Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Development
  • COB
    • About The Company of Biologists
    • Development
    • Journal of Cell Science
    • Journal of Experimental Biology
    • Disease Models & Mechanisms
    • Biology Open

supporting biologistsinspiring biology

Development

  • Log in
Advanced search

RSS  Twitter  Facebook  YouTube 

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • Latest complete issue
    • Issue archive
    • Archive by article type
    • Special issues
    • Subject collections
    • Sign up for alerts
  • About us
    • About Development
    • About the Node
    • Editors and Board
    • Editor biographies
    • Travelling Fellowships
    • Grants and funding
    • Journal Meetings
    • Workshops
    • The Company of Biologists
    • Journal news
  • For authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Aims and scope
    • Presubmission enquiries
    • Article types
    • Manuscript preparation
    • Cover suggestions
    • Editorial process
    • Promoting your paper
    • Open Access
    • Biology Open transfer
  • Journal info
    • Journal policies
    • Rights and permissions
    • Media policies
    • Reviewer guide
    • Sign up for alerts
  • Contacts
    • Contacts
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback
    • For library administrators

Supplementary Material

DEV026054 Supplementary Material

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Supplemental Figure S1 -

    Fig. S1. fas2 loss-of-function phenotype in the wing. (A) Control adult wing in Minute(O)SP/+ background. (B,C) Wings containing unmarked clones of fas2eb112. Extra wing vein material can be seen. (B′,C′) An enlargement of the wings in B and C with the extra wing vein material marked by red arrows.

  • Supplemental Figure S2 -

    Fig. S2. fas2 hypomorphic wings are proportionally longer. Graph plots the mean values with one standard deviation (s.d.) as error bars. (*) Comparing wing ratios of fas2eb112/fas2e76 flies (only females viable) grown at 18°C with yw wild-type control females, also grown at 18°C. Wing ratio of fas2eb112/fas2e76 flies is 2.24±0.05 (mean±s.d.), whereas that of the control is 2.13±0.03. A Student�s t-test confirms that these two populations have significantly different wing ratios (P<0.0001). (**) Comparing wing ratios of flies over-expressing the wild-type EGFR in the wing with wild-type yw flies. Again, female wings grown at 18°C were used for consistency with fas2eb112/fas2e76 flies. Ratios of C765-Gal4, UAS-EGFR flies grown at 18°C (2.18±0.02) is significantly different from yw controls (P<0.0001), also grown at 18°C (2.13±0.03).

  • Supplemental Figure S3 -

    Fig. S3. Fas2 does not detectably inhibit Notch, Wingless, Hedgehog, Dpp and other RTK signalling. (A) When a dominant-negative form of Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H)DN, is overexpressed in the eye, Notch signalling is reduced to give a rough eye. This was not modified by heterozygosity for fas2 (A′). (B) Heterozygous Delta (Dlrev10) flies have reduced Notch signalling and ectopic vein material, but this was not affected by halving fas2 dose (B′). (C) Heterozygous Hairless (HairlessP141) flies have increased Notch signalling and shorter L5 veins in the wing. The actual (a) and theoretical (b) L5 lengths were measured, and the relative L5 length was calculated (a/b), for each wing, to take into account changes in wing sizes. (C′) When fas2 levels were halved no significant change in relative L5 length was detected (see D). (D) Graph comparing the relative L5 lengths of control HairlessP141 wings with that of flies also heterozygous for fas2. Plotted are mean values with one standard deviation error bars. Student�s t-test confirmed that there was not a significant difference between the relative L5 lengths. (E) F76e flies have increased Wingless signalling as a result of Armadillo being stabilised. The small eye phenotype was not significantly modified by heterozygosity for fas2 (E′). (F) Overexpressing Wingless in the eye hyperactivates the pathway to give a rough eye, but this was not modified when fas2 was reduced by half (F′). (G) Overexpressing the intracellular domain of E-cadherin (cadi) in the posterior part of the wing by engrailed-Gal4 sequesters Armadillo and reduces Wingless signalling. This gives the �ripped� posterior compartment phenotype shown. This phenotype was not significantly modified when fas2 levels were halved (G′). (H) When a dominant negative form of Smoothened (Smo5A) is over-expressed in the wing by C765-Gal4, Hedgehog signalling is reduced, and L3 and L4 veins fuse as a result. This phenotype was not modified upon heterozygosity for fas2 (H′). (I) Activating the FGFR pathway by overexpressing an activated form of the receptor breathless, λ-btl, together with dof, gives a rough eye at 18°C. (I′) GMR>λ-btl, dof /+ rough eye was suppressed when heterozygous for fas2 (at 18°C). (J) Table to summarise interaction of fas2 with Torso signalling. trk5 is a hypomorphic allele of trk, a Torso ligand, which causes loss of posterior segments. fas2e76 reduces levels of Fas2 by 90%. Data in each column refer to actual numbers (percentage in brackets) of embryos terminating in A7 or A8 abdominal segment, or wild type (containing all segments A1-A8 plus terminal structures). Using χ2 test, for trk5 versus fas2e76;trk5: df=2, χ2=1.71, P=0.425; hence, there is no significant modification of the trk5 phenotype by fas2. (K,K′) fas2eb112 clones in the wing, marked by lack of GFP, do not affect phosphorylation of the Dpp transducer Mad, as assayed using anti-phospho-Mad.

Articles

  • Accepted manuscripts
  • Issue in progress
  • Latest complete issue
  • Issue archive
  • Archive by article type
  • Special issues
  • Subject collections
  • Sign up for alerts

About us

  • About Development
  • About the Node
  • Editors and board
  • Editor biographies
  • Travelling Fellowships
  • Grants and funding
  • Journal Meetings
  • Workshops
  • The Company of Biologists

For authors

  • Submit a manuscript
  • Aims and scope
  • Presubmission enquiries
  • Article types
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Cover suggestions
  • Editorial process
  • Promoting your paper
  • Open Access
  • Biology Open transfer

Journal info

  • Journal policies
  • Rights and permissions
  • Media policies
  • Reviewer guide
  • Sign up for alerts

Contact

  • Contact Development
  • Subscriptions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback
  • Institutional usage stats (logged-in users only)

 Twitter   YouTube   LinkedIn

© 2021   The Company of Biologists Ltd   Registered Charity 277992