Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES
Defined conditions for propagation and manipulation of mouse embryonic stem cells
Carla Mulas, Tüzer Kalkan, Ferdinand von Meyenn, Harry G. Leitch, Jennifer Nichols, Austin Smith
Development 2019 146: dev173146 doi: 10.1242/dev.173146 Published 26 March 2019
Carla Mulas
1Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Gleeson Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carla Mulas
  • For correspondence: cm623@cam.ac.uk austin.smith@cscr.cam.ac.uk
Tüzer Kalkan
1Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Gleeson Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ferdinand von Meyenn
2Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ferdinand von Meyenn
Harry G. Leitch
3MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
4Institute of Clinical Sciences (ICS), Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Harry G. Leitch
Jennifer Nichols
1Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Gleeson Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
5Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jennifer Nichols
Austin Smith
1Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Gleeson Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
6Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Hopkins Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QW, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Austin Smith
  • For correspondence: cm623@cam.ac.uk austin.smith@cscr.cam.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Imprinted control region (ICR) methylation levels in mouse ESCs. (A,B) Average CpG methylation levels at known ICRs were quantified in whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) data sets from an ES cell line maintained in 2i (no LIF) (Kalkan et al., 2017; GEO accession number GSE92273) (A) and from an ES cell line maintained in 2i/LIF (Ficz et al., 2013; GEO accession number GSE42923) (B). Both datasets are derived from inbred 129 strain lines. The WGBS datasets were processed as described previously (von Meyenn et al., 2016) and the mean±s.d. of three experiments are shown. The mean global CpG methylation levels in each condition are shown (red dashed line). These observations are in agreement with previous reports that methylation at three DMRs is maintained in an ES cell line derived and maintained in 2i/LIF and an allele-specific assay confirmation of normal methylation pattern at the same regions in 2i/LIF-derived embryonic germ cells (Leitch et al., 2013a).

  • Table 1.
  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Representative images of ES cells in 2i at different densities on day 2 and day 3. Blue box highlights the range of cell densities ideal for splitting. Note refractile colony edges on day 2, which are lost in overgrown colonies at day 3. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Typical cell cycle profile of day 2 ES cells plated at 1.5×104 cell/cm2. Cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI) and the Click-iT EdU kit according to manufacturer's instructions. Graph shows quantification over two independent experiments, with two separate lines in each.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Representative images of clonal assays in 2i/LIF and FCS/LIF conditions. Insets to the right show magnified views of individual colonies and suggested classification in the case of FCS/LIF.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Example data of exit from pluripotency experiment. (A) Colony-formation assay. Cells were differentiated for 36 h in four different conditions; PD03, MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901 (1 µM); BI, RSK inhibitor BI-D1870 (3 or 6 µM); DMSO, carrier control. (B) Representative downregulation kinetics of Rex1::GFPd2 cells plated in N2B27, starting from 2i (no LIF) conditions. Green dotted line indicates arbitrary threshold. (C) Use of the Rex1::GFPd2 reporter system to determine the effect of two different inhibitors (PD03, MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901 at 1 µM; PD17, FGF receptor inhibitor PD173074 at 100 nM) on exit kinetics. (D) Fixing and immunostaining for Nanog protein, to quantify the delay in transition associated with knockdown of the Tcf7l1 transcription factor by siRNA.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Representative images of cells at different stages of neural differentiation. (A) Immunostaining for Sox1 and Oct4 on day 1-3 of neural differentiation. (B) Phase contrast images showing representative morphology of early day 3 neural differentiation for two different cell lines (live cultures). Little cell death should occur during the first 1-3 days of differentiation. Cell death might become apparent once cultures become confluent. (C) Immunostaining for Sox1 and the post-mitotic marker Tuj1 on days 4 and 6 of differentiation. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Transfection efficiency as assessed by knockdown of GFP in Rex1::GFPd2 cells. Left: representative flow cytometry profile. Right: quantification of the percentage of Rex1::GFPd2 positive cells over four independent experiments.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    ES cell derivation process in 2i/LIF. (A) Flushed 8-cell embryo. (B) Embryos after 1-2 days in culture. (C) After 3 days in culture, embryos start to hatch from the zona pellucida. (D) Hatched blastocyst (bottom) and discarded zona (top). (E) Summary of immunosurgery protocol and image of ideal end-point after complement treatment. (F) Separation of ICM and trophectoderm after immunosurgery. (G) Primary outgrowth cultured for 4 days in 2i/LIF on gelatinised plates (not to scale with embryos). Images reproduced with permission from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. These images are not published under the terms of the CC-BY licence of this article. For permission to reuse, please see Nichols and Jones, 2017. TE, trophectoderm.

  • Table 2.
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

RSSRSS

Keywords

  • Differentiation
  • Embryonic stem cells
  • Pluripotency
  • Self-renewal

 Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Defined conditions for propagation and manipulation of mouse embryonic stem cells
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES
Defined conditions for propagation and manipulation of mouse embryonic stem cells
Carla Mulas, Tüzer Kalkan, Ferdinand von Meyenn, Harry G. Leitch, Jennifer Nichols, Austin Smith
Development 2019 146: dev173146 doi: 10.1242/dev.173146 Published 26 March 2019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES
Defined conditions for propagation and manipulation of mouse embryonic stem cells
Carla Mulas, Tüzer Kalkan, Ferdinand von Meyenn, Harry G. Leitch, Jennifer Nichols, Austin Smith
Development 2019 146: dev173146 doi: 10.1242/dev.173146 Published 26 March 2019

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Sign in to email alerts with your email address

Article navigation

  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & tables
  • Supp info
  • Info & metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related articles

Cited by...

More in this TOC section

  • Widespread labeling and genomic editing of the fetal central nervous system by in utero CRISPR AAV9-PHP.eB administration
  • A developmental stage-specific network approach for studying dynamic co-regulation of transcription factors and microRNAs during craniofacial development
  • EPySeg: a coding-free solution for automated segmentation of epithelia using deep learning
Show more TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES

Similar articles

Subject collections

  • Stem cells & regeneration

Other journals from The Company of Biologists

Journal of Cell Science

Journal of Experimental Biology

Disease Models & Mechanisms

Biology Open

Advertisement

A new society for regenerative biologists

Kenneth Poss and Elly Tanaka announce the launch of the International Society for Regenerative Biology (ISRB), which will promote research and education in the field of regenerative biology.


Upcoming special issue: call for papers

The Immune System in Development and Regeneration
Guest editors: Florent Ginhoux and Paul Martin
Submission deadline: 1 September 2021
Publication: Spring 2022

The special issue welcomes Review articles as well as Research articles, and will be widely promoted online and at key global conferences.


An interview with Cagney Coomer

Over a virtual chat, we spoke to Cagney Coomer about her experiences in the lab, the classroom and the community centre, and why she thinks outreach and role models are vital to science.


Development presents...

Our successful webinar series continues into 2021, with early-career researchers presenting their papers and a chance to virtually network with the developmental biology community afterwards. Here, Michèle Romanos talks about her new preprint, which mixes experimentation in quail embryos and computational modelling to understand how heterogeneity in a tissue influences cell rate.

Save your spot at our next session:

10 March
Time: 9:00 (GMT)
Chaired by: Thomas Lecuit

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates on the series.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992