via mechanisms yet unknown and involving a spermatogenesis defect associated with partial germ cell loss, to an activation of Leydig cells. This, in turn, suggests that the consequences of RA signaling in germ cells normally dampen Leydig cell activity. However, the elevated Leydig cell activity in dn-raraa males may support the spermatogenic recovery that is achieved at the cost of testicular hypertrophy and elevated levels of DNA damage/apoptosis, while not improving the low sperm quality. Considering direct RA effects in germ cells, we assume that, in particular, rec8a plays an important role, as indicated by its consistent downregulation in the testes of dn-raraa transgenic fish. Taken together, our functional evidence shows that the germ cell-specific lack of RA signaling results in a clear spermatogenesis phenotype in young adults that partially recovers within 3 months, is associated with a transient Leydig cell over-activation and results in a hypertrophied testis still showing some abnormalities. In this regard, it is possible that the duplicated germ cell mass re-establishes germ cell-mediated dampening of Leydig cell activity in 9-month-old males.

Androgens and retinoids jointly promote spermatogenesis

Next to retinoids, androgens also stimulate vertebrate spermatogenesis (O'Shaughnessy et al., 2010; Verhoeven et al., 2010). In mice, Sertoli cell-selective knockout of the androgen receptor (SCARKO) blocked meiosis (De Gendt and Verhoeven, 2012), while its ubiquitous ablation (ARKO) also reduced spermatogonia numbers (Tan et al., 2005). 11-KT (the main androgen in fish) initiated spermatogonial differentiation (Melo et al., 2015; Miura et al., 1991). In zebrafish deficient for the androgen receptor, mutants showed clearly smaller testes than wild-type fish, although some spermatozoa still were produced (Crowder et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2018). In mice, meiosis and spermiogenesis depend on androgen signaling (De Gendt and Verhoeven, 2012; O'Shaughnessy et al., 2010; Verhoeven et al., 2010), unless Sertoli cells express a constitutively active FSH receptor (Oduwole et al., 2018). In zebrafish, androgen-induced increases in transcript levels of mitotic and meiotic germ cell markers were reduced by blocking RA production, which also elevated apoptosis among spermatocytes and, in particular, spermatids (Fig. 5). Blocking steroid production in the presence of RE, on the other hand, led to an accumulation of type Aund spermatogonia and spermatocytes (Fig. 6). This suggests that retinoid-stimulated production of type A spermatogonia and meiotic cells is complemented by androgen signaling that promotes spermatogonial differentiation and completion of meiosis. Therefore, we propose that androgens and retinoids regulate spermatogenesis in a complementary manner to guarantee efficient sperm production in zebrafish. Although an androgen/retinoid interplay promoting spermatogonia differentiation is a new proposal, interactions between androgen and RA signaling have been demonstrated in other tissues/cell types (Li et al., 2002; Munetsuna et al., 2009; Ubels et al., 2003). In contrast to mammalian models, where preventing either androgen or retinoid signaling completely blocked spermatogenesis, removing one of these pathways in zebrafish still allows (some) sperm production to occur, albeit in a compromised manner.

In zebrafish, a remarkable effect of blocking retinoid signaling is increased apoptosis among spermatocytes and in particular spermatids, while spermatogonia differentiation is reduced but not blocked. In mammals, spermatogonia differentiation is completely blocked in the absence of RA signaling. Considering apoptosis, the meiotic block in ARKO mice is associated with increased germ cell apoptosis (De Gendt et al., 2004), but an androgen-independent role for RA signaling as regards germ cell apoptosis has not been reported so far. In zebrafish, inhibition of steroid production in the presence of RE has no effect on germ cell apoptosis, while the androgen-induced decrease of apoptosis (Fig. 6C) may reflect androgen support of RA production. Overall, our data suggest that 11-KT and RA jointly promote spermatogonia differentiation, while 11-KT (but not RA) also promotes the completion of meiosis, and RA (but not 11-KT) increases the efficiency of spermiogenesis by reducing the apoptotic loss of spermatids.

Fsh increases RA production and uses retinoid signaling to stimulate spermatogenesis

Fsh is an important hormone that also regulates spermatogenesis in zebrafish (Crespo et al., 2016). Its action in the fish testis is mediated by Sertoli and Leydig cells, both expressing the fshr gene (Chauvigné et al., 2012; García-López et al., 2009, 2010; Ohta et al., 2007), so that Fsh is a potent steroidogenic hormone (García-López et al., 2009, 2010; Mazón et al., 2014; Planas and Swanson, 1995) and modulates growth factor production (Crespo et al., 2016). We show here that another role of Fsh is to increase testicular RA production, thereby stimulating RA target gene transcript levels. Moreover, blocking RA production in the presence of Fsh reduced the differentiating proliferation of spermatogonia and increased germ cell apoptosis (Fig. 7A,B). Collectively, these observations indicate that the biological activity of Fsh in the zebrafish testis is, in part, mediated by RA signaling.

In conclusion, RA signaling is also of significant relevance for testicular physiology in zebrafish, with regard to both classic functions of germ cell development and androgen production. Particularly interesting is the observation that blocking RA signaling in germ cells activated Leydig cell steroidogenesis, suggesting that physiologically, RA signaling in germ cells dampens Leydig cell function. We also found that Fsh stimulates testicular RA production, which, when combined with previous findings that fish Leydig cells express the Fsh receptor (rendering Fsh a potent steroidogenic hormone), led us to propose a new intratesticular feedback loop (Fig. 8). This loop may have remained undetected so far in mammals. Alternatively, it may represent a specific adaptation in teleost fish, where Fsh is also a potent steroidogenic hormone, thereby preventing testicular hypertrophy.

In mammals, blocking RA signaling leads to a complete failure of spermatogonia differentiation; blocking androgen signaling also results in complete spermatogenic failure. Hence, RA and androgen signaling represent critical bottlenecks that cannot be bypassed physiologically. In zebrafish, on the other hand, loss of RA signaling (this MS) or loss of the androgen receptor (Crowder et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2018), both disturb but do not completely block spermatogenesis, and compensatory mechanisms rescue at least some fertility. The concept therefore is that of a regulatory system using parallel regulatory routes to avoid bottleneck situations upon failure of a single system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Sexually mature wild-type (wild type; AB strain) and transgenic Tg(vasa:EGFP) (Krøvel and Olsen, 2002) and Tg(vasa:raraa_S392stop-IRES-mCherry, myl7:EGFP) – referred to as dn-raraa – zebrafish (Danio rerio) males were used for the experiments described in the present study. For the construction of the transgenic line dn-raraa, the amino acid sequence of the endogenous zebrafish Raraa (the most similar isoform to human RARα, ∼80% similarity; and the only RA receptor modulated in its expression levels in the RNAseq dataset presented in this study) was aligned with the amino acid sequence of a dominant-negative mutant form of the human RARα previously described (RARα403*, the most potent inhibitory receptor mutant; Damm et al., 1993). This truncated receptor (RaraaDN391) protein lacks the C-terminal domain required for interacting with co-factors to activate transcription, but is able to dimerize with endogenous Rar and Rxr proteins, and then bind to RARE (RA response element) motifs. First, the raraaDN391 cDNA sequence was PCR amplified (Advantage 2 PCR Kit, Clontech) using testis cDNA and subcloned into pME-MCS (Kwan et al., 2007). Using Gateway technology, the raraaDN391 sequence, followed by an internal ribosome entry sequence (IRES) and the mCherry-coding region, was placed under the control of the vasa promoter and inserted into pDestTol2CG2 (Kwan et al., 2007). This plasmid includes a cardiac myosin light chain 7 regulatory (myl7) enhancer-promoter gene driving EGFP that can be used as screening tool.

Handling and experimentation were consistent with the Dutch national regulations. The Life Science Faculties Committee for Animal Care and Use in Utrecht (The Netherlands) approved the experimental protocols.

Transcriptomic analysis by RNAseq

Testicular samples considered for RNAseq studies were obtained employing the experimental model shown in Fig. S1A (Lacerda et al., 2010; Nóbrega et al., 2010). Upon an acclimatization period with increasing temperature (from 27 to 35°C; ∼1°C increment/day), adult zebrafish males were exposed to 35°C for 14 days and injected with the cytostatic agent busulfan (single intraperitoneal injection after 7 days at 35°C; 40 mg/kg). Fish were then placed back in normal water temperature (27°C) and testis samples were collected at different time points. Morphological analysis of testicular samples showed maximum germ cell depletion 10 days post busulfan injection (i.e. 10 dpi; Fig. S1Biii) and the recovery of endogenous spermatogenesis at ∼14 dpi (Fig. S1Biv).

Total RNA was isolated from: (1) testes of untreated adult control zebrafish; (2) germ cell-depleted testis tissue; and (3) testis tissue at the beginning of the recovery period, using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA integrity was checked with an Agilent Bio-analyzer 2100 total RNA Nano series II chip (Agilent). Only samples with a RNA integrity number greater than 8 were used for library preparation. Illumina RNAseq libraries were prepared from 2 µg total RNA using the Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The resulting RNAseq libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencer (Illumina) as 1×50 nucleotide reads. Image analysis and base calling were carried out using the Illumina pipeline. Quality control of the obtained reads was performed using the FastQC suite (v0.10.1; default parameters). The sequencing yield ranged between ∼11 and ∼70 million reads per sample, and mapping efficiency for uniquely mapped reads was between 64.8 and 73.3% (see Table S1). RNAseq-derived reads were aligned to the zebrafish genome (Zv9) using TopHat (v2.0.5; Trapnell et al., 2009). The resulting files were filtered with SAMtools (v0.1.18; Li et al., 2009), and the read counts extracted using the Python package HTSeq (https://htseq.readthedocs.io/en/release_0.11.1/; Anders et al., 2015). Data analysis was performed with the R/Bioconductor package DESeq (P<0.005, fold change [FC]≥3.0; Anders and Huber, 2010). The raw RNAseq data of the 15 samples sequenced (five biological replicates per condition) have been deposited in the NCBI GEO database under the accession number GSE116611. Regulated KEGG pathways were determined using the KEGG Mapper tool (Wang et al., 2014). KEGG pathways represented by at least five differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and by the ratios of regulated genes (up- or down-, and vice versa) higher than five were considered for the analysis.

Functional enrichment analyses were carried out using a plug-in available at www.baderlab.org/Software/EnrichmentMap/ (Merico et al., 2011) for the Cytoscape network environment (Shannon et al., 2003). The Enrichment Map plug-in calculates over-representation of genes involved in closely related Gene Ontology (GO) categories (Ashburner et al., 2000), resulting in a network composed of gene sets grouped according to their function. DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 (http://david.ncifcrf.gov/; Huang et al., 2009) was used to retrieve GO terms from the list of DEGs and exported as the input for each functional enrichment analysis.

Testis tissue culture

Using a previously established ex vivo culture system (Leal et al., 2009b), adult zebrafish testis tissue was incubated in the presence of various test compounds to investigate retinoid involvement in spermatogenesis, including retinoic acid (RA), retinol (RE, RA precursor), 4-diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB, RA production inhibitor; Mu et al., 2013; Perz-Edwards et al., 2001) and BMS493 (pan-RA receptor antagonist; Stafford and Prince, 2002; Wang et al., 2016). All these compounds were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used at the same final concentration of 10 µM. Additional ex vivo experiments were performed to test the effects of recombinant zebrafish Fsh (100 ng/ml; García-López et al., 2010) and 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT, 200 nM; Sigma-Aldrich). To exclude the potential effects of steroid hormones, incubations were carried out in the presence of trilostane (TRIL, 25 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), which prevents the production of biologically active steroids. Moreover, an androgen insufficiency model was employed to obtain the results presented in Fig. 8E-G. Briefly, before collecting testis tissue for ex vivo culture, the fish were exposed to 10 nM 17-β estradiol (E2; Sigma-Aldrich) in vivo for 3 weeks with a daily change of the E2-containing water. Using this approach, endogenous spermatogenesis is interrupted such that type A spermatogonia accumulate while the testes become depleted of type B spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids (de Waal et al., 2009).

Testicular cell suspension and culture

To investigate the cellular localization of testicular sall4, rec8a and rec8b expression, we used testes from transgenic Tg(vasa:EGFP) zebrafish expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein under the control of the germ cell-specific vasa promoter (Krøvel and Olsen, 2002). Testis tissue from ∼10 transgenic fish was digested with 1 mg/ml collagenase/dispase solution at 27°C for 2 h with gentle shaking (Hinfray et al., 2013). The resulting cell suspension was filtered through a 70 µm filter and subsequently through a 40 µm filter (BD Bioscience) before centrifugation at 500 rpm (50 g) for 10 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in PBS (phosphate-buffered saline; pH 7.4) and the resulting suspension immediately submitted to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using an Influx cell sorter (BD Bioscience). Autofluorescence was removed through the FACS dot plot profile generated with a testicular cell suspension from wild-type males. EGFP-positive and -negative cells were collected, centrifuged in PBS at 1000 rpm (100 g) for 10 min and the pellet stored at −80°C until use.

In addition, testicular cell suspensions were prepared using wild-type testes and then submitted to culture conditions. Briefly, ∼5×105 cells/ml were transferred to 25 ml culture flasks and cultured in L-15 supplemented medium (Gibco) containing 2% Ultroser G serum substitute (Pall) at 27°C for 3 days. Using this method, somatic cells adhere to the bottom of the plate, while germ cells remain in suspension. Subsequently, an equal number of cells (including both germ and somatic cells after a brief trypsin wash) were transferred to 12-well plates and cultured at 27°C for 3 days in basal, RA- (10 µM) and RE-treated (10 µM) conditions. Upon incubation, cells were centrifuged at 1000 rpm (100 g) for 10 min and the pellet stored at −80°C until use.

In vivo exposure to androgen

Adult male fish were submitted to water containing 100 nM 11-ketoandrostenedione (OA) or control untreated conditions in vivo for 5 weeks with a daily change of water (as described by de Castro Assis et al., 2018). Stock solutions were prepared in deionized water by extensive stirring at 37°C, which were further diluted to the proper concentration in aquarium water. Upon in vivo treatment, testis tissue was collected and used for gene expression analysis.

Sample preparation and analysis

Under some of the experimental conditions described in this study (testis tissue culture section), type A and type B spermatogonia proliferation activity was investigated by studying the incorporation of the S-phase marker bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; 50 µg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich), which was added to the medium during the last 6 h of the culture period. After incubation, testis tissue was fixed at room temperature for 1 h in freshly prepared methacarn [60% (v/v) methanol, 30% chloroform and 10% acetic acid glacial; Merck Millipore] and processed for subsequent analysis. To quantify spermatogonial proliferation, the mitotic index was determined by examining at least 100 germ cells/cysts, differentiating between BrdU-labeled and unlabeled cells. To evaluate the proportion of area occupied by different germ cell types in 4% glutaraldehyde fixed tissue (4°C, overnight), 10-15 randomly chosen fields were photographed at ×400 magnification and the images were analyzed quantitatively using ImageJ software. With a specific plug-in, a 540-point grid was made to quantify the proportion of the area for the various germ cell types, based on the number of points counted over those germ cell types. For both purposes (BrdU incorporation and area analyses), testis tissue was dehydrated, embedded in Technovit 7100 (Heraeus Kulzer), sectioned at 4 μm. The germ cells/cysts were identified according to previously published morphological criteria (Leal et al., 2009a).

Additional ex vivo experiments and testicular cell suspensions were carried out to investigate candidate gene expression in response to different experimental conditions. For all these experiments, total RNA was isolated using the RNAqueous Kit (Ambion) following the manufacturer's instructions. Relative mRNA levels of candidate genes were analyzed using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR; see Table S2 for detailed primer information) as previously described (García-López et al., 2010). The geometric mean of eef1a1l1, rpl13a and ubc was used as housekeeping endogenous control owing to their constant expression under the conditions analyzed.

Furthermore, incubation medium was collected to quantify testicular RA release by enzyme immunoassay (commercial kit, MyBioSource). In parallel experiments, a blood sample was collected for 11-KT quantification, and levels were measured by enzyme immunoassay (commercial kit, Cayman Chemicals).

Detection of DNA damage/apoptosis by TUNEL and quantification of apoptotic cells by morphological criteria

To determine the incidence of cells showing DNA damage/apoptosis on paraffin-embedded tissue sections from testes previously incubated in the absence or presence of the test compounds, we used the deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) approach. First, testis tissue was washed with PBS and subsequently fixed in 4% PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde (4°C, overnight). After a 30 min wash with PBS, testis tissue was dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections (4 μm) were treated with permeabilization solution (0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium citrate) for 8 min. Finally, testis tissue was incubated with TUNEL reaction mixture (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein; Roche) in the dark at 37°C for 1 h. After washing twice in PBS, sections were counterstained with DAPI, mounted in Vectashield antifade mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss LSM 700). Negative and positive controls were included in each experimental set up (Fig. S5). The TUNEL technique has been used repeatedly to detect apoptotic cells in the testis of zebrafish (e.g. Saito et al., 2011) or mice (e.g. Jauregui et al., 2018), but can also detect DNA damage in necrotic degenerating cells (e.g. Loo, 2011). We therefore refer to TUNEL-positive cells as positive for DNA damage/apoptosis.

Apoptotic cells were also quantified and analyzed using Technovit 7100-embedded Toluidine Blue-stained 4 µm sections from glutaraldehyde-fixed testes previously incubated in the absence or presence of the test compounds. Cells were considered as apoptotic when they showed shrinkage, associated with losing at least partially the contact with the immediate tissue environment, combined with pyknosis/nuclear fragmentation (e.g. Elmore, 2007). The incidence of apoptosis was quantified using a 540-point grid, as described above for the different germ cell stages, and expressed as proportion of the total testicular section area.

sall4, rec8a and rec8b knockdown by GapmeR technology

sall4, rec8a and rec8b gene knockdown was investigated by using specific antisense oligonucleotides (LNA GapmeRs, Exiqon; design IDs 639263-1, 639292-1 and 639281-1, respectively). GapmeRs were dissolved in the incubation medium at a 1 µM final concentration and applied to ex vivo tissue culture conditions for 4 days. An unassisted GapmeR uptake method, called gymnosis, has been previously described (Soifer et al., 2012; Stein et al., 2010). Three technical replicates per gene were performed and knockdown efficiency was confirmed by qPCR analysis, and normalized to the negative GapmeR control.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 5.0 package (GraphPad Software) was used for statistical analysis. Significant differences between groups were identified using Student's t-test (paired or unpaired, as appropriate) or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple group comparisons (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ns, no significant changes observed). Data are mean±s.e.m.

No statistical method was applied to predetermine sample size. The number of wild-type and transgenic zebrafish males used was based on experimental considerations. For each experiment, sample size is indicated in the figure legend and reflects the number of independent biological and/or technical replicates. Outlier analysis of numerical values was performed by Grubb's test and outliers were excluded from calculations.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Rafael H. Nóbrega (Institute of Bioscience of Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil) for assistance during the busulfan in vivo experiments; Daniëlle Janssen, Henk Westland and Esther Hoekman (Utrecht University aquarium facility) for maintaining the zebrafish stocks and for technical support; and Ger J. A. Arkesteijn (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands) for expert assistance with the FACS analysis.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

  • Author contributions

    Conceptualization: D.C., R.W.S.; Methodology: D.C., L.H.C.A., H.J.G.v.d.K., S.d.W., D.S., M.S.L., J.B.; Software: D.C.; Validation: D.C.; Formal analysis: D.C., L.H.C.A.; Investigation: D.C.; Resources: R.W.S.; Data curation: D.C., R.W.S.; Writing - original draft: D.C.; Writing - review & editing: D.C., J.B., R.W.S.; Supervision: D.C., R.W.S.; Project administration: R.W.S.; Funding acquisition: R.W.S.

  • Funding

    This study was co-funded by the Norges forskningsråd BIOTEK2021/HAVBRUK program with the projects SALMAT (226221) and SALMOSTERILE (221648).

  • Data availability

    The complete raw RNAseq data have been deposited in GEO under accession number GSE116611. Analyzed and filtered data are available in the article and its additional files.

  • Supplementary information

    Supplementary information available online at http://dev.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dev.178665.supplemental

  • Received April 1, 2019.
  • Accepted October 1, 2019.
  • © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
http://www.biologists.com/user-licence-1-1/

References

  1. ↵
    1. Adolfi, M. C.,
    2. Herpin, A.,
    3. Regensburger, M.,
    4. Sacquegno, J.,
    5. Waxman, J. S. and
    6. Schartl, M.
    (2016). Retinoic acid and meiosis induction in adult versus embryonic gonads of medaka. Sci. Rep. 6, 34281. doi:10.1038/srep34281
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Anders, S. and
    2. Huber, W.
    (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Anders, S.,
    2. Pyl, P. T. and
    3. Huber, W.
    (2015). HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166-169. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Ashburner, M.,
    2. Ball, C. A.,
    3. Blake, J. A.,
    4. Botstein, D.,
    5. Butler, H.,
    6. Cherry, J. M.,
    7. Davis, A. P.,
    8. Dolinski, K.,
    9. Dwight, S. S.,
    10. Eppig, J. T. et al.
    (2000). Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29. doi:10.1038/75556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Assis, L. H. C.,
    2. Crespo, D.,
    3. Morais, R. D. V. S.,
    4. França, L. R.,
    5. Bogerd, J. and
    6. Schulz, R. W.
    (2016). INSL3 stimulates spermatogonial differentiation in testis of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Cell Tissue Res. 363, 579-588. doi:10.1007/s00441-015-2213-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Borg, B.
    (1994). Androgens in teleost fishes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 109, 219-245. doi:10.1016/0742-8413(94)00063-G
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Busada, J. T. and
    2. Geyer, C. B.
    (2016). The role of Retinoic Acid (RA) in spermatogonial differentiation. Biol. Reprod. 94, 10. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.115.135145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Chauvigné, F.,
    2. Verdura, S.,
    3. Mazón, M. J.,
    4. Duncan, N.,
    5. Zanuy, S.,
    6. Gómez, A. and
    7. Cerdà, J.
    (2012). Follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone mediate the androgenic pathway in Leydig cells of an evolutionary advanced teleost. Biol. Reprod. 87, 35. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.112.100784
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chen, L.-Y.,
    2. Brown, P. R.,
    3. Willis, W. B. and
    4. Eddy, E. M.
    (2014). Peritubular myoid cells participate in male mouse spermatogonial stem cell maintenance. Endocrinology 155, 4964-4974. doi:10.1210/en.2014-1406
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Chen, Y.,
    2. Ma, L.,
    3. Hogarth, C.,
    4. Wei, G.,
    5. Griswold, M. D. and
    6. Tong, M.-H.
    (2016). Retinoid signaling controls spermatogonial differentiation by regulating expression of replication-dependent core histone genes. Development 143, 1502-1511. doi:10.1242/dev.135939
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Crespo, D.,
    2. Assis, L. H. C.,
    3. Furmanek, T.,
    4. Bogerd, J. and
    5. Schulz, R. W.
    (2016). Expression profiling identifies Sertoli and Leydig cell genes as Fsh targets in adult zebrafish testis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 437, 237-251. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2016.08.033
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Crowder, C. M.,
    2. Lassiter, C. S. and
    3. Gorelick, D. A.
    (2018). Nuclear androgen receptor regulates testes organization and oocyte maturation in zebrafish. Endocrinology 159, 980-993. doi:10.1210/en.2017-00617
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Damm, K.,
    2. Heyman, R. A.,
    3. Umesono, K. and
    4. Evans, R. M.
    (1993). Functional inhibition of retinoic acid response by dominant negative retinoic acid receptor mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2989-2993. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.7.2989
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. de Castro Assis, L. H.,
    2. de Nóbrega, R. H.,
    3. Gómez-González, N. E.,
    4. Bogerd, J. and
    5. Schulz, R. W.
    (2018). Estrogen-induced inhibition of spermatogenesis in zebrafish is largely reversed by androgen. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 60, 273-284. doi:10.1530/JME-17-0177
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. De Gendt, K. and
    2. Verhoeven, G.
    (2012). Tissue- and cell-specific functions of the androgen receptor revealed through conditional knockout models in mice. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 352, 13-25. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2011.08.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. De Gendt, K.,
    2. Swinnen, J. V.,
    3. Saunders, P. T. K.,
    4. Schoonjans, L.,
    5. Dewerchin, M.,
    6. Devos, A.,
    7. Tan, K.,
    8. Atanassova, N.,
    9. Claessens, F.,
    10. Lecureuil, C. et al.
    (2004). A Sertoli cell-selective knockout of the androgen receptor causes spermatogenic arrest in meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1327-1332. doi:10.1073/pnas.0308114100
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. de Waal, P. P.,
    2. Leal, M. C.,
    3. García-López, A.,
    4. Liarte, S.,
    5. de Jonge, H.,
    6. Hinfray, N.,
    7. Brion, F.,
    8. Schulz, R. W. and
    9. Bogerd, J.
    (2009). Oestrogen-induced androgen insufficiency results in a reduction of proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonia in the zebrafish testis. J. Endocrinol. 202, 287-297. doi:10.1677/JOE-09-0050
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. DeFalco, T.,
    2. Potter, S. J.,
    3. Williams, A. V.,
    4. Waller, B.,
    5. Kan, M. J. and
    6. Capel, B.
    (2015). Macrophages contribute to the spermatogonial niche in the adult testis. Cell Rep. 12, 1107-1119. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Dong, R.,
    2. Yang, S.,
    3. Jiao, J.,
    4. Wang, T.,
    5. Shi, H.,
    6. Zhou, L.,
    7. Zhang, Y. and
    8. Wang, D.
    (2013). Characterization of Stra8 in Southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis): evidence for its role in meiotic initiation. BMC Mol. Biol. 14, 11. doi:10.1186/1471-2199-14-11
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Eijpe, M.,
    2. Offenberg, H.,
    3. Jessberger, R.,
    4. Revenkova, E. and
    5. Heyting, C.
    (2003). Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1beta and SMC3. J. Cell Biol. 160, 657-670. doi:10.1083/jcb.200212080
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. El Shennawy, A.,
    2. Gates, R. J. and
    3. Russell, L. D.
    (1998). Hormonal regulation of spermatogenesis in the hypophysectomized rat: cell viability after hormonal replacement in adults after intermediate periods of hypophysectomy. J. Androl. 19, 320-334.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Elmore, S.
    (2007). Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol. Pathol. 35, 495-516. doi:10.1080/01926230701320337
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Endo, T.,
    2. Romer, K. A.,
    3. Anderson, E. L.,
    4. Baltus, A. E.,
    5. de Rooij, D. G. and
    6. Page, D. C.
    (2015). Periodic retinoic acid-STRA8 signaling intersects with periodic germ-cell competencies to regulate spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E2347-E2356. doi:10.1073/pnas.1505683112
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Endo, T.,
    2. Freinkman, E.,
    3. de Rooij, D. G. and
    4. Page, D. C.
    (2017). Periodic production of retinoic acid by meiotic and somatic cells coordinates four transitions in mouse spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10132-E10141. doi:10.1073/pnas.1710837114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Feng, R.,
    2. Fang, L.,
    3. Cheng, Y.,
    4. He, X.,
    5. Jiang, W.,
    6. Dong, R.,
    7. Shi, H.,
    8. Jiang, D.,
    9. Sun, L. and
    10. Wang, D.
    (2015). Retinoic acid homeostasis through aldh1a2 and cyp26a1 mediates meiotic entry in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Sci. Rep. 5, 10131. doi:10.1038/srep10131
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. García-López, A.,
    2. Bogerd, J.,
    3. Granneman, J. C.,
    4. van Dijk, W.,
    5. Trant, J. M.,
    6. Taranger, G. L. and
    7. Schulz, R. W.
    (2009). Leydig cells express follicle-stimulating hormone receptors in African catfish. Endocrinology 150, 357-365. doi:10.1210/en.2008-0447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. García-López, A.,
    2. de Jonge, H.,
    3. Nóbrega, R. H.,
    4. de Waal, P. P.,
    5. van Dijk, W.,
    6. Hemrika, W.,
    7. Taranger, G. L.,
    8. Bogerd, J. and
    9. Schulz, R. W.
    (2010). Studies in zebrafish reveal unusual cellular expression patterns of gonadotropin receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in the testis and unexpected functional differentiation of the gonadotropins. Endocrinology 151, 2349-2360. doi:10.1210/en.2009-1227
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Gely-Pernot, A.,
    2. Raverdeau, M.,
    3. Célébi, C.,
    4. Dennefeld, C.,
    5. Feret, B.,
    6. Klopfenstein, M.,
    7. Yoshida, S.,
    8. Ghyselinck, N. B. and
    9. Mark, M.
    (2012). Spermatogonia differentiation requires retinoic acid receptor gamma. Endocrinology 153, 438-449. doi:10.1210/en.2011-1102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Gely-Pernot, A.,
    2. Raverdeau, M.,
    3. Teletin, M.,
    4. Vernet, N.,
    5. Féret, B.,
    6. Klopfenstein, M.,
    7. Dennefeld, C.,
    8. Davidson, I.,
    9. Benoit, G.,
    10. Mark, M. et al.
    (2015). Retinoic acid receptors control spermatogonia cell-fate and induce expression of the SALL4A transcription factor. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005501. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005501
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Griswold, M. D.
    (2016). Spermatogenesis: the commitment to meiosis. Physiol. Rev. 96, 1-17. doi:10.1152/physrev.00013.2015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hammoud, S. S.,
    2. Low, D. H. P.,
    3. Yi, C.,
    4. Carrell, D. T.,
    5. Guccione, E. and
    6. Cairns, B. R.
    (2014). Chromatin and transcription transitions of mammalian adult germline stem cells and spermatogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 15, 239-253. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.04.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Hasegawa, K. and
    2. Saga, Y.
    (2012). Retinoic acid signaling in Sertoli cells regulates organization of the blood-testis barrier through cyclical changes in gene expression. Development 139, 4347-4355. doi:10.1242/dev.080119
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Hinfray, N.,
    2. Nóbrega, R. H.,
    3. Caulier, M.,
    4. Baudiffier, D.,
    5. Maillot-Maréchal, E.,
    6. Chadili, E.,
    7. Palluel, O.,
    8. Porcher, J.-M.,
    9. Schulz, R. and
    10. Brion, F.
    (2013). Cyp17a1 and Cyp19a1 in the zebrafish testis are differentially affected by oestradiol. J. Endocrinol. 216, 375-388. doi:10.1530/JOE-12-0509
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Hobbs, R. M.,
    2. Fagoonee, S.,
    3. Papa, A.,
    4. Webster, K.,
    5. Altruda, F.,
    6. Nishinakamura, R.,
    7. Chai, L. and
    8. Pandolfi, P. P.
    (2012). Functional antagonism between Sall4 and Plzf defines germline progenitors. Cell Stem Cell 10, 284-298. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Huang, D. W.,
    2. Sherman, B. T. and
    3. Lempicki, R. A.
    (2009). Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protocols 4, 44-57. doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Ikami, K.,
    2. Tokue, M.,
    3. Sugimoto, R.,
    4. Noda, C.,
    5. Kobayashi, S.,
    6. Hara, K. and
    7. Yoshida, S.
    (2015). Hierarchical differentiation competence in response to retinoic acid ensures stem cell maintenance during mouse spermatogenesis. Development 142, 1582-1592. doi:10.1242/dev.118695
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Jauregui, E. J.,
    2. Mitchell, D.,
    3. Topping, T.,
    4. Hogarth, C. A. and
    5. Griswold, M. D.
    (2018). Retinoic acid receptor signaling is necessary in steroidogenic cells for normal spermatogenesis and epididymal function. Development 145, dev.160465. doi:10.1242/dev.160465
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Kikuchi, K.,
    2. Holdway, J. E.,
    3. Major, R. J.,
    4. Blum, N.,
    5. Dahn, R. D.,
    6. Begemann, G. and
    7. Poss, K. D.
    (2011). Retinoic acid production by endocardium and epicardium is an injury response essential for zebrafish heart regeneration. Dev. Cell 20, 397-404. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Koubova, J.,
    2. Hu, Y.-C.,
    3. Bhattacharyya, T.,
    4. Soh, Y. Q. S.,
    5. Gill, M. E.,
    6. Goodheart, M. L.,
    7. Hogarth, C. A.,
    8. Griswold, M. D. and
    9. Page, D. C.
    (2014). Retinoic acid activates two pathways required for meiosis in mice. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004541. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004541
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Krøvel, A. V. and
    2. Olsen, L. C.
    (2002). Expression of a vas::EGFP transgene in primordial germ cells of the zebrafish. Mech. Dev. 116, 141-150. doi:10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00154-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Kwan, K. M.,
    2. Fujimoto, E.,
    3. Grabher, C.,
    4. Mangum, B. D.,
    5. Hardy, M. E.,
    6. Campbell, D. S.,
    7. Parant, J. M.,
    8. Yost, H. J.,
    9. Kanki, J. P. and
    10. Chien, C.-B.
    (2007). The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev. Dyn. 236, 3088-3099. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21343
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Lacerda, S. M. S. N.,
    2. Batlouni, S. R.,
    3. Costa, G. M. J.,
    4. Segatelli, T. M.,
    5. Quirino, B. R.,
    6. Queiroz, B. M.,
    7. Kalapothakis, E. and
    8. Franca, L. R.
    (2010). A new and fast technique to generate offspring after germ cells transplantation in adult fish: the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) model. PLoS ONE 5, e10740. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010740
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Leal, M. C.,
    2. Cardoso, E. R.,
    3. Nóbrega, R. H.,
    4. Batlouni, S. R.,
    5. Bogerd, J.,
    6. França, L. R. and
    7. Schulz, R. W.
    (2009a). Histological and stereological evaluation of zebrafish (Danio rerio) spermatogenesis with an emphasis on spermatogonial generations. Biol. Reprod. 81, 177-187. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.109.076299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Leal, M. C.,
    2. de Waal, P. P.,
    3. Garcia-Lopez, A.,
    4. Chen, S. X.,
    5. Bogerd, J. and
    6. Schulz, R. W.
    (2009b). Zebrafish primary testis tissue culture: an approach to study testis function ex vivo. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 162, 134-138. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Lee, J.,
    2. Iwai, T.,
    3. Yokota, T. and
    4. Yamashita, M.
    (2003). Temporally and spatially selective loss of Rec8 protein from meiotic chromosomes during mammalian meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 116, 2781-2790. doi:10.1242/jcs.00495
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Li, M.-T.,
    2. Richter, F.,
    3. Chang, C.,
    4. Irwin, R. J. and
    5. Huang, H. F. S.
    (2002). Androgen and retinoic acid interaction in LNCaP cells, effects on cell proliferation and expression of retinoic acid receptors and epidermal growth factor receptor. BMC Cancer 2, 16. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-2-16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Li, H.,
    2. Handsaker, B.,
    3. Wysoker, A.,
    4. Fennell, T.,
    5. Ruan, J.,
    6. Homer, N.,
    7. Marth, G.,
    8. Abecasis, G. and
    9. Durbin, R.
    (2009). The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Li, M.,
    2. Feng, R.,
    3. Ma, H.,
    4. Dong, R.,
    5. Liu, Z.,
    6. Jiang, W.,
    7. Tao, W. and
    8. Wang, D.
    (2016). Retinoic acid triggers meiosis initiation via stra8-dependent pathway in Southern catfish, Silurus meridionalis. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 232, 191-198. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2016.01.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Loo, D. T.
    (2011). In situ detection of apoptosis by the TUNEL assay: an overview of techniques. Methods Mol. Biol. 682, 3-13. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-409-8_1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Lord, T.,
    2. Oatley, M. J. and
    3. Oatley, J. M.
    (2018). Testicular architecture is critical for mediation of retinoic acid responsiveness by undifferentiated spermatogonial subtypes in the mouse. Stem Cell Rep. 10, 538-552. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.01.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    1. Martinović-Weigelt, D.,
    2. Wang, R.-L.,
    3. Villeneuve, D. L.,
    4. Bencic, D. C.,
    5. Lazorchak, J. and
    6. Ankley, G. T.
    (2011). Gene expression profiling of the androgen receptor antagonists flutamide and vinclozolin in zebrafish (Danio rerio) gonads. Aquat. Toxicol. 101, 447-458. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Mazón, M. J.,
    2. Gómez, A.,
    3. Yilmaz, O.,
    4. Carrillo, M. and
    5. Zanuy, S.
    (2014). Administration of follicle-stimulating hormone in vivo triggers testicular recrudescence of juvenile European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Biol. Reprod. 90, 6. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.113.110569
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. McLachlan, R. I.,
    2. O'Donnell, L.,
    3. Meachem, S. J.,
    4. Stanton, P. G.,
    5. de, K.,
    6. Pratis, K. and
    7. Robertson, D. M.
    (2002). Hormonal regulation of spermatogenesis in primates and man: insights for development of the male hormonal contraceptive. J. Androl. 23, 149-162.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. McLean, D. J.,
    2. Russell, L. D. and
    3. Griswold, M. D.
    (2002). Biological activity and enrichment of spermatogonial stem cells in vitamin A-deficient and hyperthermia-exposed testes from mice based on colonization following germ cell transplantation. Biol. Reprod. 66, 1374-1379. doi:10.1095/biolreprod66.5.1374
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Melo, M. C.,
    2. van Dijk, P.,
    3. Andersson, E.,
    4. Nilsen, T. O.,
    5. Fjelldal, P. G.,
    6. Male, R.,
    7. Nijenhuis, W.,
    8. Bogerd, J.,
    9. de França, L. R.,
    10. Taranger, G. L. et al.
    (2015). Androgens directly stimulate spermatogonial differentiation in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 211, 52-61. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.11.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Merico, D.,
    2. Isserlin, R. and
    3. Bader, G. D.
    (2011). Visualizing gene-set enrichment results using the Cytoscape plug-in enrichment map. Methods Mol. Biol. 781, 257-277. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-276-2_12
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Miura, T.,
    2. Yamauchi, K.,
    3. Takahashi, H. and
    4. Nagahama, Y.
    (1991). Hormonal induction of all stages of spermatogenesis in vitro in the male Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 5774-5778. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.13.5774
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Miura, T.,
    2. Miura, C.,
    3. Konda, Y. and
    4. Yamauchi, K.
    (2002). Spermatogenesis-preventing substance in Japanese eel. Development 129, 2689-2697.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Morales, C. and
    2. Griswold, M. D.
    (1987). Retinol-induced stage synchronization in seminiferous tubules of the rat. Endocrinology 121, 432-434. doi:10.1210/endo-121-1-432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. Mu, X.,
    2. Wen, J.,
    3. Guo, M.,
    4. Wang, J.,
    5. Li, G.,
    6. Wang, Z.,
    7. Wang, Y.,
    8. Teng, Z.,
    9. Cui, Y. and
    10. Xia, G.
    (2013). Retinoic acid derived from the fetal ovary initiates meiosis in mouse germ cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 228, 627-639. doi:10.1002/jcp.24172
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Munetsuna, E.,
    2. Hojo, Y.,
    3. Hattori, M.,
    4. Ishii, H.,
    5. Kawato, S.,
    6. Ishida, A.,
    7. Kominami, S. A. J. and
    8. Yamazaki, T.
    (2009). Retinoic acid stimulates 17beta-estradiol and testosterone synthesis in rat hippocampal slice cultures. Endocrinology 150, 4260-4269. doi:10.1210/en.2008-1644
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Nóbrega, R. H.,
    2. Greebe, C. D.,
    3. van de Kant, H.,
    4. Bogerd, J.,
    5. de França, L. R. and
    6. Schulz, R. W.
    (2010). Spermatogonial stem cell niche and spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 5, e12808. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012808
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Nóbrega, R. H.,
    2. Morais, R. D. V. S.,
    3. Crespo, D.,
    4. de Waal, P. P.,
    5. de Franca, L. R.,
    6. Schulz, R. W. and
    7. Bogerd, J.
    (2015). Fsh stimulates spermatogonial proliferation and differentiation in zebrafish via Igf3. Endocrinology 156, 3804-3817. doi:10.1210/en.2015-1157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Oatley, J. M.,
    2. Oatley, M. J.,
    3. Avarbock, M. R.,
    4. Tobias, J. W. and
    5. Brinster, R. L.
    (2009). Colony stimulating factor 1 is an extrinsic stimulator of mouse spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal. Development 136, 1191-1199. doi:10.1242/dev.032243
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Oduwole, O. O.,
    2. Peltoketo, H.,
    3. Poliandri, A.,
    4. Vengadabady, L.,
    5. Chrusciel, M.,
    6. Doroszko, M.,
    7. Samanta, L.,
    8. Owen, L.,
    9. Keevil, B.,
    10. Rahman, N. A. et al.
    (2018). Constitutively active follicle-stimulating hormone receptor enables androgen-independent spermatogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 1787-1792. doi:10.1172/JCI96794
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    1. Ohta, T.,
    2. Miyake, H.,
    3. Miura, C.,
    4. Kamei, H.,
    5. Aida, K. and
    6. Miura, T.
    (2007). Follicle-stimulating hormone induces spermatogenesis mediated by androgen production in Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. Biol. Reprod. 77, 970-977. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.107.062299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. O'Shaughnessy, P. J.,
    2. Monteiro, A.,
    3. Verhoeven, G.,
    4. De Gendt, K. and
    5. Abel, M. H.
    (2010). Effect of FSH on testicular morphology and spermatogenesis in gonadotrophin-deficient hypogonadal mice lacking androgen receptors. Reproduction 139, 177-184. doi:10.1530/REP-09-0377
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Pasquier, J.,
    2. Cabau, C.,
    3. Nguyen, T.,
    4. Jouanno, E.,
    5. Severac, D.,
    6. Braasch, I.,
    7. Journot, L.,
    8. Pontarotti, P.,
    9. Klopp, C.,
    10. Postlethwait, J. H. et al.
    (2016). Gene evolution and gene expression after whole genome duplication in fish: the PhyloFish database. BMC Genomics 17, 368. doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2709-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Perz-Edwards, A.,
    2. Hardison, N. L. and
    3. Linney, E.
    (2001). Retinoic acid-mediated gene expression in transgenic reporter zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 229, 89-101. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9979
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    1. Planas, J. V. and
    2. Swanson, P.
    (1995). Maturation-associated changes in the response of the salmon testis to the steroidogenic actions of gonadotropins (GTH I and GTH II) in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 52, 697-704. doi:10.1095/biolreprod52.3.697
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. Potter, S. J. and
    2. DeFalco, T.
    (2017). Role of the testis interstitial compartment in spermatogonial stem cell function. Reproduction 153, R151-R162. doi:10.1530/REP-16-0588
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Pradhan, A. and
    2. Olsson, P.-E.
    (2015). Inhibition of retinoic acid synthesis disrupts spermatogenesis and fecundity in zebrafish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 217-218, 81-91. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.02.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Rodríguez-Marí, A.,
    2. Cañestro, C.,
    3. BreMiller, R. A.,
    4. Catchen, J. M.,
    5. Yan, Y.-L. and
    6. Postlethwait, J. H.
    (2013). Retinoic acid metabolic genes, meiosis, and gonadal sex differentiation in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 8, e73951. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073951
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Rolland, A. D.,
    2. Lardenois, A.,
    3. Goupil, A.-S.,
    4. Lareyre, J.-J.,
    5. Houlgatte, R.,
    6. Chalmel, F. and
    7. Le Gac, F.
    (2013). Profiling of androgen response in rainbow trout pubertal testis: relevance to male gonad development and spermatogenesis. PLoS ONE 8, e53302. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Safian, D.,
    2. Ryane, N.,
    3. Bogerd, J. and
    4. Schulz, R. W.
    (2018). Fsh stimulates Leydig cell Wnt5a production, enriching zebrafish type A spermatogonia. J. Endocrinol. 239, 351-363. doi:10.1530/JOE-18-0447
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    1. Saito, K.,
    2. Siegfried, K. R.,
    3. Nüsslein-Volhard, C. and
    4. Sakai, N.
    (2011). Isolation and cytogenetic characterization of zebrafish meiotic prophase I mutants. Dev. Dyn. 240, 1779-1792. doi:10.1002/dvdy.22661
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Sambroni, E.,
    2. Lareyre, J.-J. and
    3. Le Gac, F.
    (2013). Fsh controls gene expression in fish both independently of and through steroid mediation. PLoS ONE 8, e76684. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Sato, T.,
    2. Suzuki, A.,
    3. Shibata, N.,
    4. Sakaizumi, M. and
    5. Hamaguchi, S.
    (2008). The novel mutant scl of the medaka fish, Oryzias latipes, shows no secondary sex characters. Zoolog. Sci. 25, 299-306. doi:10.2108/zsj.25.299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Sawatari, E.,
    2. Shikina, S.,
    3. Takeuchi, T. and
    4. Yoshizaki, G.
    (2007). A novel transforming growth factor-beta superfamily member expressed in gonadal somatic cells enhances primordial germ cell and spermatogonial proliferation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Dev. Biol. 301, 266-275. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.10.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Shannon, P.,
    2. Markiel, A.,
    3. Ozier, O.,
    4. Baliga, N. S.,
    5. Wang, J. T.,
    6. Ramage, D.,
    7. Amin, N.,
    8. Schwikowski, B. and
    9. Ideker, T.
    (2003). Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498-2504. doi:10.1101/gr.1239303
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Sharpe, R. M.,
    2. Maddocks, S.,
    3. Millar, M.,
    4. Kerr, J. B.,
    5. Saunders, P. T. and
    6. McKinnell, C.
    (1992). Testosterone and spermatogenesis. Identification of stage-specific, androgen-regulated proteins secreted by adult rat seminiferous tubules. J. Androl. 13, 172-184.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  82. ↵
    1. Singh, J.,
    2. O'Neill, C. and
    3. Handelsman, D. J.
    (1995). Induction of spermatogenesis by androgens in gonadotropin-deficient (hpg) mice. Endocrinology 136, 5311-5321. doi:10.1210/endo.136.12.7588276
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. ↵
    1. Skaar, K. S.,
    2. Nóbrega, R. H.,
    3. Magaraki, A.,
    4. Olsen, L. C.,
    5. Schulz, R. W. and
    6. Male, R.
    (2011). Proteolytically activated, recombinant anti-müllerian hormone inhibits androgen secretion, proliferation, and differentiation of spermatogonia in adult zebrafish testis organ cultures. Endocrinology 152, 3527-3540. doi:10.1210/en.2010-1469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  84. ↵
    1. Soifer, H. S.,
    2. Koch, T.,
    3. Lai, J.,
    4. Hansen, B.,
    5. Hoeg, A.,
    6. Oerum, H. and
    7. Stein, C. A.
    (2012). Silencing of gene expression by gymnotic delivery of antisense oligonucleotides. Methods Mol. Biol. 815, 333-346. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-424-7_25
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Stafford, D. and
    2. Prince, V. E.
    (2002). Retinoic acid signaling is required for a critical early step in zebrafish pancreatic development. Curr. Biol. 12, 1215-1220. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00929-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  86. ↵
    1. Stein, C. A.,
    2. Hansen, J. B.,
    3. Lai, J.,
    4. Wu, S. J.,
    5. Voskresenskiy, A.,
    6. Høg, A.,
    7. Worm, J.,
    8. Hedtjärn, M.,
    9. Souleimanian, N.,
    10. Miller, P. et al.
    (2010). Efficient gene silencing by delivery of locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides, unassisted by transfection reagents. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e3. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp841
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Tan, K. A. L.,
    2. De Gendt, K.,
    3. Atanassova, N.,
    4. Walker, M.,
    5. Sharpe, R. M.,
    6. Saunders, P. T. K.,
    7. Denolet, E. and
    8. Verhoeven, G.
    (2005). The role of androgens in sertoli cell proliferation and functional maturation: studies in mice with total or Sertoli cell-selective ablation of the androgen receptor. Endocrinology 146, 2674-2683. doi:10.1210/en.2004-1630
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. ↵
    1. Tanaka, T.,
    2. Kanatsu-Shinohara, M.,
    3. Lei, Z.,
    4. Rao, C. V. and
    5. Shinohara, T.
    (2016). The luteinizing hormone-testosterone pathway regulates mouse spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal by suppressing WNT5A expression in Sertoli cells. Stem Cell Reports 7, 279-291. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.07.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  89. ↵
    1. Tang, H.,
    2. Chen, Y.,
    3. Wang, L.,
    4. Yin, Y.,
    5. Li, G.,
    6. Guo, Y.,
    7. Liu, Y.,
    8. Lin, H.,
    9. Cheng, C. H. K. and
    10. Liu, X.
    (2018). Fertility impairment with defective spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in male zebrafish lacking androgen receptor. Biol. Reprod. 98, 227-238. doi:10.1093/biolre/iox165
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  90. ↵
    1. Teletin, M.,
    2. Vernet, N.,
    3. Yu, J.,
    4. Klopfenstein, M.,
    5. Jones, J. W.,
    6. Féret, B.,
    7. Kane, M. A.,
    8. Ghyselinck, N. B. and
    9. Mark, M.
    (2019). Two functionally redundant sources of retinoic acid secure spermatogonia differentiation in the seminiferous epithelium. Development 146, dev.170225. doi:10.1242/dev.170225
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  91. ↵
    1. Trapnell, C.,
    2. Pachter, L. and
    3. Salzberg, S. L.
    (2009). TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105-1111. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  92. ↵
    1. Ubels, J. L.,
    2. Veenstra, E.,
    3. Ditlev, J. and
    4. Ingersoll, K.
    (2003). Interactions of testosterone and all-trans retinoic acid in regulation of androgen receptor expression in rat lacrimal gland. Exp. Eye Res. 77, 741-748. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2003.07.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  93. ↵
    1. Van Beek, M. E. A. B. and
    2. Meistrich, M. L.
    (1990). A method for quantifying synchrony in testes of rats treated with vitamin A deprivation and readministration. Biol. Reprod. 42, 424-431. doi:10.1095/biolreprod42.3.424
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. van Pelt, A. M. M. and
    2. de Rooij, D. G.
    (1990). Synchronization of the seminiferous epithelium after vitamin A replacement in vitamin A-deficient mice. Biol. Reprod. 43, 363-367. doi:10.1095/biolreprod43.3.363
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  95. ↵
    1. van Pelt, A. M. M.,
    2. van Dissel-Emiliani, F. M. F.,
    3. Gaemers, I. C.,
    4. van der Burg, M. J. M.,
    5. Tanke, H. J. and
    6. de Rooij, D. G.
    (1995). Characteristics of A spermatogonia and preleptotene spermatocytes in the vitamin A-deficient rat testis. Biol. Reprod. 53, 570-578. doi:10.1095/biolreprod53.3.570
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Velte, E. K.,
    2. Niedenberger, B. A.,
    3. Serra, N. D.,
    4. Singh, A.,
    5. Roa-DeLaCruz, L.,
    6. Hermann, B. P. and
    7. Geyer, C. B.
    (2019). Differential RA responsiveness directs formation of functionally distinct spermatogonial populations at the initiation of spermatogenesis in the mouse. Development 146, dev.173088. doi:10.1242/dev.173088
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  97. ↵
    1. Verhoeven, G.,
    2. Willems, A.,
    3. Denolet, E.,
    4. Swinnen, J. V. and
    5. De Gendt, K.
    (2010). Androgens and spermatogenesis: lessons from transgenic mouse models. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 1537-1556. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Wang, S.,
    2. Furmanek, T.,
    3. Kryvi, H.,
    4. Krossøy, C.,
    5. Totland, G. K.,
    6. Grotmol, S. and
    7. Wargelius, A.
    (2014). Transcriptome sequencing of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) notochord prior to development of the vertebrae provides clues to regulation of positional fate, chordoblast lineage and mineralisation. BMC Genomics 15, 141. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-141
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  99. ↵
    1. Wang, S.,
    2. Wang, X.,
    3. Ma, L.,
    4. Lin, X.,
    5. Zhang, D.,
    6. Li, Z.,
    7. Wu, Y.,
    8. Zheng, C.,
    9. Feng, X.,
    10. Liao, S. et al.
    (2016). Retinoic acid is sufficient for the in vitro induction of mouse spermatocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 7, 80-94. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.05.013
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  100. ↵
    1. Xu, H.,
    2. Beasley, M. D.,
    3. Warren, W. D.,
    4. van der Horst, G. T. J. and
    5. McKay, M. J.
    (2005). Absence of mouse REC8 cohesin promotes synapsis of sister chromatids in meiosis. Dev. Cell 8, 949-961. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  101. ↵
    1. Zhai, G.,
    2. Shu, T.,
    3. Xia, Y.,
    4. Lu, Y.,
    5. Shang, G.,
    6. Jin, X.,
    7. He, J.,
    8. Nie, P. and
    9. Yin, Z.
    (2018). Characterization of sexual trait development in cyp17a1-deficient zebrafish. Endocrinology 159, 3549-3562. doi:10.1210/en.2018-00551
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Keywords

  • Retinoic acid
  • 11-ketotestosterone
  • Spermatogenesis
  • RNA sequencing
  • Zebrafish

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endocrine and local signaling interact to regulate spermatogenesis in zebrafish: follicle-stimulating hormone, retinoic acid and androgens
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Endocrine and local signaling interact to regulate spermatogenesis in zebrafish: follicle-stimulating hormone, retinoic acid and androgens
Diego Crespo, Luiz H. C. Assis, Henk J. G. van de Kant, Sjors de Waard, Diego Safian, Moline S. Lemos, Jan Bogerd, Rüdiger W. Schulz
Development 2019 146: dev178665 doi: 10.1242/dev.178665 Published 4 November 2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Endocrine and local signaling interact to regulate spermatogenesis in zebrafish: follicle-stimulating hormone, retinoic acid and androgens
Diego Crespo, Luiz H. C. Assis, Henk J. G. van de Kant, Sjors de Waard, Diego Safian, Moline S. Lemos, Jan Bogerd, Rüdiger W. Schulz
Development 2019 146: dev178665 doi: 10.1242/dev.178665 Published 4 November 2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Tissue growth constrains root organ outlines into an isometrically scalable shape
  • Stem integrity in Arabidopsis thaliana requires a load-bearing epidermis
  • A dynamic and mosaic basement membrane controls cell intercalation in Drosophila ovaries
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLE

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Reproductive biology

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

An interview with Swathi Arur

Swathi Arur joined the team at Development as an Academic Editor in 2020. Her lab uses multidisciplinary approaches to understand female germline development and fertility. We met with her over Zoom to hear more about her life, her career and her love for C. elegans.


Jim Wells and Hanna Mikkola join our team of Editors

We are pleased to welcome James (Jim) Wells and Hanna Mikkola to our team of Editors. Jim joins us a new Academic Editor, taking over from Gordan Keller, and Hanna joins our team of Associate Editors. Find out more about their research interests and areas of expertise.


New funding scheme supports sustainable events

As part of our Sustainable Conferencing Initiative, we are pleased to announce funding for organisers that seek to reduce the environmental footprint of their event. The next deadline to apply for a Scientific Meeting grant is 26 March 2021.


Read & Publish participation continues to grow

“I’d heard of Read & Publish deals and knew that many universities, including mine, had signed up to them but I had not previously understood the benefits that these deals bring to authors who work at those universities.”

Professor Sally Lowell (University of Edinburgh) shares her experience of publishing Open Access as part of our growing Read & Publish initiative. We now have over 150 institutions in 15 countries and four library consortia taking part – find out more and view our full list of participating institutions.


Upcoming special issues

Imaging Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration
Submission deadline: 30 March 2021
Publication: mid-2021

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

Both special issues welcome Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992